M. Adams on "Achieving Power": A Study in Suckpoopery Par Excellence
by Gerald Morris
July 13, 2002
M. Adams wrote a masterful essay "On Achieving Power" through opportunism
7/3/02. While he makes some accurate observations about "the movement" and
even some tactical suggestions of some merit, on the whole, it betrays his
own racial treason.
His essay begins with examples of ancient Roman powermongers who were
initially well placed and who sought nothing more than advancement of their
own careers. Yes, they "achieved power" but what was the consequence?
Corrupt monarchy with secure positions for jewish moneylenders! A worthy
study to be assured!
There is nothing wrong per se with his next platitude: "There are multiple
ways to achieve power. The difference between incompetence and competence is
how adaptable one is to the fluctuating opportunities. It can happen any way,
any time, and in stages or all at once. It also depends on how good one is at
exploiting situations." True true, but are we talking about individuals or
organizations? This is easy enough for individuals but when one has a
revolutionary organization to answer to, one has responsibilities to it.
When the "one" is taking power on behalf of his race, the responsibility is
for that race and nothing less.
Adams then uses the example of Hitler's rise to power well enough but screws
up on the assessment of what followed. "Hitler just barely got in (by a nose
hair), and the timing and events for this were beautiful for takeover. When
he got in he MAXIMIZED his presence and acted quickly to liquidate the
enemy." Hitler did NOT "MAXIMIZE" his presence nor act quickly to liquidate
the enemy. Oh, the Nazi government jailed some commies and outlawed them, but
there were plenty of kikes left roaming at large. The Nazi government would
prosecute Germans for crimes against jews all throughout its reign. They
would take hard currency in exchange for letting jews leave Germany alive for
Palestine. There were still plenty of kikes alive IN GERMANY when the Allied
Pig Armies stormed, burned, raped and looted their way into Germany. Why was
this so? Hitler "worked within the system" and wanted to "keep up
appearances," to be "respectable" within the eyes of the bourgeiosie which
used him alright but despised him in general, the adoring Friedrich Krupp
notwithstanding. All of these mistakes arose from the very same opportunism
which Adams preaches. Hitler didn't live to pay for these sins of omission
but Germany today toils for the zionist kike which Heydrich was willing to
take money from. The lesson here is clear: WORKING WITHIN THE SYSTEM IS NO
WAY TO CARRY OFF A REVOLUTION!
Adams then points out something that makes a good rule for any ruler to
follow. "Hitler had some good men around him too, and I mean REAL thinkers,
not the least of which were Goebbels and Himmler/Heydrich, who made things
run much smoother." Yes, Hitler did assemble some bright and capable
lieutenants, Dr. Goebbels being the best and most loyal of them. Himmler did
good work with his creation of the S.S. and even created the Thule Society as
a suitable "secret society" for those sort of mischievous overgrown boys who
are apt to join these kind of circle jerks. He did so to make a suitably
Aryan alternative to freemasonry available to his men. Himmler in the end
was loyal only to Himmler though, and like Goering, betrayed his Fueher in
the end. Unlike Goering, he didn't redeem himself at Nuremburg. Both
Goering and Himmler used Hitler during the Night of Long Knives to achieve
their own petty vendettas. Had Hitler actually bought the loyalty of the Army
with this, it would have been worth it. As it was, the Army never gave more
than lukewarm support to the Reich government. Adams neglected to mention
Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht among those "REAL thinkers." An oversight
perhaps? Probably not. Here is what David Irving writes of Schacht in his
"Nuremburg: The Last Battle, C-17: Schacht Saved on the Square, p 225:"
Even more irritating for Jackson was that Schacht was overheard in the
cells confidently predicting that he would be acquitted. Irritating rumours
circulated that the prosecution of Schacht was not in earnest. Letter-writers
taunted Jackson that he would never succeed in convicting a big banker
whether friend or foe, they were the new Untouchables.
He soon became aware that the Nazi banker did indeed have friends in
the most unlikely places and influence everywhere. One day one of his team,
the eminent New York international lawyer Ralph Albrecht, reported to him
that the British assistant prosecutor Colonel Harry J. Phillimore -- later a
lord justice of appeal in London* -- had accosted him in the hall outside the
courtroom and urged the Americans to relax their remorseless pressure on the
banker. When Albrecht, perplexed, asked Why?, Phillimore uneasily explained
that certain representations had been made by Sir Montagu Norman, governor of
the Bank of England from 1920 to 1944. It would be most unfortunate,
murmured the British colonel, if anything were to happen to Schacht. 712 In
fact Schacht had been an informer of Sir Montagu, secretly apprising him of
the political and financial decisions taken at the highest level in Berlin
for sixteen years before the war.713"
In the footnotes Irving explains why this peculiar encounter on behalf of
*Twenty-five years later Phillimore was one of the three judges who heard
this author's appeal in the landmark Convoy PQ.17 libel action, Cassell &
Co. v. Broome. Phillimore, Schacht, Montagu Norman, and Sir Norman Birkett,
one of the British judges who held out for Schacht s acquittal in 1946, were
all freemasons. Jackson was also a leading mason; his diary entry for June
16, 1945 records a conversation in which Truman, Grand Master of the Masons
of Missouri, showed him his gavel (Library of Congress, Manuscript Division,
R H Jackson papers, box 95)."
There you have it. Hitler hired Schacht to build the Reich economy and this
he did. How did Schacht repay the Fuehrer's trust? By spying on him,
betraying his country to his masonic "brothers" in England. Such are the
fruits of "working within the system." NEVER trust a freemason, White Man!
Adams then wrote: " Hitler had a lot of powerful people backing him and he
DID work within the system. ... Hitler was hobnobbing with the rich and
powerful telling them WHAT THEY WANTED TO HEAR. He wasn't trying to appeal to
their sense of "justice" or racial awareness. Those vultures could give a
shit about that. They wanted to know two things: 1) Are my monies safe?; 2)
What do we get out of it? Defense contracts, exclusive deals, etc. (at least
that is what you would "promise" them)."
The Party only got "respectable" later. One of Hitler's first Big Bourgeois
backers was none other than Henry Ford. Ford liked Hitler for his courageous
stance on jews and such. This was during the period of Ford's life when he
was agitating through his newspaper, the Dearborn Independent. A LOT of
Ford's and Hitler's weltanschaaung was formed by the Protocols of the Learned
Elders of Zion. Ford believed them to be authentic. I don't. Hitler's first
and for a long time only Big Money German supporter was Carl Duisberg of I.G.
Farben, who was looking for "a strong man" in 1925. Hitler didn't really get
much backing until the Party dropped its plans for nationalizing German
industry in 1931, when Fritz Thyssen joined. They would have been better off
to have quietly executed the lot of the unreliable Schlotbaronen after
consolidating power. These buzzards only cared about their profits, sold the
German people a lot of second-rate equipment, wouldn't coordinate their
activites -- all to the detriment of the Cause. Stalin's government suffered
from none of the maladies that plagued the Nazi regime because Stalin was
truly ruthless and knew that business bean counters and army oaficers are worth
a dime a dozen. Stalin enjoyed a completely unified command, and Hitler
envied it as well he should.
"We will fail so long as we are on the outside looking in instead of on the
inside looking out."
Platitudes, platitudes! How many masonic platitudes can you puke M. Adams?
Bullshit! We will fail so long as we adopt the craven policy you preach.
Fuck that! Take it to your bro' Freddy Reed and shove it up his ass! Then,
he can do you. We need to piss gasoline from Outside to In and have the
torches ready. THAT will get the compliance we need.
Adams then makes some perfectly cogent observations:
If anyone ever posed a serious threat, let's take Dr. Pierce (who would come
the closest at this point as far as an identifiable target is concerned), and
"they" were concerned, he would end up with a bullet to the head or
everything he built up liquidated almost overnight (forget "Justice" when you
have the trigger of power). Very easily done.
Yep! Disappeared! Carcass found in bitty bits in a cow pasture. This is
why we should pack heat at all times possible. Make it expensive for "them"
to pop your ass. We must organize to the point where we can retaliate in
like fashion. That's the sort of language the pigs understand. Of course,
one could take the "bullet to the head" remark as a none-too-veiled threat as
well as an observation.
"It is possible a Turner Diaries scenario could happen but very unlikely." Agreed. The point is not to tail events and wait for something to happen but to MAKE THINGS HAPPEN! A small, well-disciplined revolutionary organization can do just that. It won't be easy, but we are fighting for our lives and the lives of our posterity. We have no choice but victory or surrender.
"What is more likely is a semblance of that and "da rich folks" worried about
their wealth (mestizos and niggers wanted to expropriate their property) and
looking for a "savior" (re: Augustus Caesar in a breaking down Rome)."
Yes, the bourgeoisie will be feeling uncomfortable. We can't afford to
completely write them off. I suggest we emulate Hitler in one regard - get
some foreign backing for the nonce. (Ford) We can use domestic cash too, but
certain principles of sound organization must be adhered to. Better to have
organizational/ideological integrity than easy cash today. Build the
organization first and instill it with the right ideas. The money will come.
Even then, beware of who wants to buy you.
"It is extremely naive to think that it can only happen one way. I find only
Christians are usually that fucking stupid."
Amen, amen. We must have many plans and be able to act on them. The
consequences of any action must be well thought out. Kowtowing to the shitty
status quo is NOT an option though. Fuck that!
Adams shows some real understanding of "what is to be done" in this next bit.
The truly clever would be getting the niggers and Mexcrement stirred up
(implanting in their heads that the 'governmint' owes them slavery
reparations, the southwest JewSA is actually Aztlan, etc.) whilst trying to
evangelize to our white brethren. Look how the communists do it. They are the
absolute best at exploiting situations and opportunities. I've been to their
meetings and find their tactics interesting.
I too have been to communist meetings. I was a member of the CPUSA. Some of
their shit is useful. Goebbels won the battle for Berlin by a well-studied
pitch to the proles there. There are plenty of activists out there just
itching to fight the Establishment, and the commies have been better at
getting them into THEIR organizations, toeing THEIR line and doing work for
THEIR masters, the kikes, than nationalists have been in many countries,
including this one. The best way to fight communist and other jew-spawned
ideologies is with a strong racial appeal combined with the call for in-group
altruism ergo National Socialism. Stirring up the darkies by appealing to
their own sense of national identity and stampeding more of our White
relatives into our arms also smacks of a good strategic sense. Likewise, it
helps break the kind of sickening interracial "solidarity" the jew-communist
miscegenationist seeks to forge. Of course, the kikes could be using various
racial tensions to stampede the herd into supporting an ever more repressive
regime favoring them -- and they DO control the government/media.
Adams then shits with his keyboard: "I think I should mention this while I'm
at it: Hitler, Trotsky, Stalin and Lenin were all spies for the "federal
government" of the time. I'm not making an opinion on it, I'm just letting
you know these facts."
His presentation of these "facts" grossly misleads the reader, if ignorant of
the truth of the matter. Here it is. Hitler DID join Anton Drexler's German
Workers Party under orders from the Army. He decided that he liked the Party
better than the lickspittle Weimar government. The rest is history.
Bronstein (Trotsky) certainly ran an errand as bag boy from Jew York's own
Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., bringing much-needed cash to Ulyanov
(Lenin) in 1917 at a crucial time. This hardly can be equated with
collaboration with the Czar's government, though it might be supposed that the
Jew S. government of Woodrow Wilson knew of it. Ulyanov (Lenin) himself was
in exile in Switzerland for most of Russia's war and only returned with the
connivance of the Kaiser's government in a sealed train car in March 1917,
shortly after the "February Revolution." There is no evidence that Lenin
collaborated with the Czar's regime though, ever. The accusation that
Djuggashvili (Stalin) collaborated with the Okhrana, the Czarist secret
police, came from Bronstein after the scribbling little kike was booted out
of Russia by Stalin. It is conceivable that the Reds did snitch off some
anarchists from time to time, just as the Blacks (anarchists) have been
accused of so doing by the Reds. The burden of proof lies on Adams to
substantiate his "factual" ex-cathedra claim. Don't hold your breath
Before laying the matter of Lenin and Leninism to rest, let's consider some of
Lenin's methods and principles. I certainly agree with Adams as far as
adopting communist tactics goes. Lenin led a tight little organization of
just a few thousand members to absolute power over a large empire. Let's start
with collaborators and opportunists. Here is a nice passage from "What is to
be Done," his seminal work on how to organize and discipline a revolutionary
We are walking in a small, tight group along a steep and difficult path,
firmly joining hands. We are surrounded by enemies, and must continue almost
always under their fire. We have freely and consciously decided to unite to
fight the enemy and not stumble into the neighboring marsh, where dwell those
who from the beginning have reproached us for separating into a special group
and choosing the path of struggle, and not the path of compromise. And now
some of us are beginning to cry: "Let's go into the marsh!" And when we start
to shame them, they object: "What a backward people you are! And aren't you
ashamed to deny us the freedom to call you to a better way? Oh yes,
gentlemen, you are free not only to call us, but to go anywhere you like,
even if it's into the marsh. We even consider the marsh to be the right place
for you, and are ready to assist you as best we can to move you there. But
just let go of our hands -- don't clutch at us and soil the great word
"freedom," because we too are "free" to go where we like -- free to fight with
the marsh and with those who turn to the marsh."
Adams advocates the marsh. To the marsh with him!
His biggest marsh-gas fart erupts thus: "I'm going out on the limb here, but
I suggest those of you who can and can show a little foresight join the
Freemasons, as an example. Forget the "they be pro-Jew" shit you hear. I know
over ten masons and they could give a fuck about Jews and half of which
detest them, the others are indifferent."
Well, just as Adam's previous "facts" have been shown to be misdirection
tantamount to lies, so too is his assertion that freemasons aren't up to
their eyeballs in jew jism. I have provided plenty of linkage and references
to jew infestation of freemasonry in my article; all Adams can provide is an ex cathedra bullshit assertion to the contrary. I have been acquainted with several dozen freemasons in my lifetime and all but two have been overt semen-bespattered judeophile catamites. But let's not take my word for anything. You have the facts at your fingertips.
The matter of joining a masonic lodge is no trifle. They will have checked
you out to the best of their ability. If you are deemed acceptable to them,
then they have good reason to suspect you will in truth wholly devote
yourself to them. Napoleon Bonaparte sent his brother Joseph and other male
relatives into the lodges with the intent of controlling them. Freemasonry
played a decisive role in the French Revolution, and Napoleon, a consummate
opportunist, sought to control freemasonry in a fashion very similar to what
Adams advocates. There is a dubious assertion that Napoleon himself joined a
lodge. I'll deal with that in more detail in my next installment. The point
here is that Bonaparte was as much used by the masonic movement as he used
them. Some assert that they betrayed him through giving him faulty
intelligence in Russia. This merits further research.
Adams then set up a straw man to knock down. "A lot of the shit you hear
is regurgitated slop from people who have no knowledge about them other than
some pathetic pamphlet stating that Lucifer is their headmaster waiting to
take over the world and Christ...blah, blah, blah... in otherwords, a
Christian slant and an extremely distorted one at that, tantamount to lies."
While true enough in itself, the implication is that ANY criticism of
freemasonry is "tantamount to lies." Adams waves this red herring to
distract attention from real jewish connections to his bros. I credited Adams
with setting up this straw man but in truth, he merely used it. A far more
capable freemason who called himself Leo Taxil set up the "Luciferian"
connection through a massive hoax in the late 19th century. Go to
http://www.atheists.org/Atheism/roots/enlightenment/ for a full account of it. Here is the kernel of the matter.
"The ubiquitous paranoia about Freemasonry, along with the voracious
gullability of Catholics, proved fertile ground for one of the greatest
literary hoaxes of all time, designed by an Atheist-satirist known as Leo
Taxil. Born Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pages (1854-1907), he was educated by the
Jesuits, but soon became a militant Atheist and anti-clerical propagandist....
All of this was set against the background of "the most comical episode of
his (Taxil's) strange career," a supposed return to the fold of the church.
While writing a book on the life of Joan of Arc, designed to incite animosity
amongst the clergy, Taxil was (so the story goes) overwhelmed by returned
sentiments of religiosity. "I burst into sobs," revealed Taxil in his comical
Confession. "Pardon me, oh God!," I cried out in a voice choked with tears.
"Pardon my many blasphemies! Pardon all the evil I have wrought!" I passed the
night in prayer, and resolved on the next day to seek absolution for my
sins.... "45 Taxil immediately withdrew from public Atheistic activities,
resigning at a meeting of the Anti-Clerical League. Accounts suggest that few
of his Atheist cohorts believed in Taxil's born-again religiosity, "yet every
one was puzzled to understand the strategic purpose of this retrograde
movement...." Some cried "Ha! You can't fool us! You've been paid by the
Vatican! How much, eh?"
Taxil immediately set to work in writing the first segment of his
sham-exposé, his Complete Revelations, overflowing with imaginary and gruesome tales of devil worship, debauchery and sacrilegious rites. ...
In fact, Taxil had fooled all Christiandom: "My colleagues were aghast and
exclaimed 'You'll spoil the whole joke with your nonsense!' 'Bah', I replied,
let me be and you will see!'"
Taxil promoted his Complete Revelations and The Devil until 1897, when public pressure demanded the persona of Miss Diana Vaughn, the reformed Luciferian.
Taxil called a press conference on April 19; mounting the platform before the
assembled reporters and observers, he confessed his ruse to a bewildered
public -- "After thanking the clergy for their aid in carrying out his scheme
and attributing their cooperation chiefly to ignorance and imbecility, he
escaped amidst much confusion." 50
While this is all very amusing and does show up christians as idiots yet
again, it doesn't excuse the "Bro's" from more serious charges; their
aptitude for lying and perpetrating gigantic frauds not the least of them.
Adams then attempts to rationalize a bit. "The masons have both money and
connections and everyone I've talked to is concerned about immigration and
Sure they have money and connections...to JEWS! Sure, they're "concerned
about immigration and everything else." Plenty of beaners hate kikes. If we
are to believe the ADL, 44% of the foreign-born spics hate the kikes. Hardly
surprising. The good "Offices of Enquiry" which jew-masons refer to simply
as the dreaded "Inquisition" with the same hysterical tones as the
"Holocaust" did a good job of inculcating their brown sheep with a healthy
dose of anti-kikery. Both Hymie and John Mason have fucked up by letting
them in. Duhhh Hymie, we goofed!
Another lame excuse follows this. "Yes, I know Hitler was against masons but
that has nothing to do with our situation at all." WHAT BULLSHIT! IT HAS
EVERYTHING TO DO WITH OUR SITUATION NOW! AmeriKwa was founded by freemasons,
has the world's oldest pure masonic regime, is the world's biggest supporter
of Israel and this blatherskyte says "that has nothing to do with our
situation at all!" You want to pull a "revolution" off here, you're going to
be running smack dab into freemasonry standing against you. This animal is a
collaborator! I hope it doesn't hold a NA membership card. If so, the NA
has a problem.
It's next suggestion has some more merit. "Another suggestion is to
encourage as many as possible to become involved in law enforcement." This
has TACTICAL value. Adam's strategy though is the road to defeat. "Get my
drift? NOT to be part of the 'system' in the end but to facilitate in either
destroying it or morphing it to our own purposes." Taken alone, this
suggestion is 50% worthwhile, the bit about destroying the system.
"Morphing" it doesn't work. Adams has clearly been a part of the system far
too long. It has "morphed" him into an apologist. This is the rule, not the
exception. Hitler tried to build his regime on the Weimar system and
inherited all the ills that came with it. TEAR IT DOWN!
He rightly points out that: "I swear the 'movement' does its best to implant
into people's heads that ZOG is all knowing and seeing and nothing could be
further from the truth. ZOG is nothing but a big dumb monster and we are its
ticks and fleas." This is the most truthful statement Adams makes. The ZOG
is quite stupid and one can dance around it and irritate it a great deal.
Still, if it does set its wrathful beady eye upon you, you are in a world of
shit. I've been there.
We are then treated to this unhappy bureaucrat's on the job daydreams, thus: "Now, just IMAGINE if we encouraged and TRAINED people to "become" part of it
and other organizations. Just IMAGINE if we had little Europes and from
childhood to early adult they were instilled with our thinking and then
encouraged to join that which is most effective for us and for them. Yep,
This has certain tactical value but is strategically worthless. Every
interest group and their dogs jockey for position in the ruling hierarchy the
same way. That explains the system we have now, which M. Adams is very much a
part of, bought off by jews. By all means, we should send in well-trained,
indoctrinated people into positions of influence but this will NEVER change a
government which Dr. Pierce has repeatedly told us was flawed from its
beginning. The system will look after its own interests first and last.
The next statement shows the petty level of this flunky's intellect. "With
that said, enough friendlies within the "system," then one can either make
"oops, silly me" mistakes (like conveniently shredding/misplacing a file) or
actively help those in need."
And THIS is the basis of M. Adams' "Grand Strategy!" It would be funny if he
were puking this pabulum at our enemies. PATHETIC! How many generations of
"eugenic" breeding toward perfect office stooges will it take to consummate
the "revolution?" Bureaucrats of the World, Unite!
More smug bureaucratism follows: "First, however, coordination must be
achieved or at least should be tried to some extent."
"Tried to some extent" MY ASS! Coordination MUST be PERFECTED among all
"Which means a certain level of sophistication and steering away from the
do-nothing waving-placards mentality or the 'Alex Curtis leave snake skins on
rose bushes' mindset."
All of these "unsophisticated" methods do more to EDUCATE THE PUBLIC than any
bullshit "behind the scenes paper shredding" tactic which Adams is so
enamoured of. We have to draw attention and HOLD IT!
"You wouldn't believe some of the stuff I did to help my associates in need."
OH YES I WOULD, given what you and your "associates" are....
"I was also in a position to gather information for certain individuals very
No doubt. Certain individuals like Abe Foxman perhaps?
"I'm not into daydreaming or deceiving myself." No, you are really quite
comfy in your petty oafishul position and have no real illusions about your
own revolutionary potential, which is nil. But you have peddled your
soporific dreams to the wrong folks this time, snitch.
"Direct action has about a single percentile chance of achieving anything."
This never deterred real revolutionaries, but you don't know anything about
that now do you? Hitler didn't sit on his ass in some cushy little office in
Weimar, Germany. He risked getting his head blown off in 1923. Goering DID
get his balls blown off. You, M Adams don't have any balls so I guess the
example is lost on you. It won't be on other VNN readers.
"Whereas the other routes have always been a lot more successful." For petty
little wannabe powermongers YES! The current regime is looking for JUST
YOUR SORT! Unscrupulous, dull-witted induhviJEWals of your sort are WELCOME
in the Jew S. government today. Corrupt regimes have always welcomed
opportunists of your ilk. Well, a government full of myopic cowards like you
is one ripe for overturning. ITZ COMING!
"To be on the outside looking in will undoubtedly lead to nothing." Another
common masonic platitude! To be on the outside BATTERING THE ROTTEN INSIDE
DOWN will lead to victory! Having a Trojan Horse or two will help but
without support from outside, without the bulk of Akhaeans poised and ready
at the gate, the Trojan Horse will fail, or worse yet, accept a job in "The
Coroporation." We must have both outside and inside forces and they must
think in terms of WINNING, not compromise or cynical platitudes. Adams
writes like a cop. Cops are useful but one soldier is worth 1,000 cops. We
need the Army, or at least a significant fraction of it. The Girondists had
their share of French nobility but it was the Jacobins who drew the French
masses into initially supporting their revolution. The bloody fervor in Le
Marseilles is Jacobin, Outsider, relative to le Ancien Regime that "lost its head." Among the French masses were plenty of soldiers, including a certain Corsican cadet. Hitler got the Army but only by using his own, the SA, as a threat and a bargaining chip. In hindsight, he sold out his army to the
status quo for a cheap price, given the trouble he had afterwards. Trotsky
got his army by the power of his pen, and both Hitler and Trotsky were indeed
OUTSIDERS relative to the regimes they toppled. Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin
did a better job too, because they EXTERMINATED their enemies! No
compromises, no "working within the system" bullshit for the Reds. I hope no
VNN readers took your little defeatist homily for anything other than what
I've called it. Those who do should go to Worldnet Deli.
Adams then projects his own ugly little psyche so: "I can't help but mention
too that Hitler encountered a lot of the small-minded types in his movement."
Hitler encountered many more pinheads of Adam's calibre in the Weimar
Here Adams is trying to sell himself as some sort of BIG FUCKING
SOOOOOPHISTICATE. "And what I mean by that is those who are automatons in
their thinking. Unadaptable and woefully ignorant about the inner-workings of
the political machine. Most of what I've encountered thus far fits this
I too have been "inside." Most government types are a bunch of
oversocialized little rats who get off sniffing each others arses, eating
each others shit and puking it back on demand. Sure, they love to wheel and
deal. It's not what you know but WHO YOU BLOW AND I KNOOOOOW WHO YOU BLOW
His contempt for the loyal stalwarts who form the backbone of any
organization, including the NA, emerges here: "They can lick envelopes, pay
"dues," but aside from that accomplish nothing aside from whining." What
these fine folks need is LEADERSHIP and that you don't offer Monsieur
Here is another bit of half truth: "Many have figured out the "meeting"
methods don't work, and then others have tried the asinine "lone wolf" [my
gawd, I've never seen anything quite so ridiculous in all my life] method."
When "meetings" are infiltrated by poisonous slugs of Adam's sort, they are
indeed dull and pointless. The better sort of people then go alone if they
can find nothing better. No revolution has ever been accomplished by lone
wolves, true enough, but NO REVOLUTION HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED BY TOY POODLES
LIKE M. ADAMS EITHER! The NA has the potential of gathering lone wolves into
a formidible pack but only if it can keep out sneaking jew lapdogs of the
The poodle yips out the following conceit: "Their only hope is a
road-warrior scenario and I would have to say they would make good shock
troops if that time ever came, however, it won't so long as those with the
grey matter THINK like them. They are muscle, not intellect."
An organized, determined force can create whatever scenario it deems most
fitting to its purpose. Our hope lies in organizing AND in instilling that
determination, The New Hardness, into our people. Spoiled lapdogs think
themselves "smart" so long as their masters stand by to protect them while
they yip, piss and shit. Just remember poodle, your masters are getting as
stupid and decrepit as you are and we WILL easily crush you in our jaws after
we finish your precious jews off. Adams, you are one pathetic fool. You
have been bred for your retardation no doubt and have no concept of anything
beyond your precious jew-masonic status quo. Go shuffle your papers. We
will cremate you in a pyre of them!
The poodle suffers from terminal glaucoma as well as myopia as we see in its
smug little conclusion: "Ahh finally, the 'movement' is nothing more than a
heat collector and a sideshow that allows a few to beat their chests and flap
their gums ad infinitum." It clearly doesn't think too highly of us now does
it? It sees us as nothing more than a nuisance, troubling it as it fattens
on our tax dollars. Its final advice is nothing less than an ultimatum
demanding our surrender: "If it continues that route then better hope for Mad
Max to come down the highway, if not, then better GROW UP and see things how
they really are and act accordingly!" Admas clearly "acts accordingly" as
its jew owners butt fuck it daily. No doubt this painted catamite moans
with womanish pleasure as Hymie pokes his 3" kosher pickle up his bunghole.
Well, I suppose it is "GROWN UP" for low-born, gutless gutter fags of this
sort to find powerful jew patrons and to turn tricks for them. I for one and
I hope I speak for the vast majority of VNN readers, do not suffer from M.
Adams' gross birth defects.
In summary, I would first like to point out that I have deliberately
minimized ideological content in this essay in order to demonstrate that
there are certain sound principles that anyone seeking to overturn a regime
should adhere to. These are:
A revolution is only accomplished by a well-organized, uncompromising
Any revolutionary organization CAN NOT tolerate self-seeking, opportunist
A revolutionary organization can not tolerate defeatism.
A revolutionary organization can not, does not wait for events but plans
A revolutionary organization does not despise its people but seeks to
Cops and other petty functionaries make piss-poor revolutionaries but
good spies for the status quo regime.
Only the most proven revolutionary individuals can be trusted with the
task of infiltrating the status quo system.
Revolutions are NEVER waged nor won by joining the enemy regime and
lending strength to it.
There are many paths to revolution. Surrender isn't one of them.
Revolutionary organizations must instill revolutionary ideology into their
Given that the only "ideology" M. Adams has given has been defeatist
suckpoopery, I see little need to preach to the choir on these matters. The
ZOG, while senile, is still mortally opposed to us. If you have any
remaining doubts about who butters M. Adam's ass, then consider his closing
line: "I'm not into playing cowboys and indians with my offspring's future."
Meaning, it won't stick its scrawny neck out to save ONE member of Our Race.
It wags its tail, gets its doggy biscuit from Hymie, and Hymie has perhaps
permitted it to breed more little docile shitting poodles. This thing is an
opportunist through and through and always was. It took a cushy job working
for the Man, joined "the right club" sucks the right dick and tells us that
if we don't surrender then it will yip in alarm to its masters. It has spawn
to feed and won't overexert itself at any honest job to get that food.
Creatures of this sort are born to suck up to tyrants. We have no use for it
save as fertilizer. It has lied outrageously, puked its contempt for us and
finally announced in no uncertain terms that it WILL sell your ass and mine
to the ZOG in a heartbeat. We will encounter plenty more of its ilk but if
we plug our ears when it begins to sing its tune and strangle it to death, WE