Vanguard News Network

Good God why does Faurisson make such a fuss. It’s obvoius to anyone with half a brain that Weber has been bought or blackmailed by the Jews, or that he is a crypto, with the instruction: savagely attack Israel as cover but derail and corrupt revisionism.

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, looks like a duck, it is a duck.

To add to my comment above: of course Faurisson is right calling for Weber’s resignation. I had forgotten he was doing that – the title of this piece.

I had just read all of his letters to Weber before my comment above, and couldn’t understand why he couldn’t see Weber was an anti 20 years ago.

I see the Voice of Treason is allowing Weber airtime. WTF are they thinking? Weber has squandered millions of revisionist and WN donation dollars. He has turned a once vibrant organization into a news clipping service. Weber cancelled the Journal for Historical Review. He cancelled the IHR annual conferences. He has denounced Holocaust Revisionism in a recent article in January. All Revisionists have no called for his removal as director and further total removal from the IHR also.

At what point do people ‘get the message?’

“I wonder if Weber is a jew.”

It’s a good question. But that has been discussed here very recently.

Personally, I sort of doubt it. But he could be. Probably he’s just a spineless gentile — a total, useless, weaking.

But why did Faurisson take 30 years to come to this conclusion?

Weber is most likely a crypto. When I look at a picture of his face, my Jewdar goes off.

And in addition to his appearance, his voice is also very Jewish sounding.

See, there you go.
I thought weber was a good white name, and I google it and find out it’s a common jew name. Huh.

http://www.revisionists.com/photos/mark_weber_002.jpg

“See, there you go.
I thought weber was a good white name”

It’s one of those iffy names that could go either way. Webber would be English, and not Jewish (as there were no Jews in England durig the Middle Ages). Weber is the German equivalent. It meant simply a weaver. That would not likely have been a Jewish occupation. But by extension, it could come to mean a dealer in fabrics, owner of a cloth business, a cloth merchant. In that case, its implications become something quite different.

I wouldn’t think the name tells us very much, one way or the other. I find the first name, Mark, slightly more significant. Jews do favor gentile-sounding names like “Mark”. Crypo-Jews, that is.

I also don’t get anything out of the photo, one way or another. I’ve no opinion there. I will say though, that his features are NOT Semitic. There could be something Ashkenazic there, maybe, but not Semitic.

Little known fact:

“Miller” is the third most common surname for American Jews.

;-)

jew or not it has been proven that he ripped off millions from the WN/Patriot/Revisionist movement while doing nothing but pulling the plug on projects.

Spread this link far and wide

http://www.robertfaurisson.blogspot.com

In 2001 former IHR employee stated that he overheard a conversation between Mark Weber and Greg Raven about selling the Liberty Lobby mailing list to the ADL.

A friend of mine who has met Weber and knows people who know him has no opinion as to whether he’s Jewish. But he says that he is a poor manager and has dificultty dealing with other people, also that he has his “problems” (no idea what that means). Apparently, he’s kind of detatched and unrealistic. I’ve no knowledgde about the Jewish aspect; but I will say that Jews have an uncanny way of finding their way into positions like that, where they can be in control of things. One of their strategies is that if they can’t destroy a movement, they will at least infiltrate and control it. There are many, many crypto-Jews out there who could fill such a role. And they haven’t been officially Jewish for several generations, so no one would know. I don’t mean to sound paranoid, but I’m sure there are many more of them than we would even imagine.

“I’ll note here that in general Weber is an atrocious debater, careful as he is to ingratiate himself with the opponent or the master of ceremonies, sometimes even to the point where one may wonder what side he’s on.” R. Faurisson

Old saying- a liberal is one who cannot take his own side in an argument. (Robert Frost)

Faurisson proves in his article that Weber WAS NEVER a committed revisionist. Weber is feeding off the IHR body which is in advanced state of decay, thanks to years of Weber’s do nothing lazy and indolant behaviour. Weber has sucked off the IHR tit for long enough.

The effectiveness of the IHR brought into focus key elements of revisionist theory which most assuredly upset the Jews. Anyone who knows the “Chosen” well realizes they have many tricks up their sleeves to derail efforts to scrutinize their precious “Holocaust”. What truly branded the IHR as Public (Jewish Public…) Enemy Numero Uno was and is their devotion to scholarly observation of historical events. Mr. Weber was part and parcel of that thorough re-examination. However, lately he’s been acting as if his particular opinion has been misinterpreted, and he demures to the Jewish affront against revisionist speakers. Rather that simply address the many heated questions spewing from the mouths of his incongruous radio hosts, he acknowledges their “proof” of the Holocaust, which is little more than propaganda on the order of Nuremberg. The effect this has on the revisionist community is profound. We seem to have been ‘outed’ as Neo Nazis, whose thirst for Jewish blood can never be slaked. We have placed all of our revisionist eggs in a basket that seems to be deteriorating, and or sabotaged. The Jews apparently have either gained control of Mr. Weber, or they have simply created a disinformation ruse in order to humiliate anyone who confronts the sacred memory of Jewish ‘Victims’. The fact is, there IS NO PROOF that the Holocaust occurred. There are no names of Jewish people executed in gas chambers. The reason is: No Jews were executed in Gas Chambers! Virtually every gruesome testimony of the so-called “Survivors” of the Holocaust was a rehash of WWI atrocity propaganda. Indeed, some embellishments were added, but the Jews have now to PROVE what they claimed. Unfortunately, Mark Weber will not stand in the way of those ridiculous anecdotes.