|
1/5/01
-----Original Message-----
From: arlmr [arlmr@cableone.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 11:30 PM
To: jfarah@worldnetdaily.com
Subject: direct question
This is a serious question, not intended as a joke or insult.
Are you in any way subsidized by Jews to spread Israeli propaganda?
Alex Linder
Vanguard News Network
----------
From: "Joseph Farah" jfarah@worldnetdaily.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 13:37:45 -0800
To: "arlmr" arlmr@cableone.net
Subject: RE: direct question
I wish we were subsidized by anyone...
JF
Ed. Note :
Well, that could almost pass for a denial...A.L.
1/5/01
Dear Mr. Robinson,
Let me say this before I get started: "Yes, I know it's your website and you can do
whatever you want to with it.
"Now that we've gotten that out of the way, what the hell gives with you? Yes, I'm talking
about your deleting Steve Sailer's article "GOP Future Depends on White Vote." Sailer
claims you think his piece is "divisive" and "promoting racism." I don't read it like
that.
I've noticed that you regularly censor worthy material from Free Republic. Don't get me
wrong, there is nothing wrong with having a policy against open rants about "niggers and
kikes," etc. (nor is there necessarily anything evil about allowing such talk :-) But to
eliminate thoughtful, well reasoned, and "soft spoken" writing like Sailer's and others...
what are you, some kind of Trotskyite Poster Boy?
I notice that your boy, Bush is already appointing Democrats and pandering to everyone
except the people who created America (not to mention Western Civilization). Don't you
think that is divisive and promoting racism?
For what it's worth, I once thought highly of you and your website. Not only did I link to
FR on several web pages and sites of my own, I actually joined FR once, then decided not to
post there because I thought I was such a hot-head I would make you look bad. But I used to
read the site a lot! I hardly ever go there now, not due to being angry with your policy --
I am angry with your policy, but there is still much worth reading at FR -- it's just that
I've found other sites that address our real problems and I have little time to waste with
either the naive, or with hoaxers.
Regards,
Mr. Tsun
Let me put it to you gently. I don't give a damn about what you think.
Jim Robinson
jimrob@psnw.com
http://www.freerepublic.com
Ed. Note.: This is how the cons operate. They go all limp when it comes to their
ostensible opponents on the left: but note how their resolve stiffens when facing
criticism from the right -- the racialists it is Semitically Correct and socially
acceptable to hate. The workaday cowardice exhibited by the likes of Jim Robinson, Joe
Farah, Lew Rockwell, and other masters of censorship and timely euphemism is exactly the
reason the nation has reached such a parlous state. Feel free to congratulate Robinson on
his gutlessness at the above address. A.L.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's an exchange with a reader who took us to task for misreading
the Lubinskas piece. Follows my response, mixed in with his original letter, and then a
second, separate letter in which I made the point that...well, read the letters and it will
be clear. A.L.
> Sir - I'd suggest that you go back to frontpagemag.com and reread the "end
> of paleoconservatism" article. Notice that the writer is James Lubinskas,
> assistant editor of American Renaissance, and that, contrary to what you
> might think, he looks forward to the day when a radical racial nationalist
> movement can take shape in America.
I suggest you go back and read the article instead of the writer's associations at the
bottom: nothing in it comes anywhere close to what you claim is his position. His words
are purely analytical, and to the extent I get anything between the lines, it's the
opposite of what you say. If anything, he's celebrating the end of Buchananism.
I notice you wrote a letter to Frontpage. If you really think inclusiveness is the solution,
you're wrong. There is no way out but through the Jews. Jared Taylor has been coopted by
them, just like the conservative movement was coopted by the liberal neocons back in the
seventies. It's later than you think. Openly pro-White advocacy, open criticism of Jews
as the collective negative they are, is the only way to go.
> Also, it seems that you think Dr. Sam Francis is just a remonstrating fat
> old man. Well, I'd hate to make liberal use of certain adjectives to
> describe a certain "strong young man" whom the NA has recently chosen to
> deify...
>
> Yours,
> [name removed to protect the guilty]
>
> P.S. - Don't post this in your "Reader Mail" section.
My litmus test is public criticism of Jews. Lubinskas fails that test. Sam Francis
fails that test. Jared Taylor fails that test. Joe Sobran passes that test. William
Pierce passes that test with flying colors.
Let me tell you privately that I have spent a lot of time pushing Taylor's book on people
and defending him to true racialists -- and, boy, he doesn't make it easy. He draws up
short at the lines of Semitical Correctness, just like nearly everybody else. If he has
ever written a word acknowledging that Jews are a collective negative and the single force
most responsible for our current state, I haven't seen it. William Pierce criticizes Jews
in every public broadcast. That is strength any way you cut it. Your remark that we "deify"
him is cheap. We respect Pierce for his straightforward moral courage the way you guys
respect Taylor for his "respectability."
You claim Lubinskas looks forward to the day when a radical racial nationalist movement can
take shape in America. Of course, he and Boss Taylor run like sixty from the National
Alliance, which has been building that movement for thirty years. Too scared and
Semitically Correct, I guess. All you behind-the-scenes racialists are coopted and
excessively cautious. We genuine racialists are open and proud and can say what we wish,
not niggle at the borders of what is "permissible" to say. We, unlike your heroes, refuse
to let the Jews define those borders. I say whatever I want through VNN; -- Sammy
Francis can't say the same, can he? My policy is objective kiss and slap, and the day
Francis comes out and writes what he knows to be true about Jews, I'll give him the
editorial equivalent of three cherry pies.
Alex Linder
P.S. You're free to posterize this letter and wear it on a sandwich board.
Mr. [Name removed to protect the guilty]:
I can't resist a pensee du escalier...
If you ever wonder how the country achieved its present parlous state, the answer lies
inside you: happy to have your letter published in Frontpage, afraid to have it published
in VNN. Our country, our race are endangered because of men like you, [name removed
to protect the guilty].
Yours in preserving "respectability,"
A.
From: Regmeister regmeister@earthlink.net
To: webmaster@tookie.com
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 3:11 AM
Subject: The Best Apology
The best apology "Tookie" (!) can make is to acknowledge the justice of the sentence of
death imposed upon him and cease all attempts to have the sentence vacated or to obtain a
pardon. But I guess it's a story of "everybody wants to get to heaven, but nobody wants to
die", right? "Tookie" and "Mumia" must be laughing their asses off at how they've conned
the usual crowd of weepy liberals into buying their line of bull. But I must say that
"Tookie" has out-Mumia'ed Mumia--a Nobel Peace Prize nomination! Right up there with other
luminaries like Kissinger and all the others who've debased it over the past couple of
decades. It looks as though "Tookie" will have the honor of representing the absolute
nadir, though--unless O.J. Simpson is nominated during the next round.
R. Belser
The following is an exchange with Christian-coward conservative Diane Alden, in response
to her recent viciously anti-German column blaming "German" thinking for our current cultural
maelstrom, in just the same sense that the term "Russian" mafia is used: to disguise the
fact that almost all the people she blames are Jews. Frothing hate on Germans has become
de rigueur on the right, a favorite technique of paycheckmongering cowards like
Alden and the jerk-job specialists at WorldNetDaily -- and it's going to stop or they will
get more of what she received here.
Here is the article referred to:
http://www.newsmax.com/commentarchive.shtml?a=2000/10/29/152520
[Ms. Alden:]
Your piece wins the award for the most disgusting piece of Semitically
Correct cowardice I have read in the past year, and that's a very strong
competition, given that Joseph Farah exists.
You look at yourself in the mirror, you canting, hatemongering
German-smearing, Semite-intimidated liar. You don't have the balls to
blame the Jews. But you know damn well that the people you are talking about are
Jewish -- not German. You know what that makes you? You do, don't you....
Maybe next week you can copy J.R. Nyquist and write a column about how the
Germans are "really" responsible for the Bolshevik revolution and not "men
with Jewish names."
Goodbye, Diane Alden. You are a coward. And you know yourself to be such.
Alex Linder
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
[Now, note the incredible lack of logic, the complete avoidance of the one point the
opening letter made...]
> From: "Diane Alden" wulfric8@yahoo.com
> Reply-To: "Diane Alden"wulfric8@yahoo.com
> Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 17:29:29 -0800
> To: "arlmr" arlmr@cableone.net
> Subject: Re: I'm afraid of Jews, so I blame Germans, just like J.R. Nyquist and
> the other conservative cowards
>
> Yes -- my mission in life is to skewer every single ethnic group on the
> planet -- before it is over with I will have polished off the feminists,
> enviros, radical gender groups, Russians, French, English, Poles,
> Slovenians, Eritreans, Kuwaitis, El Savadorans, you name it. I live to BASH
> all groups regardless of race creed or color -- skin heads -- nazis --
> socialists -- communists -- anti semites, -- anti CAtholics -- anti any
> body. It was this week the German's turn -- but next week who knows. I am an
> equal opportunity basher.
> D.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arlmr arlmr@cableone.net
> To:wulfric8@yahoo.com
> Date: Saturday, November 04, 2000 2:34 PM
> Subject: I'm afraid of Jews, so I blame Germans, just like J.R. Nyquistand
> the other conservative cowards
[My second letter]
Your response neatly ignores the whole point of my letter: You don't have the courage to
name the real enemy, so you pick on the Semitically Correct target -- the Germans. Just
like the rest of the Christian cowards. Honestly -- if you ever wonder why y'all are dying
off, it's because you are cowards. You blame "secular humanists" "atheists" "Germans"
"barbarians" -- but never the one group that conspicuously opposes everything you
Christians say you hold dear: the goddamn Jews. Never a word of criticism of the
Chosen!
Do you really wonder why everyone in the world despises you and thinks you're gutless?
Because you are! Do you really imagine the averge person reading your thoughts doesn't see
what you are obviously afraid to mention?
Hitler was FIGHTING the damn Frankfurt school, yet you are treating the nazis and commies
as though they are the same thing -- how the hell do you think they all the Frankfurt Jews
got over here? They are JEWS not GERMANs. The common thread is the Jewishness, not the
Germanness. Who were the thirties "red diaper" babies? Who were the leaders of the
sixties radicals? Who created and led the insane feminists? Which radical, destructive
cause in America isn't led by Jews? And where is the con coward columnist who will point
that out? He doesn't exist -- he -- whether you or Farah or Nyquist or George Will -- is
blaming the Germans.
You do realize that Marx, Marcuse, Freud, Horkheimer, Adorno, Fromm, etc etc -- are all
Jews? Why attack my ethnic group by blaming Germans for Jewish crimes and Jewish hate?
Obviously because if you criticize Jews directly in our "free" media they kick you off the
gravy train. You and I both know that's true, and that that truth conditions everything we
see the "respectable" media. It's all about a paycheck to you guys, when you get down to
it, and that's why nobody takes you very seriously.
Sweetheart, I know ya ain't no heavyweight, but I want you to do me a little favor. Please.
Dig up a copy of John Murray Cuddihy's The Ordeal of Civility and read it. Give the
Germans a break, find some balls, and jump on the assholes who angled us into both world
wars and are probably going to end up making the White race extinct.
Go to this link and read the Kevin MacDonald paper on immigration if you want the truth
about Jewish destruction of the racial and cultural stability of the country.
http://www.ddc.net/ygg/new/index.htm
Serious political criticism means taking on the Jewish media that controls the country.
Short of that, it's just a bunch of masturbatory junk. Lay off the Germans if you don't
have the courage or knowledge to figure out what's really going on. Isn't that the
"Christian" thing to do?
A.
[Which led to...]
From: "Diane Alden"wulfric8@yahoo.com
Reply-To: "Diane Alden"wulfric8@yahoo.com
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 18:19:39 -0800
To: "arlmr" arlmr@cableone.net
Subject: Re: I'm afraid of Jews, so I blame Germans, just like J.R.Nyquist and the other
conservative cowards
From someone who defends Hitler -- like I give a shit what you think -- you are pathetic --
and so unAmerican -- I guess all the Jews and other unacceptable who died for your ass must
have been fools. Next time you go to a graveyard or Arlington look at how many Star of
Davids stand -- what a tragedy for them and for you. Stupidity and philosophical
foolishness aren't ethnic problems they are human problems. God help us all when the hate
from the left and right is so blind to the chilling and anti human and liberty killing evil
of it. PLEASE don't read my stuff any more and PLEASE don't answer this email -- I am
ashamed that for you.
D.
-----Original Message-----
From: arlmr arlmr@cableone.net
To: Diane Alden wulfric8@yahoo.com
Date: Saturday, November 04, 2000 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: I'm afraid of Jews, so I blame Germans, just like J.R.Nyquist and the other
conservative cowards
[Response mixed in...]
From someone who defends Hitler -- like I give a shit what you think -- you are pathetic --
and so unAmerican -- I guess all the Jews and other unacceptable who died for your ass must
have been fools.
The public was wise in wanting to stay out of both World Wars. Would have been
infinitely better for the West you ostensibly defend if we had. The truth is that Jewish
and Anglophile traitors angled us into both world wars.
Next time you go to a graveyard or Arlington look at how many Star of Davids
stand --
Like the guy who bribed Clinton to bury him there? Did you write a column about that?
what a tragedy for them and for you. Stupidity and philosophical foolishness aren't ethnic
problems they are human problems.
And in your case, personal problems as well, although no doubt you can find a German to
blame.
God help us all when the hate from the left and right is so blind to the chilling and anti
human and liberty killing evil of it. PLEASE don't read my stuff any more and PLEASE don't
answer this email -- I am ashamed that for you.
Lay off Germans or you'll get plenty more. I can't stop you from writing garbage
exculpating Jews for their crimes, but I certainly can and will expose you as the Christian
coward you are, merrily shitting all over Germany to curry favor with your bosses. Fair
warning. Don't do it again.
[There you have it. It is just possible that this woman is so stupid she truly doesn't
realize that all the people she named off were Jews. Cowardice is likelier, though. Let's
see, off the top of my head, here's a brief rundown of cons blaming Germans where Jews
would be appropriate: Pat Robertson, Balint Vazsonyi, J.R. Nyquist...and from Alden's
column, it sounds like Rush Limbaugh can be added to the list, too...]
From: arlmr@cableone.net
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:28:42 +0800
To: et.letters@telegraph.co.uk
Subject: paralympics
Paralympics is a sick idea, and the woman you smear has a lot more guts than you cheap
smearing sneerers. The whole special olympics ilk is just Kennedy-spawned garbage to serve
as a backdrop for libs' moral preening. To civilized people, it is stomach turning bilge.
A. Linder
This is a back and forth with a black female L.A. Times reporter who wrote a column based
on a note she received from a Jewish woman who was horrified that her son, often harassed
by coloreds, wanted to attend UC Santa Barbara because it has the most whites...
To: sandy.banks@latimes.com
Subject: blaming the victim
You are doing what in any other context a lib like you would call "blaming
the victim." If the white kid gets beat up and harassed by Mexicans and
Blacks, he's the real problem, right?
Alex Linder
----------
From: Sandy.Banks@latimes.com
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:28:29 -0700
To: arlmr arlmr@cableone.net
Subject: Re: blaming the victim
No, the white kid isn't the problem, but neither are the other hundreds of
black and Latino kids on that campus who didn't beat him up. If I tried
to avoid being around white folks because I've been mistreated by some (and
I have, as have my children, who've been called names, had fruit chucked at
them out of passing cars and been spit upon by a group of white teenagers
yelling `go back to Africa' and such), I would not only be racist, but
stupid. My point is there are mean and ignorant people in every racial
'group,' just as there are kind and decent ones. It is when we begin
blaming an entire group for the actions of a few that we are succumbing to
the kind of prejudice that denies us all our humanity.
...............................
[A.L.]
So because some people of all races are bad, we can't make any generalizations about race?
You know, like Brother Jesse talking about how relieved he felt when the late-night
footsteps behind him were whites'? No difference between Jesse and the Jewish kid and me
and you. We all know vastly disproportionate numbers of Negroes are violent criminals
compared to whites. We also know blacks' 85-average-IQs leave them borderline-educable.
We also know that the laws in this country discriminate against whites, and that whites
advocating white interests aren't allowed access to any public forum, merely treated as
targets of hate. Whereas public Negroes such as Jackson and Sharpton are allowed to make
all manner of lies and misrepresentations without it ever affecting their status. Did you
see where three of the teen brawlers in Illinois Jesse defended got arrested for more
brutality? What about "Football" Williams, the guy who nearly killed Reginald Denny,
busted again in your neck of the woods. Did you write a column about that? And how
lenient the criminal justice system is when it comes to black-on-white attacks?
You are using a small truth to occlude a big truth. The fact that there are bad people of
every race can't be allowed to cloud the immense disparities in violence, IQ, and general
civilizability that exist between the black and white races. They are such different
animals that, as Thomas Jefferson said, "the two races, equally free, cannot live in the
same government." Here's a fact you probably don't know and would never publish: Young
black men are 3% of the population, but they commit 40% of the violent crimes. I'm sure
you can understand, with a little imagination, why so many of us whites don't like being
around blacks and see it as a real tragedy that they were ever brought into this country.
A.
[Banks]
Whew.... If I were the prejudiced sort, I'd say you sure give your people a
bad name.
[A.L.]
Don't kid yourself, sugar.
-------------------------------------------
First up is an exchange with David Horowitz, a leftist extremist Jew
selling himself to Gentile conservatives as a fellow. Horowitz advocates anti-Foundational
racial principles and slurs anyone observing the truth about that touchiest of subjects.
Sir -- go back and reread your article on the ben franklin school and your
speech about henry hyde, specifically your remarks about maxine waters.
don't you see how naive you are and how meaningless is your faith in the
individualist ideology against the reality of race? what do the individual
rights of smart white kids mean when they are subject to the depredations of
inner city niggers? this isn't a matter of johnny getting away with
knocking over susie and stealing billy's lunch money -- this is a matter of
two subspecies struggling for room. i heighten the contrast deliberately,
but my picture is closer to the truth than your and the cons' view that this
is simply a matter of enforcing the individual rights of all americans. no,
that is a nation-killing and fateful distortion of ground-level reality, the
facts of which you see clearly enough, but the meaning of which escapes you.
have blacks anywhere been capable of producing or sustaining a
civilization? have you heard of africa? have you ever lived in a big city?
do you think the natural law at work in Zimbabwe and South Africa might
apply to LA too?
there simply is no solution: the scenes you depict simply show gresham's
law as it applies to people. the stronger, cruder, inferior people drive
out the superior, refined people. and the media jews' is going to keep
pumping nigger (c)rap thru its amplifiers until we're all wiggers, and
making impossible by social and legal sanction any public expression of
white racial solidarity. can vouchers or better school administration make
civilized people of niggers? really? where? or is this just another lib
social-engineer-alchemist's pipe dream?...is proper school administration
all that is separating the 'bigger, tougher, more sexual' niggers from the
white kids? is that really all it would take? you are either incredibly
naive, which i doubt, or soon on the way to having third thoughts. did you
ever think that maybe white people have special (let's say sub-species-al)
reasons for moving away from blacks, as white people ALWAYS do, even as
black people have obvious reasons for voting themselves shares of civilized
peoples' earnings?... liberals have only exacerbated the problems of the
inner city, as you could tell if you'd ever lived there. it aint the foul
wasp bureaucrat administrators or the creepy jewish social service
worker/psychologists that make niggers not interested in cleaning up their
yards. imagine trying to make slums out of Swedish-Americans. biology
trumps the conservative religion of individual rights, as you must be
beginning to suspect. as bad as your continual laments suggest your social
and professional position is -- you still don't show the courage to risk it
by observing the real facts, do you?
you and the other public cons can keep trying to drive out nature with a
typewriter, but she writes in the only code that matters -- the genetic.
wake up, man, you can do better.
jack halliday
>It's your own genes that should worry you.
--David Horowitz
So you don't object to genetic arguments in principle. Just a question of
who it's politically safe to employ them against, right? That's how you and
the "fearless" conservatives operate, isn't it?
Did you ever hear that old adage about the reformed whore in church, and how
she shouldn't preach the first time out? Most people who took half their
lives to figure out Marx was wrong would be very careful about future
pronouncements.
Keep thinking sir, I have no doubt you can do better.
jack halliday
The italics are David Horowitz responding to a questioner about his position on Jared
Taylor...
I washed my hands of Jared Taylor after reading his Renaissance newsletter. These are
people who really believe in race, and therefore racial purity. I believe that culture
is the determining factor in shaping human affairs. America could be only ten percent
Anglo-Saxon and still be America, if the political culture created by those Anglo-Saxon
geniuses remained intact. [D.H.]
[This is my reponse to Horowitz, which he posted on his site. J.H.]
You mean those "Anglo-Saxon geniuses" who put the value of the black man at three-fifths of
the white man? You have downgraded the political culture of America from the simple, if
sophisticated, affirmation of the norms of free and responsible white people into some
world-embracing spiritual elixir that anyone can swallow. You are still a Marxian in
favoring abstractions over facts. You have bought into the religious hokum that America
is an idea.
Imagine yourself reading that last statement -- 'only ten percent Anglo-Saxon' -- to
Thomas Jefferson. How do you think he would have responded once he stopped laughing? Why
do you indulge in the fake obeisance of describing as geniuses men whose opinions you
discard the minute they depart from your own, O master-of-geniuses? And why do you smear
and disdain to rebut the arguments of those, such as Taylor, who take seriously and in
modern context those genius opinions you discard? What does that say about your character
and intellect and integrity? Less than it says about your vanity, perhaps.
As for culture, not race, being determinant, well, I was going to make fun of you, but then
I remembered the remarkable democratic civilization those cultured American Negroes wrought
in Liberia. Those who have visited tell me it's every bit as civilized as Washington, D.C.
Someone with the courage and intellectual honesty to break with the perverse and vengeful
Jewish-led left ought to find it worth the time to write a long, thoughtful article
rebutting another nascent movement (Taylor and his crowd's) displaying, if anything, even
more courage and intellectual honesty. You owe the Founders and the Taylors and your
readers the courtesy of considered rebuttal.
You still betray traces of your leftist heritage. I've read Taylor's work, and he doesn't
discuss racial purity at all, as you claim. When I add that misrepresenation to the barely
veiled slur that he is dirty (or else why wash your hands?), I get a half-subtle attempt to
sway your client into thinking Taylor reeks of the Reich.
Inwardly you know that if you took the pains to study the facts about race, your
intellectual honesty would lead you in Taylor's direction, which would certainly undermine
your position with the neoconservative right, that other club of Jewish and Jewishyouwere
ideologues. Start and stick with the facts, sir, and the theories will tend to suggest
themselves. You have merely played switch-bitch with your ideologies, but if you listen
the facts will sing to you, too.
Toward a better, sharper David Horowitz,
Jack Halliday
Horowitz responded that the 3/5 was not a measure of the value of the black man, but a
Congressional compromise for calculating representation. That led me to write the
imaginary conversation between a slave, a genius and a super-genius, in which I
satirically upbraided D.H. for his dishonesty in presenting himself as the heir of
the founders while misrepresenting their true racial beliefs, which were, once again,
that Blacks and Whites could not be mixed freely without destroying civilization.
You can find the "Conversation" here. J.H.
The next is a copied paragraph from the weekly digest called The Federalist, put out by the
Claremont Institute in Southern California. it is another willfully ignorant attack on the
Taylor crowd and all racial nationalists.
>Obviously, these claims are patently false; they are the delusions of
the "race matters" crowd, who make mutually contradicting arguments
about the nature and importance of skin color. Skin color is merely an
accident of birth. It does not mean someone is smart or ignorant, hard
working or lazy, sensitive or unfeeling, artistic or athletic, reads
novels or TV Guide. In the final analysis, people are individuals,
whose identity is shaped by innumerable characteristics and
experiences, of which race is the least important. All policies that
classify people and then treat them differently based on race are
inescapably a form of intolerable stereotyping.
This is silly, simplistic piffle, and for you to speak of "delusions,"
well, look in the mirror.
What about Jefferson's statement that there was no way that free blacks
could live amongst free whites -- you know, the part of his statement that
didn't make the wall cut? You write "obviously, these claims are patently
false" -- well, obviously, you all are patently correct or you wouldn't need
to sound so sure with all those adverbs.
Generalizations -- general truths -- are not "intolerable
stereotyp[es]," as you have it. You are using a simple truth -- that skin
color isn't an absolute predictor of the character of a single individual --
to deny a larger and more important truth: that race is, on the whole, a
very good predictor of a number of important characteristics: crime, IQ,
bone density, fecundity, skin color etc. Generalizations about race
represent extremely important truths that all conservatives up until about
1950 have accepted as obvious. They are matters of fact that will influence
the direction of our civilization whether conservatives are discomfited by
them or not.
Conservatism is made weaker by -- indeed I think it is foundering on --
this silly, ahistorical ideology of colorblindness. If race is the "lease
imporant" factor in our makeup, a silly assertion that betrays your
ideology, why is it that racial groups mix so uneasily in the absence of
federal nightsticks? If people are merely individuals, and racial
generalizations are -- what, immoral? illegal? indecent? unpublishable in
the Jewish-dominated press? -- then how do we explain, say, Africa? or
Washington, D.C.? or Cabrini Green? How long before we stop pretending its
ALL due to liberal policies? Isn't it true that liberal policies have
merely exacerbated racial problems? You don't have a problem calling black
people black, although not all blacks have black skin. You accept the one
generalization easily enough, why not others? Don't we owe our white,
Western forefathers enough respect to take seriously the views of their
cream that, with respect to the numerically insignificant Sowells, the
majority can't be mixed with European Americans without destruction of
civilization? What are you scared of, boys?
jack halliday
Back to Backtalk Index
|