Vanguard News Network

“When Victims Rule” by JewishTribalReview.org, circa 2006.

“The Jew cries out in pain as he beats you.”

[Book; a .PDF file].

While 4-part-harmony “barbershop” music (meaning four men singing a cappella together, with no instruments used) was sometimes performed by Black people in the 1800s, it was largely a White thing, and it still is [1]. Today, PC historians try to claim that Blacks invented barbershop music. Nope. Blacks didn’t invent peanut butter, either. One of the earliest barbershop groups in America was Dan Emmett’s Virginia Minstrels, who were White men who sung in blackface. (Emmett wrote the famous song “Dixie”: “I wish I was in the land of cotton, old times there are not forgotten; Look away, look away, look away, Dixie Land”).

American barbershop music, which was here as early as 1843, grew from actual barbershop singing (in barbershops; hence the name) in England, and was popular here until circa 1925, when jazz began to eclipse it. (English barbershop music used instruments, unlike in America, although Emmett’s group did play instruments as well as sing a cappella).

Today, you can hear barbershop music all over America, and it’s good music with lots of talented White singers. It’s difficult to sing a cappella well since there are no instruments to hide any mistakes that you make.

More about barbershop music [Here; a .PDF file]. (Consider this quote from the .PDF file about barbershop music/ethnicity: “While the Black quartets influenced the barbershop tradition, the latter was primarily centered on both White culture and White participation as it continued to develop.”).

Here is a famous barbershop group, The Buffalo Bills.

.

[1] the 4 harmony parts are: soprano, alto, tenor and bass

They call feminism “the destroyer” for good reason.

Feminism, as we know it today at least, emerged in force in the Western world circa 1972 (remember the infamous Billy Jean King/Bobby Riggs tennis match in 1973?) [1].

Maternal bonding (i.e., mother/child bonding during the first year or so after childbirth) is “essential” for normal infant development, said one expert.

Feminism ruins maternal bonding. If Mommy is always absent from the home due to work, the child won’t bond with her properly.

Most criminals never properly bonded with their mothers [2]. Which is probably why they are in prison. Child/mother bonding during the first several years of a child’s life is crucial, with the first year being probably the most critical.

It’s downright abnormal for a woman to deliver a baby and then, just 8 weeks after maternity leave, return to work at that shiny office building downtown to work for Mr. Goldberg doing unimportant tasks like answering the telephone (let Goldberg answer his own phone). Eight-to-ten weeks (on maternity leave) is not at all enough time to properly bond with your child. It requires a year at the least and maybe longer than that. In fact, it could be argued that early-return-to-work is a form of child abuse.

.

[1] the King/Riggs game

[2] “There is increasing evidence from the fields of development psychology, neurobiology and animal epigenetic studies that neglect, parental inconsistency and a lack of love can lead to long-term mental health problems as well as to reduced overall potential and happiness.” — from a 2016 British child-care study titled “The Importance of Early Bonding on the Long-Term Mental Health and Resilience of Children”

Some time ago, I read an interesting magazine article about a White American man who was forced to move to El Salvador or Guatemala or some other Brown country as part of his job. He was a manager at some big corporation back East.

He told several funny, but sad, stories about how it is very difficult to get good mechanical repair service in Brown countries. The repairmen don’t operate on “White time,” instead, they operate on “Brown time” — which could be 6 hours later than the pre-arranged “White time” appointment. Repairmen in Brown countries are notoriously incompetent. They all come from the “just use a bigger hammer” school of repair. Just whack it harder! They may, or may not, fix your refrigerator or air conditioner correctly. It’s a 50/50 gamble. Your device may or may not work tomorrow. It might explode as well! (Tell me again why Brown immigration into America is a good thing).

He said that he was very glad to return to America 2 years later.

The very idea that the Indians “owned” America circa 1820! Most Indian tribes had summer and winter camps. They would move back-and-forth as the seasons changed. But that doesn’t stop the liberals from moaning about how Whites “stole” Indian land. (Granted, a few western Indians lived in permanent, cliff dwellings in the rocks of New Mexico and Arizona, e.g., the Anasazi). And then, there’s Kennewick Man to further spoil the liberal “theft” argument. (“Native American” has a lot of different meanings. The first “Native Americans” were Eurasians who came here by crossing the Beringia land bridge circa 11,000 BC. Some Eurasians were no doubt White, since “Eurasian” covers a lot of different types of people. So the Indian “claim” to American land is non-existent).

[Article], [Article] and [Article].

It looks like Team Trump has found good evidence of vote fraud. For example: [Here] and [Here].

If Donald Trump enacts partial martial law (i.e., military law takes over) due to the 2020 vote fraud, then the vote fraudsters will likely be arrested by the U.S. military, and taken to/held at military bases, where the fraudsters’ Jewish lawyers can’t bail them out. They could be held for a long time before trial. They could also face eventual execution for treason or sedition. (The rule that “civilians may not be tried by military tribunals as long as civilian courts are functional” may not apply here, given Trump’s Executive Order of 2018 which established a “national emergency” then; that EO is still valid).

If I were one of the vote fraudsters, I’d be getting scared right about now. (It’s going to be curious to see how many vote fraudsters there are: 100? 500? 1,000? And who directed the fraud?).

I’ve noticed a curious thing about Jews over the years.

When you first meet a Jew, he will, somehow, let you know that he’s a Jew. It’s almost like he has to, for some deep emotional reason; perhaps not immediately, but soon after you meet; he’ll drop a “my rabbi said such-and-such” comment or he’ll mention his bar mitzvah, or something. He’ll let you know he’s a Jew, somehow, some way. Sooner or later.

But, if you, a gentile, “out” him by telling other gentiles that he’s a Jew, he’ll accuse you of anti-Semitism.

In other words, he can and will “out” himself as a Jew, but you can’t “out” him, or else you hate Jews.

Mainstream liberalism has no map and no compass, i.e., ideologically speaking, leftists just wander about, like a man lost in the woods. Directionless. They have no actual game plan. They just follow the liberal line, which is: “oppose anything that seems conservative and use violence when necessary.”

According to leftists, one minute “race” matters, but the next minute it doesn’t matter. One day race doesn’t even exist, but the next day the liberals are moaning about how evil White people are! Money and wealth are evil, say the leftists, yet some of the richest people in America are leftists (e.g., Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg). Congress is full of wealthy liberals (e.g., Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi). Somehow, liberals don’t care if other liberals are rich. But if conservatives are rich, that keeps them up at night.

According to the liberals, one minute there is an important thing known as sex/gender, but the next minute it doesn’t matter what sex/gender you are, because all humans are the same!

It must be very confusing to be a leftist. Nothing is concrete in leftism. The political goalposts move constantly. It’s Alice-In-Wonderland-ish. Socialists are called “democrats.” Even Marxists are called “democrats.” In the liberal mind, everyone on the Left is a democrat.

Actually, I’m sort of kidding here because I’m treating leftism as a political ideology. It isn’t. It’s more like a cult that has no actual beliefs other than hate — you just show up and you’re a member of it just by being there and hating most of the people in America. So pay no attention to what I just wrote above. There’s really only one thing you need to know about leftism: it isn’t a political ideology per se. It doesn’t need to be coherent. It doesn’t need doctrines and tenets and beliefs. Because it’s only a weapon. That’s all it is. Liberalism is a wrecking ball being used against White Western culture. Leftism amounts to: “tear it all down! Destroy America and the West! Wreck everything traditional! Burn it all!” That’s what liberalism is about. Just like Marxism. It need not be coherent or sensible. Liberals build nothing. They only tear down. That’s all they do. Liberalism won’t be satisfied until Western culture is destroyed — and then the liberals will have to find something else to destroy.

Williams said something important back in January 2002: he said that, when the White people finally left Africa (in other words, when White rule ended there), Africa went sour. Because Africa needed White people to keep it running smoothly. Here’s the quote: “The tragic fact of business is that ordinary Africans were better off under colonialism.” Wow! Who’da thunkit?? [Article].

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“The subject is the general decline in moral fitness of White Americans. In fact, I believe this moral decline is an affliction not just of Americans, but of White people nearly everywhere. I don’t want the word moral to be misunderstood here. I’m not talking at all about the same thing some Christians refer to when they lament the decline of morals in America. I’m not talking about sex, for example.

By moral fitness I mean such things as strength of character, toughness, degree of self-discipline, willingness to endure hardship. But moral fitness is more than that. Being morally fit also means having an internal code of behavior and sticking to it. It means having values and standards that one applies in a systematic way to guiding one’s own behavior and to judging the behavior of other people. It means having some purpose in one’s life and directing one’s life in accord with that purpose.”

[Article].

Audio version: [Here].