Thoughts About the Lies Surrounding Gender and Sex
Posted by Socrates in "woke", 'sex-change', 'social construction', 'transgender', Cultural Marxism, culture of critique, leftism, leftist/liberal hate, leftists, leftists-as-liars, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, Max Scheler at 3:36 pm | 
Permanent Link
Q: If gender is only a social construct, why would someone identify as “transgender”? In other words, why would someone say, “I transformed from one gender to another gender” if gender was merely a “social construct” (i.e., not real, not natural)? [1][2].
A: They couldn’t identify as “transgender” if gender didn’t exist! More proof that the fag lobby is either lying, or, lying! Understanding leftists begins with this fact: they play word games. Clever word games designed to fool the people. Leftists are liars who champion freaks and weirdos because they are also freaks and weirdos: unhappy people who hate themselves. First, the liberals say, “gender is mental, it’s an identity, so it’s not physical,” but then, 2 days later, they are saying that someone who had his penis removed and replaced with a “mangina” is a “transgender person.” But, I thought gender was only mental? Why are they getting “manginas” installed? That’s physical, not mental. It requires special surgery.
And another thing: a person isn’t “assigned” a gender at birth. That (cleverly) sounds like he/she is “given a gender by a doctor.” Not! He/she is born male or female. The evil, White male patriarchy doesn’t “force their genders upon them”! (One leftist [again cleverly] said that labelling people by gender/sex “is like putting people into boxes.” Okay, but guess what: 99.999% of the people of America fit into only two boxes: male or female. Just two boxes! The Left is championing a very tiny percentage of freaks, maybe .001 percent of the total population. Why is the Left wasting so much time and money championing a tiny group of freaks? Because leftism is ultimately a weapon used against White Western culture and it has been used with vigor since circa 1960)[3].
.
.
[1] “gender” used to refer only to grammar (i.e., words, such as “he” and “she” and “her”). But then the fag lobby hijacked “gender” to mean whatever they want it to mean: sometimes it means “biological sex” and sometimes not, depending on the day, the week, or the month.
[2] “social construct” = something that was made by society, by the dominant culture (i.e., by evil White males in positions of authority! Oh, how dare they!). In other words, for example, the dominant culture, long ago, decided that there are “two sexes/genders” and then forced everyone to go along with that construct; a social construct is not natural, per se. It’s man-made. It’s forced upon the citizens. Social constructionism is the main part of creepy postmodernist philosophy (which is a critical theory and therefore is Cultural Marxism) and it’s 90% Jewish in origin. See elsewhere on this blog.
[3] In his 1994 book “The Sacred Chain: The History of the Jews,” the late Jewish author Norman F. Cantor notes on page 421 that the infamous Jew, Claude Levi-Strauss, an “anthropologist,” could be considered a godfather of left-wing thought, since Levi-Strauss developed/galvanized the concept of the ‘bad’ White world vs. the ‘good’ non-White world, which Cantor calls “the cardinal doctrine of all leftist-leaning thought since 1960” (Dr. William Pierce used to sell this informative book).