Thoughts on “Free Trade”
Posted by Socrates in communism, free trade, geographical Marxism, globalization, Marxism, Marxism and equality, Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 1:54 pm | 
Permanent Link
(Food for thought: this “interdependence” that Pierce talks about could be called “geographical Marxism.” Meaning: using “free trade” to make all countries dependent on, and therefore equal to, each other, politically, economically, militarily, etc. This is a twist on regular Marxism, since it does not seek to overthrow governments, but instead seeks to work with existing governments of various political persuasions).
by Dr. William Pierce.
[…]
“We are now, however, seeing one of the pitfalls I warned against back during the debate over “free trade.” We are seeing what “interdependence” really means. “Interdependence” is one of those very trendy concepts which is fashionable among air-headed liberals and also is being pushed very enthusiastically by hardheaded Jewish media bosses. The idea is that no country — with the exception of Israel, of course — should be independent and autonomous. Autonomy has been given a nasty flavor by these people. To them it is a Politically Incorrect concept. It is a bit like fascism or racism, they would have us believe. What we should have instead of independence and autonomy is interdependence: that is, all of the countries of the world dependent on each other to such a degree that no country can act unilaterally on any matter, but must first obtain the consent of all of the other countries on which it is dependent: like a big “family of nations,” a very fashionable idea in this feminine era, a very warm and fuzzy sounding idea, the sort of idea in favor with the Clinton crowd and with air-heads generally.”