Vanguard News Network

Western philosophy is full of influential people: Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Kant. But their ideas are outdated. The Western philosophy of old no longer matters. It’s moot now. Times have changed. Western culture is under constant assault today. But Western culture must survive, and in order to survive, White Nationalism (WN) must become the official philosophy of White people — that means all White people: Sally Soccermom, Joe and Suzy Suburbia, all of them, from California to Maine.

To help White Western culture survive, it would make sense that a leading White Nationalist philosopher be adopted and used by White activists, i.e., the philosopher’s writings and speeches should be made available to the White citizens as much as reasonably possible; granted, this has already happened to some degree, but often White activists quote themselves instead of quoting leading WN philosophers. As for the question, “which White Nationalist philosopher should be adopted/used by activists?,” this essay was written to address that. (Some White activists might ask, “why focus on the works of only one leading WN philosopher?” and my answer is: simplicity. Simpler is better; do people worship three gods?).

Who is, historically speaking, the “king” of White Nationalism? Probably Adolf Hitler. But that’s a problem for us, since, thanks to the Jewish media and Jewish Hollywood, Hitler is universally hated and so adopting him as the top WN philosopher for today is really difficult; even “conservatives” despise him. In the mind of Joe Sixpack, trying to champion Hitler is like trying to champion Satan.

That, it would seem, leaves either George Lincoln Rockwell, David Duke, Dr. Revilo Oliver or Dr. William L. Pierce to replace Hitler as the premier WN philosopher for today (I’m leaving out Alfred Rosenberg and Alex Linder on purpose) — someone to quote, emulate, follow and rally around [1]. No offense to Rockwell or Oliver, but Pierce gets my vote. He has the intelligence, the credentials (a Ph.D. from a well-known American university) and his just-the-facts style is perfect for the White layman. Pierce’s calm and reasonable philosophy (which is thankfully preserved in text, on audio and on video) will be vital during the next century. There is even a book about Pierce for those who want a more in-depth study of him [2].
.

[1] like Hitler, Rosenberg has too much historical baggage; ditto Rockwell with his “Hitler worship”; Duke is a Christian and Christianity is Jewish at its core — see the Old Testament; Linder is a very good philosopher already, but he seems too young to be in the same league yet as Pierce or Oliver, but maybe I’m wrong and he already is?; Pierce has some historical baggage, but not enough, in my opinion, to take him out of the running for top WN philosopher for today; as for Oliver, there’s not enough audiotape of him speaking, while there is lots of audiotape of Pierce; furthermore, while Pierce isn’t exactly a charismatic speaker, Oliver is even less so, in my opinion

[2] the book about Pierce is called “The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds” (2001) by Robert S. Griffin