|
Those Who Don't Care To Help Themselves
by Dale Peterson
THOSE who don't care to help themselves will usually find themselves without assistance when they realize that they have postponed their action beyond a time where it will effect change to the dire predicament these types often find themselves in. Those, on the other hand, who help themselves before asking for assistance from others, are usually the ones who will find assistance from others when they are in a time of requiring such.
The first type, as Dr Pierce enjoys calling them, are the "Sally Soccermoms" and the "Joe Sixpacks" of our society, the types who he also calls "the Lemmings." He's right, that's exactly what they are, Lemmings, or to use another animal comparison, Sheep. They'll continue walking along on their merry way and will scratch their heads in wonder when they find themselves in the unpleasant situation that they have strolled into. The other type, who can be called leaders or, following on from the former analogy, herdsmen, are the ones who will break from the pack, who will stand up and think for themselves and, using their own volition, decide their own course and become masters of their own destiny.
The first type need the second type always, but the second type only need the first very rarely. There will always be more followers than leaders, and this will continue until we have a sane society where rationality, will and independent thought are traits encouraged in our young, rather than discouraged. The herd always needs the herdsman, the follower always needs someone to follow - the leader. Leaders don't need the followers, they can make their own way with or without followers, just as the herdsman does not need the sheep to find his way home, on the contrary, the sheep need him.
The first type are the people who are the main inertia behind a White racial awakening. It is not the Jews, nor the low-IQ African Negroes that is impeding this struggle, it's the effects that these foreign races have had on our race, and the trend-follower attitude they have instilled in our typically trend-setting race, that has brought about this neutralization of our race's collective will. Change has become a bromide. We constantly hear the phrases "we live in a world of change" and "change happens all the time" and "change is the only constant," yet change only takes place in the most trivial of aspects: the coffee we drink; the clothes we wear; the television shows we watch; the way women wear their hair; the kinds of architecture that are in style; the amounts and the flavors of garbage we'll allow fag teachers and child-molesting priests to squirt and ram into our kids and our minds. Real change, societal change, change that goes outside the politically-correct boundaries into the extremes of black and white, yes and no, right and wrong, life and death, are denounced by the labels with which they have been, albeit correctly, stamped: extremism. That kind of change, that "extreme" change, is the only kind of change that is unwelcome in our society, and the only kind of change that really matters and is really needed.
The first type would rather survive in silence than take a chance and speak out, and polarize their fate between living and dying. They prefer their mediocrity, over a chance at success and failure, not always because they are incompetent and destined for that failure, but because they've been told they are by JewTV Inc., which over decades has brainwashed the people who put a man on the moon into believing they are equal with bubble-lipped headhunters from the cannibal Congo. Who of a thinking mind, who believes that yes, we are indeed equal with these burry-headed, black-skinned spearthrowing savages, would believe that great wonders are also within our power? In reality, the White race is by far the most inventive, the most productive, the most intelligent and the most capable race on the face of the earth. It has an unbelievable potential, only it doesn't realize that it does. An intelligent woman once compared the situation to having the Jew Woody Allen and the Austrian Arnold Schwarzenegger sit down together, and that Arnold would try and convince not only himself but a crowd of others that he and Jew Allen were 'equally' strong. This is quite a good way of looking at the current self-degrading attitude of the White race toward itself and toward others.
The second type, however, make up probably the majority of readers of this fine website. We are the leaders, the dissidents, the vanguards, the men who change, rather than the men who allow themselves to be changed by others. We are the men of ability, some of us are men of the mind, others are men of physical skill and stamina, but we have in common one uniting factor - competence. We have potential, we are they who answer "I can," when the masses of asses ask "who will?" We have endured their burdens because we have assured ourselves that they are just like us. But we have instead misled ourselves -- they're not. We have devoted ourselves to the maintenance of their provision, but we have found ourselves providing for those who take what we give them, waste it foolishly, and demand that we give them some more. We have sacrificed our pleasures for the sake of perpetuating their comfort, but them from their comfort-chairs and lounges only snigger and snipe at our sacrifices. We give, they take, we work, they use, we create, they take our creations for granted, we provide, they waste our provision, we ensure their survival, they instead attempt our enslavement.
Wishful thinkers among us have pretended not to notice this, believing that willingness to commit so ignoble a suicide is not possible for the members of a a race whose name has the very meaning of noble. They tell us that we are all in this together, which is their first fraud. Their second fraud is trying to tell us that we must live for them because of the fraud perpetrated in the first, that we must give what is ours to them because they need what is ours. What they don't understand is that they need what is ours because they are unable to produce what is theirs, and no matter how much we give to them they will always need more than the sum of our donation. Sacrifice of the best for sake of the worst is not a noble act; nobility is not gained through sacrificing, but through producing. I will not give my life to save that of another man who is about to shoot himself, or a man foolish enough to encourage another to shoot him. What sense is there in a productive man's sacrifice to save an unproductive suicidal fool?
I also will not give my time, or parts of my life, to lead herds of sheep or lemmings from their suicidal course. There is no benefit to me or you in having the lemmings follow us, we do not need them, they need us. It would be the greatest tragedy in the world for one of us to die, even if by dying we saved ten thousand of them. Do you think they'll appreciate our sacrifice? Do you tell me that they'll come around if we only give them a little more? Do you tell me that it's in our interest to save them, because we need them as much as they need us? They won't appreciate our sacrifice, they never have, and they never will. Cannibals don't thank their victims for a nice meal. We have giiven them everything over the last hundred years, we don't have much more to give, and I'm not about to give them any more. How much more can we give them, especially when there is no indication that it will make the slightest difference to their attitude. The illusion that our existance depends upon a horde of ignoramuses, people mentally infantile enough to believe that Whites and Blacks are equal in every way but skin color, this great mystical myth of the twentieth century is debunked by one simple question. Why would you think that those who don't care to help themselves will be care to help you?
It is the unfortunate consequence of many great men that they have sacrificed themselves for the sakes of their inferiors, hoping for at least a good memory in the minds of those who they gave their lives trying to lead to better things. In the Christian Bible there is Jesus, the Jew who was crucified by those he was trying to save, for trying to save them. A more recent and more realistic figure is Adolf Hitler, who gave his life trying to build a better Germany, and who is now the most reviled and despised man in all of German history, the fallen leader of a nation that no longer exists. He led them out of hell to a better society, but today the clean, White nation he built is being overrun by the Jews and mongrels he fought against. The same men whose fathers and grandfathers died fighting for a better Germany, for an Aryan Europe, now curse their past, and spit on the graves of their forefathers. One might wonder what Adolf Hitler actually achieved. I'd say he tried to lead a herd of lemmings back from the cliff, and instead of diverting them from their peril, was trampled underfoot by a wave of the creatures desperate for death. Let's not follow his example. Let's cut our own trail, forget the lemmings and their suicidal quest. Don't doubt the ability of the capable minority, they might have our productivity now, but when we leave they will soon be picking each other's bones for breakfast, and it'll be nobody's fault but their own. Those who will follow us will do so of their own volition, they will break from the pack and become leaders in their own right, those who don't deserve their fate, the terrible living mediocrity they desire with the most rapacious lust.
DALE PETERSON
|