Vanguard News Network

Donald Trump will likely be re-elected (after all, he’s running against Joe “Where Am I?” Biden and the entire anti-America/anti-cop/anti-normal movement). Trump will also be picking at least one more conservative justice for the Supreme Court, making the court tip 6-3 in favor of the conservatives. (Liberals have always had a “thing” for the Supreme Court. Recall FDR’s failed plan to “pack” the Court).

Liberals must be panicking right about now. (Seems only fair. Liberals controlled America for 50 years: the Congress, the Supreme Court, the state legislatures, the governors, etc. They owned America for decades, since conservatives weren’t entering politics nearly as much as liberals; why do you think America is so damaged today?).

Listening to the media frenzy over Ginsburg’s passing, you’d think that Jesus, Elvis, and Gandhi had all just died at the same time, and not Ginsburg.

Why are they celebrating the life of Ginsburg, a Jewish leftist and former ACLU lawyer? She was one of those “progressive” fools who believe that the U.S. constitution is “a living document” — which is ridiculous. The idea that the constitution can be bent, twisted, shaped and stretched over the years to fit any situation is not only stupid but very dangerous. (Ginsburg’s fellow yid on the high court, Justice Louis Brandeis, was a big believer in the “constitution is a living document” nonsense, as early as 1928; see Brandeis’ dissent in Olmstead v. US [1928]. Indeed, the Jews are very fond of the “living document” idea. Look at the Roe v. Wade ruling [1973]. It wasn’t even based on constitutional law!).

One “conservative” TV pundit (a male) said that Donald Trump must pick a woman to replace Ginsburg on the court. Must! Yeah, suuure, let’s feminize the court even more than it has already been feminized. Others have joined in his calling for a woman only to replace her; that is Affirmation Action for the high court, and it’s very wrong.

(Above: the Appalachia region).

The Western world is White. It was founded by White people. So, even if Whites in America do have “White privilege,” what’s the point of mentioning it? That’s like saying “Black people in the Congo, or in Kenya, or in Nigeria, have Black privilege.” No doubt they do have Black privilege, because those countries are historically Black. What’s the point in mentioning it? That’s like saying “ice cream is cold.” Yes, it is. What’s the point? (Recall that “White privilege”/”White skin privilege” is a term that came from Marxists circa 1967. It’s a bogus term because it suggests that all White people have automatic, inborn privilege, when in fact they don’t. Many Whites are poor, e.g., in West Virginia and the Appalachia region; we don’t see them “cashing in” on their “skin privilege”; “White privilege” is just another attempt by the Marxists to pit people A against people B; such pitting is a specialty of the communists) [1].

.

[1] “Internally it (the communist party) thrives upon promoting clashes: Between employer and employee, landlord and tenant, white and negro, native-born and foreigner, Catholic, Protestant and Jew; between the America people and their government, and within every non-communist organization.” — U.S. Senate report on American communism, 1956

Isn’t it odd? People who mention Jewish billionaire George Soros (re: leftists, rioting and The Insurrection of 2020) soon find themselves shut down. Silenced. It’s almost as if mentioning Soros’ political activities is a deadly sin! (You can mention the political activities of the powerful Koch brothers. That’s fine. Because they’re not Jewish).

Here’s an article about Soros and why you should be concerned about his activities.

“We must make a clear-cut distinction between the vessel and its contents. The State is only the vessel and the race is what it contains. The vessel can have a meaning only if it preserves and safeguards the contents. Otherwise it is worthless.”

— Adolf Hitler; Mein Kampf; Chapter II: The State.

No wonder the elites hated Hitler: he wanted to preserve the White race. That is the opposite of modern America. Our government is doing its best to kill off White Americans via various methods: the pushing of “diversity,” passing hate-crime/hate-speech laws, etc. Just think if the U.S government had taken steps, circa 1870, to preserve White culture in America via federal law and via constitutional amendment? As it should have? America would not have its current problems.

(It’s about a year-long coal miner’s strike in Kentucky in 1973-1974).

As I watched this documentary, I was reminded of how close labor-union ideology is to communist ideology. They are nearly identical. Both of them pit person A (the worker) against person B (the company/boss) in a never-ending, hate-filled battle. Both invoke made-up “rights” that did not previously exist (e.g., “right to strike”; “worker’s rights”). Both are international in scope (most labor unions call themselves “The International Brotherhood of XXXXX”); both rely mostly on propaganda and on naive stooges to achieve their goals; of course, the labor union movement was created by Jews. It’s just another “Jewish adversary movement.” Labor-union demands caused at least half of all American manufacturing jobs to go overseas. The Rust Belt is the handiwork of unions. Labor unions also shrink the labor pool, which means less jobs are available since only union workers can work. (A personal note: my grandfather was a loyal union man; but he lost faith in unions after numerous strikes left him without work for many months; he wanted to work “scab” but was threatened about crossing a picket line. A curious word, “scab”: if you want to work, you’re a scab? Does that mean, if you don’t want to work, you aren’t a scab? By the way, scabs are actually good things: they cover a wound and promote healing; big money says that a Jew coined the term “scab.” And a final question: why are bus drivers union in some non-union states? In other words, why are people paying more money in those non-union states for bus rides when they don’t have to? Ditto cashiers at big supermarkets in non-union states: many, if not most, are union, which means a bigger grocery bill for you).

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“The fact is that we would have international chaos if everybody behaved the way the Jews do. So this raises two interesting questions: Why do the Jews behave the way they do? And why do we let them get away with it?

Well, I’ve already given an answer of a sort to the first question: the Jews behave the way they do because we let them behave that way; it’s just like the case of the bank robber, who will keep coming back until the bank guard stops being nice and shoots the robber. But there’s really more to it than that. No one else is even inclined to make the sort of demands on the rest of the world that the Jews do. The Jews really are different. Their religion provides a few clues in this regard. It is a religion which tells them that all the property of the Gentiles really should belong to Jews, that the Jews are entitled to it. It’s as blatant as anywhere in the 60th chapter of the book attributed to their prophet Isaiah, where they are told to keep their gates open all the time, so that all the wealth of the Gentiles can be brought to them. “Thou shalt suck the milk of the Gentiles,” the Jews are told. And if you think that doesn’t really mean what it sounds like it means, you should look into the Talmud, where the Jewish sages, the Jewish interpreters of the Bible, explain to the rest of the Jews what it means. The Talmud tells the Jews that only Jews are human beings, that the Gentiles are just animals created by the Jewish tribal god Yahweh to be used by the Jews, like other animals are used. Because Gentiles are merely animals, they can’t really own anything, and it is the duty of the Jews to make sure they don’t.”

[Article].

Audio: [Here].

When you make a deal with Jews, you lose. Every time. The Jews will always come out on top and you’ll always come out on the bottom; because sooner or later, the Jews will work around/violate any deal that you made with them.

(A news quote about the Abraham Accords): “Israel agreed to suspend a plan to annex the West Bank.” That’s funny, because they already have annexed it. But anyway, in other words, Israel will not build any more houses in the West Bank (land which Israel stole from Jordan in 1967) for 4 or 5 years, until Donald Trump leaves office. After that, Israel will forget about any deal with the Arabs. In fact, Israel broke the last Israeli/Arab accords (i.e., the 1993 Oslo Accords).

Both the Oslo Accords and the Abraham Accords were clever smoke-and-mirrors for Israel: they were designed to look important and impressive, but in reality these types of accords only allow Israel to stall for time while it increases apartheid against the Arabs and makes Israel more and more Jewish each year [1].

.

[1] The Jews now control 78% of Palestine, which is way up from the 56% of Palestine that the 1947 UN Partition Plan gave them even though they were only 40% of the population back then (granted, the UN plan wasn’t ratified since war broke out)

Remember this: liberal policies always do the opposite of what they intend to do.

Re: the ongoing wildfires in the western United States: As you can read here, the liberal media is trying to make a big deal out of the fact that most land in the liberal states (e.g., California) is either federally-owned or privately-owned and therefore not under state (i.e., liberal) control. But that’s not true. Thanks to liberal (“green”) state laws, it’s often illegal for private landowners to cut or clear away unwanted brush on their own land. Hence the reason why so many acres are burning in California, Oregon and Washington. But of course, the liberals blame “climate change” and Donald Trump for the wildfires! In California, private landowners must submit a “Timber Harvest Plan” to the state government in order to clear brush — i.e., they must get written permission from the government to clear brush on their own land! How Soviet! But only about 1/3 of those landowners are granted such permission. That’s the real reason California is experiencing lots of wildfires. Ditto the other liberal states. (Also, as several people have already observed: if the wildfires are really caused by global warming/climate change, why did all of the fires stop at the Canadian border?)

(Above: the one-man-band Jack Greenberg, who played numerous “instruments” in the American civil-rights movement).

Jews, not Blacks, founded the NAACP (which might seem odd at first, until you understand the Jews: they always champion “the outsiders” over the White people, because they themselves are the eternal outsiders, and because they are also “natural subversives behind the enemy lines,” always causing trouble for Whites because that’s what they naturally do; just as frogs hop, Jews subvert; it’s in their DNA).

But what about other ethnic organizations in America?

Quoting the late, Jewish, NAACP lawyer Jack Greenberg (1924-2016), concerning the Mexican-American civil-rights group called MALDEF:

“Okay. Well, I’m pleased to say that, um, um, I was the founder of MALDEF [Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.]. And the reason is that we were in a number of cases asked by some Mexican-American lawyers in the Southwest to help them out or take over some cases. And they were – at that time I had a survey made. There was no Mexican-American lawyer who had a full set of the Federal Reporter in his office. So, without that, you really couldn’t handle a case in federal court.”
— Jack Greenberg, from an oral history interview, July 2011.