Vanguard News Network

This article seems a bit convoluted. If I understand it correctly, the link Kaminski provides argues that it was the Harrappan pre-Aryan Asuras of India, who under Aryan pressure, migrated westward and set the foundations for all of European civilization, including its philosophy. This robs the Aryans of their role as the cultural foundation of Europe. At the same time, however, the author argues that the leadership of the westerly clans of Hittites, Chatti, etc., were Indic and even Abraham’s and Sarah’s real names are derived from Sanskrit, which is definitely an Indo-European language. So, if Abraham was a pre-Aryan Asura, how did he get an Indo-European name and how is it that the Asura clans migrating westward spoke Aryan Indo-European languages? Something doesn’t fit, and it sounds like the theory is a modern Indian nationalist concoction. The Indian Hindutva movement rejects the notion that the Aryans were the foundation for Indian civilization, so this sounds like a theory to counter that notion and claim non-Aryan Harrappans as the founders of western civlization, a reversal.

I believe the first posters’ claim is the more appropriate one. I found Kaminski’s rationales contorted in the extreme, as most doubters’ minds are.

‘Sh’ma Yisrol, Adonai Eloheynu, Adonai Echod!’
Why? Christ believed it, and He is the Messiah.

And because I believe the first, the second is a corrollary to it:

“Firmly I believe, and Truly,
God is three, and God is one!”
– Cardinal Newman, set to music as “Dream of Gerontius” by Elgar.

GOD is, (if not an Englishman) at least a Caucasoid European! – If the premise that Christ is Adam’s flesh and of his ‘seed’ for Adam in Hebrew means’ fair, ruddy, able to blush’ as Strong’s Concordance clearly noted. This has been known by those who ‘say they are Jews, but are not’ [Rev. 2:8,0] and therefore, are mere imposters.

But one thing Abraham is NOT, is some Darkie from the Punjab. And that’s ALL this article is about, frankly.