Vanguard News Network

Jews took over the academy. They let in lots of fags and feminists, and coloreds who didn’t know which end of the pencil to pick their nose with. They made normal white men uncomfortable through their sneers and queered curriculum. Now people wonder why men aren’t interested in college.

No hint of all this in the following story. As in everything else, from comic strip to country music song to sitcom utterance the woman is always right. It was tired and wrong thirty years ago, but it will persist until the jew has wrung the last drop of advantage from it.

What does the white man get out of college? For most majors, the answer is nothing. Liberal arts is largely a waste – a bunch of professors intellectually inert as they are politically hostile. So why bother?

Increasingly the while male doesn’t. He proceeds to business or construction where at least he can still get ahead, even with its rampant anti-White discrimination.

How typical of our non-nation is the judeostructure favoring women every step of the way then asking, in all synthetic not-getting-it, how come there aren’t any males around?

Listening to a clam-jammer discuss Kate Millet is not education.

Listening to a Freakin-Nonamerican discuss the wond’rous U of Timbuktu back in the day is not education.

Education is white men reading, writing, and discussing among themselves, the rest is politics of an effective but inferior sort.

Alex,

When I first read the headline I expected to hear an explanation of why men were being discriminated against in college admissions (“their gender’s overall success”). How wrong I was!

Today, two-thirds of colleges and universities report that they get more female than male applicants, and more than 56 percent of undergraduates nationwide are women. Demographers predict that by 2009, only 42 percent of all baccalaureate degrees awarded in the United States will be given to men.

But then, women make better social planners and bureaucrats. They’re our ‘future leaders’. Men are only good at making useless stuff like cars, airplanes, light bulbs, cameras, moving pictures, televisions, computers, electrical power plants, radios, refrigerators, houses, paved roads, bicycles, motorcycles, the printing press, and lots of other useless gadgets that don’t really improve the quality of life for anybody.

Hence, the Mexican invasion…

Note the rejection of the “engineer/computer scientist” at bottom and the preference for the girl who is hopeless at math ‘but got good grades in math’.

Also not mentioned is that at the higher IQ levels there are more men (several times more at the highest levels) than women. Hence, preference should be given to basketball players. You know, the oppressed that are treated like royalty on campuses.

My staff and I carefully read these young women’s essays about their passion for poetry, their desire to discover vaccines and their conviction that they can make the world a better place.

At my own college these days, we have three applicants for every one we can admit.

Gee, that sounds discriminatory! “I like her! … He fails to excite me.” … (see below)

http://www.startribune.com/562/story/338997.html

Last update: March 29, 2006 – 7:22 PM

Jennifer Delahunty Britz: Punished for their gender’s overall success

Aiming for balance, many colleges set the bar higher for young women seeking admission than they do for young men.

Jennifer Delahunty Britz

GAMBIER, OHIO – A few days ago I watched my daughter Madalyn open a thin envelope from one of the five colleges to which she had applied. “Why?” was what she was obviously asking herself as she handed me the letter saying she was waitlisted.

Why, indeed? She had taken the toughest courses in her high school and had done well, sat through several Saturday mornings taking SATs and the like, participated in the requisite number of extracurricular activities, written a heartfelt and well-phrased essay and even taken the extra step of touring the campus.

She had not, however, been named a National Merit finalist, dug a well for a village in Africa or climbed to the top of Mount Rainier. She is a smart, well-meaning, hardworking teenage girl, but in this day and age of swollen applicant pools that are decidedly female, that wasn’t enough. The fat acceptance envelope is simply more elusive for today’s accomplished young women.

I know this well. At my own college these days, we have three applicants for every one we can admit. Just three years ago, it was two to one. Though Kenyon was a men’s college until 1969, more than 55 percent of our applicants are female, a proportion that is steadily increasing. My staff and I carefully read these young women’s essays about their passion for poetry, their desire to discover vaccines and their conviction that they can make the world a better place.

I was once one of those girls applying to college, but that was 30 years ago, when applying to college was only a tad more difficult than signing up for a membership at the Y. Today, it’s a complicated and prolonged dance that begins early, and for young women, there is little margin for error: A grade of C in Algebra II/Trig? Off to the waitlist you go.

Rest assured that admissions officers are not cavalier in making their decisions. Last week, the 10 officers at my college sat around a table, 12 hours every day, deliberating the applications of hundreds of talented young men and women. While gulping down coffee and poring over statistics, we heard about a young woman from Kentucky we were not yet ready to admit outright. She was the leader/ president/editor/captain/lead actress in every activity in her school. She had taken six advanced placement courses and had been selected for a prestigious state leadership program. In her free time, this whirlwind of achievement had accumulated more than 300 hours of community service in four different organizations.

Few of us sitting around the table were as talented and as directed at age 17 as this young woman. Unfortunately, her test scores and grade point average placed her in the middle of our pool. We had to have a debate before we decided to swallow the middling scores and write “admit” next to her name.

Had she been a male applicant, there would have been little, if any, hesitation to admit. The reality is that because young men are rarer, they’re more valued applicants. Today, two-thirds of colleges and universities report that they get more female than male applicants, and more than 56 percent of undergraduates nationwide are women. Demographers predict that by 2009, only 42 percent of all baccalaureate degrees awarded in the United States will be given to men.

We have told today’s young women that the world is their oyster; the problem is, so many of them believed us that the standards for admission to today’s most selective colleges are stiffer for women than men. How’s that for an unintended consequence of the women’s liberation movement?

The elephant that looms large in the middle of the room is the importance of gender balance. Should it trump the qualifications of talented young female applicants? At those colleges that have reached what the experts call a “tipping point,” where 60 percent or more of their enrolled students are female, you’ll hear a hint of desperation in the voices of admissions officers.

Beyond the availability of dance partners for the winter formal, gender balance matters in ways both large and small on a residential college campus. Once you become decidedly female in enrollment, fewer males and, as it turns out, fewer females find your campus attractive.

What are the consequences of young men discovering that even if they do less, they have more options? And what messages are we sending young women that they must, nearly 25 years after the defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment, be even more accomplished than men to gain admission to the nation’s top colleges? These are questions that admissions officers like me grapple with.

In the meantime, I’m sending out waitlist and rejection letters for nearly 3,000 students. Unfortunately, a majority of them will be female, young women much like my daughter. I will linger over letters, remembering individual students I’ve met, essays I loved, accomplishments I’ve admired. I know all too well that parents will ache when their talented daughters read the letters and will feel a bolt of anger at the college admissions officers who didn’t recognize how special their daughters are.

Yes, of course, these talented young women will all find fine places to attend college — Maddie has four acceptance letters in hand — but it doesn’t dilute the disappointment they will feel when they receive a rejection or waitlist offer.

I admire the brilliant successes of our daughters. To parents and the students getting thin envelopes, I apologize for the demographic realities.

Jennifer Delahunty Britz is the dean of admissions and financial aid at Kenyon College. She wrote this for the New York Times.

©2006 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.

_______________________

Here are examples of the more stringent requirements for women (the aforementioned “hint of desperation in the voices of admissions officers”):

Verbal 510
Math 410
Combined 920

Impressive grades but low test score. Active in high school government and in music. Her essay screams ear: she’s got a good one for languages, music and the written word. Her interest in Religious Studies and high scores in math classes tells me that she’s fairly well-rounded. I like her and would admit.

… “high scores in math classes” … with a 410 SAT!???

_________________

Verbal 560
Math 680
Combined 1240

Scores are high; lots of AP classes, but an essay about his driver’s license that fails to excite me. He sounds like he’ll work in engineering or computer science some day, but I wouldn’t count on him to become one of California’s leaders. I’d say no.