19 July, 2008

What Are Paleoconservatives?

Posted by alex in paleoconservatism at 8:07 pm | Permanent Link

They’re making ethnicity outweigh race. Which is like saying that the Grand Canyon is nothing compared to a crack in the sidewalk. This is a very common ploy with their paid writers and the sheepdogs like Sid Cundiff.

Comment-dropper Cuntlips is a queafing sophist liar . He serves as a sheepdog to bark the easily intimidated conservatives back into line every time they approach the plantation’s border: the agreement that, as the price of respectability, paychecks, and the ZOG-guaranteed right to collect 501c3 foundation monies, we’ll all shtick to the Big Lie that race-doesn’t-matter when writing for the public. The paleocon writers know that their position, putting ethnicity over race, is safe, and that’s the reason they write as they do. Not because they believe their public position on race is right. Most of them are well aware they are canting. They must keep the party line on race for reasons of professional security, while indulging a bit of illiberal sentiment privately, after peeking both ways out the blinds. Regarding themselves as men of culture and character, the last civilized holdouts in an age of barbarism, the paleoconservative writers discover that their lying, their deal with the devil, tweaks them more or less continually, since racial truth incompatible with liberalism lies at the bottom of pretty much every issue they write about. Knowing they can’t write about the deepest matters honestly, the conservatives lose self respect and become cranky. Needing a place to vent the frustration born of their intellectual tergiversation, and needing to excrete the hostility this self-knowledge creates, they find and turn on and shit on White Nationalists. It’s as safe to attack us as it is unsafe to tell the truth about race their jewish masters want covered up. Oh well. Even a eunuch has to eat. And prudence, remember, is the chief conservative virtue. But verily I say unto you, the one-word definition of conservative is coward.

We can’t help but observe the paleocon dogs never bark when the kikes who own them spirit yet another WN or revisionist off to prison for nothing more than speaking his mind. Don’t wait up for Tremulous Tommy to mention the persecution of Steve Whittle and Simon Sheppard. Indeed, Fleming has celebrated the jailing of WN. Why? Because it makes it easier for him to maintain his pose as the right margin of respectability – the place to go if you want something different and better than what the Reps and Dems have to offer. In reality, Fleming and crew are part of the System they affect to despise. They may get crumbs compared to the liberals, but they’ve long since adjusted to that. They’re happy with their slice, however small it is. They’ve lost long enough that the only people they attract are ceta males who I believe get some kind of sexual pleasure out of submitting to a stronger force. They aren’t homosexuals, most of them, but they are women-men. They let out the telling little-dog barks whenever they encounter normals – men who feel the way Schroeder did, as Charles Shulz put it in Peanuts: “I’m not like you, Charlie Brown. I have to win sometimes.”

From VNNForum.com
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=76500
Chronicles thread in which Tom Fleming shows himself an angry old eunuch
http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=603


  • 11 Responses to “What Are Paleoconservatives?”

    1. Bret Ludwig Says:

      To recap, race is not color per se but “an extended and partially inbred family structure”. So to disavow race for ethnicity is a semantic exercise on both ends.

    2. Don Says:

      A robust message, written in the spirit of AL if not he. The paleo-cons are a revolting bunch. They join the wretched Justin Raimondo and the equally wretched Paul Gottlieb in demeaning epithets directed at the most powerless people in this country, blue-collar white American workers. This tendency is as paramount in the paleo-con world as it is in the neo-con world.

      They’re a classist bunch, eager to put themselves well within the most classist white Americans. Their ideological doctrines are so divorced from the real world, that they exist merely to spew unreasoned illogical arguments about the rest of us, and to unhold notions that won’t get them into trouble with their masters.

    3. New America Says:

      Great essay.

      The demonic Jew, with their ability to pervert all who trust them, have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams with the formation of the term, “paleoconservative,” and its implications.

      As I read the writings of the late Dr. Sam Francis, I realized how badly the term “conservative” had been hijacked by the Jews.

      You rarely hear the word “conservative” these days; it’s either “neoconservative” or the loathed “paleoconservative.”

      In short, using their usual cuckoo’s egg strategy, the Jews have pretty much replaced the term “conservative” with “noeconservative,” and have, in fact, made the definition of “neoconservative” the NEW definition of “conservative.”

      The Goddamn Jews who financed Buckley’s “National Review” – and Buckley, come to think of it – have now made “conservatism” a pejorative terms, and “classic ‘conservatism'” a pejorative ideology, in turn old, tired, archaic, and failed.

      Clever, this linguistic neutering of your defeated Enemies.

      “Paleos” are simply another straw man – and, like straw men, are subpotent, at best, and impotent, at worst.

      Kind of like much of “Chronicles,” come to think of it…

      You made an excellent observation, one that I strongly agree with, and see as the canary in the coal mine of “conservative/Nationalist” thought.

      you wrote:

      Needing a place to vent the frustration born of their intellectual tergiversation, and needing to excrete the hostility this self-knowledge creates, they find and turn on and shit on White Nationalists. It’s as safe to attack us as it is unsafe to tell the truth about race their jewish masters want covered up.

      in reply:
      I think there is a bit more to this than it seems at first sight.

      I think an Obama Presidency, overseeing as it will the greatest economic train wreck in American history – and THAT”S saying something – will also have the effect of (1) legitimizing discussion of RACE, much more often, and (2) this will allow the beginnings of discussion of a Positive Theory of RACE.

      This will lead to US – one way, or another.

      I think they are afraid of that.

      Parenthetically, let me note that:

      I am laying such groundwork as I can, slowly, softly, quietly.

      Frank Roman has been laying the sort of intellectual groundwork we need to help people open their eyes; short of the focus of VNN, he has been discussing RACIAL issues, in a positive Nationalist light.

      Peter Schaenk, of VOR, did a lot of good for people I gave cd’s of his works to, edited to help them go right to the good parts. I edited out the music, which, all too often, gets in the way of the message.

      That takes us to WHY are the takimags and Chronicles people attacking us so vehemently, just now.

      The answer is simple.

      The Jews SEE the possibility of a Nationalist Awakening, and with that, the spark of WHITE Nationalism will spark a prairie fire – Obama, for instance, has made public MENTION of the word “Nigger” much more acceptable.

      His nomination would seem the ideal opportunity for Republicans to attack Affirmative Action full tilt; that they haven’t says something about the One Party System – a LOT of the Dispossessed Majority will have good cause to see social issues stripped of the cute phrases, and clever code-words, and begin to look at the social issues – ultimately ALL social issues, in the light of RACE.

      THAT will lead them to US.

      And, the neoconservative attacks on us are designed to act as back fires, designed to contain the prairie fires before they become uncontrollable.

      Remember, when Hitler took office, the unemployment rate was FIFTY percent.

      The People heard the Call, and the Awakening took place.

      Subsequently, social and economic miracles took place, as the Creative Powers of the White RACE were allowed to flourish, free of the dimmer switches placed on them by the demonic RACE known as Jews.

      If we start with Family, as the microcosm of RACE; RACE, as the macrocosm of Family, and RACE as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture, then, eventually, the Spirit will punch through the Mind, which has been trapped by Wordism into the functional equivalent of impotence, and/or insanity.

      “First, they ignore you, then they mock you, and then they try to destroy you.”

      “…try…”

      New America

      An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

    4. Mark Says:

      “Your true fatherland is wherever you are comfortable, no matter what country your (sic) are in. Voltaire, who followed his own advice and went to live first in Prussia, then in Switzerland, concludes by saying: “He who should wish his fatherland might never be greater, smaller, richer, poorer, would be the citizen of the world.””

      There is some truth to that, and I think whites of whatever ethnicity should be allowed mobility within the white spectrum.

      Obviously Voltaire felt comfortable in Western civilization, no matter the country. He didn’t go to Africa and live in a mud hut with savages.

      Nationalism or racialism isn’t trying to exclude or destroy the world, its trying to preserve its own racial and cultural uniqueness. The international or multicultural movement is a destructive movement, wishing to destroy the Western world and its races and cultures by merging it with the more primitive third world.

      “Marx and Engels viewed the nation-state (along with the family and private property) as an institution that had been created by patriarchal men solely for the purpose of oppressing women and the poor. In the Communist Manifesto, they wrote the blueprint, not merely for communist revolutions, but for an international order that would ultimately end the exploitation of poor nations and replace nation states themselves. Here, in a nutshell, is the entire modern doctrine of internationalism: an end to the exploitation of poor nations by rich nations, and, ultimately, an end to the system of nation-states.”

      Indeed, an end to the West and the white man and woman.

      Really it’s just an exchange of power. Let’s see, would I rather be “exploited” by white men who preserve my race and way of life, or by evil Jews who want to destroy my race and culture and control my thoughts with hate laws? Not a difficult choice.

    5. Socrates Says:

      Don: “alex” is indeed Linder.

      However, sometimes VNNB posts are posted in the blog category “Alex Linder,” usually not by Linder.

    6. -jc Says:

      Another outstanding piece of writing. And, if we make it through this, Linder will be venerated as a racialist Mencken by our people.

    7. Brian Stone Says:

      I loved the term “Queafing.” I had to look it up. it means vaginal fart.

      Alas, you mispelled it. According to Dictionary.com it should be spelled queef, not queaf. Still It’s a wonderful term of derogation which I shall make full use of. Thank you.

      By the way jc, I agree with you about Linder. His writing is one of the main things that keep me coming back to VNN.

      -Brian

    8. Alex Linder Says:

      Alas, you mispelled it. According to Dictionary.com it should be spelled queef, not queaf. Still It’s a wonderful term of derogation which I shall make full use of. Thank you.

      By the way jc, I agree with you about Linder. His writing is one of the main things that keep me coming back to VNN.

      -Brian

      Ha, good catch. I had forgotten – don’t see that word too much, don’t know who made it up. But it sure fits gas escaping the Sid.

    9. Alex Linder Says:

      btw, just to clarify, we have certain people allowed to post here through the system, rather than as comments. most of what appears posted by ‘alex’ is me, Alex Linder, but not all. sometimes people go in under ‘alex’ to post administrative stuff. but generally ‘alex’ is me, as is ‘kville’ at Kirksville Today.

    10. Alex Linder Says:

      P.S. – when i first learned ‘queefing,’ i was instructed that it was not just a vaginal fart but a bloody one. scholars differ.

    11. Alex Linder Says:

      finally it pains me to say this – we use a combo of scribe fire atop word press to edit this thing, and it is so fucking annoying that sometimes, to preserve sanity, we just let typos lie. because half the time when you go in and change them, it fucks up ten other things, especially the spacing. Socrates prefers the block form; personally i like ragged right, feels livelier. to get that effect often involves about six different attempts to post. it’s utterly maddening, and you would think i’m joking but i’m not. i sometimes rue the day we ever left basic html for blog format. the archive function and the comments are the only good things about blogs run off word press.