Vanguard News Network

This ridiculous: people under the age of 18 cannot buy butter knives or forks in stores. Yes. It’s hard to believe England once ruled over half the world (the British Empire). First England banned guns, because Black drug gangs were using them too often (Jamaicans, I think). Then they banned knives when Black/Brown immigrants were getting too violent with knives. Why not just ban Blacks and Browns? Problem solved. Coming next: England will ban baseballs bats, hammers, and wrenches.

Seen: an online video which talked about “the 3 main ideologies of modernism” (liberalism, communism and fascism). In the video, the narrator, when talking about Cuba, called communism an “economic” ideology. I disagree. Economics has nothing to do with communism, it just seems that way on the surface.

You will no doubt ask: “Well, if communism isn’t an economic ideology, then what is it?” Simple. It’s a Jewish racial ideology, based on historic Jewish communal living [1]. Economics is just the window dressing — a cover if you will.

More pointedly, communism was designed as a “racial time bomb” set to explode 10 years or so later (i.e., circa 1860) by pitting White citizens against other White citizens, making them fight endlessly (just like all Jewish “liberation ideologies”: feminism, socialism, labor unionism, etc.). Communism wasn’t meant to succeed (in fact it couldn’t succeed and Karl Marx, communism’s founder, surely knew that). It was meant to destroy the White Western nations.

Marx was racially Jewish, and all of the people who spread communism in the early years were also Jews (e.g., the people who spread it to China such as Grigori Voitinsky and Adolph Joffe) [2]. Marx designed communism to destroy the Western world but most especially England. In fact, Marx said that any revolution that didn’t spread to England would be pointless (“a storm in a teacup”) [3]. But sadly for Marx, his plan didn’t work: communism turned East instead and ruined Russia, China, Vietnam, etc. But unknown to Marx, other Jewish intellectuals would later “tweak” his communism to create a more-deadly form of it, which is now called Cultural Marxism, which is “much easier for the fools to swallow” [4][5]. Cultural Marxism is now destroying every White country and if it’s not stopped soon, the entire West is doomed to extinction.

.

[1] Jews are a race due to centuries of inbreeding — in fact, the Jews have so few “genetic founders” that most Jews are almost cousins to each other. Most Jews (90%) are Ashkenazic Jews (a.k.a. Eastern European Jews, a.k.a. “Big-Nosed Jews”). The other 10% are Sephardic (a.k.a. Mediterranean Jews). Jews are not White, despite having “white” skin. Jews have an inborn fear and hatred of White Western culture and they have long wanted to destroy it.

“Yaaay, capitalism!”?? Nope. It’s been ruined like everything else in the West. Any entity that isn’t overtly and staunchly right-wing will sooner or later turn Left. In just a few decades, capitalism turned red, rojos, Marxist (or nearly so). Everything is going Left. Soon my dog will be marching in the streets, making silly demands and spouting Lenin.

Well, now we know where a good amount of “woke capitalist” ideology came from: the World Economic Forum [1]. This late 2019 declaration was “written by Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum.” It reads in part: “(A woke company) continuously expands the frontiers of knowledge, innovation and technology to improve people’s well-being.” How does supporting trannies and Black thugs “improve people’s well-being”? Some people have said that Schwab is a Jew. Others say no. Anybody have good evidence one way or the other? If nothing else he’s a wealthy globalist and an egalitarian, and that’s bad enough.

.

[1] newbies: “woke” here means “big corporations embracing and supporting Black radicals, queers, trannies, etc.”

Negroes: they riot when they don’t have their own country, and they riot when they do have their own country. There’s no pleasing negroes. They riot regardless. Just like a frog hops, just like a sparrow flies, Blacks burn and loot. It’s what they do. It’s automatic. Inborn. (Don’t forget, Whites built South Africa. The Blacks are destroying White buildings and White technology).

“President Cyril Ramaphosa is set to address the nation, amid rampant looting and rioting across South Africa.”

[Article].

When you send Puerto Ricans to do a White job (i.e., flying a White-built military airplane), it can end badly, and it did. All 9 members of the Puerto Rico Air National Guard were snuffed instantly.

[Video, 13 minutes].

When will this end? It won’t end. It’ll keep going and going. And then they’ll find other White things to destroy. Because liberalism is all about destroying. Liberalism does not build anything. It only tears down. “Tear down evil Western culture!” has been the Jewish/liberal motto since WWII. (There’s nothing evil about Western culture. In fact, Western culture has given the world more than any other culture by far, and that’s the whole problem! Heck, we even gave the world democracy, and look what they did with it! We gave the world electricity, telephones and computers. And are the liberals thankful? Nope. They instead erase our wonderful history).

“The city of Charlottesville, Va. followed up its removal of two controversial Confederate statues Saturday with the lightning-fast toppling of a third local landmark: a monumental tribute to explorers Meriwether Lewis, William Clark, and Sacagawea.”

[Article].

by Robert S. Griffin, Ph.D.

[…]

“While white villainy seemed to make sense given the false notion of racial equality, it simply didn’t square with the facts. The vast majority of whites didn’t concern themselves with blacks and wasted no time trying to suppress them. The vast majority of whites didn’t care what blacks did. They simply wanted to go their way and let blacks go theirs. But the facts of the matter aren’t what is important. What is important is to understand that World War II served to heighten the belief that if blacks had any problems at all, they could be laid at the feet of whites.”

[Article].

The United States of America was founded by 118 White men beginning in 1776 [1]. It was founded as a White Western republic, based largely on British common law [2]. It was not founded as a multicultural democracy, regardless of what your history teacher, Mr. Weinberg, told you. In fact, in the first decades of the American republic, only White males could vote, or hold public office, and even then, they had to be land-owners.

Since it is a White Western republic, you may wonder “why is the U.S. government allowing all sorts of non-White immigrants to flood into America?” The short answer: the unconstitutional 1965 immigration act, a.k.a., the Hart-Celler Act. A longer answer: the jerks in Congress, along with their lobbyists, want America to turn non-White for various reasons, none of them good.

But, for several reasons, they cannot legally genocide America’s White people.

First and foremost, the U.S. Constitution says they can’t genocide us! In the first paragraph, the Constitution mentions “our posterity.” That means “our offspring who come after us” [3]. In 1776, “our posterity” meant “the White people who will come after us.” Not Indians, not Blacks. So, non-White immigration and multiculturalism are unconstitutional. That’s what it says. Granted, not word-for-word, but the meaning remains, regardless. Words mean things! (unless you’re a postmodernist).

Secondly, the U.S. government signed the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, which prohibits wiping out a culture in whole or in part [4]. (Don’t even try to mention “the American Indians” because the UN didn’t exist until 1945). Flooding America with non-White immigrants and saturating our culture with government-sponsored, anti-White multicultural programs is, in fact, genocide, albeit slow genocide.

It’s time for White Americans to demand that the illegal and unconstitutional genocide of our White people stop immediately.

.

Political Correctness (P.C.) was a Soviet term. It referred to “a statement that is not factually correct, but is nonetheless politically correct” [1]. It was telling a lie that pleased the communist party, in other words. Today, it’s “the policing of speech.” Why does P.C. exist in America, “the land of the free”? (By the way, the Gypsy Moth is an invasive, destructive moth. The caterpillar (larva) destroys trees. Hence the name). Someday, America will embrace freedom again. It won’t care if “gypsies are offended by a bug’s name.” Who cares if gypsies are offended? Are they important people?

[Article].

.

[1] Political Correctness is a sub-ideology of Cultural Marxism, and Cultural Marxism is a sub-ideology of Critical Theory.

These CRT (Critical Race Theory) fanatics are dangerous creeps who want to destroy our excellent Western culture. Now we know where the big push to abolish merit in America came from: the CRT founder Freeman.

The merit system means, of course, choosing people based on their merits, their abilities. Choosing the best people for the job. That’s the only proper way to choose someone. That’s why “Affirmative Action” is bullshit. Merit must be the sole yardstick used to measure qualifications. But A.A. chooses people by race. Under A.A., a negro gets a job because he is Black. That’s not good enough!

Here’s the late Alan David Freeman [1], the guy who pioneered CRT, talking about how he wants to end the merit system in America (since Blacks have less ability than Whites):

“In terms of strategy, I would suggest that instead of continuing to be preoccupied with obtaining a small number of slots under traditional criteria for representative minority people, that we engage in an all-out assault on meritocratic pretenses. This would mean a thoroughgoing scrutiny of the ideology of meritocracy, of ability, of quality, all of which I believe are basically class-loaded concepts that parade themselves as criteria of objective quality, when in fact they are instruments of class domination. That requires a good deal of effort because so many of us have internalized those criteria as genuine measures of self-worth. How many people, having done well on the test, think immediately that they are better people, that the test was a genuine measure of self-worth or self-quality? That ideology has got to be busted up.” — Alan Freeman, in 1979, at a CLS seminar that he organized.

“Instruments of class domination”?? Someone read a lot of Marx! The very idea that merit isn’t objective! Of course it is. The best person wins. Simple. How is that not objective? So, according to Freeman, we must end the merit system and choose people based on…what? Their zip codes?? Of course not. Freeman wanted to abolish merit and choose people based on Affirmation Action quotas and “equity” — based on them being Black or Brown. That’s not merit. There’s a lot of postmodernist philosophy found in CRT, which automatically disqualifies it as Marxist baloney.

.

[1] It is said that two men pioneered Critical Legal Studies and the later Critical Race Theory (CLS morphed into CRT in the 1980s): a negro professor at Harvard (!!) named Derrick Bell, and Alan David Freeman, who I believe was racially (keyword) a Jew, but I admit that I cannot prove that 100%. His children apparently were baptized Christians at some point. Previously, I was 100% sure Freeman was a Jew, based on various research, but now, based on still more research, I’m only about 90% sure. Regardless, Freeman’s work on CRT carried the day, not Bell’s. Bell was a lightweight negro, not a real intellectual like Freeman. Bell was simply a Black “quota hire.” A photo of Freeman is here: his nose is kinda hooky and his ears are kinda big, and Freeman is often, but not always, a Jewish name; using web searches, I found one “Freeman” who belonged to a synagogue near where Freeman was born, which I found interesting, and, who has the same given name as his mother! I also took into account region of birth, record of achievements, personality type, etc.