10 June, 2015

Montana’s Unconstitutional Hate-Speech Law

Posted by Socrates in 'hate', 'hate' laws, hate speech, jewish hate & hypocrisy, Jewish history, judaism, Socrates, Talmud at 11:14 am | Permanent Link

Hate speech? If anyone could be charged with hate speech, it’s the Jews. Their book, the Talmud, is filled with hatred against gentiles. Below are some examples and where they’re located in the Talmud [1].

[Article].

.

[1] gentiles mentioned as being unclean, like animals:

“A certain man was pouring wine from one jar into another by means of a tube, when a Goi came along and touched the tube with his hand. As a result all the wine (in both jars) had to be thrown away.” — Abhodah Zarah (72b)

“If a Jew buys a vessel for use at table from an Akum, whether it is made of metal, glass or lead, even if it is new, he must wash it in a Mikvah [a large basin], or in a cistern which holds forty quarts of water.” — Iore Dea (120,1)


  • 3 Responses to “Montana’s Unconstitutional Hate-Speech Law”

    1. nom nom nom Says:

      “A Jew was pouring wine from one jar into another by means of a tube, when an African-American came along and touched the tube with his hand. As a result all the wine (in both jars) had to be thrown away.” — Abhodah Zarah (72b)

    2. fd Says:

      David Lenio must learn to fly below the radar. The schizophrenia, mixed government is a joke. The Federal and state constitutions and the Bills of Rights are overlaid with laws. We’re down to guerrilla warfare—hit and run.

      The 14th amendment police state believes that being right wins the case. That’s funny.

    3. CW-2 Says:

      The ridiculous concept of ‘hate speech’ is indicative of a gelded anti-masculine society. It is a silly fluffy feminine idea of niceness in the face of danger. The supporters of such ideas will be the first casualties in the coming conflicts. Nature will pronounce her harsh judgement.