Holocaust Daily: 62k Jews Were Gassed Today, but the Rabbi Wail Index Makes it Feel like 68
Posted by alex in holocaust racket at 1:48 pm | 
Permanent Link
[“‘Holocaust’ Remembrance Day” spreads like topsy. Remember the Holocaust and keep it holy… You dirty goyim, more than you deserve it is, that rabbidics allow you to waggle around on their planet. Surely every day is already Holohorseshit day, as literally not a day goes by that doesn’t feature all the Holonews you can eat, piping hot and stinky from the oven, sprinkled o’er with fresh small dead black fish for extra stinky geshmaltzness. What a coincidence that the richest and most obnoxious people on earth are the greatest and noblest victims. There is a final solution to jewish holocaust lies: NO JEWS. JUST RIGHT.]
None of this happened by accident. Quite the contrary, it was planned, it was designed. It took the active participation of an entire country to accomplish, not the workings of a few evil leaders.
 If they are “Holocaust revisionists,” I suppose someone who claims two plus two is five is a “mathematical revisionist.” We call the person ignorant, stupid or some other less than flattering word, but not a “revisionist.”
Consider — for shock value — what the reaction would be if a group of “antebellum revisionists” claimed African Americans were never slaves? That blacks were never sold, lynched, beaten, raped and bartered?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1621309/posts
Downplaying the Holocaust would be another tragedy
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | April 25 2006 | William Choslovsky
Posted on 04/25/2006 12:08:27 PM PDT by knighthawk
The Final Solution: Auschwitz, Treblinka, Bergen-Belsen, Dachau, Buchenwald, Terezin, Chelmno, Sobibor, Majdanek, Belzec, Polish ghettos.
Adolf Hitler’s Nazis murdered 6 million Jews — 6 million girls, men, grandmothers, babies, uncles, neighbors, women, fathers, friends, sisters, colleagues, cousins, lovers, boys, mothers, aunts — 6 million human beings. Though Hitler’s main target was Jews, he also exterminated 5 million other people, mostly Catholics, homosexuals, gypsies and the handicapped, to support his master race ambition.
For perspective, and to humanize each of the 6 million victims, consider this: If you read each victim’s name — taking just two seconds per name — it would take you 139 days to complete the task. Start and you will not finish until September. But that is only if you never stop to eat, drink or sleep, much like the conditions the victims endured.
Most perished (were murdered) quickly in the gas chambers, gallows or execution lines. The rest were forced to perform labor so excruciating the likes of which adjectives do no justice in describing. Then there were the rapes, beatings, heinous medical “experiments” and brutal, arbitrary tortures.
None of this happened by accident. Quite the contrary, it was planned, it was designed. It took the active participation of an entire country to accomplish, not the workings of a few evil leaders. It happened in the “modern era” in the most civilized of countries, and it happened for only one reason: because they were Jews. Somehow, a few survived.
Note, the above description is hollow, it is weak, it is inadequate. It is all I can offer in honor of Holocaust Remembrance Day, which is today.
Amazingly, there is a group of individuals who deny the Holocaust ever occurred. They are called “Holocaust revisionists.” If they are “Holocaust revisionists,” I suppose someone who claims two plus two is five is a “mathematical revisionist.” We call the person ignorant, stupid or some other less than flattering word, but not a “revisionist.”
Calling Holocaust deniers “revisionists” wrongly suggests there is room for debate. It lends credence to asinine assertions. We are talking historical fact, not policy debates or competing historical theories.
Ideally, the “revisionists” would not warrant any attention. As my grandmother Baba Bella used to say, “If you argue with a fool, that makes two.”
Unfortunately, some of the “revisionists” possess an air of credibility. Take Northwestern engineering professor Arthur Butz, who penned a book in 1976 denying the Holocaust. Butz recently garnered much attention when he was paired with the good company of the president of Iran questioning the Holocaust.
In a world that is often ill-informed, ignorance can pass as fact if left unchallenged. If supposedly credible individuals like Butz are not condemned, then the perpetual lie soon becomes “truth.” Our silence is the source of their strength.
Insulated by tenure policies, Butz peddles hate using his university-sponsored Web site. Northwestern can ban hateful speakers as it did a few years ago when it prevented hate-monger Matthew Hale’s attempt to speak on campus. Butz has a right to his soap box, but the university need not provide it for him.
Consider — for shock value — what the reaction would be if a group of “antebellum revisionists” claimed African Americans were never slaves? That blacks were never sold, lynched, beaten, raped and bartered? Suppose these “scholars” claimed the whole idea of a black slave trade was simply a hoax devised by blacks to garner sympathy. How would we respond?
I would like to think that I would be joined by everyone, no matter their ethnicity, in obliterating such a lie. I would like to think that the “revisionists” would be called racists.
Most important, the lessons of the Holocaust are hardly static. Today — not 1944 — synagogues are vandalized in Europe. The Arab press publishes articles stating that Jews use the blood of Muslim children in Passover festivals. Arab children use text books demonizing Jews. Foreign “news” organizations “report” America and Israel orchestrated the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Likewise, the lessons of the Holocaust are not limited to Jews. Long before Darfur, upward of 2 million Christians were butchered in the Sudan under the command, “convert or die.” Trains carrying Hindus are set afire in India. Jehovah’s witnesses are beheaded in the Philippines. A million Tutsis were murdered in Rwanda in 100 days in 1994. Coptic Christians are persecuted to near extinction in Egypt. Muslims were persecuted in Bosnia a decade ago. Saddam Hussein gassed Kurds. And so it goes. Millions killed not for anything they did, but because of who they were.
I relish the day when “Holocaust revisionists” like Butz can be dismissed and scorned, not given a university paycheck. Until then remember, two plus two is four. Do not forget it lest the victims of the Holocaust died in vain.
William Choslovsky is a Chicago lawyer.
27 April, 2006 at 9:11 pm
Ah, the slave trade – Jews living in the South, and the North, owned more slaves in proportion to their numbers than did Whites. And the majority of slave ships were owned by Jews. In a news article that mentions both Jews and the slave trade, perhaps these little facts could have been worth mentioning?
28 April, 2006 at 12:21 am
Fuck the Holohoax.
28 April, 2006 at 5:11 am
“William Choslovsky is a professional liar.”
Bow to your Jewish god.
28 April, 2006 at 9:24 am
Here is Dr. Butz’s website:
http://pubweb.northwestern.edu/~abutz/
You can download and read Dr. Butz’s book, “The Hoax of the Twentieth Century” referred to above, for free here:
http://vho.org/GB/Books/thottc/#download
For those of you unfamiliar with “holocaust revisionism” (holocaust factualism), read it and then decide who is lying.
28 April, 2006 at 3:30 pm
Thanks, John!
28 April, 2006 at 5:03 pm
Holohoax Revisionism in 60 seconds:
———————————-
It is easy to show that the extermination legend merits skepticism. Even the casual reader of the Holocaust literature knows that during the war virtually nobody acted as though it was happening. Thus it is common to berate the Vatican, the Red Cross and the Allies (especially the intelligence agencies) for their ignorance and inaction, and to explain that the Jews generally did not resist deportation because they did not know what was in store for them. If you add all this up you have the strange claim that for almost three years German trains, operating on a continental scale in densely civilized regions of Europe, were regularly and systematically moving millions of Jews to their deaths, and nobody noticed except for a few of our Jewish leaders who were making public “extermination” claims.
On closer examination even those few Jewish leaders were not acting as though it was happening. Ordinary communications between the occupied and neutral countries were open, and they were in contact with the Jews whom the Germans were deporting, who thus could not have been in ignorance of “extermination” if those claims had any validity.
This incredible ignorance must also be attributed to Hans Oster’s department in German military intelligence, correctly labelled “the veritable general staff of the opposition to Hitler” in a recent review.
What we are offered in evidence was gathered after the war, in trials. The evidence is almost all oral testimony and “confessions”. Without the evidence of these trials there would be no significant evidence of “extermination”. One must pause and ponder this carefully. Were trials needed to determine that the Battle of Waterloo happened? The bombings of Hamburg, Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki? The slaughter in Cambodia? Yet this three year program, of continental scope, claiming millions of victims, requires trials to argue its reality. I am not arguing that the trials were illegal or unfair; I am arguing that such historical logic as the legend rests on must not be countenanced. Such events cannot happen without generating commensurate and contemporaneous evidence for their reality, just as a great forest fire cannot take place without producing smoke. One may as well believe that New York City was burned down, if confessions to the deed can be produced.
———————————-
From:
http://pubweb.northwestern.edu/~abutz/di/intro.html
29 April, 2006 at 2:44 pm
Here’s a thought. What are most blacks (last) named who are descended from Civil War era slaves?
And why? I am willing to bet that jews owned most of the big plantations and the slaves thereof. And that these were in coastal and savanna areas, i.e., Louisiana and South Carolina (Judah Benjamin, anyone?). And that those slaves were treated the worst. So, despite the fact that those slaves, I am betting the majority of all slaves, were jewish owned, they had no residual loyalty to those masters (especially after they were newly enslaved to banks after becoming “free”), and did not take their names when they were granted freedom. They took the names they liked, names of the towns they lived in or near, or the names of people they respected, or at least hadnt treated them poorly (read: names of non-jews, often scottish names).
Of course now the jew pollutes history and discuorse for his own evil aims (history repeats) and sics his idiot killer robots upon the only people that ever treated them in anything approaching a humane manner.