Media Grip Weakening
ABC segment on Dirkhising and media bias shows networks pressured by Net news...
by A. Linder
We turn on our TVs and catch the nightly sermon. The priests seem invincible, like there's
no way to fight their smug lies. But that's not the case. We can dump them for the
Internet, find a better church, one that preaches what we believe. And they know it. They
give signs they are starting to feel it. One sign is that many of their stories these days
are responses to issues first raised on the Net. This makes the sacerdotal gatekeepers tremble
because no matter how sonorously the acolyte-anchor-actors intone their lines, the producing
priests at 30 Rock sense -- and know that we sense -- that the age of the pandit in the
pulpit is over.
Why would anybody want to listen to some sub-high-school-educated, pompous haircut like
Pete Jennings omnisciently intone slanted "news" you could have read on the internet days
ago? And sit through endless Jewish agitprop and Maalox commercials before you get to it?
The Jewish scriptwriters, the Peter-feeders, have no answer. Even the lemmings are starting
to realize they have better options. Network ratings are in decline.
Dimly sensing a disturbance in the Force, ABC this evening (4/10/01) ran a segment on Jesse
Dirkhising and media bias. Dirkhising, you will recall, was the kid buggered to death by
two Arkansas hairshop queers. Yeah, they really worked the poor guy over, gave him the John
Wayne Gacy special: tied up, beaten, underwear shoved down throat, openings taped, stuffed
with foreign infected body parts. Bottom line? Kid expires suffocating in his own misery
while Pet Shop Boys relax in the kitchen with a nice sandwich. Story ripples over national
wires like pebble in Niagara.
The same media that filed over 3,000 stories in the month after the murder of Matthew
Shepard wanted nothing to do with Dirkhising. Indeed, if it hadn't been for William Pierce
of the National Alliance, not even the conservatives who hyped it would have heard of it.
After Pierce raised it, the case was promptly seized on by Joseph Farah at WorldNetDaily,
followed by the rest of the cons over the next several months. A steady drumbeat from the
Internet-based alternative media coupled with a "breakthrough" story by queer "conservative"
British writer Andrew Sullivan finally brought the story to national liberal prominence.
Sullivan at least did a little reporting: his Nexis search showed over 3,000 Shepard stories
versus under 50 on Dirkhising in the month after each murder. ABC in its setup mentioned
conservatives whining about media bias, hinting that these are the same old complaints that
intelligent people are long used to, but now that a genuine, bona-fide, HIV-positive queer
like Sullivan has raised the issue, why, maybe there's something worth looking into.
But of course there isn't. The difference between the cases is that Dirkhising's doesn't
point to any larger lesson, can't be attached to any national issue like "hate crimes."
Doesn't fit the lib agenda is what ABC meant, of course. The Jewish scriptwriters can't
twist it to suit their purpose: browbeating normal Whites into accepting additional legal
discrimination against their race. So they ignored it. No more complex than that.
Controlled media pick stories that push their agenda. No big secret. Anybody with
functioning antennae who watches a week's worth of TV or reads a few big-city dailies can
figure that out. The only thing remarkable here was that an issue first pushed by the White
nationalists didn't simply disappear the way so many similar issues have in the past.
Instead, it grew, steadily and surely, picking up advocates and gaining profile until even
ABC -- but there's the problem: that's the wrong way to look at it. We tend to look at
coverage by big networks as validating our claims. Wrong way to go. That way leads to
purse-lipped bitching by old-maids like Reed Irvine. The right way is to believe in our
cause and accept that we are right, and move forward. The media are biased and
Jew-controlled. They will never stop pursuing their Jewish, anti-White agenda, no matter
how much we beg and plead and earnestly point out their slants and bias. The right way is
to build our own media -- Vanguard News Network -- and forget them. The right way
is to go our own way and let the Jewish liars try to catch up. The right way is to laugh
and fight. Life's not fair and neither are media: conservatives never learn this, and,
not coincidentally, they never win either.
I think we overestimate the power and intelligence of ZOG media. Yes, they are run by
manipulative liars bent on White genocide, but there's also a quality of almost naive
arrogance in their assumption that everybody sees the world the way they do. Many of them
give no evidence of being aware that other people see the world differently. Nobody on the
right goes through life without meeting strong leftist headwinds. Millions of people on
the left go through life not even suspecting there are counter-arguments. Do I overdraw
the case? Barely. Just barely.
ABC's liberal queering of story selection and reportage could no more be avoided by the
Jewish producers in a discussion of that queering than in anything else. Two segment
teases: In the first, Pete asked: "Did the media calculatedly ignore a murder involving
two gay men?" Love that 'involving.' And again: When we come back, we'll take a closer
look at a murder involving two gay men and accusations of media bias. You've got to love
these liberals. The queers just happened to be in the same room when Dirkhising was
sodomized to death. They were involved. Then the cops showed up. They were involved
too. The people next door heard a ruckus and walked outside to see what was up. They were
involved. Always bloodless with libs when one of the Preferred Stock commits a crime.
Always up close and personal and lugubrious when Common Stock do so much as pass out a
But the winds, they are a-changin', Mr. Dylan. Mr. Jones 'bout to swing 'round on Mr.