Vanguard News Network

Circa 1990, the police raided a retail store in my city. It seems that the owners of the store were holding $500-per-pot poker games in the back room at night. This was called “sinful” and “corrupting” and so forth. A dozen people were arrested, old people were man-handled, etc. The store was closed for some time — perhaps even permanently.

Yet, the U.S. stock market (a giant gambling operation based in New York City) is called “good.” It’s perfectly legal.

State lotteries from Florida to California are called “wholesome family fun.” They are perfectly legal as well. (I’ve seen people blow an entire paycheck on a lottery ticket. Yeah, real wholesome…“honey, why is the fridge empty?”).

What nonsense. If someone wants to gamble, let them. It should not be a crime. It’s their money to lose, if they want to. (Trivia: your retirement money is linked to the stock market by your financial planners: if “the market” collapses, poof!, there goes your retirement! Better luck next time!).

Now, both houses of the U.S. government are rushing to hold hearings, not on the November 2020 election fraud (no, no!), but on a stock market controversy which emerged just a few days ago. The government has priorities, you see. Election fraud? No problem. Orange Man Bad is out. Next. But “trouble” in “the market”? Investigate at once! Leave no stone unturned! A crisis!

[Article] and [Article].

Short novel: “The Old Man and the Sea” by Ernest Hemingway (1952). [Here].

For opposing the brutal, Marxist government, these guys ended up in prison doing hard time. Sad. If the American government were really a friend of freedom and peace, it would have toppled the Cuban government years ago via various methods. (What about the 1961 “The Bay of Pigs” invasion, you say? That wasn’t even supposed to succeed. It was only supposed to temporarily appease right-wingers in America; And 17 years later, America “thanked” Nicaraguan leader Somoza for his major help with that Cuban invasion by watching the communists — with help from Cuba! — attack and rape Nicaragua. We did nothing to help Somoza repel the communists, even though we could have easily done so) [1]. No good deed goes unpunished!

[Article].

.

[1] Quoting Somoza, re: The Bay of Pigs invasion: “All was in readiness, but at the last moment, orders came from the White House to cancel fighter support for the invading Cubans. Only President Kennedy and his brother, Bobby, knew why this decision was made. It was a U.S.-planned and U.S.-financed operation and, in the end, it was a U.S. decision that led to disaster for the invasion force and permitted Castro to remain in power.”

“If the United States had lived up to her commitment to the Bay of Pigs invaders, there would be no Castro on the scene today, and the Communists would not have Nicaragua.” — from Anastasio Somoza’s book “Nicaragua Betrayed” (1981).

This is very disturbing, considering the information below:

“Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner? Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order? Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times”? If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents.”

Most normal people would answer “yes” to some, or even most, of the above.

How ironic that, thanks to the psychological feature called Affect Intensity, the political Left is much more prone to violence than the Right. For example, the Marxist group called Weather Underground committed at least 25 bombings in 1974/1975, including at the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon, the California Attorney General’s office, and a New York City police station. Even worse than that, hundreds of left-wing-committed bombings occurred in America during the early and middle 1970s [1]. Hundreds! So why don’t we ever hear about those bombings today? Name a right-wing group that has committed even 10 bombings anywhere. You can’t. (Curiously, the Weathermen, later called Weather Underground, was led by Jewish radicals, such as Terry Robbins, Ted Gold and John Jacobs; Robbins and Gold were killed accidentally in 1970 by one of their own nail-studded shrapnel bombs).

Today, for entirely political reasons, leftists are not considered to be “potential terrorists.” Only right-wingers are! This stinks. It’s a fraud and a lie.

[Article].

.

[1] see the news article “The Bombings of America That We Forgot” by Bryan Burrough, in Time magazine, September 20, 2016.

On January 6, 1941, the crippled, left-wing pinko and nation-wrecker Franklin D. Roosevelt made his famous “Four Freedoms” speech, which was likely written by one of his Jewish speechwriters such as Sam Rosenman. In his address, Roosevelt talked of a future world in which four freedoms would be guaranteed to everybody: freedom of speech and expression, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear. (I would have added “and free tacos for everyone standing under 6-foot-6 inches!” but he didn’t ask me…).

Okay, FDR, if we really have freedom of speech, why is everybody being deplatformed and banned on social media today? Hmmmm? Where is our freedom today, commie-boy? By defeating Germany, FDR and his hebes actually paved the way for anti-White tyranny in 2021.

Black people are everywhere today: on the TV, in the movies, and now they’re going to be on our money! Why? A good question, indeed. Why?

Here’s a news quote: “The Biden administration says it is “exploring ways to speed up” release of $20 bills featuring abolitionist Harriet Tubman after the Trump administration delayed the move first initiated by President Barack Obama.”

“Speed up” the release of Tubman bills? Why? Is she going somewhere? I think she died!

Harriet Tubman is a fraud, of course. Most “magic negroes” are. She wasn’t a founder, nor an important governmental person in our history. Her biography is 90% fake and fawning, just like that of Rosa Parks, MLK Jr., etc. So why should she be on the $20 bill? By the way, Tubman will replace President Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill — so, in other words, Tubman is now more important than a White president!

Like most magic negroes, Tubman was “built” by a Jew, in this case Earl Conrad (1912-1986; real name Earl Cohen), who was a communist, a labor organizer and a writer; he wrote for a newspaper in Auburn, New York in the 1930s. Long a champion of all things negro, “Conrad” later worked for a Black newspaper in Chicago and wrote a biography of Tubman in 1943 (which flopped and quickly vanished) and a bio of Black actress Dorothy Dandridge as well. He also wrote “Jim Crow America” and “The Invention of the Negro.” Yes, “Conrad” liked the darkies! The lighties, not so much.

One expert said that if not for “Conrad,” few people would know anything about Tubman, since no books about her had previously appeared in the 20th century except for “Conrad’s.”

[Article].

(Did you know that Britain has turned so far to the Left that it has “racism police”? Yes. Racism police! They are euphemistically called “Community Safety Units” or also “Community Cohesion Units.” They “fight racism” (but only White racism — I’ll bet you $50.00 cash on that). It’s just like being inside the book “1984” by George Orwell, only it’s 2021 instead of 1984. Worse, in Britain, the “victims” of “hate” decide if the “hate” is actually “hate” or just another paranoid persecution fantasy [1]).

In Britain today, even if you’re a cop, you cannot share a meme of a Black criminal/drug addict who ODed in U.S. police custody. If you do, you’ll face criminal charges, like this guy. Floyd wasn’t even British! And he was a thug and an ex-con! [Article].

.

[1] The UK government says this about “hate” (bold text is mine): “Second, the working definitions of hate incidents and hate crimes in England and Wales are broad. Under these definitions, the “perception of the victim or any other person is the defining factor in determining a hate incident” — so, if Crazy Joe Tranny decides that you have harassed him, oops, her, because, well, he’s, oops, she’s a crazy tranny, then that’s all the cops need to arrest you, or at least file your name in a computer database of “haters.” [Here].

“Gruesome Harvest” by Ralph Keeling (1947).

After the “allies” were finished destroying the German military machine in 1945, they set their sights on the innocent citizens of Germany: women, children, the elderly. Make no mistake: this was the world’s biggest “hate crime.” Women were raped. Men were murdered. Elderly people starved to death. Millions of German civilians suffered terribly. All because the Jews wanted revenge on the people who resisted the New World Order (a.k.a., the Jew World Order).

Here’s the intro to the book:

“On May 8, 1945 the shooting ended in Europe. But, shockingly, the war against Germany went on. Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill had decreed that the German people must suffer–and suffer they did. Driven from their homes, looted of their property, decimated by famine and disease, raped, robbed, and enslaved, millions of Germans–most of them women and children–bore the brunt of what Time magazine called “history’s most terrifying peace”. Gruesome Harvest was one of the first books in America to sound the alarm against the victor’s postwar war against the Germans.”

[Book].

“Please note that “equity” is the term now used to dog-whistle to the woke that you intend “equality of outcome” rather than “equality of opportunity.” Politicians who demand “equity” are demanding, in effect, quotas at the expense of the careers of competent white men and their families.” [Article].

“Neoconservatives and their apologists would have the public believe that the neocons were former Leftists who saw the light and came to reject liberal or Marxist ideology as a matter of conviction and principle. Regrettably, this official line has come to be conventional wisdom, no doubt reflecting neocon efforts to hide the fact that their transformation was neither sincerely motivated nor sincerely enacted. To understand the real agenda that drove and continues to drive much of neoconservatism, one needs to look back to the origins of the movement and the cultural backgrounds of those who lead it.”

[Article].