28 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in leftism, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, natural law vs. positive law, natural rights of Whites, negative vs positive rights, rightists at 11:58 am | Permanent Link

In this case, “negative” doesn’t mean what you might think:

A negative right = a right you were born with. A natural right.

A positive right = an artificial “right” which requires someone else’s labor or money in order for you to enjoy that “right” (e.g., free college, free healthcare).

Leftists embrace positive rights. Rightists embrace negative rights.

“The difference between negative vs positive rights is that one requires action while the other requires inaction. Negative rights are the requirements of someone else not to interfere in your ability to obtain something. Positive rights are a requirement of someone else to provide you with something.

You may hear negative rights referred to as “liberties,” and that’s because they are basic human and civil rights stating that no one can interfere with our right to obtain something through trade or bartering.

Positive rights are often called “entitlements” because they are things that someone must provide to us, whether we’ve earned them or not. We don’t have to do anything to obtain positive rights; they’re granted to us.”

[Webpage].

27 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in race as a social construct, race baloney, Race Denial, racial differences, racial hierarchy at 4:36 pm | Permanent Link

(“This is one of those views which are so absurd that only very learned men could possibly adopt them.” — Bertrand Russell, 1959. Only an intellectual would believe that human races don’t exist. Being “well-read” [being an intellectual, usually a Ph.D.] doesn’t mean you’re smart. It means that you’ve read 138 college textbooks written by leftist Jews. You are merely “book-smart.” Your head is filled with Jewish nothings. The U.S. government is filled with intellectuals. Hence the reason America is now circling the drain).

“‘Race-denialism’ is defined as follows: “The denial of the existence of human races, in part or in whole, as they have historically been perceived and as they are commonly perceived today.”

[Article].

27 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in conservatism, conservatives, cuckservatives, Ted Nugent at 3:24 pm | Permanent Link

In general, I like Ted Nugent. But sometimes I’m stumped by his comments. Is he aiming his politics at a certain audience? At the flag-waving, “Toby Keith” types? Or does Nugent believe exactly what he’s saying? Surely he has enough money so as not to be too concerned about being blacklisted by the PC crowd or by the Jews. Or not?

Nugent seems to hate Nazis, but he seems to like Jews and Blacks. And why is Nugent calling antifa “fascists” (see the 23-minute mark in the video below) when they are, in fact, communists (i.e., the opposite of fascists)?

But Nugent is basically right about Kyle Rittenhouse, recidivism, and when he suggests that America is the last free country on earth. If America falls, then heaven help us all. (Trivia: Nugent was, at one time, a cop. An actual, sworn, reserve member of, I think, a sheriff’s department).

Newbies (I usually focus on newbies; oldbies already know), let’s keep this simple: Fascism wants to preserve the West. The original fascist party in Italy was a reaction to Bolshevism [1]. But communism wants to destroy the West.

[Ted Nugent video, 42 minutes].

.
.

[1] To be clear, “fascism” in this post refers not to the type found in the confused, semi-leftist Fascio di Combattimento of 1919, but to the later, perfected version of it found in the Partito Nazionale Fascista (PNF; 1921-1943). Unlike communism, fascism actually works and it can allow a country to remain White — if the country wants to and if the leaders are capable, of course.

27 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in black culture, Black maffletes, Black mentality, Socrates at 2:11 pm | Permanent Link

Black maf question (subtraction):

Q: “If’n Shaniqua have 4 rocks o’ crack cocaine, and she give 2 rocks to LaDerrikus, den how many rocks she have lef?”

A: “2 rocks.”

“No, dawg! Dat be raciss White maf. Shaniqua have as many rocks lef as she tinks she have lef. If’n she tinks she have 12 rocks lef, den she have 12 rocks lef! Dat be non-raciss maf.”

[Article] and [Article].

26 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in music, rock music, Socrates at 11:24 pm | Permanent Link

Spooky (1979) by Atlanta Rhythm Section.

The lead singer for Atlanta Rhythm Section (Ronnie Hammond, a great singer) was shot by the police in 1998 and he almost died. [Video].

26 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in Critical Race Theory, Critical Theory, Cultural Marxism at 3:51 pm | Permanent Link

How much damage does Cultural Marxism (CM) have to do before it’s banned by law? [1]. If you say, “but CM is free speech,” no, it’s not. If a judge gives you a longer jail sentence due to his prior CM indoctrination, that’s not “free speech.” That’s “a violation of your Constitutional rights.” CM is not simply “free speech.” It’s a threat to our entire system of republican government: local, state and federal. Indeed, if 2021 is any indication, America may not survive CM.

[Article].
.
.

[1] CM is “Marxism applied to culture rather than applied to economics.” The main feature of CM is “critical theory” (founded circa 1937 by Jews at Columbia University in NYC) which basically means “voices of authority criticizing the hell out of White Western culture” — which has led to things like the Summer 2020 riots and assaults and even murder such as we saw in the recent Waukesha parade attack. “Voices of authority” means especially university professors, and also politicians and celebrities. CM is based on lies and racial hatred.

26 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in anti-fascists/antifas, leftism, leftism as a Jewish construct, leftists, Lenin, liberalism, liberals, Marcuse, Marxism, New Left, Sixties, Vietnam, Vietnam War at 2:24 pm | Permanent Link

Newbies, keep in mind that, when people talk about Jews being “X percent of the leftist radicals at Berkeley” they are talking about the biggest and most important radicals. Not just the “average” radicals. Ditto communism and feminism. In other words, the leaders were Jews. The spear point, if you will, was Jewish. And they were of course following a Jewish ideology (Marxism).

The New Left began circa 1964, and it was more radical than the Old Left. While the latter focused mostly on class and labor issues, the New Left focused on race, homosexuality, feminism, and the Vietnam War (which the leftists didn’t care about per se; they didn’t care about American boys dying, they were merely opposing it for political or racial reasons; some leftists saw the war as “imperialism” while others saw it as White imperialism, i.e., “White men exploiting Asia” — apparently most were unaware of the Jew, Walt Rostow and his creation of the war; Rostow was a close pal of JFK).

The New Left was entirely a Jewish creation except for a couple of gentiles, e.g., Tom Hayden, who was Irish. The godfather of the New Left is undoubtedly Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979), who was a Jewish communist; he invented the concept of “intolerance against movements from the Right, and toleration of movements from the Left.” In other words, “no enemies will exist on the Left, regardless of who they are.”

“Jews were disproportionately involved in the 1960s student movement known as the New Left. Drawing on research data from primarily the USA and Australia, we explore some of the key factors that contributed to this prominence including the significant number of Jewish students at key universities, the impact of left-wing family backgrounds on many Jewish students, and the general influence of Jewish cultural values and experiences. We argue that Jewish student radicals incorporated the whole spectrum of Jewish identity from those who either rejected or expressed ambivalence about their Jewishness to those whose radical and Jewish commitments were closely aligned. We also explain why the Jewish contribution to the New Left had so little impact on mainstream Jewish political culture.”

[a .PDF file].

26 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in Big Business, Big Media, global citizens, global citizenship/world citizenship, Global Man, global vs. local/regional, globalization, leftism, leftist/liberal cruelty, leftist/liberal hate, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, liberals as bullies, liberals-as-destroyers at 12:35 pm | Permanent Link

A great article. Share it widely.

“The problem is, leftists would have no power to cancel anyone without the constant support of Big Tech, Hollywood, the mainstream media and international corporations. These companies don’t actually care what social justice warriors think, and they’re certainly not afraid of a tiny minority of lunatics with zero consumer leverage. Yet, they are the base of control that allows leftists to wield legitimate tools for deconstructing people’s lives. The corporate world aids the leftists because leftist goals serve corporate interests (for now).”

“What I see moving forward is that the left is becoming the Cheka, or the political commissars of the globalist “Great Reset.” They have been molded for decades for this role and their purpose is to provide an element of social force and the illusion of consensus.”

[Article].

26 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in Covid Antibody Dependent Enhancement, Covid Derangement Syndrome, Covid-19, Covid-19 as a scam, Covid-19 lockdowns, Covid-19 vaccines, Covid-stupid, Covidians at 12:24 pm | Permanent Link

You knew that the sneaky Covidians would “discover” another Covid-19 “variant” around the time of Thanksgiving, and…yep! It’s here! It’s called the “Botswana ‘Nu’ variant.” It’s just in time for use as an excuse to go back to lockdowns and increase the “jabs” among the right-wing holdouts. Like the “Delta variant,” this new variant is no doubt caused by the “vaccines” themselves — see “Antibody Dependent Enhancement” (ADE) [1]. But this one is sort of a surprise: I had thought they’d keep giving the variants Greek names: Alpha, Delta, Gamma, etc. (Update: “Nu” is Greek as well).

[Article].

.
.

[1] of course, if you do a web search for “Antibody Dependent Enhancement” you’ll only find tons of left-wing baloney about how ADE is not-not-not happening re: Covid-19. ADE causes the mutation and strengthening of Covid-19, and experts warned about the dangers of mass vaccinations early on.

25 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in NATO, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, Western philosophy at 4:35 pm | Permanent Link

Why do otherwise-smart people call the West “the Western Hemisphere”? It’s not the same thing. The “Western Hemisphere” includes non-White countries including parts of West Africa, Mexico, Central America, and Columbia.

The West, however, means “all of the White countries.” (It originally referred to “all the NATO countries” circa 1950).

End of rant.