Vanguard News Network

I have noticed that leftists have no good feelings for the past. Whereas right-wingers feel a fondness and even a longing for “the good old days,” left-wingers would rather forget the past as quickly as possible. For a leftist, it seems, the past is “the bad old days” [1]. I find that odd and troubling given how many leftists inhabit America. History (remembering it) is an important part of being human, after all. And we learn from the past. What do normal friends do when they get together after a 20-year separation? They reminisce about the old days, of course. But what do leftist friends do when they get together after a long separation? They only talk about what’s coming next. It’s almost as if leftists are afraid of the past, afraid of having a foundation or a grounding or a prior framework. A leftist is like a rootless traveler who is always moving from place to place, afraid to look back, worried that he might find a monster (himself, maybe? his mother? his father?) in his past. (Oddly, liberals have no problem obsessing over the past when it comes to “racist” or “homophobic” events which didn’t even directly involve them, and which may have occurred 50 years ago! Liberals still obsess over Pinochet, Rosa Parks, Matthew Shepard and Emmett Till even today; furthermore, though I’m not a psychologist, I think that leftists are mentally unsound; they are damaged in some way, perhaps due to childhood abuse or other trauma).

.

[1] a liberal once told me that he hated America because “it was racist from the very beginning.” This says a lot about the liberal mind: “White roots” are really “racist roots.” Also, that same liberal rode a bicycle everywhere, instead of driving a car, because cars (and roads? and oil?) are racist, apparently. Like Judaism, liberalism is an anti-White/anti-Western creed bent on forgetting and ultimately destroying all traces of the White past; the liberal “job” won’t be “complete” until all things White are erased from history

“No one is above the law” proclaimed The Nancygirl. Oh, really? That’s funny. What about Hillary and the 30,000 missing/destroyed emails? What about the millions of illegal aliens who are in America right now? What about the illegal 2003 Iraq War? Remember Saddam’s non-existent Weapons of Mass Delusion (WMD)? The USSA is a big joke designed to keep the rubes busy and confused… [Article].

“The belief in human equality” = the denial of race, creed, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, IQ, national origin, religion, height, weight, strength, life habits and ability to navigate through life without help from the government. Under “human equality,” none of that exists. Strangely, that’s also the definition of “the belief in communism.” You know: Universal man. One-size-fits-all. Human robots. Worker bees. Slaves.

News headline, 9/24/19: “Megan Rapinoe gives passionate speech on racism and inequality after winning top FIFA award” [1].

Well, golly gee. But I say: consider this:

Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Byelorussia, Cambodia, China, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Kirghizia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldavia, Nicaragua, Poland, Romania, the Soviet Union, Tajikistan, Turkmenia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Yugoslavia. In the 20th century, 100 million innocent citizens were murdered in those countries in an attempt to make them all “equal” to each other [2]. Yes, they’re all equal now. They’re all equally dead. Murdered by communism/Marxism. Yet, people still talk of human equality as The Wonderful Goal That Mankind Must Achieve At Any Cost! Well, those people should be jailed, yes, jailed for such dangerous talk. (Since 1945 — after the destruction of Hitler’s Germany — human equality has been the new religion of the Western world; it’s pushed by the schools, by the media, by the government, by nearly everyone who is in a position of authority).

Humans, being biological entities, can never, ever be equal. Only machines can be equal.

.

[1] Rapinoe is a female, lesbian, U.S. soccer player

(Above: like most powerful people in Mexico, Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard is a White Spaniard).

Those evil White people! But wait: most of the important people in Mexico are White Spaniards (or Jews). So, Mexico is going to wage war…on itself? Hmmmm. Let’s see how that works out, eh?

[Article].

King Crimson, “Epitaph” — sung by ELP’s Greg Lake — (1969) [Video].

What do you call “scaring millions of children with weekly, even daily talk of the world ending in 15 years due to non-existent ‘global warming'”? I call it child abuse. In fact, in most states, deliberately scaring a child by word or deed is child abuse. When will the schoolteachers, and other leftists, be charged with child abuse? Anytime soon? (One can only guess how many children have turned to drugs or alcohol as a result of being scared by the endless “climate change” bullshit) [1].

[Article] and [Article].

.

[1] Most states have laws against the psychological abuse of a child, e.g., deliberately causing lasting anxiety or depression in a child

How do you fix something in Mexico? Get a hammer. If that doesn’t work, get a bigger hammer. And if, for some reason, that fails, just use lots of bailing wire and swear a lot. [Article].

There are two types of con games: the short con and the long con. The Federal Reserve itself is a long con. It’s been going on for decades.

We have all heard that “America is not a command economy like the Soviet Union. It’s instead a free-market economy where public demand/activity decides monetary activities and policies” (i.e., not the government or any one single entity).

Why, then, does the Federal Reserve (often confusingly called “the Fed”) set America’s interest rates? [1]. Why not “let the market decide” how high, or how low, the interest rates are? Money is a commodity, just like almost anything else. Why not allow, say, Big Bank X to decide its interest rates? [2]. Oh, that’s right, I nearly forgot: the Federal Reserve must make all the decisions about America’s money supply so that it can regularly “cycle the economy” like a washing machine! (Ron Paul even mentioned such regular economic cycling). In other words: first there’s a boom cycle, then a bust cycle, then a boom cycle, then a bust cycle, then wash, rinse, repeat! Isn’t that right, Jews? Of course it is. “The Fed” is one of the biggest con games in human history. In fact, “the Fed” is inflationary by default: its policies, especially “fractional-reserve banking,” cause inflation by making more money available (to whoever wants/needs it) than would otherwise be available.

When will America return to an honest money system?

.

[1] despite having a “.gov” URL address that suggests it’s “governmental,” the Federal Reserve is a private but very-slightly-regulated corporation, complete with share-holders. Every four years, the President chooses the chairman of the Federal Reserve from a short list of Fed “governors” — oy, not much variety there if’n ya ask me! The Jewish banker Paul M. Warburg invented and created the Federal Reserve system in 1913. “The Fed” actually caused the infamous 1929 stock-market crash

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“The really disappointing aspect to all of this is that it should have been foreseen. The Whites of South Africa voted themselves into their present situation, when they agreed to let Blacks participate in their elections in 1994. They folded up under the pressure of being called bad names by the Jewish media and being told by their preachers that Jesus was angry at them because of apartheid. They were so eager to be in the good graces of Jesus, the Jews, and the international community that they took leave of their senses and handed their government over to Nelson Mandela and his fellow Black terrorists on a silver platter. And they believed the assurances of the media and their bought politicians that everything would work out for the best if they let the Blacks run South Africa.”

“I said that perhaps we can learn from the example of the South Africans. Of course, when I say “we” I don’t mean White Americans as a whole. Since White South Africans as a whole didn’t learn a thing from the example of the Portuguese and the Belgians and the Rhodesians, I don’t expect Americans to do any better. But perhaps some of us can learn a few things. One of those things is that we really need to find a better way than mass democracy for governing ourselves. We’ve been fed a lot egalitarian baloney about people all being pretty much the same, and so we tend to assume that since we can look at facts and make rational decisions, everyone else can. But most people cannot. Most people are not rational and can be manipulated by playing on their fears and desires, the way the majority of South African Whites were manipulated by the media and the churches in their country in 1994. The South Africans didn’t want the sort of situation they have today, but they let themselves be bullied and lied and tricked into it. If only hard-headed and rational South African Whites had been permitted to vote in 1994, South Africa still would be a White-ruled country today: perhaps even an all-White country.”

[Article].

[…]

“Belief in the dangers of AGW (human-caused global warming) has led to the emergence of the new generalist or interdisciplinary field of “climate science,” cobbled together with the express purpose of manufacturing evidence in favor of AGW. Significant differences exist between this climate science and the natural sciences. Regular scientists rely on objective, empirical methods to test hypotheses, not confirmation bias to uphold a neoliberal globalist status quo. Climate researchers, on the other hand, are heavily invested in filtering data through the lens of a single interpretation; they are trained to ignore all hypotheses, with the exception of AGW, no matter how plausible. In the natural sciences, governments will fund competing theories; in climate science, only AGW receives funding because it is the only politically correct explanation.“

[Parts I and II].

[Parts III thru V].