Vanguard News Network

According to Karl Marx, socialism is “Part 1” of a communist revolution. It’s “pre-communism.” (Part 2 of such a revolution, the final part, is “true communism” occurring, when the state withers away and everyone sits around holding hands and singing songs. But states don’t wither away, ever, so it’s all Jewish nonsense).

Adolf Hitler was anti-communist. While Hitler admired Marxism’s ability to “grab citizens by the collar,” he made it very clear to his National Socialist subordinates that his NSDAP (the “Nazi Party”) was not, in any way, a Marxian socialist party. Some of Hitler’s left-wing subordinates were dismayed that he rejected Marxian socialism.

In fact, “The Night of the Long Knives” (i.e., Hitler’s purge of left-wing National Socialists, such as Ernst Röhm and Gregor Strasser, in 1934) was a successful attempt to keep Marxian socialism from spreading within the National Socialist ranks [1].

.

[1] Röhm and other left-wingers wanted a “second revolution” in Germany; this revolution was going to install actual, Marxian socialism. Hitler was strongly against the idea of such a revolution; had such a revolution occurred, it would have been impossible for Hitler to transform Germany into the economic and military powerhouse that it later became

“Conservatives” love to say that Adolf Hitler was a “socialist.” You’ve heard it before: “Hitler was just as much of a pinko as Stalin!” But was he? No, for several reasons that I will present, in five parts.

First of all, “socialist” is, today, a common political label. It applies to a leftist/liberal. But Hitler’s National Socialism was a racial movement. You cannot, in good faith, attach a political label to a racial movement.

(Above: Sumner Redstone, circa 2008)

Yes, Mr. Redstone has died. But don’t be sad. There are dozens and dozens of Jewish media bosses left, who are just waiting to pour, uhhmm, “information” into your brain 24/7! How cool is that??

“Sumner Redstone, who turned his family’s movie-theater company into a global media empire spanning television, movies, radio and books, and who famously proclaimed that “content is king,” has died…He was 97.“

You can get a better take on Mr. Redstone (his real name was Rothstein) and his fellow Jewish media bosses here: [Article] (sadly, this article, which was written by Dr. William Pierce, is somewhat out of date; it needs to be updated; readers, if you want to help us update this article, please feel free; just compile names of media companies/names of CEOs/proofs of Jewish ethnicity, etc. and post the information in the Comments section below; use as many URLs as necessary; use good sources only, please).

Bad idea, Joe. Kamala Harris is not popular, even among the liberals. [Here].

“Tess” (1979); this movie is somewhat rare; starring Nastassja Kinski. Directed by Roman Polanski. Say what you will about the Jew, Polanski, he’s a good director. [Movie; Duration is 2 hours, 51 minutes].

(Note: this post does not really relate to left-wing terrorism such as the Weathermen and Antifa; terrorism is a somewhat different matter; more below)[1].

The American Left keeps getting more extreme, more demanding with each generation. Like spoiled children, leftists are never satisfied with their prior political gains (which have been very significant!). They always want more, more, more. More laws. More funding. More mandates. More equality. More fairness. (Coming next: the “free everything” movement! Free housing, free food, free land, free electricity, free cars, free pets, free this, free that! All paid for by Whitey’s taxes). Will leftists ever be satisfied? No. Not as long as White men exist. The equalizing/leveling movements (feminism, anti-racism, “gay rights”) are ultimately anti-White, anti-male movements.

Anyway.

America first had the Old Left (circa 1920s-1950s), which was mostly concerned about labor issues (laws, unions, wages, etc.), not race. Then came the New Left (circa 1964-onward) birthed by the Jew, Herbert Marcuse. It was more radical, more college-based, and more concerned about race, feminism, “gay rights,” etc. And now, we have the New, Extreme Left (my term, birthed, it seems, circa 2012 during the Obama era). The New, Extreme Left (hereafter the NEL) is not satisfied with the “weak” gains made by the prior New Left regarding race, racism and sexual issues in America. The NEL is more radical, more impatient and more freaky than the prior Left [2]. It sees the prior gains of the New Left as ineffective and as “convenient political posturing.” Even before Trump Derangement Syndrome (which is real), the Left was becoming more extreme and demanding, e.g., private bakeries were being sued and harassed because they wouldn’t make “gay” wedding cakes (in 2012); also, the Left began voicing more-negative views about capitalism and more-positive views about socialism; it also began making more-frequent demands for slavery reparations. The NEL wants more regarding race and sexual issues (such as “transgender” mandates). Much more: more anti-racism laws and mandates, more environmentalism/green Marxism, more Cultural Marxism in general [3][4][5]. And the NEL is willing to use more-extreme measures to get what it wants, e.g., publicly harassing White people over their “racism,” doxxing them, committing/publicizing fake “hate crimes” almost monthly, and canceling peoples’ internet websites and social-media accounts (these are brazen free-speech violations). Further, today’s Left sees nothing wrong with giving drivers licenses to illegal aliens (which is a public-safety hazard), or letting them vote (that’s vote fraud) or attend college (at in-state tuition rates no less!).

.

[1] however, as one essay noted, “History shows that liberals need radicals. We need radicals because drastic change against entrenched evil and concentrated power requires personal bravery to the point of obsession.” — “The Dance of Liberals and Radicals” by Robert Kuttner, https://prospect.org, March 17, 2015.

[5] The Obama administration pushed “global warming/climate change” mandates hard. But president Trump later reversed them. Obama was very liberal and he ushered in the “nanny state” with his radical Obamacare health plan

This “changing-the-founding-date-of-America” thing is ridiculous. Because the U.S. did not exist until 1776. It (meaning “Britain’s 13-colony bloc in North America”) was still British territory in 1619. It was under the rule of a monarchy, by King James, King George, etc. The monarchy ultimately controlled policy regarding slavery, and other things, in the colonies in 1619 — in other words, the coming of slavery is actually British history, not American history!

News quote: “She then quoted someone she described (as) a “successful and insightful TV veteran” who said: “We are a cancer and there is no cure…But if you could find a cure, it would change the world.”

Yes, the media is a cancer, and it has been for decades. The media poisons America with false propaganda every day. Indeed, the media has the power to make millions of Americans behave in very unnatural ways.

But, if nothing else comes from the horrible year 2020, at least there was this ray of light: “The end of the mainstream media as we know it.” Some people already knew the truth about the mainstream media; however, the media has now been universally exposed as being completely biased, totally partisan, and shockingly untrustworthy. Heck, the media even politicized a deadly disease (Covid-19) and lied about its sometimes-cure (the drug hydroxychloroquine) solely to hurt Donald Trump politically! The media also fomented riots, by default, after the negro Saint George Floyd’s death in May. So much for objective journalism and professionalism; my God! No doubt we will all enjoy seeing media outlets go bankrupt in the next year. (And furthermore on this topic: who controls 90% of the mainstream media? A race/ethnic group posing as “just a religion” [i.e., Jews]).

“But a new study by Danish social scientist Emil Kirkegaard (right) has replicated the Pew Research findings with a vengeance, revealing that, in a huge dataset and on multiple different measures, being Left-wing predicts being mentally ill while being Right-wing is associated with sound mental health [Mental Illness and the Left, by Emil Kirkegaard, Mankind Quarterly, 2020].” [Here].

Okay. But, a rhetorical question: if that’s true, why does the U.S. government hate, demonize and attack the Right so much? (Think the Charlottesville rally and Roger Stone’s arrest, for examples).

“Justice requires equality before the law, which is an instance of equality of opportunity. It isn’t an equality of outcome. Opportunity is justly offered to all on equal terms. That doesn’t mean that everyone will be equally able to meet those terms. Some people will have more ability, more relevant merit, than other people do. When the law treats all persons equally, their life outcomes, their degrees of success, are always unequal. When outcomes are equalized, it always means that the law is unjust, favoring some people above others.”

“The races of humanity aren’t each others’ equals. Racial quality and racial equity (what is usually meant by “social justice”) are in conflict with each other. You can’t have one without sacrificing the other. If we go with quality, we reach the stars. If we go with equity, then we will see the tide recede in the evolution of life on Earth.”

[Here].