|
Stop Jew Jacoby Now!
by Andrei Kievsky
June 13, 2002
I just saw that Jeff Jacoby will be chatting live today at 10 am on
http://www.boston.com Jacoby is a hard-core Zionist swine who loudly advocates open
immigration, race mixing, and of course his shitty little state. He just
wrote a column soiling his pants over the Daniel Pearl video, and he goes
over his little shop of imaginary holo-horrors, but fails to mention
judeo-commies butchering 10 million Ukrainians.
So if anybody gets this in time and is in front of a computer at 10 am, go
to http://www.boston.com and chat up Jacoby and others and tell them what we really
think!
Here's some ammunition for you:
Unlimited consumption of fossil fuels requires continued and expanded U.S.
involvement in the Middle East, possibly even leading up to World War III...
The Israeli Lobby favors the U.S.'s gas guzzling energy policy.
Why?
Jeff Jacoby, a Jewish columnist for the New York Times-owned Boston Globe, is well known for two things:
1. Strong advocacy for Israel and for U.S. intervention in Israeli-Arab
affairs on the side of Israel.
2. Strong advocacy of unlimited consumption of fossil fuels using
spurious "free market" arguments and phony appeals to patriotism.
The Israeli Lobby wants to keep America hooked on unlimited consumption of
fossil fuels in order to maximize conflict between the U.S. and the oil-rich
enemies of Israel.
Jacoby on unlimited US fossil fuel consumption:
"The United States does not need a massive federal strategy to guide and
regulate its creation of energy. It doesn't need government subsidies for
alternative fuels. It doesn't need price caps. It doesn't need new taxes on
SUVs. It doesn't need mandatory conservation . . . We live in an age of
cheap and plentiful energy, cheaper and more plentiful than our grandparents
could have dreamed. It will be even more abundant and more afford able for
our grandchildren - if only we let the market do its job."[1]
"But Dukakis knows I am no friend of transportation welfare[2] or government
bailouts for failing enterprises. That predisposes me against Amtrak's
request for $1.8 billion in post-Sept. 11 "disaster" aid and billions more
for long-term capital improvements. But I wanted to give Amtrak's acting
chairman a chance to change my mind . . . Dukakis's argument in a nutshell
is that passenger trains are important to the nation's transportation
network, and that if Amtrak can count on a steady influx of federal funds -
around $1.5 billion a year, he suggests - it will be able to improve its
service and carry a larger proportion of the nation's travelers. That is
roughly the argument that Amtrak has been making since it was created 30
years ago, and so far it has been good for more than $25 billion in
government subsidies (including a whopping $3.9 billion in the last three
years alone). Yet its service remains poor, its finances are a mess, and its
share of the travel market has vanished to almost nothing. Amtrak carries
just three-10ths of 1 percent of intercity passengers in the United States
and loses an average of $25 on every ticket it sells. By any standard, it is
a proven failure."[3]
"In every respect, CAFE has been a failure. The only issue Congress should
be debating is how quickly to repeal it. Instead it is considering demands
to make the regulations even stricter - and to apply them with particular
severity to light trucks and SUVs. But before Congress votes, it should
understand the stakes: Higher CAFE standards will mean smaller vehicles, and
smaller SUVs will mean more death.
That's worth repeating: Smaller SUVs will make highways more dangerous[4],
not less. It is fashionable to deride them as dangerous, gas-guzzling
monsters, but it would be more accurate to call them family-sized
lifesavers. Force them to shrink and they will save fewer lives. According
to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, replacing the very largest
cars and SUVs with vehicles one size smaller would kill 300 more people per
year. Must they die?
Too many Americans have already been sacrificed on the altar of fuel
efficiency[5]. It's time for Congress to stop the bloodshed by putting CAFE
out of business."[6]
Here Jacoby advocates unlimited consumption of oil on the one hand, while on
the other hand urging us to "get tough with the Saudis," even to the point
of breaking off our alliance with them. Wouldn't it be easier to "get tough
with the Saudis" if we were less dependent on their oil? Or does Jacoby
want us to simply use our mostly "goyim soldiers" to go beat up Saudi Arabia
and take their oil by force?:
"It is time to face the truth about our Saudi "friends": Their money, their
diplomacy, their politics, and above all their Wahhabi strain of Islam -
extremist, intolerant, aggressive, and poisonously anti-Western - made Sept.
11 possible. The Taliban and Al Qaeda represent not perversions of Wahhabism
but its full flowering. That is why they had the support of so many Saudis -
and why the blood of the victims is on Saudi hands.
For years the House of Saud has had it both ways[7], posing as a friend of
America while spending lavishly to advance America-hating Islamist extremism
around the world. When forced to choose between the two, they have generally
kept faith with the extremists. Saudi Arabia and the United States, as Crown
Prince Abdullah himself said last month, are at a crossroads. Perhaps it is
time they went their separate ways."[8]
A Letter to the Editor in response to Jacoby's illogical "Get tough with the
Saudis" article:
In ``facing the truth about the Saudis'' (op ed, Nov. 18), Jeff Jacoby is
right to state that U.S. obsequiousness with Saudi Arabia has cost us dearly.
the Saudis have it both ways: posing as a friend of the United States and
spreading anti-U.S. extremism across the world.
For years Washington has allowed Riyadh to dictate the terms of the
Saudi-American relationship.
What Jacoby does not get is this: The reason the Saudis can have their cake
and eat it too is because of US dependence on Saudi oil. So long as
Americans are unwilling to drive more fuel-efficient cars, Saudi Arabia will
continue to dictate to Washington. Jacoby should remember his own
contribution to ensuring continued US dependence on Saudi Arabia. In his
July 19 column, "Smaller cars are killer cars" Jacoby lambasted the
Corporate Average Fuel Economy program. The program's purpose is to reduce
our insatiable need for foreign oil.
We cannot continue to have our cake and eat it too. Either we reduce our oil
consumption or we risk being dictated to by oil rich countries.
PAUL G. JOSEPH
Boxboro[9]
=====================
Jacoby the militant Zionist:
Arafat and his gang are enemies, and enemies should be destroyed.[10]
Jacoby denies the right of Palestinians to their land:
"The truth is that there was never an Arab country of Palestine, and
Palestinian Arabs were never a nation. The truth is that Jerusalem was never
the capital of any Arab state or province; it was never even a major
cultural center. The truth is that in all of recorded history, only one
people has ever made Palestine west of the Jordan a sovereign nation-state
with Jerusalem as its capital: the Jews."[11]
So what is the claim of modern "Jews" to the territory that is now called
"Israel?"
"What are the facts about the Jews? The eastern European Jews, who form 92
per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews,
were originally Khazars. There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who
ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back
to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the
Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by
saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised
Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you
one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and
you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars
who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as
ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call
the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and
since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.
Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and
Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call
themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes
that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was
adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia.
The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them
in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They
hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had
accepted Christianity as a religious faith.Now imagine how silly it was for
the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our
power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral
homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that?
Because they (the Jews) control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio,
the television, the book publishing business, and because they are
influencing ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes to
promote their Big Jewish Lie, it is not too surprising that you believe that
lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't
call black black anymore-you'd start to call black white. And nobody could
blame you. That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of
all the misery that has befallen the world."[12]
=====================
Jacoby, as a voice of International Jewry, is predictably in favor of open
immigration into America.
Buchanan's blind spot on immigration
By Jeff Jacoby, 2/24/2002
"Nothing about Buchanan's complaint is new[13]: not his conviction that
Mexicans are of a different ''race,'' not his dismay at their supposed
unwillingness to embrace English, not his dread that California and the
Southwest will be overwhelmed if the swarm of newcomers isn't cut off.
Americans have been hearing dire predictions about the pernicious effects of
immigration for 250 years, yet we stand today as the most powerful,
prosperous, and productive nation on earth. Far from weakening America's
greatness, the constant arrival of immigrants would seem to be a secret of
her success.
It is especially odd to hear Mexican immigration attacked as a threat to
America's Western, Christian values. As Wattenberg notes in his debate with
Buchanan, the twin roots of Mexican and Latin culture are the Catholic
religion and the Spanish language (Portuguese in Brazil's case). ''Now, last
I heard,'' says Wattenberg, ''Spain and Portugal are still part of Europe.
Catholicism is a very vibrant part of Christianity. What is your problem
with ... Mexican immigration?'' It is a challenge Buchanan never quite gets
around to answering.
Immigration is America's national growth hormone; choke off the flow of
newcomers and we end up choking ourselves[14]. Immigrants are one of the
great engines of American progress; we need them at least as much as they
need us. How strange that someone as passionate about history as Buchanan is
manages to miss that point so completely.[15]"
Wonder why our immigration laws let in all sorts of rapists, terrorists and
welfare suckers? Wonder no more!
Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881- 1965: A
Historical Review
Kevin MacDonald : Department of Psychology California State University- Long
Beach Long Beach, CA 90840- 0901
http://www.p-m-s.freeserve.co.uk/texts/USpol.htm
Population and Environment, 19, 295-355 (1998).
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses Jewish involvement in shaping United States immigration
policy. In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of
co- religionists as a result of anti- Semitic movements, Jews have an
interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally
homogeneous societies in which they reside as minorities. Jews have been at
the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status
quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non- European peoples.
These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and
funding anti- restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and
originating intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological
perspectives in the social sciences.
Jacoby is also in favor of racial amalgamation of the "goyim," (non-Jews)
even though he has never denounced the fact that every major Jewish
organization has denounced intermarriage of Jews with non-Jews, and he has
never denounced the fact that the state of Israel does not recognize
marriages between Jews and non-Jews. Jacoby's stance on race is typical of
organized Jewry, which opposes every form of ethnic nationalism except his
own. Note that Jacoby opposes racial solidarity of Blacks, Hispanics and
Asians as well:
"Many minority interest groups resent the drift from narrow racial and
ethnic pigeonholes. Fewer people identifying themselves as black or Hispanic
or Asian, they fear, will mean a drop in their own political power, not to
mention a drop in affirmative action largesse. Some of them push a
separatist line, urging minorities to take pride in being "of color" and
resist assimilation into the mainstream.
But in the piquant phrase of demographics expert Ben Wattenberg, host of the
weekly PBS program "Think Tank," the separatists are being "defeated in the
bedroom." The population of blended citizens is soaring, and with it the
realization that our racial divisions are only skin deep. Tens of millions
of Americans have learned to think outside the racial box. It's time the
government followed suit."[16]
I hope I have demonstrated to you how Organized Jewry is engaged in a
systematic campaign of disinformation and deception in attempting to
subjugate all non-Jewish peoples to Jewish interests, even to the point of
getting us to make war with one another where there is no good reason for
war.
Opposing racial amalgamation and valuing one's own kind is no vice, and it
is time to reject Jewish logic that "Opposing race mixing leads straight to
the death camps." Plenty of people of every race oppose race mixing, and
opposition to race mixing does not have to lead to race war.
Some of the strongest opponents of race mixing are themselves people of
mixed-race heritage, such as Leo Felton, whose father was African-American
and mother was European American. Felton stated that:
``What they (his parents) did in commingling their blood was wrong. Evil,
even. A government that permits such conduct is also, to that extent,
wrong,'' Felton said in the neatly written, four-page account of his beliefs
and racial identity.
Acknowledging his roots as the child of a black father and white mother,
Felton said he has good relations with both of his parents.
But he strongly decried the idea of any interracial couple, including his
parents, having children.
``For two consenting adults of different races to decide that they will
brave the criticism of their families and whatever degree of ostracism in
our `racist' society for the sake of being together is one thing,'' Felton
wrote from the Plymouth County Correctional Facility.
``But to forcibly introduce a third party into the situation by procreating
is something else entirely. This third party, the child, did not enter the
equation knowingly and voluntarily, and unlike the parents, is not only
burdened in his or her physical appearance with their choice but cannot back
out of it if he or she doesn't like being an outcast.''
To practice what he preaches, Felton said he will not have children of his
own.
``For my part I have not bred, nor would I ever,'' he wrote.[17]
National Alliance
P.O. Box 90
Hillsboro, WV 24946
Phone: 304-653-4600
http://www.natvan.com / http://www.natall.com / http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com
-----------------------------
[1] JEFF JACOBY, GLOBE STAFF Date: June 11, 2001 Page: A15 Section: Op-Ed
[2] "Total disbursements for highways are expected to be $126.2 billion in
2001" see http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/fhwa1.htm and on top of this is the
expense of being forced to own, insure, register, maintain and fuel your
private auto and maintain a standing army in Saudi Arabia to keep the oil
supply secure. These factors show that the system of private autos is not
in accordance with "free market principles," as Jacoby deceitfully claims.
Remember the Mossad motto, "Victory through deception."
[3] JEFF JACOBY, GLOBE STAFF Date: October 25, 2001 Page: A19 Section: Op-Ed
[4] This is the "arms race" logic applied to civilian highways. If all cars
on the road were small, light, economical and of limited power, wouldn't
everyone be safer? Instead, Jacoby is advocating that some people be safer
by owning large SUV's, and tough luck for those who drive small cars. Even
this logic is perverse, when you consider that SUV's have a much higher
rollover risk than cars, and it was found that large cars provide the same
protection as SUV's while large cars are less dangerous to other cars than
SUV's. See http://www.cybersteering.com/worldcar/suvsafe.html for more
information.
[5] Another case of a Jew saying the exact opposite of what is true.
American soldiers are being sacrificed on the altar of unlimited consumption
of fossil fuels in Middle East wars, and it's really about getting America
to fight Israel's enemies.
[6] JEFF JACOBY, GLOBE STAFF Date: July 19, 2001 Page: A17 Section: Op-Ed
[7] Just who is looking to "have it both ways" here?
[8] JEFF JACOBY Date: November 18, 2001 Page: E7 Section: Op-Ed
[9] Date: November 25, 2001 Page: D6 Section: Letters
[10] JEFF JACOBY, GLOBE STAFF Date: February 10, 2002 Page: C13 Section:
Op-Ed
[11] JEFF JACOBY, GLOBE STAFF Date: November 18, 2001 Page: E7 Section:
Op-Ed
[12] http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs956b.html
Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals
of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish
businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the
Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the
Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the
great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million
dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.
Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider
at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to
gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with
Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph
Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.
This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard
Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper
of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and
extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to
us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. --
Kevin Alfred Strom
[13] The reason Jews talk about this is because Americans wanted to keep the
Jews out of America. The patriots like Henry Cabot Lodge were right -
Jewish immigration has been tremendously harmful to America, from the
"Russian" mafia operating in NYC right to the early 20th century immigration
of Jews who came to America, took over the mass media (see
www.natvan.com/who-rules-America ), took over the universities and imposed
"political correctness," made the INS totally ineffective (the flight school
just recently (March 2002) got the approved visas for the alleged 9/11
hijackers), and are working to convince White Americans to commit collective
suicide.
[14] Jacoby knows that Jews don't work in blue collar trades, and thus are
not likely to be affected by influxes of cheap blue collar labor, and in
fact Jews are happy to get cheap servants to mow their lawns and take care
of their children.. Jews don't care about carpenters, auto mechanics,
roofers, or ditch diggers any more than they care about the soldiers that
get sent to die in wars that the Jewish lobby pressured America into
entering.
[15] JEFF JACOBY, GLOBE STAFF 2/24/2002
[16] JEFF JACOBY, GLOBE STAFF Date: July 9, 2001 Page: A11 Section: Op-Ed
[17] Felton: I'm cursed by mixed-race family
by Robin Washington Wednesday, July 11, 2001
http://www2.bostonherald.com/news/local_regional/felt07112001.htm
ANDREI KIEVSKY
|
