|
Red Gold: Groups, Power, and Equality
by Karl Kammler
June 17, 2002
We Westerners, of late, have confused the particular and the universal, mistaking our ideals for brute reality. Right now, Whites are busily pondering nice platitudes, while the rest of the world operates on "might makes right," as always. Have no illusions about "equality," "harmony," "tolerance," "sensitivity," or any foolishness like that -- it's never happened in human history, and it won't happen in America. America is neither a "magical" place in that respect, nor is she exempt from the workings of human nature. Recall how the Blacks treated the White colonists in Haiti 200 years ago -- there is a reason only dusky faces blight that island. The real law is kill or be killed, live as the hammer or die as the anvil. Drill deep enough into any spot on the earth, and one strikes the true, viscous "red gold" that softened and deracinated oil men like Bush can barely face -- the spilled blood of the great racial competitions of the past.
The Constitution is not the source of our "rights." Rights existed before the document was written -- which is why even if the Second Amendment were repealed tomorrow, I'd still have the right to own a gun. Some say that God gives rights to men and that governments have to respect these rights. However, here's where the secret comes in: you only have a right if you can successfully assert it. God isn't going to come down and help anybody get his rights. If He exists, He may as well not, in matters temporal and political. Nor will a government respect the rights of the people because its administrators believe in God. They only respect the rights of the people under threat of arms. Rights are meaningless without countervailing power. Power comes from Nature and from the will to wield that power. "Rights," in the end, accrue only to the strong, the capable, the responsible, and the worthy.
You can talk about rights and God all you like, but remember this: your opponent may not play by the same rules you do. Particular people conceive rights in a particular context; these are taken for granted and they come to seem universal. There are no "universal human rights." Particular Western constructs have been erroneously applied universally, or at least wrongly thought to be universal. This tendency is what made it possible for Jefferson to pen the seemingly universal statement "all men are created equal," while obviously holding views to the contrary regarding race relations.
The legal traditions of this nation are on the side of White Nationalism. The laws, customs, and practices stretching back to this nation's beginning confirm this. The Immigration Act of March 26, 1790, for example, restricted naturalization to "free white persons" only. The Chinese Exclusion Act of May 6, 1882 later underscored this racial dimension of American rights and citizenship. America was clearly founded as a White country -- she is ours and ours alone, and we must not rest until this nation is restored to its proper owners, the posterity of our forefathers. The laws were once on our side, but they are no longer, thanks to the Talmudic legerdemain of our racial enemies. Nevertheless, the law is but a luxury. All we have left on our side now is the will to power, which is really all we need since the law merely served as a ritualized facade and rationale for power in the first place. At VNN, we tell it like it is -- the unvarnished truth. We haven't the time for niceties and euphemisms.
If non-whites say they have a "right" to America, they are going to have to fight us for it, they're going to have to gather up the will and amass the power. Whites need to rejoin this cosmic contest, mustering the strength to overcome any alien challengers. Some say that one day the United Nations might intervene to prevent a nationalist restoration in this land. Who knows what the future holds? Our answer can only be "bring it on!" We must solemnly resolve to resist racial submergence in any way we can, despite any potential government-led disarmament, even if it means coming up behind those patrolling blue helmets and sliding a knife between their ribs. We must cultivate among ourselves an unabashed sense of entitlement and righteous indignation. Whites are the ones who have been wronged, not the mud-colored "minorities" who are actually the world's teeming majority, and now it is "pay back time" in the best tradition of natural justice. As the great scholar Revilo P. Oliver stated in a 1967 speech titled "The Road Ahead":
"Race is the one thing that we all have in common. It is an obvious and inescapable bond of unity between us, a unity that transcends theological distinctions and even belief and unbelief. It is an immediate reality, not an idea lost in the past and to be recovered, if at all, only after years. The instinct of race is part of whatever self-respect and pride is left in us, and as we are coming to realize, it is becoming a matter of survival. It is the strongest emotional force that can be aroused in man, for it appeals to the deepest and most primitive emotions."
This is the New Hardness coined by VNN Editor and White Nationalist activist Alex Linder -- the total abandonment of the useless charade called "sensible libertarianism" and "respectable conservatism." It is the only viable course toward the salvation of the White race at this point in history. Moving ahead as a race, toward a new beginning, requires looking behind, delving deep into the same pools of strength, and even Berserkr rage, tapped by our ancestors who sailed the high seas in their long ships.
The New Hardness is the polar opposite of the old altruism that has dominated American politics for far too long. Nature has everything balanced: we look out for ourselves alone, and other races look out for themselves alone. Call this the "invisible hand" theory of race relations, as a nice thumb of the nose to our wayward libertarian brethren. We do not have to worry about the welfare of other races. If we do, we push the fulcrum too far in the direction of the other race. We end up looking out for them, they look out for themselves, and no one looks out for us. We lose out. What happens to non-whites should be outside the scope of our concerns. We do not "hate" them. If you have a tick on your body and you remove it with a burning match, does it mean you emotionally "hate" the tick, or is it a natural and logical response to the situation? We do not hate them but are indifferent to them, and have no connection, responsibility, or obligation to them. We must forever abandon altruism.
Some think altruism virtuous and enlightened, but what good is it if the entire race is forever lost? The altruist will not be around to enjoy his "righteous" choice, nor will his descendants be there to hail his memory or carry on his example. Altruism is an evolutionary dead end, an action that proves to be in vain. Until we learn to think this way again, the way we used to, and look out for our interests exclusively, letting other races take care of themselves, Whites will always be the suckers on this planet and forever played the fool.
If we fail, then when the Third Worlders place a burning tire filled with gasoline around the neck of the last White liberal or libertarian, in that famed practice known as "necklacing," that will be poetic justice.
KARL KAMMLER
|
