9 January, 2009
Goy Control Loosened in Federal Parks
Posted by Socrates in guns & goy controllers, Second Amendment, Socrates at 6:24 pm | 
Permanent Link
Good news, yes, but you still must follow state laws in federal parks, e.g., you can’t carry a concealed gun without a state concealed-carry permit, despite the two rights granted by the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution [1][2]:
[1] the two 2nd Amendment rights are: to “keep” and “bear” arms
[2] almost all major gun-control laws have come from Jews, e.g., the Gun Control Act of 1968 (which came from Rep. Emanuel Celler), the 1994 Brady law (which came from Senator Howard Metzenbaum and Rep. Charles Schumer) and the 1994 assault-weapons ban (a.k.a., “The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994,” which came from Senator Dianne Feinstein and Rep. Schumer). The assault-weapons ban expired in 2004, but will likely return
9 January, 2009 at 6:46 pm
“. . .despite the two rights granted. . .”
Rights are recognized, not granted.
9 January, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Nonsense. Rights do not float around like ghosts in space waiting to be ‘discovered’ by the human eye. They are manufactured products, agreed upon by society, and they are whatever the government says they are.
If white nationalists came to power, certain ‘rights’ now recognized would disappear, like the right to no-fault divorce, the right to miscegenation, the right to vote–and other ‘rights’ not recognized would appear, like freedom of speech, the right to a fair job and a fair pay not stolen by immigrants or outsourced, and the right to free association. It is simply a matter of designing society such that it best fits our genetic interests and our genetic aptitudes. A white country must have rules that make whites happy, prosperous, and populous, whatever those rules might be. They are dynamic not static, and they are relative to our condition, not absolute floating around in space and set down in stone forever.
The entire model of ‘human rights’ was made up in the 1800’s and makes far less sense than the ancient models of human civilization. As you can see, the 1900’s haven’t been very good for whites who so ardently embraced human rights. That might be a good warning sign that they are not as great as they seem.
9 January, 2009 at 10:12 pm
It’s not guns that should be banned from national parks, it’s non-White gang-bangers, who are using those parks for their non-White criminal activities.
I love the idea of living in a safe, clean, all-White society where you would have the RIGHT to a decent job that pays a living wage and the RIGHT not to live in fear of the police or the government. Shockingly, America is still majority White, at least for the time being. Surely we can do better than this!
9 January, 2009 at 10:49 pm
“Nonsense. Rights do not float around like ghosts in space waiting to be ‘discovered’ by the human eye. They are manufactured products, agreed upon by society, and they are whatever the government says they are.”
There are different types of rights–civil rights, granted by the government; and natural rights, granted by the God of nature. The first expesses, say, the right to an attorney ect; the second, the right to self-defense. This latter the government does not grant, and therefore cannot take away–ever, even if they kill innocent folks and try to take guns away. It is your DUTY to know this, it is your duty to always protect yourself and family, otherwise you commit the sin of suicide.
Also, as I recall, “human rights” are a bastard hybrid between the two, a rephrasing to promote an idiology. This part is a little fuzzy for me, it’s been a while. You are correct in it’s recent appearance. Another language game our opponents are so fond of playing.
9 January, 2009 at 10:54 pm
Allow dogs and beer and they’ll have it!
9 January, 2009 at 10:55 pm
Please note that “civil rights” and “human rights” are NOT for White, heterosexual people. Everyone else can have those kinds of “rights”, ‘cept us.
9 January, 2009 at 11:32 pm
Zara, my buddy ol’ pal, this must be a weak area for you.
If you have government you have civil rights–I have been wrong before but I think this is correct. The so-called civil rights movement was based on blacks saying that they were not getting theirs. Now we have affirmative action–some equal opportunity. What we want, demand, is our own government and civil rights among us, and us alone.
In other words, I must have a trial by my peers–that is educated white males of a certain age with honor–before I am found guilty of theft. As for human rights–as I said they are a con and should be thrown in the dumpster with the other liberal bullshit.
10 January, 2009 at 12:03 am
Zarathustra is correct. In point of fact in the US, whites have less rights of any type than every other group in Judeo-America.
10 January, 2009 at 1:20 am
Communists,Jews and Liberals(all variations of the same animal) just LOVE UNARMED SLAVES.The second Amendment ain’t about duck hunting.It’s about the Founding Fathers KNOWING-that all Gov’ts turn into Tyrannies and the People Have a Right to Protect Themselves,their Property,and Families against Criminals and Tyrants-and we must be armed to do this.Tell any liberal to go out into “Injun Country” UNARMED and get touchy-feely with the natives.See how far they get without firepower.Just ask the Israelies if they prefer slaughtering unarmed civilians,or would rather be up against well-armed and organized troops who can kick their ass.Obviously, after the last few days in Gaza,I would say the clear choice for all Tyrants near and far is unarmed sheep.But what the hell do i know?I’m just a “radical” and “conspiracy nut”.
10 January, 2009 at 8:51 am
Guns don’t kill people, niggers with guns kill people. It’s just the government using the violent nigger’s behavior to pass more restrictive gun laws against law abiding whites. Do you think blacks give a rat’s ass about “gun laws”. If you haven’t noticed, they’re not big on obeying ANY laws.
Bottom line is, Governments much prefer UN-armed citizenry.
10 January, 2009 at 9:50 am
Jews are what need to be banned and here is one reason.
http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/2003/3/5/la_raza_and_citigroup_partner_to.htm
ED!
10 January, 2009 at 10:05 am
How the the White 28 year old woman who bicycled from Berkley CA. intending to go to NYC I think and was murdered by one of her beloved spare “change” apes.
That story vanished.
10 January, 2009 at 10:14 am
We need to tighten the screw on existing white leaders, government and NGO employees/bureaucrats using whatever way which, for they’re the biggest problem to the well-being of our kind. Name and shame miscreants, ridicule them, in the most effective manner possible with word power. Initially.
10 January, 2009 at 5:44 pm
Howdy Doody is right, a few months ago there was a White liberal douchebag who got murdered while canvassing a colored neighborhood for the Obamanator. That story recieved only scant more coverage than the Witchita Massacre did, or the Channon and Christopher murders in Knoxville. That is to say, it barely recieved any coverage at all from our “free” press.
11 January, 2009 at 7:50 am
“NEW YORK — Citigroup today announced a $105 million strategic partnership with the National Council of La Raza (NCLR).
The core component of this partnership is a commitment to provide up to $100 million to finance the creation of affordable housing and community facilities, including single-family homes, multi-family rental housing, schools, and job training, child and health care centers located in Hispanic neighborhoods and/or serving Hispanic populations.
This partnership is one way that Citigroup is making communities better. Said Citigroup Chairman and CEO Sandy Weill, “As part of our ongoing work in the Hispanic community, we are proud to be partners with the National Council of La Raza.”
Thanks, Ed.
12 January, 2009 at 10:36 am
Sandy Weill………….Another one of Satan’s Spawn.
12 January, 2009 at 2:31 pm
From Warburg, Rosenburgs stealing secrets to the http://www.ussliberty.org they are the enemy and if don’t think so then WTF do you think ?