INSTAURATION: Bombfather, the Plagiarist
Posted by alex in Einstein, Instauration, jew frauds, jewed culture, jewish scam artists, Wilmot Robertson at 6:09 pm | 
Permanent Link
[November 1994]
Bad news for Einstein aficianados. Recently discovered correspondence reveals that he treated his first wife, physicist Mileva Maric, whose father was a Serb and mother a Montenegrin, most shabbily. He never got around to marrying her until after their illegitimate child was born, a girl, who was immediately given up for adoption or otherwise disposed of. What happened to her is all so murky that even Einstein’s most avid biographers can’t penetrate the mystery.
Two sons came into the picture later: Hans Albert, who became a professor of physics at Berkeley, and Eduard, who suffered from schizophrenia and spent much of his life in and out of psychiatric clinics. Harvard Professor Gerald Holton in a forthcoming book, Einstein, History and Other Passions, wonders if there wasn’t a streak of mental disease in Einstein himself, since he often displayed schizoid traits.
Einstein’s second wife was his second cousin, Elsa Löwenthal, a Jewess who had a daughter from a previous marriage, but had no offspring with Einstein. In company with wife #2, who later left him, he made his first trip to the United States in 1921. After being driven to his totel in New York City, he commented, “Jews, Jews, nothing but Jews. It was the first time in my life that I saw Jews en masse.”
Overpraised Hero
After the publication of his paper on special relativity in September 1905, even though it contained no footnotes or sources (an unheard of practice in scientific treatises), Einstein became a world hero, first to his fellow Jews and then, as the Jewish media network moved into high gear, to non-Jews. The iconolatry went well beyond the limits of what Einstein deserved, especially since Henri Poincaré the brilliant French mathematician and physicist, was the brain behind relativity theory.
The influence of Poincaré extends not only to Einstein’s notion of relativity, but also to the famous equation E=mc2, which was adumbrated in a paper the Frenchman wrote in 1900. In 1904, one year before Einstein published his paper on special relativity, Poincaré gave a speech at a world scientific congress in St. Louis. Here is how it began: “Relativity, according to which the laws of physics should be the same for a stationary observer as for an observer transported in uniform motion. . . .”
A 60-page article celebrating the 200th anniversary of the Ecole polytechnique (France’s Massachusetts Insitute of Technology) and published in the journal, La jaune et la rouge (April 1994), is devoted to rehabilitating Poincaré and showing that he is more responsible for relativity than Einstein. Proof after proof is offered and the comparison of several texts makes it seem as if Einstein plagiarized much of Poincaré’s own words. Whether it will ever be possible to restore Poincaré’s reputation and reduce the hype about Bombfather is a question for the future. The hero worship of Einstein will certainly continue until and unless the Jewish grip on the Western media is loosened.
12 October, 2006 at 6:24 pm
In my studies of the Bible I have found that “the Jews” took a lot of ideas (Satan as the cause of evil, the resurrection of the dead) from various peoples–even the garden of Eden story is a reworking of a Babylonian myth (a much better reworking, I think).
The Jesus Seminar goes further and says that Jesus himself is the Jewish answer to the mystery cults and their pagan dying-and-rising saviors. Two excellent books are The Incredible Shrinking Son of Man and The Jesus Puzzle.
Jesus could be the Corn King, but my jury is still out on that one.
But Einstein was only just acting like a Jew.
The newspapers were just acting like Jews in praising one of their own to the heavens.
12 October, 2006 at 6:46 pm
So, another jew fraud. Their very best and very brightest, shown to be hardly more than a intellectual fraud. E=jew x lies to the infinite power.
And he got rid of the baby? Wow. What a guy.
12 October, 2006 at 6:47 pm
So much of what we think we know . . .
12 October, 2006 at 7:26 pm
And to compound matters, Einstein’s theory of relativity is incorrect.
Herbert Dingle proved it:
http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm
http://www.mrelativity.net/Papers/18/Ricker.htm
.
12 October, 2006 at 8:13 pm
For a truly in depth treatment of the fraud of quantum mechanics and relativity theory I recommend reading ‘The Farce of Physics’ by Bryan G. Wallace. Here is the link:
http://surf.de.uu.net/bookland/sci/farce/farce_toc.html
From the introduction-
A 1986 Harris poll found that about 70 percent of the responding adult Americans described themselves as interested in science and technology, and they said their understanding of the subject was very good or adequate. [153] The word scientist entered the English language in 1840, and few individuals earned a living doing research, with most of the investigations carried out by gentlemen of wealth and leisure. At that time, a handful of American scientist were taking steps to transform their status and image and separate themselves as professionals from those they considered amateurs. [154] The major tactic used to create this artificial separation has been the elaborate use of technical jargon and complex mathematics. This erection of higher and higher barriers to the comprehension of scientific affairs is a threat to an essential characteristic of science, its openness to outside examination and appraisal. [155]
Because of this, modern theoretical physics has become to a large degree, little more than an elaborate farce. I will attempt to explore and document this argument, and this book is meant for anyone who is interested in this subject. I have tried to reduce the technical jargon and mathematics to a minimum in order to reach the widest possible audience. If the reader finds parts that are hard to understand, just skip them, and perhaps come back to them later if you decide to explore that part in greater detail. You should realize that in general only about 90% of professional physicists are able to make sense of less than 10% of what other physicists say. [156]
For the past 50 years most of the scientific research has been funded by the federal government, and the number of Ph.D. scientists working in the U.S. has far outstripped the growth of the population as a whole. President Eisenhower stated that “in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.” [150]
You the taxpayer fund this research, and you also enjoy the benefits that legitimate research can bring. That is why it is important to understand what you are getting for your money, and for you to inform your elected representatives when you think your precious tax dollars are being wasted. This book is a journey through my career as a physicist, giving the interesting details of the many events, arguments, and evidence encountered along the way. I suspect that the reader will discover that the truth can be stranger than fiction.
The term physics was derived from the Greek word “physis” for nature, and the roots of physics lies in the first period of Greek philosophy in the sixth century B.C., where science, philosophy and religion were not separated. The aim of physics is to discover the essential nature of all things, and it lies at the base of all of natural science.
The father of modern physics and astronomy, Galileo Galilei, was outspoken, forceful, sometimes tactless, and he enjoyed debate. He made many powerful enemies, and was eventually tried by the Inquisition and convicted of heresy. In Galileo’s time it was heresy to claim there was evidence that the Earth went around the Sun, and in our time it is heresy to argue that there is evidence that the speed of light in space is not constant for all observers, no matter how fast they are moving, as predicted by Prof. Albert Einstein’s sacred 1905 Special Relativity Theory. The heresies change, but as you will find from reading this book, human nature remains the same!
12 October, 2006 at 11:29 pm
Just to clear some things up. Montenegrins are Serbs. Montenegro is a country, its inhabitants are Serbs. The problem arises after several decades of communist propaganda of them being different from Serbs. Same goes for Macedonians and FYR Macedonia. Both countries were formed in 1945 as separate communist republics to form Yugoslavia headed by the jew Tito and his ilk. Its the good old jewish tactic of divide and conquer.
So Mileva Maric by ethnicity is fully Serbian.
As for the jew Einstein, I’ve known for some time that he plagiarized several scientists throughout his career and claimed it as his work. I’ve heard stories that he even stole some invention from Nikola Tesla (another Serbian) while working in the patent office in Switzerland. The guy is a typical jew, of whom only jews can be proud of.
13 October, 2006 at 1:45 pm
here’s a source that claims E=MC (squared) was discovered before Einstein –
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olinto_De_Pretto
– in Wikipedia of all places. It must have slipped by the jew screen there. Looking at pictures of Einstein – well, he looks like an alcoholic unemployed factory worker, getting ready to have his first “eye-opener” of the day – at about 12 noon, after he’s stumbled out of bed after an all night bender. How could someone who looks that – undisciplined? marginal? come up with something so brilliant?
But, “that’s just my opinion” Ha Ha
13 October, 2006 at 1:48 pm
High-energy physics = Talmudic mumbo jumbo. About as scientific as that other great fraud, Freud. We can add Marx and Boas to the equation.
13 October, 2006 at 1:48 pm
(submitting again, to make sure this post “takes,” I’m having technical issues)
Here’s a source that claims E=MC (squared) was discovered before Einstein –
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olinto_De_Pretto
– in Wikipedia of all places. It must have slipped by the jew screen there. Looking at pictures of Einstein – well, he looks like an alcoholic unemployed factory worker, getting ready to have his first “eye-opener” of the day – at about 12 noon, after he’s stumbled out of bed after an all night bender. How could someone who looks that – undisciplined? marginal? come up with something so brilliant?
But, “that’s just my opinion” Ha Ha
13 October, 2006 at 2:47 pm
I always found very odd that “famous” picture in which the patent clerk Albert sticks out his tongue. Never seen any man of caliber in either science or arts making such a fool of oneself. The fascinating thing would be to know what did he actually do at Princeton University? Was he just the usual honorary do-nothing celebrity or did he really have to lecure et al??
13 October, 2006 at 4:31 pm
Speaking of Freud, I rejected the whole “id-ego-superego model” some time ago. I realized I don’t have any such thing going on inside of me. It’s amazing how “clean” I felt once I purged that horseshit out of my mind, and I recommend it highly.
I consider it just another Jewy mindfuck. It might very well describe the Jew psyche – I wouldn’t doubt that the average Jew wants to kill Daddy because he secretly wants to fuck Mommy – but I can’t see how it relates to any one else.
13 October, 2006 at 4:45 pm
Re Zoroastro
The position of the ‘good doctor’ at Princeton Institute for Advanced Study was pretty much a sinecure. He found time between his efforts on the unification of physics to write on the desirability of ‘world government’. A subject dear to the hearts of ‘the chosen’!
13 October, 2006 at 6:12 pm
The major tactic used to create this artificial separation has been the elaborate use of technical jargon and complex mathematics.
Well, Graachus, perhaps all them there numbers seem all confusing-like, but I can assure you there’s a purpose. I’m sorry, but studying medicine, building high-tech machinery and doing all the other things all them college kids in the natural sciences do, isn’t possible without hokey-pokey mathematics and all those funny words.
As for Einstein, there is more proof of his frauds here:
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,1780224,00.html
“A lot of people think of Einstein as a mathematical genius – he wasn’t,” said David McMullan, a physicist at Plymouth University. He said Einstein used Straus as he had used other mathematically gifted colleagues in his early career. “Straus’s mathematical virtuosity gave a framework to Einstein’s intuitive vision of the universe.”
What is an “intuitive vision of the universe”? Does it mean making things up, while it is the Aryan mathematician Straus who does the actual work?
“Intuitive vision.” The typical Jew – talk, talk, talk, talk. While someone else, who doesn’t have the media’s attention, makes real progress.
Einstein was also active in communist circles. There is no proof of him being an actual member of the Communist Party USA, but they were all his friends and acquintances – all those Jews in New York, who controlled the party and made up most of its members. (This “workers’ party” never consisted of workers, but of people in high positions in universities, mostly Jews.) These were the people he hang out with. He was friends with those in the Rosenberg spy ring, who turned over nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union.
13 October, 2006 at 6:14 pm
Addendum: after WWII, where he had advocated killing millions of Germans with nuclear bombs, he became a leading figure in the World Government Movement, an anti-White, communist front.
13 October, 2006 at 6:35 pm
“About as scientific as that other great fraud, Freud.”
Don’t forget Dr. Milton Fraudman, loyal supporter of the paper money aristocracy. Fraudman was the originator of income tax withholding. Without this, the whole damn system would fail.
13 October, 2006 at 8:30 pm
Hoosier–
When I was (tentively) majoring in Psychology, I had a female teacher who said, concerning Freud’s theory, something like this:
“Freud’s theory is way out, but I can see how he could derive such a theory by working with middle-class Jews.”!!!!
Far out.
That was in 1973, but I still remember it.
14 October, 2006 at 1:37 am
it sound like your teacher was pretty “jew wise,” Antagonistes
Here’s a little video of Einstien talking about – a Hebrew university?
I can’t quite make out what he’s saying:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ChbLfdtk08
Ha Ha, look at some of the comments – and look how the Einstein advocates go off the deep end when challenged. The whole Jewy thing – it truly is a religion. I’m not sure what user “kfrkk” is trying to say.
14 October, 2006 at 8:28 am
The position of the ‘good doctor’ at Princeton Institute for Advanced Study was pretty much a sinecure. He found time between his efforts on the unification of physics to write on the desirability of ‘world government’. A subject dear to the hearts of ‘the chosen’!
As I have thought… Thanks, Celtic Warrior.
14 October, 2006 at 5:11 pm
It was said of Einstein even before he died that,
“When physicists came to visit he played the violin. When musicians visited he talked about physics.”
The same was true of Veliokovsky, another Jewish fraud (redundant synonyms) Einstein was close to in his Princeton years. Astronomers thought his astro-physics was nonsense but considered his ancient history sounded plausible. Archeologists liked his astrophysics but thought his ancient history absurd.
15 October, 2006 at 3:47 pm
Our criticism of Einstein is a bit contradictory, it seems. Some say Einstein is a plagiator of a good theory. Some say his theory is nonsense. A synthesis of both positions would be that Einstein is a plagiator of a nonsensical theory, but this position is a bit funny, I guess. I am not an expert, so I can’t say what is the case.
William Pierce thought Einstein to be competent, btw, but that doesn’t mean a lot to me. I tend to believe that the theory is nonsense, because I never could understand it. Before I became jew-wise I thought I was too stupid to understand, but now I see the case a bit differently. That someone with a limited mathematical understanding, as it was obviously the case with Einstein, can be a great theoretical physician, seems improbable to me. And many good theoretical physicians have said that the theory of relativity is quite useless, because it can’t be tested.
The Nazis were perhaps right when they spoke of “Jewish physics”, which was an attack to sound reasoning similar to the Jewish attack on good music with the atonal crap.
If you have the time you might read Christopher Bjerknes huge book on Einstein, which deals with physics as well as politics.
You can download it here (17MB):
http://www.jewishracism.com/SaintEinstein.pdf
Einstein might be part of the great mind-rape, the jews are perpetrating to us. The idiot as genius. If you can sell that, you can sell everything. And the jews proof it every single day that they can fool us big time. The biggest hoax is that the jews are innocent victims of the events they themselves have organized.
Some additional remarks concerning the “father of the bomb”: The development of the atomic bomb had nothing to do with the theory of relativity, of course, although ZOG propaganda always makes the link, when it states that the talk of “Jewish physics” doomed the German project of an atomic bomb.
The atomic race between the Germans and ZOG is so obfuscated like any other subject of prime importance. My casual reading on this matter indicates, that it is far from clear, that the atomic bombs, which were dropped on Japan, were independently developed in the JewSA. The amount of treason is incredible! Powers, who had access to secret files, says in his book about Heisenberg that 17 major acts of treason helped to develop the bomb, if I recall correctly, but he doesn’t specify! And Hydrick argues in his book, that only the looting of the U-boat U234, sent to Japan in the last days of the war, made it possible for the Jews of the Manhattan project to complete their bombs. And there are other speculation surrounding that topic.
Einstein is only in political respects the “father of the bomb”, he hated the Germans so much, that he used his reputation to persuade his race fellow Roosevelt to develop the bomb, of which he knew, that the Germans worked on it. Einstein was treated in Germany more than well (he became professor without fulfilling the ordinary preconditions). He left to the USA, before Hitler came to power. But as a real zionist he hated the Germans (the father of modern Zionism, Moses Hess said, that all Germans must be killed, because all Germans would be natural born jew-haters (I wish it would be so!)). In 1942 Einstein expressed in a letter to a Mr. Sayen that he hoped that all Germans would be killed at the end of the war.
And today Einstein is presented as a national hero by the German ZOG, not only as outstandings physicist, but also as good-natured fellow. Schools are named after him, his disgusting face can be seen on stamps, etc. What a silly comedy life has become.
16 October, 2006 at 10:39 am
Sehnsucht nach dem Reich Says:
“Einstein is a plagiator of a good theory. Some say his theory is nonsense. A synthesis of both positions would be that Einstein is a plagiator of a nonsensical theory, but this position is a bit funny, I guess. I am not an expert, so I can’t say what is the case.”
——————–
I’m not an expert either, but my theory is that Einstein is a plagiarist of a good theory – perhaps a theory that needed some work and fine tuning. Then, he added some of his own nonsense, and twisted a good theory into a nonsensical theory. Maybe both sides are true. But I’m speculating – trying to find a pattern from the information that may not exist.