Vanguard News Network

The Ejew had a number of disguises and name changes. It initially grew out of the European iron and steel trade agreements of the 1950’s, then became the ‘Common Market’, the ‘European Economic Community’, the ‘European Community’, and finally the ‘European Union’.
For the time being the EU is not openly Marxist, it doesn’t have to be, it’s policies of bureaucratic globalization and stripping of national soverignty are working as intended to prevent any protest at the suicidal importation into Europe of every form of turd world vermin.
There is a glimmer of hope, big jew’s determination to integrate the disparate Euro countries is driving the national economies so far from any natural equilibrium that dangerous instability will be normal.

Here’s irony: while the Zionist powers-that-be in America relentless suppress the average American through globalist and multi-cultural protocols (the likely end, conscription for a ‘total war’ against Islam), in Israel, illegal aliens are met with the most vigorous protest:

“Israelis worry that their national identity as a Jewish state is being threatened by unauthorized African migrants, who now make up less than 1 per cent of Israel’s population.

“It’s the crumbling of the Zionist dream,” Interior Minister Eli Yishai warned on Thursday.

Officials claim the overwhelming majority of the migrants are not bona fide refugees escaping persecution and war, but economic migrants looking for jobs. Israeli leaders use terms like “infiltrators,” ”cancer“ and ”national scourge” to describe them, setting an inflammatory tone.” 1

Dare I say, makes White Nationalist look positively genteel by comparison.

1 http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/05/25/tensions-increase-as-israeli-leaders-call-for-expulsion-of-african-migrants/

Plenty of ‘good ideas’ have been stated by many WN authors over the past century, but the prevailing climate of consumerism and junk culture has prevented the mass of Whites from seeing just how they are being lead to the slaughter.
It’s difficult, but we must remain optimistic if we are to take advantage of the turmoil which is sure to occur.

This poor “proletarian” (note: proletariat are Jews living off the money of their rich brethren-in-faith, to do their dirty jobs, remember Karl Marx) had excellent connections to Wallstreet banksters and WW, who provided him with passport, free journey and cash to revolutionize Russia.
As usual when after success a huge spoil is to be divided, Jews like any gangsters start to fight each other. Lev Bronstein-Trotsky lost and was “expelled”. The day of reckoning came later, and it is hard to imagine a more cruel end he found at the hands of comrades-in-pay.
So, CW2 could be quite right:
“we are to take advantage of the turmoil which is sure to occur.”

A forward-thinking story about people of different races and sexes, united as one under the direction of an educated visionary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX8fKLjC__c

Of course, not neary as cool as the nigger that the cops in Florida recently put down when they spotted him eating another dude’s face.

Pah-dah-dap-dap-dah …

Excellent post, Red Skull! I have read it several times over and I agree not only with what you said about Lev Davidovitch but also the way you said it. I have read several books by Trotsky, including his last one, which was a very funny and unflattering assessment of Stalin and his betrayal of the Revolution. Writing that book is what probably cost Trotsky his life. And like you say he is the most interesting figure in the Bolshevik pantheon, although Lenin was also someone who I find quite fascinating.

Lenin was not only the one who brought Stalin up through the ranks, he, along with his friend Trotsky, also tried to remove Stalin from power before it was too late. Lenin then died quite unexpectedly a short time later. Stalin then had Trotsky fired from his post as Soviet War Minister, then stripped him of his Party membership, exiled and ultimately assassinated.

National autonomy no longer suffices. Economic evolution demands the abolition of national frontiers.
unquote

NPR worshiping White Race traitor Useful idiots believe it today.

Pardon my typo—Thats “crypto-Jew”

Hey!Not bad for spell-check when its only my brain doing the proofreading!

@Obersturmbannfuhrer McGreen

Sieg Heil !! —Thanks for the clarification on that aspect of the ever-evolving EVIIIILLLLL Plot to Rule the Masses —Terrible Timmy!

Then again–howcome ol Uncle Joe Continually ESCAPES the “Crucifixtion Treatment” the Jews give Hitler unendingly…………in the Zionist/Marxist/Jew/Mainstream Media?

Lets hear what the VNN Swami of Smerk has to say about that.

I have to agree with you Tim,Stalin was enigmatic,maybe even moreso than the Fuhrer,Being an “Asiatic” as you described.

But if he was “privately hostile to the Jews” as you say then i guess we have to like him a little bit then don’t we?

Wasn’t he planning some sort of Pogrom against the Yids prior to his death?

Aslo i believe he had some unsavory things to say about the
“Chosen Ones? ” didn’t he?_i n that Movie way Back–Stalin–With Robert Duvall>

Still–Victor Suvuvrov says he was planning to invade Europe to expand the Revolution,and the Fuhrer Pre-empted him.

At least Stalin had the BALLS to personally sign your death Warrant!!

Thats what he went to and did EVERYDAY for a job!!

I wonder if Communist King Obongo will have the Balls to do the same??

Kevin MacDonald responds:

[Recently by Kevin MacDonald: Immigration And The Unmentionable Question Of Ethnic Interests]

Fundamentally, Eugene Girin does not like Yuri Slezkine’s findings. In response, seeking to make these conclusions easier to dismiss, he adopts the stratagem of trying to convince his readers that I have misrepresented Slezkine. But I did not.

No one is saying that all Jews supported the USSR or denying that some Jews suffered from the regime, even at the height of Jewish power. But Slezkine provides overwhelming evidence that Jews constituted an elite in the USSR and that the great majority of Soviet Jews supported Bolshevism and benefited from it—evidence that fits well with previously existing data that I have summarized in my writing on this topic.

Girin provides some Slezkine figures on Jewish representation in early Bolshevism to suggest that Jews did not play a particularly outstanding role. However, he fails to note how Slezkine contextualizes these findings. After all, the title of Slezkine’s book is The Jewish Century. It would be odd to find that Slezkine’s real view is that Jews were not much of a factor in arguably the most significant upheaval of the 20th century.

For example, Girin quotes Slezkine that “the vast majority of Bolshevik party members (72 percent in 1922) were ethnic Russians.” But he fails to note Slezkine’s basic argument that the Jews formed an elite within the Bolshevik movement: Jews formed 40 percent of the top elected officials in the army, 5 of the 12 members of the Bolshevik Central Committee that voted to launch an armed insurrection in 1917, and much else (see Slezkine, pp. 175–180).

Jews did not form a particularly high percentage of the Cheka, says Slezkine, “but even in the Cheka, Bolsheviks of Jewish origin combined ideological commitment with literacy in ways that set them apart and propelled them upward” (p. 177).

Slezkine’s views on this matter are entirely compatible with my previously published analysis of the Jewish role in Bolshevism: Jews formed an indispensable elite that was a necessary condition for the success of Bolshevism. (Even this is an understatement, as argued in the longer Occidental Quarterly version of my VDARE.COM article.)

Historian Albert Lindemann makes the same point in his book Esau’s Tears:

“Citing the absolute numbers of Jews [within the Bolshevik movement], or their percentage of the whole, fails to recognize certain key if intangible factors: the assertiveness and often dazzling verbal skills of Jewish Bolsheviks, their energy, and their strength of conviction” (p. 429).

There is no claim that all or even most Bolsheviks were Jews.

Jews formed less than five percent of the Russian population at the time of the Revolution, and they were underrepresented in the major urban areas of Moscow and Leningrad prior to the Revolution because of the Pale of Settlement laws. But having a very large, even dominant influence despite forming a small percentage of the population has been a theme of Jewish history, most notably in Eastern and Central Europe prior to the Revolution. The case of Revolutionary Russia once again underscores the importance of philosemitism and building alliances for the Jews. This has been typically necessary in Diaspora situations in order to advance their perceived interests.

Girin makes the outrageous claim that I argued that “ex-Jews like Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, and the thousands of Cheka operatives and Bolshevik party members retained their Jewish identity and ‘Eastern European shtetl culture [his emphasis]””

But in fact I explicitly granted the possibility that they did not. And I certainly did not say that Jewish Bolsheviks retained their Eastern European shtetl culture in toto, but that they had retained some aspects of traditional Jewish identity, specifically the ones I listed: a strong sense of estrangement from non-Jewish society, a fear and hatred of peasants, hostility toward the Czarist upper class, and a very negative attitude toward Christianity.

Since this is a major issue on which I do not agree with Slezkine, I spend almost eight pages on the issue of the Jewish identity of Jewish Bolsheviks in the longer Occidental Quarterly review (pp. 75–82). I would urge readers to look at this material as well as Chapter 3 of my study The Culture of Critique.

And in the end, as Slezkine actually says (p. 286), by the time of World War II most Jews

“knew that they were, in some sense, Jews. They may never have been to a synagogue, seen a menorah, heard Yiddish or Hebrew, tasted gefilte fish or indeed met their grandparents. But they knew they were Jews in the Soviet sense, which was also—in essence—the Nazi sense. They were Jews by blood.”

As for Girin’s other comments, they essentially contradict Slezkine’s argument that in fact the USSR was a Jewish haven and that Jews formed an elite until the post-World War II era, when issues related to Zionism and popular and official anti-Semitism combined to lessen Jewish power.

The fact that Jews were an elite in the USSR shouldn’t be a surprise. As Slezkine and others have documented, Jews were an economically and culturally dominant elite throughout Eastern and Central Europe too, and they soon became an elite in the U.S. after the massive upsurge in Jewish immigration beginning in the late 19th century.

Nor should it be surprising that there is a massive taboo surrounding Jewish involvement in the most murderous regime in history. After all, despite the fact that Jews constitute less than 3 percent of the U.S. population, the Holocaust has become a cultural icon as a direct result of Jewish activism and influence in the media, Israel has become a sacred cow in American politics, and the role of Jewish organizations in helping unleash massive multiethnic immigration into the U.S., as well as engineering the current American involvement in Iraq, goes unmentioned in public debate.

Kevin MacDonald [email him] is Professor of Psychology at California State University-Long Beach.

http://www.vdare.com/articles/stalins-willing-executioners-girin-vs-macdonald