Tolerate Homosexuals? NEVER!

by Jasa Petrovic Slovjanski

June 29, 2002

Recently on VNN there has been an article by F.C.I. Clarke on the subject of homosexuality. Because this Clarke claims to be a White Nationalist I will extend to him every bit of respect that is required by the title. I do not wish to belittle the author, but I do intend to refute the idea he supports. This idea is that tolerating homosexuals is acceptable for the White Nationalist movement.

The author begins by stating that most White Nationalists believe that homosexuals are "promoters of the Jewish agenda." I disagree with this comment entirely. Perhaps if anybody noticed, one of the nationalist movement's principle complaints about the Jewish agenda is that it preaches the normalcy of homosexuality, and tells us to tolerate it. Homosexuals may not promote the Jewish agenda, but the Jews promote the homosexual agenda. In fact the very term 'homosexual' as an identity is essentially a product of Jewish psychology, with roots that can be traced back to Freud. In white, Christian society, homosexual acts were seen as sinful, but willful. For all its morality, Christianity is based on the idea of free will; you can do whatever you want so long as you are willing to pay for it in the end. The idea that people were born homosexuals would be looked on as preposterous back then, and it was.

The argument that homosexuality has been around since the beginning of mankind is irrelevant. Murder, thievery, incest, and adultery have been around just as long, so should these acts also be tolerated? The Aryan race has historically been a moral, disciplined race with a strict honor-based culture. The Jews, using Freudian psychology, have spread tales that homosexuality was just as widespread throughout history as it is now. But the obvious fact is that the proliferation of homosexuality today is due mainly to the belief in this myth, as well as the idea that homosexuality is a natural-born trait. There is really no way of telling how widespread homosexuality was throughout history, but the character and culture of the Aryan race throughout its history ought to be sufficient. The popular natural-born excuse does work for me; people are also born with Down's, schizophrenia, and a number of other defects.

Pointing out the Greek and Roman empires is also insufficient. One should remember that both these empires were essentially destroyed, due mostly to decadence. Racial mixing was not the cause, but the effect of moral and cultural decay. The Byzantine empire was arguably the greatest Aryan empire of all time, and yet it was a Christian society. Even before Christian morality, the Aryan race has always appreciated strength and character. Men were men, and women were women, up until the early 20th century. While some may disagree, a main factor in why Europeans chose Christianity is that it held sacred values that appealed to Aryans. In the case of Russia for example, Prince Vladimir observed several religions(including Islam) and decided on Orthodox Christianity as an official religion. And thus in the 988 A.D., the Russian state was created. That Russian nation would then survive as the last remnant of the Roman Empire. Numerous national stories of European countries start similarly; a leader unites the local tribes under Christianity and a nation is founded.

The author of the original article also pointed out that whites have an interest in white homosexuals seeking white partners. For what reason? Miscegenation? Am I the only one that notices that HOMOSEXUALS DO NOT HAVE CHILDREN?! Who cares what race their 'partner' is? The author asserts that White Nationalism should be a one-issue platform, and that intolerance of gays is dividing the white race. Nonsense. Tolerance of gays is dividing the white race. The proliferation of homosexuality is lowering the white birthrate. By convincing white children that they can be born gay, Freudian psychology ensures that these children will not grow up to carry on their genes. It's as simple as that. Without reproduction, race no longer becomes an issue.

As for the idea that intolerance of homosexuality is Jewish, this is absurd. We are not at war with the Jews of the Old Testament; modern Jews aren't even blood related to them for the most part. We are at war with the ADL, Sumner Redstone, Michael Eisner, and the rest of the Jewish gang. All of them preach tolerance of homosexuals. Sure, Jesus may not have said anything about sodomy, but did he really have to? The New Testament does contain verses on this topic, such as:

1 Corinthians 6:9 "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God."

Romans 1:22 "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet."

They are not as direct as those found in the Old Testament, but they will do. The argument that queer-bashing is Jewish is simply outrageous; even the Jewish religious community tolerates them to a wide degree. Homosexuality is a product of modern Jewish "culture," and de-Jewing ourselves does not mean never emulating anything ever done by a Jew throughout history. Jews also had laws against adultery and thievery; should we tolerate those as well? Do Jews not breath in oxygen and convert it into CO2? Should we stop breathing so as to be completely anti-Jew?

Homosexuality is a perversion and an abomination. It is the ultimate antithesis of everything white society is built on: discipline, order, and honor. A homosexual is essentially someone who has no discipline; they seek sexual gratification regardless of where it comes from. It is the "I do whatever I want, whenever I want" idea that is destroying our culture today. The most noble trait of man is to deny base impulses. The gay male, regardless of how masculine he acts, is a feminized male. He is ruled by emotions and abnormal impulses. Heterosexual promiscuity is just as bad, as it usually involves birth control or abortions rather than healthy white babies raised by loving parents in a stable relationship. Homosexuality is the pinnacle of the "everything is permissible" Freudian idea. Freud is Jewish, not intolerance of homosexuals.

We true White Nationalists want not only a nation that is racially white, but also culturally and morally white, just as Dr. Pierce said. The homosexual population is a small fraction, and one we can do without. We do not want gay teachers teaching our children, nor do we want them as counselors at our youth-camps so they can molest and indoctrinate our future leaders. Perhaps some have forgotten, but those were some key reasons why the White Nationalist movement began in the first place. Homosexuality spreads disease far more rapidly, and bisexual activity is even worse for the white race as a whole. We do not need that kind of perverted lifestyle corrupting our movement. We have enough trouble with the occasional raving gunman or bomber ruining our collective good name.

The idea that the heterosexual is merely somebody that thinks he or she is "immune from same-sex attractions" as put forth by the author is equally ludicrous. I am 19 years old, and lived for seven years in a condo complex that is still a well-known haven for gay males. At 16 I worked at an internet provider run, and mostly staffed by gays, situated in a homosexual shopping mall(yes, a gay mall). At 17 I joined the army and throughout basic training and AIT we had community showers. Yet to this day I can honestly say that I have never experienced any form of "same-sex attraction." I am straight, and thus I simply do not see men the way I see women. That is just the way the normal person is. Only when we submit to Jewish Freudian psychology does this idea about subconscious homosexual urges occur. Freudian psychology is only theory unless you give it credibility. So will I ever tolerate homosexuals? Only when they are in special treatment centers and those with serious diseases are in quarantined hospitals.


Tell a friend about this article:

Back to VNN Main Page