Vanguard News Network

(Somewhere in America, 1950)

Conservative White man #1: “I had a horrible dream last night. I dreamed of a very different America — an America full of insane regulations and ridiculous bureaucracy, full of severe corruption and mismanagement. This America was run by lunatics, with sky-high taxes and millions of criminal Brown people, with bums camping out on the streets and pooping on the sidewalks, with mysterious, hellish fires destroying entire neighborhoods. It was an eerie place where you needed a government permit for every activity — unless you had White skin, then you needed 3 permits for every activity. It was sort of like the Soviet Union, but right here, right in America! Thank God, it was only a bad dream.”

Conservative White man #2: “How scary! It’s a good thing that won’t really happen here!”

Conservative White man #3: “Right! The American people would never tolerate such a nightmarish situation!”

[Article].

“Clear away dry brush and dead trees near roads and highways? That doesn’t sound very green to me. Better leave the dead weeds and trees alone.” — said, no doubt, some California government liberal circa 2000. Guess the results. [Article].

Is Donald Trump a polarizing figure? No. The media made him into a polarizing figure. Big difference there. The media decides who’s controversial, and therefore polarizing, and who isn’t. Citizens are expected to respond accordingly, and some do.

BBC News quote, 10/28: “Trump booed at Washington DC baseball match; President Trump was booed while watching the fifth game of the baseball World Series, being played in Washington DC.”

(Above: the U.S./Canadian border, the longest unguarded border in the entire world).

Could such a long, unguarded, fenceless border exist in Africa? No. In South America? Nope. On the southern U.S. border? No way. Only between two mild-mannered, polite, law-abiding, safe, White countries could such an unguarded, fenceless, 5,500-mile (total including Alaska) border exist. Ponder that fact for awhile.

Quoting a news article: “An official statement from the Student Council at Oxford announced the intention to request that students opt for the British Sign Language “silent jazz hands” instead of loud clapping as it may not be an “inclusive” behavior.”

Ohh, yes, we must be “inclusive” of every single human on earth, no matter how ridiculous that may be! Must we include retarded midgets, too? What about homosexual, retarded midgets? What about dyslexic, homosexual, retarded midgets? What about dyslexic, legally-blind, homosexual, retarded midgets? What about Asian, crippled, dyslexic, legally-blind, homosexual, retarded midgets with Tourette’s Syndrome? Must they be included, too? At any cost, right?? Political Correctness is Cultural Marxism [1]. And there’s no end to it. Literally. Each month there’s a new offense, a new transgression, a new outrage that normal White people have committed against some “other,” i.e., some outsider person (e.g., a Black, Brown, female, homosexual, or disabled person). It’s time for Britain to follow Argentina’s example (circa 1977) and close, yes, close all the universities until the administrators can prove that they have scrubbed them clean of Cultural Marxism and made them safe for normal people again.

[Article].

.

[1] “Politically correct” was a popular Soviet term; it refers to “something that is not factually correct, but is nonetheless politically correct”; in other words, it’s a lie

In journalism schools, they used to teach “objective journalism” — in other words, they taught the idea that you must report on an event fairly and evenly, favoring no one or no position in your reporting. Fair and balanced.

Consider this: the UK’s Guardian newspaper says this, in print:

“Our reporting on the environment, from our international team, will never be influenced by…political interests and will always be rooted in scientific fact.”

Scientific fact? Sounds good. But wait. Then the paper says this, on the same page, in print:

“…We will bring you the world’s leading voices on the climate crisis, and we will cover issues across food, travel and lifestyle in order to help readers live sustainably. We will undertake investigations into the economic and political structures that underpin the carbon economy, and examine the role the climate crisis plays in many other critical issues – including inequality, migration and the battle over scarce resources.” The paper also uses scare words like “emergency” and “catastrophe” to describe the climate “crisis”.

A climate “crisis”? Who says it’s a “crisis”? [1]. Many great scientists don’t believe that there’s any crisis and they have science on their side. The earth has warmed about 1 degree in the past 150 years — that’s not a crisis in any way, shape or form. Furthermore, “the world’s leading voices” on the so-called “climate crisis” are, to a man, anti-science liberal extremists [2]. The Guardian will either report with, or without, the insertion of left-wing ecopolitics into its reporting. Either it will “never be influenced by political interests” or it will by default, by using the liberal so-called climate experts as sources of authority on the weather. Which will it be? It can’t be both.

[Article].

.

[1] Remember the media-driven “energy crisis” of 1973/1974? The media mentioned it daily. “The world’s oil supply will vanish soon!” But the crisis itself suddenly vanished (virtually overnight), never to be heard about again.

[2] The “global warming” crowd is made up of two types:
Type 1: people who know that “global warming theory” is bullshit but push it anyway for political/anti-White reasons; Type 2: people who really believe that mankind will vanish in 30 years due to “climate change”

Okay, I’m confused. According to the sandal-wearing socialists in California, only the government is capable of good; private companies are only capable of evil. So, why is Pacific Gas & Electric — a private company — allowed to control all of the electricity in the Soviet State of California? Hmmmm, Gavin? [1]. [Article].

.

[1] “The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is an American investor-owned utility with publicly traded stock” — Wikipedia

Praise dee lawd, Jeebus! Black church/cult members versus rural White, Southern Arizona people and cops in 1982; lots of violence ensued, including shooting: [Video; duration is 20 minutes].

Just when you thought that Pinochet had “squared away” Chile, this happens: protesters are revolting against the first right-wing president since Pinochet. And to think, Chile is a stable and wealthy country. But Chile has a large and muscular leftist underground that hates success and prosperity — just like in America. (But note: since I don’t live in Chile, I can only guess at the current political situation there). [Article].

America’s “love” for World War II is fascinating, puzzling and depressing. Now, you can go on “tours,” presumably, of famous WWII places, like the beaches of Normandy! Or the white cliffs of Dover! Oh, how romantic! You can almost hear FDR on the radio and bullets whizzing past your skull, as evil Nazis fall to the ear-splitting rhythm of allied machine guns firing democracy-bullets! Is that a tear of nostalgia running down your cheek? No?? You’re not very patriotic.

Consider the facts: WWII was the most deadly war in human history. Tens of millions of innocent White people died. More were wounded/maimed/crippled. Billions of dollars worth of property was destroyed. Europe never recovered from it. Worst of all, WWII was totally unnecessary. The allies were “guaranteeing Poland’s borders” by fighting Hitler? Bullshit. Trivia: at that time (1939), Poland was considered by nearly everyone to be a shitty little country, yet, we’re told that the allies “had to” defend Poland. Total crap. The Jews, like Bernard Baruch and William Bullitt, told America and Britain to defend Poland as a pretext for war. Period. That’s why WWII happened. The only reason why [1].

Newbies, there’s nothing to celebrate about WWII. At all. It wasn’t a “good war.” Only the Jew won WWII.

.

[1] “Chamberlain, he (Ambassador Joe Kennedy) says, stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war.” — The Forrestal Diaries, 27 December 1945