Women: A Psychological Sketch Part 2
Women of Both Sexes

In reviewing the responses to part one of my essay, I have to say that I am disappointed. For a group of people who periodically make fun of genocide and fancy themselves as pre-revolutionaries, my readers seem to have some very weak stomachs. If you can't handle some basic truths about women, how in the hell are you going to take back your civilization?

My intent in part one of this essay was not to trash women. Now that may be how it sounded, but hedging and balancing, and looking at both side of every generalization would have made it twice as long and half as useful. Most of what I wrote has been written before by philosophers and religious leaders over the past 2,000 years. Nothing I wrote was really new or terribly original. Yet the women of both sexes were offended! Nearly everyone seemed to miss the most important point: female psychology and behavior are malleable. With the right leadership, their average behavior can and will improve. That requires strong male leadership, not a disingenuous, pandering mentality calculated to placate a woman's sensitivities in the hope of receiving sexual favors or minimizing disagreement.

Nationalism, if it is ever to succeed, requires a comprehensive worldview. Jews = bad is a good start, but it's only a start and not enough. Nationalism's adherents need to understand how the world works. That includes understanding history, political science, evolutionary psychology, philosophy, economics and many other disciplines. This knowledge needs to be comprehensive and interlinked so that the nationalist's worldview becomes intuitive. You need to understand the Jews, you need to understand women, and you need to understand yourselves. If this is all too difficult for you, then I suggest that you get some tattoos the police can later use to identify you with, shave your heads, wear combat boots and keep your mouths shut. All opinions aren't equal and if you've got a problem with this, then you've internalized a bit too much of our pseudo-democratic ethos.

You cannot hold on to false myth systems, self defeating politeness or misplaced chivalry if you want your ideological movement to advance. These things impede your mental growth and confuse your decision making processes. You have to take the way the world works at face value and deal with it. This includes understanding that women are not revolutionaries. It is a very romantic notion to think of you and your woman, side by side, battling ZOG. More likely, when the going gets tough, she'll leave. If she's spiteful, she'll do an interview with Mark Potok at the Southern Poverty Law Center and tell the world what kind of underwear you prefer. If you don't believe me, go check their Intelligence Report archives (for example, see the winter 1999 issue). If you have some fantasy about an equal number of men and women retaking this country then you're just screwed in the head. You, White nationalist, have internalized feminist doctrine so thoroughly that even you can't get rid of it. Exactly how many female signatories were there on the Declaration of Independence?

If you think that the only problem we now face is the Jew (or Jews plus Nogs plus Hispanics), then you aren't even ready to begin to be a nationalist. You are a hobbyist. Japan is full of a bunch of wimpy, androgynous males. It is materialistic, hedonistic, narcissistic and has a low completed fertility rate. And Jews have virtually nothing to do with any of this. Wealth and giving women close to equal rights has plenty to do with it. Again, I write this not to gratuitously criticize or blame women for our problems. Women are different than men. They have their strengths and we have our weaknesses. Get over it. If you give them the vote, you will get a different type of society. It will be less masculine and more permissive. Jews or no Jews. Am I getting through here?

Now that I have been so divisive and have so offended sensitive people, I will go on to write a bit about men. Please don't be offended, hardened warriors!

Western men have become pathetic wimps. If Western civilization collapses, it will be the fault of White men. Not our women. Not Jews. Not Mexicans. Not niggers. All of these other problems would never have even existed if White men had been strong and done what they knew to be right at the time. The founding fathers warned of Jews. Yet White men let them in a mere 100 years later. Nearly all White men knew it would be a mistake to give the descendents of our slaves the vote. But we did it. And now a borderline retard has the same vote as a physics professor.

Men's nature-given responsibility is to lead women and to ensure the stability of society for future generations. In these tasks, we White men have almost completely failed. We have failed our ancestors and we have failed our descendents. We have failed our mothers, our wives and our daughters. We opened our hearts to every whining special interest group and caved in because we lacked the will to fight. We gave women, known to subordinate reason to emotion in their decision making process, the right to vote. We permitted our involvement in two fratricidal world wars where hundreds of thousands of our healthiest men were killed. We voted for FDR and the beginning of the welfare state. We permitted our daughters to dress like whores. We did almost nothing to stop the invasion of Mexicans into our living space. We became greedy and materialistic. We have made compromise after compromise to protect our wealth and status, sacrificing our principles and honor on each occasion to the point where there are neither principles nor honor remaining to defend.

We became more concerned with having a nice car or truck than with standing up for what we knew was right in the long term. We allowed our younger sons to be drugged by experts who pathologized their normal behavior and our older sons to dress and behave like rogue ghetto niggers. And what exactly have we White men gained for all of these catastrophic losses? We have a nice minivan. We watch Monday Night Football in Dolby surround sound. We have a big mortgage on a poorly constructed suburban house. We own a motor home and a set of titanium golf clubs. Pretty fair trade, don't you think? A civilization is headed towards moral and economic bankruptcy as well as cultural ruin so that White men could enjoy the most transient soft and mediocre comforts.

Women didn't do this. Men did it. Do I need to point out that this is all way more important than women getting boob jobs or wearing thong underwear? So am I being divisive? Is this unpleasant to read? Because this doesn't apply to you, personally, is it not relevant? What about your father, White man? What did he do to stop all of this? Did he fail us? How about your uncle? Your grandfather? In all likelihood, the responsibility partly resides in the families of every single man reading this. The problem, the weakness, the abrogation of responsibility is part of each one of us.

Now, on to White nationalist men: If you want to take on the parasitic group that has the highest average IQ of any population on the planet, then you're going to have to grow some balls and get your collective heads out of your asses. Specifically, you're going to have to figure out the way the world really works, get off of your Hitler kicks and become effective. You are not effective waving Third Reich flags at rallies no one else attends or getting arrested for throwing leaflets no one reads onto suburban lawns at 3:00 a.m. You're also not effective doing something stupid that gives ZOG the excuse to lock you up. And you are also not effective when your primary concern is in not offending others' feelings.

The next part of this essay will return to its original subject matter--trying to help men understand women better and deal with them. Since the vast majority of VNN readers are young males, I think it's a relevant topic.

JOHN ALLINGTON