AIN’T SKEERED O’ JEWS – BACK IN THE THIRTIES

9/11 INSIDE-JOB BELIEF SPREADS

Former CIA Analyst Comes Out For New 9/11 Investigations

Bill Christison, a CIA analyst for 28 and a half years, has emerged after 5 years of downplaying 9/11 skepticism, as a proponent for new 9/11 investigations. He joins Mel Goodman, David MacMichaels and Ray McGovern as a critic of the 9/11 Commission, but goes further, endorsing some 9/11 theories, and giving them priorities;

Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11

by Bill Christison
www.dissidentvoice.org
August 14, 2006

… But on July 29 and 30, and then again on August 1, something else happened that increasing numbers of people believe is of equal importance. On these dates C-SPAN rebroadcast a panel discussion, held originally in late June… to discuss what really happened on September 11, 2001… The meeting was attended by 1,200 people interested in hearing something other than the official story of 9/11. The TV audience was evidently large enough to spur C-SPAN to broadcast the panel discussion five separate times in four days…

…Let’s address the real issues here. Why is it important that we not let the so-called conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11 be drowned out? After spending the better part of the last five years treating these theories with utmost skepticism, I have devoted serious time to actually studying them in recent months, and have also carefully watched several videos that are available on the subject. I have come to believe that significant parts of the 9/11 theories are true, and that therefore significant parts of the “official story” put out by the U.S. government and the 9/11 Commission are false. I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe…

Christison had previously emerged as a critic of Bush foreign policy in Robert Greenwald’s “Uncovered: the War on Iraq” – “That very first day, on September 12, one day after September 11… the meeting that was held in the White House, in the situation room… led to Rumsfeld asking the question, “Shouldn’t we use this as an opportunity to do something about Iraq as well?”” – Bill Christison.

NIGABE: STARVING FOR LAUGHTER

Mugabe issues ultimatum to new black farmers in Zimbabwe

Aug 14 11:02 AM US/Eastern

Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe has warned new black farmers to either produce food on farms taken from whites or have the land seized by the government.

“Those with land should use it to prove they were indeed interested in farming in the first place,” Mugabe said Monday at a Heroes’ Day celebration.

“Those who can’t produce, be warned, we will take the land back. We now need to distinguish capable and committed farmers from holders of land who are mere chancers and who should be made to seek opportunities elsewhere,” he said.

Around 4,000 white farmers have lost their land, often violently, since Mugabe launched his widely criticised land reform programme in 2000 to redress the imbalances in land ownership from the colonial era.

Fewer than 600 farmers remain on their properties in Zimbabwe, once called a regional breadbasket, and the programme has been widely criticised as a failure.

“If farming is not in your blood, switch to what you are good at. [turning over rocks for grubs] We want those with land to use it. We don’t want to keep begging for food,” Mugabe told thousands who gathered to celebrate Zimbabwe’s fallen liberation struggle heroes.

Critics blame the land reform programme in part for the country’s economic woes, saying the majority of its beneficiaries lacked the skills and means to farm and relied instead on state handouts. [useless niggers] […]

Zimbabwe’s annual inflation declined to 993.6 percent in July from 1,184.6 percent, while reeling under spiralling unemployment and severe fuel and food shortages.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/na/060814150217.hl8mkhtr.html

NIGS ‘N’ MEXES USE GUNS TO SHOOT PEOPLE, SO WE SHOULD OUTLAW REPLICAS, REASON DALLASITES

Alarmed by rising gun crime in Dallas, named the most dangerous city in America by the FBI, and by shootings nationwide by police of offenders carrying toy weapons, councillors have advanced a plan to ban replica firearms.

But some see the measure as a “criminalisation of nostalgia” in a city where guns and popular culture are inextricably linked, from the pistol-packing six-shooters in Texas-themed spaghetti westerns of old to one of the greatest television cliffhangers – who shot JR in the 1980s series Dallas?

“It’s a loss of innocence and very sad,” said Mike Belden, 57, manager of the Collectible Trains and Toys shop in Dallas. “My generation grew up on a steady diet of TV westerns and everybody wanted to be the cowboy. A toy gun was just part of the costume. If you wanted to be Superman, you had to have a cape, and if you were playing cowboys, the pistol was essential. And westerns taught us lessons. The good guys always won, the bad guys always lost and it was easy to tell who was who.”

Others point to the “hypocrisy” of politicians wanting to ban toy weapons while continuing to use gun culture to market the city. Baseball caps and T-shirts bearing the slogan “Shoot JR in Dallas” were sold to try to persuade Hollywood producers to film the forthcoming Dallas movie remake there.

Despite a recent drop, murders in Dallas still run at four times the US average and its overall crime rate has been highest in the country for cities with a population of more than 1 million for eight successive years, according to the FBI.

The council will vote on the proposal from its public safety committee this month. If it is passed, Dallas would become the second city in America, after New York, with such stringent laws about the sale and possession of toy guns. Replicas painted in bright colours or made of translucent material to help distinguish them from real guns would be exempt.

“I would have liked to see the city absolutely outlaw replica guns, but to get anything progressive done in this part of the country is significant,” Rev Peter Johnson, a community activist and supporter of the ban, told the Dallas Morning News.

Article.

TOURING AMERIKWA, GOOD OL’ USSA…

Intellectual Weapons, Today’s Zundel and You

Recently, during these summer months, I’ve been riding my Vulcan thousands of miles. My Western fun-adventures are all about exploration. As a kid, I did the same thing in the East.

I’ve discovered some fundamental facts. Amdom today, in many aspects, resembles the South Africa of yesterday. Essentially, the political entity called America is fetching in foreigners so as not to dirty her hands. It’s kinda like the old East German state’s 100,000 Vietnamese labor force.

The capitalist USSA, in many respects, is similar to today’s Germany, one-GB and France. Some infer that the Third World is metastasizing within the body of the nation. At hotels around the country Third Worlders have provided most of the physical labor -such as pool maintenance. This is simply an undeniable.

Moreover, Third Worlders pick the fruits of our fields. Often it’s impossible to converse with the labor force of Haitians, Mexicans and others. The construction trade is also full of illegal migrants.

Generally, at night, after my ride, I ambulate along streets, visit malls and have lunch in local restaurants. I try to mix with the town folk. I have a thirst for knowledge and my goal is to learn from primary sources.

This writer’s no theorist. I have resided in both the East and West. I’ve been coerced into studying the Markist gods of the East and Freudian gods of the West. Let me tell your something. My friend, reality affirms that the opulent American politico hierarchy has had more success in multicultural achievements than those who built the foundations of the former Soviet Union.

During exploration trips, to induce sleep, I read issues of “The Occidental Quarterly” and other cultural periodicals. My bag has always been the behavioral paradigms within ethnicity. I try to correlate what I’ve seen with what I’ve read. Well, the other day, I ventured to the Florida Keys. While in Miami there was no doubt that one had left the actual state of the USA. Street after street was built upon filth. The society was surely representative of unadulterated capitalism. The homeless could be seen picking trash cans and across the avenues sat fenced-in homes of millionaires. The pages of The Occidental Quarterly were alive.

Outside Miami TQO’s message continued to unfold. In the Keys obese British, German and other rich tourists mingled with plump Americans. Their entire existence oscillated around plastic, sunshine and selfish intrinsic values. Not one person had any interest in defending Whitey, an endangered species.

Today, while sitting in bed, I picked up a cultural periodical and read the editor’s note. He pleaded for readers to assist in advancing subscriptions. Years ago, when I was young, I would have purchased a few hundred. Now I merely remail old issues of worthy publications. Occasionally I buy extra copies and forward them to concerned loved ones in America or Europe.

The editor of this particular publication spoke about criminalizing white dissident speech and association. A good and intelligent fellow, he depicted how those of Euro heritage were being incarcerated in Ausseyville, England and Amdom. While he vented concern about our people, a war was raging and the entire world was angry at America. Yet, consumers I had conversed with around Amdom had little interest in the
millions deprived of their homes in regions near our TV hero’s J state.

Readers of these few lines, might be interested to know that not one single person, at any restaurant, knew anything about my friend and free speech advocate Ernst Zundel. They were unaware of basic freedoms of speech being curtailed. They spoke about clothing, cars and toys.

As beautiful women, with eye-catching enlarged breasts, smiled at phony rich men, several free speech advocates were being arrested in Europe. Polonian-American media noted that the FBI, in coordination with Home Land Security experts, had provided evidence to the Polish police about
a so called anti-Semitic internet operation. As you read this, alleged anti-war thought criminals are incarcerated.

According to Nowy Dziennik (July 7, 2006, p. 4), Blood and Honour was a chauvinistic association. It elicited fascist propaganda about a certain group. The organization was so dangerous that it spawned anti-Semitic hate propaganda in Polish, Russian, English and other languages. It advocated laws to restrict illegal migration. It even went so far as to insist that the political control group of EuroMan does not represent the interests of Euro society’s survival. Like TOQ -only unsophisticatedly- it spoke of declining birth rates, demographic change and coerced hybridization due to media propaganda.

Let the lessons of free speech hero Zundel and Dr. Ratajczak be a tool for learning. Big Brother is watching you. He reads cyber space. The myth of our free speech is encroaching upon Western civilization’s other major myth.

I learned one thing while riding countless thousands of miles within the former Soviet Union. You know what it was? It was that more and more sheeple will fight and die to carry the chosen message and support chosen goals.

Recent tours of Amdom indicate that it’s no different here. Unless you understand the value of self-censorship and what some infer is the evolution of the USSA, there is every chance that you will experience something that you could have never envisioned.

Lastly, your problem is not unique. It’s global.

bruno

NOT ENOUGH COONTASTICS READING NEWS?

‘Too many white faces on the BBC news’

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/08/14/nbbc14.xml

CHESTER MAKES WAY FOR EPSTER THE MOLESTOR

Don’t forget to warn your child about the noxious nosemen, often seen in the company of dershowitzim..

Jeffrey Epstein craved big homes, elite friends – and, investigators say, underage girls

Is it anti-semitic to complain about being molested by a jew? How would Alan Dershowitz answer that question?
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/pbcwest/content/local_news/epaper/2006/08/14/m1a_EPSTEIN_0814.html

CHINESE HATE NIGGERS TOO

[Reader writes:] I’ve never heard of those. The jewipedia writer says these mini-riots preceded the Tiananmen Square protests

As well as resentment about the larger stipends given to African students, hostility from Chinese students towards Africans also flared up when there was contact between African men and Chinese women. In an incident in Shanghai in 1979, African students were attacked after playing loud music and consorting with Chinese women. These clashes became more common during the 1980s and sometimes led to arrests and deportations of African students. Cultural differences in dating habits added to the tensions – whereas Chinese students were expected to know each other for some time before dating, African students often asked strangers to date.

On December 24, 1988 two male African students were entering their campus at Hehai University in Nanjing with two Chinese women. The occasion was a Christmas Eve party. A quarrel about correct identification between one of the Africans and a Chinese security guard, who had ordered the Africans to register their guests, led to a brawl between the African and Chinese students on the campus which lasted till the morning, leaving 13 students injured. 300 Chinese students, spurred by false rumors that a Chinese man had been killed by the Africans, broke into and set about destroying the Africans’ dormitories, shouting slogans such as “Kill the black devils!”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_Anti-African_protests

JEWS ARE A VERY ETHICAL PEOPLE, THEY TELL US

OCCUPIED PALESTINE (ISRAEL SINCE 1948) ORDERS IMMEDIENTLY TEL AVIV WEST (USA BEFORE 1948) TO SPEED UP THE DELIVERY OF SHORT RANGE ANTI-PERSONNEL ROCKETS WITH CLUSTER MUNITONS , SO IT CAN MURDER EVEN MORE GOYIM ( HUMAN CATTLE) IN LEBANON…..

http://www.natallnews.com/printer.php?id=2759

CALENDAR: IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON THE ‘HOLOCAUST’ TO BE HELD IN DECEMBER

Iranian Conference on the ‘Holocaust’
December 11-12.2006
We have lift off. The paradigm changing conference to scientifically investigate the nature of a ‘Holocaust’ will be held in Tehran on December the 11th and 12th this year. All those wishing to attend or offer papers please email the institute at the email address at the header. The organisers are hoping not only sceptics but believers will attend to exchange views. There is obviously more freedom in Iran than in the controlled Western countries where dissidents on this topic are imprisoned.

Further details will be given as available

There will be an announcement shortly on official website
www.ipis.ir calling for papers from those who want to participate in the conference. We would be very happy to have speakers from any where. the registration can be done in this e-mail address.

S.M.Tabatabaee
General Director
Institute For Political and International Studies (IPIS)
[email protected]

GENES AND DISEASES

8-14-06

“Race” These Days

Oh, what to do if you’re a racial mutt? Just check most of the little boxes on a race questionnaire? [by the way, you’ll notice that “Jewish” isn’t listed within the racial/ethnic groups. Recall what we wrote a few days ago about Jews now being listed as a religion only. Further, those who doubt that Jews are a racial group might ask themselves how Jews get 30 different genetic diseases if they are not closely related by genes, while Blacks get maybe 7 or 8 diseases related to their genes, e.g. sickle-cell anemia [1]. In other words, it would appear that Ashkenazic Jews are more related to each other than Blacks are – in fact, we have heard that geneticists love to study the Ashkenazim since those Jews are so closely related]:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/education/09ethnic.html?ex=1312776000&en=cf462f4f26f4ea33&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

[1] a mention of Jewish genetic diseases: http://www.mazornet.com/genetics/index.asp

PREPARING YOUR FAMILY AGAINST X, Y, AND Z

This is a great presentation that everyone can understand.

http://www.stevenharris.net/streamcertprepclass.htm

JOKE

A guy goes into an “adult” store,
and asks for an inflatable doll.

A guy behind the counter asks,
“Male or female?”

The guy says,
“Female.”

Counter guy asks,
“Black or white?”

The guy says,
“White.”

Counter guy asks,
“Christian, or Muslim and Jewish?”

The guy asks,
“What the heck does religion have to do with it?”

Counter guys says,
“The Jew and Muslim only come as a set.”

The guy asks,
“Why is that?”

Counter guy says,
“The Jews and Muslims blow each other up!”

KIKES KIKING KIKILY: LARRY JEWBOY AUSTER

Subject: Jew doesn’t like you

*In case you missed it ——-

Jews positioning themselves as “on the right” talk about you…

Looking up something at google, I happened to come upon an article at a neo-Nazi or pro-Nazi or just plain Nazi website called Vanguard News Network. It makes its intention clear right up front, with a slogan in its masthead that says: “No Jews. Just right.” The article, by the website’s editor Alex Linder, attacks Samuel Francis and Jared Taylor for being insufficiently pro-white and not anti-Semitic at all. Below are a few excerpts from the article that give an idea of where Linder is coming from. It’s unpleasant to know that such things exist, but necessary nevertheless.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/001646.html?q=counterrevolution-net/vfr/archives/001646.html*

Thanks, yes i’d seen that. auster is a kike punk. The jews smell the end of Israel, and they’re hard at work across the west turning white. They’re buying men, well, menlike creatures (slick nick walleyed-homo griffin) and groups (BNP), and slithering in where fools & tools allow them (AmRen[t?]).

RESPONSE TO ANY OF, OH, A THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO DON’T GET IT

to think is to generalize. your type makes the one out of a hundred bad whites equal to the eighty out of a hundred bad jews/nigs. your so-called morality prevents problems from being identified and solved. essentially, your position is that thinking, reaching conclusions and acting on them is immoral. i disagree. thought is the white man’s natural defense, and to deprive us of it is genocidal.

THE OTHER JEWBOX

[Reader writes:] Douglas LOWENSTEIN celebrates his Constitutional Right to turn your child
into a violent, feckless zombie:

“Those of us in the Video Game Voters Network were emailed a press release today stating that the state of Illinois will have to pay a half-million dollars in attorney’s fees to the Entertainment Software Association, Video Software Dealers Association and Illinois Retail Merchants Association. ESA president Douglas Lowenstein is quoted in the press release saying “Judge Kennelly’s rulings send two irrefutable messages — not only are efforts to ban the sale of violent video games clearly unconstitutional, they are a waste of taxpayer dollars.” The law was declared unconstitutional in December of last year.”

WEAK-IPEDIA

[Reader writes…]

Alex,

Birdman had a link called “Wiki Slashes VNN”. I followed it, and sure enough the entry was infuriating. So I changed it. After a few back-and -forth switches I had this exchange with John254 at Wikipedia:

User talk:Mark Richards12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Thank you for your comments. However, when I first reverted the edits by 69.108.13.67 to Vanguard News Network, I placed a Neutral Point of View notice on 69.108.13.67‘s page, not a vandalism warning. Please understand that this version of the article is inconsistent with Wikipedia’s Neutral Point of View policy. It contains many statements that are not neutral because they take opinions promoted by Vanguard News Network, and phrase them as facts. When writing Wikipedia articles, one needs to be careful to attribute opinions to those that hold them. For example, instead of saying that “Vanguard News Network is trying to inform people of Y” — which assumes the existence of Y and that convincing people of Y’s existence is “informing” them –, it might be more appropriate to state that “Vanguard News Network claims that it is trying to inform people of its belief in the existence of Y” or perhaps “Vanguard News Network promotes its claims about the existence of Y”. After I first reverted the edit by 69.108.13.67, instead of discussing this issue or rewriting the edit to conform to the Neutral Point of View policy, 69.108.13.67 simply reinserted the disputed edit into the article. I treated this as vandalism because, according to Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit, in the case of Neutral Point of View policy violations, “If the user persists in reverting to his preferred version of the article, however, that may be considered vandalism.” Furthermore, the subsequent use of various IP addresses to repeatedly reinsert the same edit tended to convey an impression of bad faith. Please see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Making all of your contributions under the same named user account, and discussing issues such as my Neutral Point of View notice rather than simply reverting the disputed edits might tend to avoid conflicts with other Wikipedia editors. If you wish to re-write your edit in scrupulous accordance with the Wikipedia Neutral Point of View policy, using your named user account, you may do so. However, this this version of the article is clearly inconsistent with Wikipedia’s Neutral Point of View policy, and it cannot remain in its current form. John254 17:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Additionally, your version of the article gives excessive prominence to the views of Vanguard News Network, and does not treat the views of its opponents. It is essential to the Neutral Point of View policy that both sides of the issue should be presented. John254 17:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Clarification

I admit I jumped in and edited the article without being familiar with Wikipedia’s procedures. I became aware through a link called “Wiki slashes VNN” checked it out and saw a totally inappropriate article. So I rather impulsively changed it from my computer at work. It quickly changed back so I changed it again. Then I went to a friend’s house and used his computer to check it out. Sure enough, changed back. So I used his computer and changed it again. Went I went home it changed back again, so I used my home computer to change it yet again. I was not tryimg to be devious, and I didn’t even consider that IP address business. Now, enough about my article. Let’s talk about yours. This a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black. Your article is entirely your own point of view. That’s what inspired me to edit it in the first place.
“Many followers of both white nationalism and white supremacy feel that Linder is juvenile.” Never mind the fact that I find it highly unlikely you are qualified to judge what white nationalists feel, “juvenile” is a description that no one I am aware of would share. Clearly your POV. And there are no followers of “white supremacy”. That’s a term used only by people who try to discredit WNs. And whether or not Linder is juvenile, this article is about VNN. If you want to call him juvenile, create an article called Alex Linder and do it there.
“that VNN forums are excessively lowbrow” This is not a POV? Come on.
“Linder’s past statements regarding Christianity unwisely alienate a large segment of the population” Assuming there’s a group Y out there, and assuming to speak for it. Exactly what you accused me of doing.
“There have been allegations that Linder keeps alternate user-names on the forums to provide support to his main user-name”. Allegations. Great. Maybe I’ll edit the ADL’s website to say there are allegations it’s a domestic terrorist organization.
“One of VNN’s most frequent contributors is Tomasz Winnicki of London, Ontario whose posts to the VNN forum have resulted in Richard Warman filing a complaint against him at the Canadian Human Rights Commission. A Canadian Human Rights Tribunal convened in August, 2005 to hear the case and has adjourned until October 17, 2005” All of which is totally irrelevant to an article titled “VNN”.
“According to archived correspondence at VNN, involving editorial responses to readers’ letters, Linder seems to support the idea of a genocide against nonwhites – the idea that virtually all non-whites the world over ought to be exterminated, in order to eliminate even the possibility of racial intermixing, and their lands repopulated with white settlers.” Once again, this an attack on Linder but the article is about the website.
That’s why I changed the article. I more accurately described what’s on the site.
—Mark Richards12 21:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Mark Richards
[edit]

Response

If you look through the edit history of the Vanguard News Network article, you can verify that I played no part in initially writing this article. My sole involvement in this article was to revert the edits that you made to it, which does not constitute an endorsement of the previous version. Wikipedia editors often participate in “RC Patrol”, a process in which they scan recent edits to identify vandalism and other edits that need to be reverted. For this reason, I am not going to defend the version of the article that existed before you edited it — it might be biased against Vanguard News Network (although I do not claim that it is). Therefore, to the extent that the article is biased, you are welcome to edit the article so that it conforms to the Neutral Point of View policy. My only objection to your previous edits was that they were decidedly pro-Vanguard News Network in that they stated opinions promoted by this website as fact, and entirely ignored opposing opinions. The existence of a potentially biased article in Wikipedia doesn’t justify biasing it in the other direction — the proper response is to bring the article into compliance with the Neutral Point of View policy. If you can edit the article to make it more neutral, you are welcome to do so. However, this version, in stating the opinions of Vanguard News Network as facts is far more blatantly inconsistent with the Neutral Point of View policy than the version it replaced — which, even if somewhat off topic and factually questionable, does not make such a serious error. Thus, I would recommend that you not reinsert this version into the article verbatim. In any case, any further edits you make to Vanguard News Network should be with your named user account. John254 23:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit]

More questions

Fair enough. But what about my objections to the article? Shouldn’t you have been calling it vandalism long before I came on the scene? Really, if you had never heard of VNN and encountered that article as your first contact, would it be of any use to you at all? —Mark Richards12 02:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Mark Richards

At this point John254 refused further discussion. He even deleted the conversation from his own page. Unfortunately for Wikipedia users, this clearly demondtrates that they are on the bandwagon, too.
I looked up “Alex Linder” too. Everything in the article is supplied by the ADL. Maybe you write the article on Abe Foxman.
Mark Richards

GRIFFIN, BNP, WEBSTER HISTORY

Friday 5th May 2006.

The Editor,
Daily Mail,
2 Derry Street,
London W8 5TT. [By Hand]

Sir:

My attention has been drawn to David Jones’ profile of BNP Nick Griffin (“A Very Plausible Bigot”, 29th April) which contains inaccurate information about me. As Jones made no effort to contact me before publication, natural justice requires that you publish the following:

1. Jones’ claim that I engaged in correspondence with Nick Griffin “on Hitler¹s Mein Kampf and the writings of Oswald Mosley” is completely untrue.

2. I was not “closest ally of the late leader John Tyndall”. Tyndall resigned from the NF to form the BNP in 1979 expressly because he failed to have me expelled from the NF! It was 20 years later that Griffin displaced Tyndall as leader of the BNP. As I have never been a member of the BNP and have never applied to join it, I am not “an outcast……whose image no longer fits with the modern, made-over BNP”.

3. Jones allowed Griffin to claim that he stayed over-night at my flat only once. As many people can attest, he stayed several times a year from 1976 until 1980. He was never shy of asking to stay in the presence of NF office staff. He attended parties at my flat, on one occasion bestowing on me a greeting which provoked wolf-whistles of the 40+ guests.

4. As to Griffin “not knowing” that I was homosexual, this was widely known by 1969 [See: ‘Many Shades of Black’, the memoirs of the NF¹s co-founder John Bean.] Further, I have correspondence from Tony Williams, the former Ipswich NF organiser (a boyhood friend of Griffin’s and a former fiancee of Griffin¹s sister). He states he told Griffin in 1977 that his over-night stays with me were widely discussed: “You know he¹s queer, don¹t you?” to which Griffin replied: “I don’t worry about that sort of talk. I want to get on in the party.”

5. As to my having “denied it to senior people”, it is on record that I raised the matter with John Tyndall, then NF chairman, in April 1972. He subsequently discussed the issue with the then NF President, Frank Clifford. I have Clifford’s hand-written note of their discussion.

6. Griffin’s reason for not suing me (that his reputation as BNP leader would bias a jury against him) is absurd. My account [copy enclosed] of our relationship and his overtures to two other male NF members was published before he was elected BNP chairman in 1999. His 1998 ‘race hate’ conviction was irrelevant to the issues of any possible libel case and would have been have been struck out of my defence had I deployed it. His first reason for not suing me was that I was “a man of straw”. He changed this when asked to explain why he did not sue the ‘Sunday Times’ and ‘Searchlight’ for reporting the substance of my “libels”.

Yours faithfully,

Martin Webster.

WEBSTER ON BNP

Dear Tim,

Thanks for your phone call yesterday. I agree with you that it is gratifying that a significant number of ordinary electors are willing to give their vote to what they perceive to be a “racist” and “anti-Establishment” party.

Like you, I do not doubt that the majority of the BNP’s members are well-motivated sincere patriots. But what good people perceive to be the case, and what is reality, are sometimes different things. That, of course, is the point of this e-mail.

My respect for the sincere motives of BNP voters and the party’s rank-and-file activists does not alter my view that the BNP has been captured by a clique of corrupt careerist opportunists, led and controlled by Nick Griffin, who have converted the BNP from being a party which…….

1) opposed multi-racialism and racial-interbreeding (irrespective of the participants’ “culture”) and, as a consequence, advocated the repatriation of all Coloured immigrants (and any White immigrant riff-raff) plus their descendants to their lands of national/ethnic origin;

3) identified Zionist-Jewry as the root cause of all pernicious forms of internationalism which lead to the destruction of all ethnically homogeneous nations (except Israel/Jewry);

…..into a party which has…..

1) rejected repatriation as “unfeasible and inhumane” and, hence, has accepted a multi-racial future for Britain;

2) replaced its “racialist” policy with a placebo policy of opposition to “multi-culturalism” (including anti-Muslimism) which the majority of its rank-and-file members (to say nothing of its potential electorate) are too politically unsophisticated to be able to distinguish from its former anti-multi-racialist policy;

3) sought — and been given — a measure of promotion of the Zionist-dominated mass media as a reward for quietly dropping its anti-Zionist stand and by engaging in behind-the-scenes hob-nobbing with Jewish and Gentile media Neo-Cons.

Apart from this political betrayal, the BNP has become a private ‘milch-cow’ for the Griffin family. It is being run as a Griffin Family Business. Employees and/or party officials (who, at the level of the Leadership Advisory Council, are almost one and the same thing) are hired and fired at the whim of Griffin, just as if he were running a privately-owned firm.

It is the membership of this Griffin-appointed Leadership Advisory Council, plus lower-ranking officials of the party (also all appointed by Griffin), plus the small — and dwindling — number of rank-and-filers who have been members of the party for 10 or more years, who get to attend what the BNP is pleased to call its “Annual General Meetings”.

Because the vast majority of those attending these BNP “AGM’s” are reliant on Griffin for position and/or income, they do not pose a threat to him. The motions put up for discussion are not, anyway, binding on Griffin, only advisory. They do not constitute a platform for challenging the leadership, adjusting the policy direction or examining the financial management of the party.

Such a set-up is a recipe for a kleptocracy — which is exactly what the BNP has become. The party is run like an African banana-republic.

If you agree with my analysis, then it is not a matter of “intellectual snobbery” but a service to the cause of British nationalism to state (as I do) that however sincerely-motivated may be rank-and-file BNP members and those who voted for the BNP on 4th May, these people are being conned by a wholly unscrupulous crook who will perpetrate any treacherous act (political and financial) to further his personal career and swell his personal bank balance.

Nobody knows how much Griffin pays himself – or how much he pays his Mum for being Admin Secretary or his Dad for being his private (as distinct from the party’s official) accountant.

The party is supposed to provide full accounts to the Electoral Commission. Its Trafalgar Club generates an annual income of around £70,000 but no accounts have been published for it since Mike Newlands, the former BNP Treasurer, was sacked in 2000 for calling Griffin “a crook” for dishonestly manipulating the club’s accounts in order to make illegal ex-gratia payments to Griffin’s buddy Tony Lecomber in the bogus guise of “debt repayments”.

Likewise, nobody knows how much Mark Cotterill raised “for the BNP” when he ran the American Friends of the BNP in the USA. No accounts recording the AF-BNP’s income, Cotterill’s “expenses” and remittances to Griffin/the BNP were ever published on either side of the Atlantic.

In case you need to be reminded just how wicked Griffin (with the knowing support of his parents) is willing to be, then I invite you to read the below e-mail I have sent to a mainstream journalist who last year tried but — for mysterious reasons — failed to secure publicity for one of Griffin’s most wicked acts.

In the e-mail I quote Griffin twice. The second quote was uttered as he watched a “friend and comrade” (a naive, deeply dim, idealist, who I knew in the NF) knock down sheets of asbestos and breath in the clouds of dust that this created. Griffin caused a video to be made of that and other connected activity — conducted for the SOLE financial benefit of the Griffin Family — and he provided the voice-over commentary for it. I have a DVD copy of that video.

It is because I know this background (and I have only touched on the surface of things herein) that I cannot surrender myself to unqualified expressions of delight at the results achieved by BNP candidates in the recent local council elections.

I am just as desperate for a “nationalist dawn” as you or anybody else. I have sought it from when I was a 17 year old in 1960. But because I know what I know, I cannot allow myself to get drawn into the festivities being enjoyed by those who, through no fault of their own, do not know what I know.

This is not “intellectual snobbery” or being a “dog-in-a-manger”. It is a sincere effort to deal with reaality, not with naive and ill-informed “perceptions”.

The more “successful” Nick Griffin is, the greater catastrophe awaiting the cause of British nationalism.

This morning I heard on the radio a sad but true aphorism: “Hope is very cruel — it never departs from one completely”.

Best wishes,

Martin.