Vanguard News Network

Woke Judge #1: “Do we free the Black man convicted of rape, or let him remain in prison?”

Woke Judge #2: “Hmmmmm. Was the rape victim Black or White?”

Woke Judge #1: “White.”

Woke Judge #2: “Hmmmmm. Let’s favor Blackness. It’s 2021, after all. We must pursue maximum wokeness! White skin just isn’t woke enough!”

[Article].

(Above: the godfather of critical theory: the Jewish, Marxist philosopher Max Horkheimer. He founded critical theory in 1937. Hitler kicked Horkheimer and Company out of Germany. But Hitler was smarter than we were: Horkheimer then came to America and he set up shop at Columbia University in NYC. Why did they let him set up shop there? Good question!).

“Critical Theory.” “Critical Race Theory.” You’ve heard about them. It’s all Marxist crap.

Why do we tolerate “critical” Marxist baloney? By their very nature, “critical theories” (e.g., feminism) work against White Western culture. In other words, critical theories are killing Western culture.

An easy-to-remember definition of critical theory is: “Jewish intellectuals criticizing, and then tearing down, White culture.” First comes the criticizing, then comes the tearing-down, aided by the criticism. Granted, not everyone who pushes critical theory is a Jew. But it came from Jews. The penalty for pushing critical theory should be severe (e.g., life in prison), but of course it isn’t. There is no penalty. This is 2021 and the Jews are getting away with anything and everything. (Shouldn’t it be a crime to knowingly destroy a healthy, productive society, a country that put men on the moon and invented the transistor? Yes, it should be).

This below is one, sorta-funny example of being “critical” in the Marxist sense:

“Dig deep into White society. Find an imaginary “problem” that concerns race (or sex). Don’t worry, you’ll find a problem if you look hard enough (here’s one: “White male patriarchy in America’s preschools is creating fascist 6-year-olds”!!) Then, moan steadily about the problem; exaggerate the severity of the problem and make it seem really horrible and racist/sexist. OMG!! Write “academic” papers and books about the problem, teach college courses about the problem, and demand that laws be passed to fix the problem. Blame the problem entirely on White male racism/sexism. Repeat this action all across the culture until White society is destroyed and the world is “safe” for the Jews, God’s Chosen Mosquitos!”

Question: if America is such a racist country (“full of White rednecks”), why does every Black and Brown person in the entire world want to immigrate to America? Obviously, America isn’t a racist country. In fact, since 1970, racism has hardly existed. Because White people are too damn nice.

“The only thing of real importance that leaders do is to create and manage culture. If you do not manage culture, it manages you, and you may not even be aware of the extent to which this is happening.” — Edgar Schein, social psychologist; he had a Jewish father.

Agreed. So why aren’t we Americans managing our culture? It’s managing us (currently, trannies can use women’s bathrooms and negroes must be worshiped).

Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) are working hard to tear down White Western culture. The most successful culture in history.

How is tearing down White Western culture “social justice”? How is dismantling the greatest culture ever created by mankind a good thing? Ponder that. That’s akin to searching out the greatest scientist on the planet and killing him simply because he’s the greatest scientist on the planet! “How dare he be the greatest scientist alive! The nerve of that guy! What a show-off! What arrogance! He deserves to be killed!” Same concept. Why would you knowingly kill the best person or the best thing? It makes no sense [1]. The opposite is true: you should try to preserve the best person or thing.

Social Justice Warriors are angry losers who came from broken homes; they didn’t get any parental love as children [2]. They are defective people who have low self-esteem so they must attack an entire culture to make themselves feel better. (Because after all, that’s what leftism is: it’s not a political ideology, it’s a weapon. All it can do is attack and tear down). Most of all, SJWs know that White males created the world (all important inventions came from them) and the SJWs really hate that, to an extreme degree.

.

[1] Actually, it does make some sense if you’re a White-hating leftist. Jewish author Norman F. Cantor notes on page 421 of his 1994 book, “The Sacred Chain: The History of the Jews” that the infamous Jew, Claude Levi-Strauss, an “anthropologist,” could be considered a godfather of left-wing thought, since Levi-Strauss developed/galvanized the concept of the “bad” White world vs. the “good” non-White world, which Cantor calls “the cardinal doctrine of all leftist-leaning thought since 1960”

[2] Ask a liberal what “family values” are and he’ll give you a blank stare. He has no clue what they are. There’s no such thing as a long liberal marriage. After a few years, the feminist wifey files for divorce. Especially in California. Conservative families are much more stable than liberal families.

California is a state run entirely by liberals. When your state is controlled by liberals, there are no adults in charge. Because liberals are children in adult bodies. They don’t think logically. Liberals should never be allowed to hold public office.

“Even though the state’s tattered electric grid can barely meet existing demand – and more rolling blackouts are almost certain this summer – California continues to pile bad policy on top of bad policy. The state has banned the future sale of cars powered by internal combustion engines which will result in dramatic increases in electricity demand and will require, according to a recent report by the California Energy Commission, the installation of 1.2 million new EV charging stations by 2030. Bans on natural gas will further increase electricity demand.” (Of course, allowing 12 million illegal aliens to live in California doesn’t help any. That’s a lot of extra bodies needing electricity).

[Article].

“America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative” by Dr. Revilo P. Oliver (1983).

[a .PDF file].

(Above: Arnold Aronson, circa 1955)

There’s a saying: “civil rights” is Jewish tyranny in blackface. Here’s one reason why (make that three reasons).

Without Arnold Aronson (1911-1998), the civil rights movement, as we know it today, would not exist.

A Jew, Aronson was the main founder of the umbrella group then called the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, founded in 1950 as a collection of 30 civil rights groups. He served as its executive secretary from 1950 to 1980. For its first 13 years, the LCCR was basically a one-man operation run by Aronson in a Manhattan office.

The LCCR was basically carrying out the dream of Herbert Marcuse, albeit much earlier: Marcuse’s New Left (founded circa 1964) was intended to be a large collection of “oppressed” people, all working together: Blacks, Latinos, queers, women, etc. Aronson pioneered the “umbrella group” strategy vis-a-vis civil rights.

Here’s a quote about Aronson from the Congressional Record (House of Rep.) in 1997:

“During the Leadership Conference’s first 13 years, Arnold Aronson served as its secretary and directed the day-to-day operations of the organization. Along with NAACP Washington bureau director Clarence Mitchell, Aronson and the Leadership Conference coordinated the successful lobbying efforts which resulted in the passage of the 1957 and 1964 Civil Rights Acts, the 1965 Voting Rights Act, and the 1968 Fair Housing Act.” (That last Act forces you to rent homes/apartments to Blacks and Mexicans, whether you want to or not. So much for America being “The Land Of The Free”).

Aronson was a busy bee. He buzzed around frantically and probably didn’t get much sleep during the 1960s. Nation-wrecking is hard work!

Almost as important as Aronson in the civil rights movement were two other Jews connected to Aronson: Joe Rauh, a lawyer, who was a major lobbyist for LCCR on Capitol Hill; and Marvin Caplan, Aronson’s top lieutenant.

Since 1948, “human rights” have been a big thing in the West. All humans enjoy “human rights” simply because they are human, we are told by the UN, UNESCO and by famous leftists. They say that all of the world’s humans enjoy human rights, even retards and communists and 400-pound fat women.

But that’s not correct. All humans are different, so how could they all enjoy the same rights? Who would grant those rights? God? Which god? No two humans are the same. Some are taller, shorter, fatter, skinnier, smarter, dumber, more ambitious, more lazy, etc. Humans vary greatly. Like snowflakes, no two are alike. How come the humans didn’t have humans rights until 1948? So, in 1947, they didn’t have any such rights? That seems odd.

The only way all humans in the world would enjoy the same rights (human rights) is if they were all the same and all equally valuable. But they aren’t. Thomas Edison was much more valuable than a negro in Africa. So human rights cannot exist. If a lion eats a human in the jungle, then that human didn’t have any “human rights,” did he? And how come the lion has no “animal rights”? Shouldn’t the lion have rights? Such as: a right to eat meat (the human) in order to survive? Humans are animals, just like lions are.

Human rights are bogus. Fake. They don’t exist.

(In fact, humans rights are a fantasy made up by a Jew [Rene Cassin] for UNESCO in 1948. How does a Jew decide that all humans have “human rights”? If humans have human rights, how do you explain Gaza, which is today a giant concentration camp full of Palestinians? Apparently, “certain people” have human rights and other people don’t. Right, Israel?).

“Traditional society took centuries to evolve, the building of communities, values and trust. Life progressed in an otherwise orderly fashion until the recent arrival of cultural Marxism.” — a UK teacher known as AsiaTeacher.

This is absolutely correct. What is going on in the Western world today is not evolution (slow, natural change). It’s revolution (forced, quick change). The revolution seeks to transform the West from “White-ruled and stable” to “non-White-ruled and unstable.” Why? To usher in Marxism in all of the White countries [1]. (Because it’s hard to communize stable, White countries. But it’s much easier to communize unstable, multicultural countries in which the citizens have no common heritage). Why would anyone want to screw up White, stable countries with Marxism? Two reasons: 1) Because Marxists hate White culture with a passion; 2) White, stable, male-dominated countries aren’t “equal” and human equality is the political/social Holy Grail since the 1960s. So, the federal government will soon become your father and your mother. All major decisions in your life will be made by federal bureaucrats: where you work, how much you earn, where you live, etc., etc. This revolution is being led, of course, by Jews in the media, in the universities, and in the government. Those Jews decide which speech and which behavior is, and isn’t, “acceptable.”

.

[1] if this were 1967, the Marxism they are seeking to install would be regular (economic) Marxism. But this is 2021, and the Marxism they seek to install is largely Cultural Marxism. This allows for more micromanagement of the culture; it’s basically the difference between the Old Left (1930s) and the New Left (1960s), the latter of which focused much more on identity politics and “White-hating”