Vanguard News Network

(from a blog)

“Notice they don’t answer the first question and the second question makes the assumption that just because something is constitutional it’s OK. It also assumes that just because the US Supreme Court says it’s constitutional it is. While in the legal system that may be true the 13th Amendment seems pretty clear to me.

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

If I must participate in some service against my will it seems to me to be by definition involuntary servitude/slavery. The 13th Amendment forbids that. I don’t care what some people in black dresses say. Conscription is both unconstitutional in that it violates the 13th Amendment and it goes against the concept that government is created at the consent of the governed to protect their rights. If the 13th isn’t enough you can take a look at the 5th and 14th too.

The reason these additions are noteworthy is that xyz had emailed them directly requesting what would occur if an individual refused to serve. She has yet to receive a personal reply but the FAQ as we have seen has been updated with a poor answer.

If there is no punishment for failing to participate in the “mandatory service” then it’s not mandatory just like “mandatory” participating in the census is in fact not.”

http://blogofbile.com/tag/mandatory-national-service/

I can just see all those kids now, so cute, running around in their little red scarves! Waving their little black “Sayings of President Obama” books! (Or is that too obvious a parallel?)
If Bush had come up with this (not that I’m any fan of his), they’d all be screaming “Hitler Youth!”

Hello, I am the author of the blog post linked to in this post. However you might wish to reconsider after learning that I am a lesbian.

Anywho, I realize I cannot change any of your minds regarding your beliefs and I support your right to free speech, however it is my view that tyranny calls no race or ethnicity home.

“…it is my view that tyranny calls no race or ethnicity home.”
Huh?

Allison, your highfalutin’ statement about a “collectivist philosophy based on uneducated fear” will get flushed down the toilet as soon as you and you dyke girlfriends get lost and find yourselves driving in a nigger slum neighborhood. Door locks will go down, windows will be rolled up. And if the black savages attack, your hip, liberal, affluent homo and lesbo friends won’t help you, Mlle Carpet-muncher.

The fact is that humans organize into groups for rational reasons. Try collecting the garbage without teamwork, for example.

And deeper than that, all animals are objectively members of groups, based on physical facts of family or race. Which helps the survival of your genes: saving the life of your sister’s children, or saving the lives of a total stranger’s children? All animals, including humans, are programmed to prefer the former, for good reasons. It’s a good strategy in the competition for survival. The opposite of this strategy simply results in your line’s extinction. Which, as a lesbian, you are ensuring: you are helping to extinguish your family and your people, ensuring that they will not be around in future. Their traits won’t survive. Their curiosity, their intellectualism, their lovable and valuable traits – will be gone forever, probably replaced by hordes of niggers, utterly stupid creatures. But you will get a gold star for being a good radical individualist. Whoop-de-do.

“But at least I’m leaving a legacy of books or writings!” cries the radical individualist.

But in a nigger world, who will read them? You’d better make sure your writings are in gutter Spanish, or in Ebonics. With lots of pictures. And that they’re about bling, fucking, and food. NIgga don’t know from John Locke, baby, sheeeiit!

Only White children can have the curiosity and intellect and stamp of mind to appreciate the products of White culture. It’s all alien and irrelevant to Africans. Bye-bye, your contribution. Unless you have readers – unless there are people like you in the future.

Excellent commentary, sgruber. Radical individualism is parallel to internationalist collectivism in a few ways, with the libertarian “individual” corresponding to the liberal-collectivist “all mankind,” which is like saying “all mammals,” or better yet, “all worker ants.” A planet filled with down-bred dregs who almost universally prefer log-thump thug-noise to mozart and magazine literary garbage to a well-written novel is not something I’d declare a desirable outcome, but then again, I’m not someone who looks at places like Haiti and Africa, and then at our current President-elect, and foolishly thinks that we’re not going to experience a noticable downslide in the direction of Turd-World conditions under him. The fact that he has surrounded himself with jews, the same people who founded and administered that (thus far) unequaled monstrosity called the USSR, makes things look even less rosy.

“I’d say ban her from VNN…”

She won’t be back anyways. She was expecting a slew of silly ad hominems from a bunch of cave-dwelling knuckle-draggers, but instead got a series of intelligent responses whose core argument she is unable to refute.

Aviation, Geography, and Race
by Charles A. Lindbergh
featured in Reader’s Digest, November, 1939, pp. 64-67

Aviation has struck a delicately balanced world, a world where
stability was already giving way to the pressure of new dynamic
forces, a world dominated by a mechanical, materialist, Western
European civilization. Aviation is a product of that
civilization, borne on the crest of its outlook. Typical also of
its strength and its weakness, its vanity and its
self-destruction – men flung upward in the face of God, another
Icarus to dominate the sky, and in turn, to be dominated by it;
for eventually the laws of nature determine the success of human
effort and measure the value of human inventions in that
divinely complicated, mathematically unpredictable, development
of life at which Science has given the name of Evolution.

Aviation seems almost a gift from heaven to those Western
nations who were already the leaders of their era, strengthening
their leadership, their confidence, their dominance over other
peoples. It is a tool specially shaped for Western hands, a
scientific art which others only copy in a mediocre fashion,
another barrier between the teeming millions of Asia and the
Grecian inheritance of Europe – one of those priceless
possessions which permit the White race to live at all in a
pressing sea of Yellow, Black, and Brown. But aviation, using it
symbolically as well as in its own right, brings two great
dangers, one peculiar to our modern civilization, the other
older than history. Since aviation is dependent on the intricate
organization of life and industry, it carries with it the
environmental danger of a people too far separated from the soil
and from the sea – the danger of that physical decline which so
often goes with a high intellectual development, of that
spiritual decline which seems invariably to accompany an
industrial life, of that racial decline which follows physical
and spiritual mediocrity.

A great industrial nation may conquer the world in the span of a
single life, but its Achilles’ heel is time. Its children, what
of them? The second and third generations, of what numbers and
stuff will they be? How long can men thrive between walls of
brick, walking on asphalt pavements, breathing the fumes of coal
and of oil, growing, working, dying, with hardly a thought of
wind, and sky, and fields of grain, seeing only machine-made
beauty, the mineral-like quality of life. This is our modern
danger – one of the waxen wings of flight. It may cause our
civilization to fall unless we act quickly to counteract it,
unless we realize that human character is more important than
efficiency, that education consists of more than the mere
accumulation of knowledge.

But the other great danger is more easily recognized, because it
has occurred again and again through history. It is the ember of
war, fanned by every new military weapon, flaming today as it
has never flamed before. It is the old internal struggle among a
dominant people for power; blind, insatiable, suicidal. Western
nations are again at war, a war likely to be more prostrating
than any in the past, a war in which the White race is bound to
lose, and the others bound to gain, a war which may easily lead
our civilization through more Dark Ages if it survives at all.
In this war, aviation is as important a factor as it has been a
cause – a cause due to its effect on the balance of strength
between nations, a factor because of the destruction and death
it hurls on earth and sea. Air power is new to all our
countries. It brings advantages to some and weakens others; it
calls for readjustment everywhere.

If only there were some way to measure the changing character of
men, some yardstick to reapportion influence among the nations,
some way to demonstrate in peace the strength of arms in war.
But with all of its dimensions, its clocks, and weights, and
figures, science fails us when we ask a measure for the rights
of men. They cannot be judged by numbers, by distance, weight,
or time; or by counting heads without a thought of what may lie
within. Those intangible qualities of character, such as
courage, faith, and skill, evade all systems, slip through the
bars of every cage. They can be recognized, but not measured.
They lie more in a glance between two men than in any formula or
mathematics. They form the unseen strength of an army, the
genius of a people.

Likewise, in judging aviation, in its effect on modern nations,
no satisfactory measurement of strength exists. It is bound to
geography, environment, and racial character so closely that an
attempt to judge by numbers would be like counting Greeks at
Marathon. What advantages will they gain? What new influence can
they exert? To judge this, one must look not only at their
aviation but at them, at the geography of their country, at
their problems of existence, at their habits of life.

Mountains, coastlines, great distances, ground fortifications,
all those safeguards of past generations, lose their old
significance as man takes to his wings. The English Channel, the
snow-capped Alps, the expanses of Russia, are now looked on from
a different height. The forces of Hannibal, Drake and Napoleon
moved at best with the horses’ gallop or the speed of wind on
sail. Now, aviation brings a new concept of time and distance to
the affairs of men. It demands adaptability to change, places a
premium on quickness of thought and speed of action.

Military strength has become more dynamic and less tangible. A
new alignment of power has taken place, and there is no adequate
peacetime measure for its effect on the influence of nations.
There seems no way to agree on the rights it brings to some and
takes from others. The rights of men within a nation are
readjusted in each generation by laws of inheritance – land
changes hands as decades pass, fortunes are taxed from one
generation to the next; ownership is no more permanent than
life. But among nations themselves there is no similar provision
to reward virility and penalize decay, no way to reapportion the
world’s wealth as tides of human character ebb and flow – except
by the strength of armies. In the last analysis, military
strength is measurable only by its own expenditure, by the
prostration of one contender while the other can still stagger
on the field – and all about the wolves of lesser stature abide
their time to spring on both the warriors.

We, the heirs of European culture, are on the verge of a
disastrous war, a war within our own family of nations, a war
which will reduce the strength and destroy the treasures of the
White race, a war which may even lead to the end of our
civilization. And while we stand poised for battle, Oriental
guns are turning westward, Asia presses towards us on the
Russian border, all foreign races stir restlessly. It is time to
turn from our quarrels and to build our White ramparts again.
This alliance with foreign races means nothing but death to us.
It is our turn to guard our heritage from Mongol and Persian and
Moor, before we become engulfed in a limitless foreign sea. Our
civilization depends on a united strength among ourselves; on
strength too great for foreign armies to challenge; on a Western
Wall of race and arms which can hold back either a Genghis Khan
or the infiltration of inferior blood; on an English fleet, a
German air force, a French army, an American nation, standing
together as guardians of our common heritage, sharing strength,
dividing influence.

Our civilization depends on peace among Western nations, and
therefore on united strength, for Peace is a virgin who dare not
show her face without Strength, her father, for protection. We
can have peace and security only so long as we band together to
preserve that most priceless possession, our inheritance of
European blood, only so long as we guard ourselves against
attack by foreign armies and dilution by foreign races.

We need peace to let our best men live to work out those more
subtle, but equally dangerous, problems brought by this new
environment in which we dwell, to give us time to turn this
materialistic trend, to stop prostrating ourselves before this
modern idol of mechanical efficiency, to find means of combining
freedom, spirit, and beauty with industrial life – a peace which
will bring character, strength, and security back to Western
peoples.

With all the world around our borders, let us not commit racial
suicide by internal conflict. We must learn from Athens, and
Sparta before all of Greece is lost.

Reader’s Digest, Nov. 1939, Vol. 35

“Aviation, Geography, and Race
by Charles A. Lindbergh”

Prophetic words.

“featured in Reader’s Digest, November, 1939, pp. 64-67”

Ah, those were the days! Try getting something even half as forward as that printed in a major magazine today.

A link that Allison may want to check out:

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,3097355,00.html

A quote from a feminist friend of mine:

“It’s a very simple fact that
European Caucasian men
treat their women better
than any other race on earth”

(I swear to God that’s true)

Of course the jewish controlled MSM would have you believe otherwise. If you wish to be guided by their lies then that’s your choice. Just make sure your willing to accept the consequences of your decisions.

A national work program is just the start.Can you imagine the howls and screams if Shrub were to propose that?I responded to that silly lesbo in her comments section.She would not or could not refute what i said about the violations of free speech and assembly that i brought up about the Euro-Conference in Mississippi.She could only say we’re “stupid”,and have no claim to constitutonal rights,or to hide behind it.Somehow,being nazis abrogates your Constitutional Rights.I also pointed out how i’m sure she lives in a nice “white area” of town,and challenged her and any liberal meat sack to live up to their egalitarian views and move down close and LIVE WITH the muds she so claims to love.She could only say we’re violent and hateful.Challenge a Liberal with Racial Facts and they quickly devolve to name calling and poo-poo negation.She also had no comment on the FACT that over 36,000 white women are raped every year by niggers,as opposed to roughly 10 black women by white men.I predicted that when the time came,she and all others who thought like her would be at the pityless muds mercy and I and my Komerades would laugh and watch as the muds had some fun with her.Reasoning with doesn’t work,they are zog slaves who won’t wake until its too late.She also critized my spelling and grammer,i told her i don’t discount peoples opinions because they can’t spell perfect or have perfect grammer.In any case,it clearly showed they are scared of racial facts and truths.

Little Johnny to parents: “It is my duty to report you to the neighborhood block commisariat for improper sentiments concerning Comrade President Obama.

Do I spy some Red (and White and Blue) Guards in our future?

The Red Skull said

She also critized my spelling and grammer, [sic]

Boo-hoo-hoo! That’s one point for the labia-licker.

It’s CRITICIZED and GRAMMAR. A third-grader who has the mental discipline to consult a spell-check program has more on the ball than you do.

Helpful hint: look for the little red line under words you type here. That line indicates you may have made a mistake. Have the maturity to accept it when you are caught in a mistake, and the enterprise to correct yourself. Don’t just flip me or the world a bird like a dumb nigger. Being uneducated is no fault, but being lazy and touchy about it is.

Until you pull up your grammatical britches, expect your ass-crack to be continue being “critized.”

Obviously white European man treats white European woman too good… Else we wouldn’t be burdened with the petulent Marxist child that is feminism: something which has prospered in white European lands as no-where else.

I don’t think it’s any coincidence that some of the most Aryan lands such as Sweden and Norway are today cesspools of feminist political correctness.

the FACT that over 36,000 white women are raped every year by niggers,as opposed to roughly 10 black women by white men.[RedSkull]

In point of fact, I believe that statistic is actually zero to ten.
(Just being technical here.)

i don’t discount peoples opinions because they can’t spell perfect or have perfect grammer.

Neither do I. (But good grammar helps reader comprehension. Paragraphs and punctuation help too.)

Re. the Euro-Conference in Mississippi.She could only say we’re “stupid”, and have no claim to constitutonal rights,or to hide behind it. Somehow,being nazis abrogates your Constitutional Rights.

Standard leftist argument. Especially common in Europe.
Where in the American Constitution does it say that civil rights do not extend to stupid people? And who defines what is “stupid”? Whatsmore, of all ironies, these are the same people who make such a fuss about Civil Rights!!! Oh, but only in some cases, it seems. That doesn’t extend to YOUR rights.

What good is “freedom for all” if it means the freedom of the nigger to ruin your neighborhood, city, nation, and life? I am not interested in the freedom of the East Indian, the Hottentot, the Hmung, or anyone but my people.[Sgruber]

I believe it was President Adams who said: “While we are friends of Liberty everywhere, we are the guardians only of our own.”
(Someone should tall Dubya that!)

snakeman says, “Ban her.”
White men don’t censor. Jews, Amren and Stormfront censor. White men don’t .
[ZZ McGee]

Excellent retort! Thank you! Censorship is the enemy of liberty. The enemy of thought.
It is also the opposition’s last resort when it’s bereft of any argument.
It’s an admission of defeat; so when reason can’t win (because it’s on the other side), force must be used instead. If they had an argument, they would use it.

Ahh,point well taken sgruber!Ha!I have too laugh at myself…..I always did hate english class, does it show?

It does. But you take criticism commendably well. :)

JTSays: Obviously white European man treats white European woman too good… feminism [is] something which has prospered in white European lands as no-where else. …some of the most Aryan lands, such as Sweden and Norway, are today cesspools of feminist political correctness.

Europe, especially away from the Mediterranean, ALWAYS accorded women much respect and many rights, and in many ways social and legal equality. This was far more so than found elsewhere in the world. (Feminists fail to appreciate this. Their movement would have gotten exactly nowhere in Arabia or Africa or China.) The existence of this female freedom among the ancient Britons and Germans was noted and commented on two millennia ago by the Roman writers. This did not weaken the Britons and Germans. It was a British queen who resisted the Roman invasion ferociously. Significantly, it was only in Northern Britain and Germany that the Roman armies finally met their match and were halted, and where the Roman invaders had to build walls to protect themselves from the indomitable natives.

And Scandinavia has historically treated women with virtual equality … certainly more so than any other cultures outside of Europe. [An anthropologist might bring up some remote, tiny tribes in the Amazon or Philippines, but those would be cultural anomalies and are irrelevant on the world stage. Such tiny, primitive tribes cannot be considered “successful” cultures among the competing civilizations of the world.]

So female equality in Northern Europe is nothing new. It lasted for thousands of years, right up until recently. The Viking woman had a lot of status in her society. That did not sap Scandinavians of their vigor. Only when Jewish-inspired Marxism (and all its sickly children such as feminism) invaded and poisoned their minds, and turned them against themselves, did Scandinavians/Aryans fall to their present pathetic condition. This has come about mainly within the past half-century.

But, oh yes, to tell the truth, the process was really initiated back around the 1300s when Christianity was introduced. It was government imposed, but met with intense resistence from the people. The Vikings were proud barbarians and they were unashamed of it. It was Christianity that induced guilt. As an article in the National Geographic said: “The Vikings were barbarians, and they KNEW they were barbarians.”

Either way — Christianity, Marx: same source.

Yes, great words indeed by Charles Lindbergh. And try to get that kind of article printed in today’s Reader’s Digest. Ha! A family member gets that little rag sent to me each month, and it’s getting noticeably more and more leftist and multicultural in its content and tone. I suspect it’s jew run like most nowadays. I’d never subscribe to it on my own. Most of the writing is pretty bad, actually, and it’s mostly a patriotard kind of rag now.

Allison Says:

“Hello, I am the author of the blog post linked to in this post. However you might wish to reconsider after learning that I am a lesbian.”

Sorry to hear about your affliction. May I recommend a cure?

TRY SOME DICK!

Jon

gw: You are right about how Reader’s Digest has changed over the years, or at least the perception of it has. I’m looking at the current issue right now. There’s an article with various famous people talking about people who have been “Great Inspirations” and I don’t think there’s a White man in the group. They’re all women, niggers, and/or jews. There’s another article about a doctor, could be a jew, who’s gone to Ethiopia and adopted five little niggers.

There’s an article entitled “Keyboard Cowards” about. you guessed it, internet bullying on various websites. It mentions one website where a UCLA student was called “a stinky, ugly jew …the most hated slut on campus”. I don’t see any pro White sites named, but the intent is clear to me.

It mentions two young women who had threatening messages, their photos, and comments that one had herpes and both should be raped, posted on an internet website, have filed a federal lawsuit against the dozens of anonymous users who made the comments. They’ve subpoenaed Internet service providers, have acquired some of the users’ names, named one pubicly, and are threatening to out more.

Uh oh. Better be careful, fellas and gals, about what you say about someone on the web. It may come back to bite you in the ass one day. If you can’t stick to facts about someone, you might want to keep your mouth closed.

But, about Reader’s Digest, it did used to be considered more conservative than liberal. I always remember hearing how bad the writing was too. It’s still not very well written. If you look at the page that lists the Editors and various department heads and writers, etc., you see some probably jew names, but not necessarily overwhelmingly so.

It just isn’t correct or acceptable these days for anyone to be pro White. Period.

What wonderful writing by Lindbergh.

Re libertarians. Some of them are kookoo. I knew one, years ago, who wouldn’t walk on the street or sidewalk because it was publicly owned and built by civil servants with extorted money…I wonder if he still stays away from all towns & cities or if he has come to his senses.

“What wonderful writing by Lindbergh. ”

Yes. But didn’t the, ah, “press” turn against him and turn him – virtually overnight – from a national hero into a reviled loonie and traitor? After that, he was off the national stage and pretty much persona non grata.

And the highly respected Father Caughlin was similarly removed from the radio. (Both were anti-war.) No “hero” is secure, no matter how admired. Such is the power of the press.

HaHa. Yeah, I think I remember my grandmother having copies in her bathroom. As I said, I would never have subscribed to it on my own but it gets delivered to me every month, like it or not.