Vanguard News Network

It looks as if the Shitcago Spittoon is really desperate for new subscribers. So much so that I couldn’t even read the stupid liberal’s article without some pop-up ad constantly getting in the way begging for money. Good riddance to that Jewspaper. And to hell with Shitcago, too.

Correct, Tim McGreen. The Jew papers across the country are desperate to publish any article to fill space that is destitute of an add to help make their payroll.

Most U.S. kids don’t live in ‘traditional’ homes, and that’s OK
[email protected]

Less than half of kids in the United States now live in a “traditional” family, as defined by a new Pew Research Center report: two heterosexual parents who are both in their first marriage. (Albert Mollon, Getty)
Less than half of American kids live in a “traditional” home, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of 2013 American Community Survey data.
Another point worth noting: Fifteen percent of kids live with two parents who are in a remarriage, according to the study. Meaning at least 61 percent of kids (46 plus 15) are living in households with two parents — even more if we consider all the partnered same-sex parents who were counted as “single” here.
So while some will read this data as a societal shunning of traditional values, I read it — at least in part — as a societal willingness to embrace an ever-widening definition of family.
We’re increasingly able to shape our lives in ways that would have been socially impossible in decades past — extracting ourselves from unhappy marriages, creating homes with committed same-sex partners and fulfilling lifelong dreams of parenthood despite marital status.
Certainly children enjoy countless advantages when they’re raised in homes with two loving, engaged parents. There’s no question. But an honest look at the data indicates the number of children living with two parents hasn’t dipped since 1980, and has possibly even risen.
It’s also worth considering the newly released National Child and Youth Well-Being Index, produced annually by Duke University, which, as we discussed last week, shows that violent crimes, suicide rates and teen births have decreased significantly in the past two decades, as have smoking and binge drinking. High school graduation rates, bachelor’s degrees earned and preschool enrollments, meanwhile, are on the rise.
Change can be good. So can tradition. Thankfully, we live in a world with room enough for both.

The article in TOO is very interesting, but more important are the postings/comments. The latest one written by “David” is the best for some time. He correctly rejects the dead-ends of false optimism and false pessimism. We still have everything to play for but victory can only be achieved by confidence, energy and strong willingness to work hard and fight hard. Think of the great Nathan Bedford Forrest!

No, non-traditional families are not ok and acceptance of them will destroy this nation which of course is the goal of the kikocracy. I believe growing up in a non-traditional family can lead to confusion, anger, violence and induce sociopathic personality traits. They say sociopaths/psychopaths only comprise 4% of the population but anyone who doesn’t reside in an ivory tower and has lived in with the real world knows that figure is much higher in the kwa.

Of course, the kikocracy is so fixated on destroying the white race of North America that in so doing both diaspora jewry and izzy will lose their chief enforcer, protector and benefactor. In other words, since the jew is the parasite and we are the host, if we die so does jewry and their beloved little hate state in the Levant.

The man in the sky: Jill Mustang and Big Jim Jesus are proof that Christians invoke their god against their enemies. My god–the Jew god–is going to beat you up.

Jill and Jim, do you not recall fd’s recommendation that marriage be replaced by co-habitation? That’s how most of our ancestral parents lived with each other for thousands of years and it seemed to work very well.

As you should know marriage was originally a pagan, not a Christian institution. The pagans understood marriage correctly, it was a sober social/legal contract and not the sentimental, irrational expression of bourgeois respectability that it became during the Victorian era. Only those with wealth, property and titles need to get married so as to legally protect their estates and to make sure they get passed along to the desired recipients. For most everyone else co-habitation should be sufficient.

The divorce rate in America is probably 80%. It’s not working. Cohabitation free of the harsh regimentation of the establishment is healthy and natural. It’s all about the couple. Accept all gifts :)

Jill Mustang and Big Jim Jesus, you’d argue with an echo. Your religion is based on Jewish scriptures written by greasy hook-nose kikes.

In extreme contrast, I live in accordance with the eternal laws of nature which no art can overturn.

It is true that in traditional societies, marriages were arranged.

I have seen quite a few of these where the two partners did indeed “fall in love” and transcend what started as largely a business dealing. These were arranged by wise parents, who knew their children.

But I have also many marriages in the West, where the partners thought themselves to be in love, and then the marriage turned into a sham, with both sides scrambling for the money.

I don’t think there is a clear-cut answer, in the hyper-individualized West. Modern times, also, have changed the nature of the life-struggle. Birth control, also, has made sacred sex into a game of human flesh meat-joining among the unmarried.

But I can understand the feelings of those who want their marriage to be more than a business partnership. They want romance, a term which indeed harkens back to ancient, pagan Rome.

You do not have to be Christian to have this attitude. Nor do you have to be Christian to believe that marriage is for life, and between a man and a woman.

But Christianity has often been anti-romantic. Paul advised Christians that it was better to take a wife than to burn with lust. This is not romance; this is also a “business” relationship—having a wife as a sex-mate while she cleans and cooks (even considering the historical context). And many people have thought that the teachings of Luther did much to destroy any feelings of romance among the Germans.

This pragmatic attitude toward man/woman relations is repulsive to many people. They see it as industrial and soul-less.

Common sense is not being too liberal, Tim McGreen. The couples living together in the 1970s (shackin’ up) seemed so much happier than couples who chose regimented marriage and the approval of the status quo. Cohabitation is not rocket science: food, clothes, shelter, reproduction.

Thanks for the info. I knew about Johnny Winter but not the others mentioned.

Janis Joplin grew up in Port Arthur which is near Beaumont where Johnny Winter is from.

Miss Mustang, what you describe is normal human behavior.

I can well see Druids, worshippers of Mithras, or Zoroastrians giving each other the same knowing winks, nudges, etc. about a young couple in their midst, and having the same delight, the same remembrances about their youthful days.

And it would not have anything to do with a church, that organization that says that a Christian Bantu is your “brother” . . . no, it would have to do with a pagan religion that sprang from blood and soil, and which ministers to those people ONLY of that blood and soil, and has priests accordingly.

And as far as “virtue”—-that largely came from the Greeks.

But I think that people do want their acts consecrated by ceremonies; hence, funerals, weddings, baptisms, pledgings of troth, etc.

People want to have a concept of the Holy. And, as Sri Sreggin Das said, you do not have to be Christian to have it. In fact, it may be argued that Christianity DISENCHANTED human life.

Why are the Christian churches emptying? Because they have become rootless and cosmopolitan. They don’t or won’t address our feelings of ‘blood and soil’.