Constitution? What Constitution?
Posted by Socrates in guns & goy controllers, guns and gun issues, jewed culture, jewed law, military, militias, Socrates, War On White Males, War On White People at 1:27 pm | 
A Jewish mayor in Illinois ignores the 2nd Amendment and instigates a ban on so-called “assault rifles” (by the way, an “assault rifle” is a fully-automatic machine gun. Most people don’t own machine guns. They own semi-automatic versions of them). The 2nd Amendment doesn’t mention any specific types of guns, only “arms.” Newbies, the gun-control movement in America is mostly Jewish-led [1][2]. (Note: if any gun is suitable for “militia” use, it’s the so-called “assault weapon.” It’s based on a military gun. In other words, those guns should be the last guns anybody would want to ban)[3].
[1] in the border areas of Israel, Jewish civilians can legally carry fully-automatic assault rifles, i.e., machine guns. How ironic!
[2] a list of Jewish gun-banners
[3] the 2nd Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”
6 April, 2018 at 11:06 pm
“Deerfield Mayor Harriet Rosenthal…”
Every. Single. Time.
6 April, 2018 at 11:07 pm
“Deerfield Mayor Harriet Rosenthal…”
Every. Single. Time.
7 April, 2018 at 7:37 am
Good post.
8 April, 2018 at 9:42 pm
A reasonable interpretation of the 2nd Amendment would be to grant citizens access to weapons sufficient to defending the republic and The Bill of Rights from Government tyrants. 38s won’t get the job done. An AR-15 in the hands of millions will