In Defense of Nazis

by J.R. Colson

Communism has had more than its share of apologists - usually Jews. Let's give the boys in brown a chance to make their case, for once.

On the back wall of a local record shop in Tucson was a poster of the Communist/mass-murderer Ernesto "Che" Guevara. I asked the clerk if he sold any of the posters.

"Yeah, quite a few, actually."

That Guevara oversaw the executions of thousands of innocents apparently means nothing -- Che is a lovable folk hero.

Indeed, there is a bar in Tucson called "Che's" named after him; a recent TV show featured a youth wearing a Che T-shirt. A revolutionary consumer icon, he's. Kind of like brand-new "Biz" with revolutionary stain-removing power.

Other Communists are exalted as well. In the 1960s, it was fashionable for college students to own copies of Mao's "Little Red Book." Never mind that Mao is the biggest murderer in the history of mankind, with more than 60 million corpses to his credit.

My point, you wonder?

Communism, contrary to uninformed claims, is the opposite of Nazism. Indeed Nazis were the sworn enemies of "Jewish-Bolshevism" of the type that now proliferates in the White West under the Semitically Correct banner of multiculturalism, or "cultural marxism" if you oppose it but aren't serious.

The following are some observations about the German nationalists and their movement:

  1. Nazism was a REACTION TO murderous, Jew-led Communism in Russia and Europe;

  2. Nazism racked up nowhere near the body count Communism did -- does;

  3. The victims of Nazism were Communists, thieving gypsies, leftists, homosexuals, Jews, and a few egalitarian Christians who spoke out against Nazism knowing that it would result in their arrests; most of these victims died by starvation or disease, not "gassing";

  4. Nazism as an ideology is much less totalitarian than Communism;

  5. Nazism attempted to forcibly preserve traditional White European culture; that alone is significant, making it the only recent, state-sanctioned movement to attempt such;

  6. If not for the Nazis acting as a hedge, Western Europe would have been Communized by 1945;

  7. The Nazis were not attempting to "take over the world"; invading 1 and 4/5 countries -- Poland and the rest of Czechoslovakia -- does not equal attempted world domination. Hitler invaded most other countries in Europe AFTER England and France declared war on Germany;

  8. Nazism was straight about its aims, never hiding behind phony slogans such as "Soon everybody will be equal";

  9. The Nazis were not gun-banners as many claim; in fact, they weakened previous gun ownership prohibitions for regular German citizens;

  10. Nazism is not a left-wing ideology, because:

    • it is not a political movement per se, it is actually a racial movement, and cannot rightly be viewed through only a political lens like Mussolini's fascism;

    • a "limited government" was not the norm in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s;

    • a large government was needed to preserve German culture by force;

    • THE most conservative action one can take is to preserve one's culture by force. That is true "conservatism."

A culture is the foundation on which everything else rests. It trumps all other social ideas, or styles of government.

In fact, if you are not preserving your race or culture FIRST, as the Nazis were, you absolutely cannot call yourself a "conservative," no matter how much you love Pat Robertson, or quote Rush Limbaugh.

The "Holocaust": key to the ongoing demonization of Nazism...

The key to the truth about Nazism resides in that special event called "The Holocaust" -- capital 'h,' trademark applied for, as David Irving says.

While the promoted "Holocaust" is the most exaggerated event in human history, the Jew-led Holocaust of White Christians in the Ukraine and elsewhere in Eastern Europe is the most underreported story of the last 100 years.

And of course, as stated above, the German-led "Holocaust" was in large measure a natural reaction to the Jew-led starter Holocaust that nobody ever talks about. Except the "starter" Holocaust was far bigger than the publicized one.

From a functional perspective, lying about the "Holocaust" serves several purposes:

  1. It insulates all modern Jews from criticism.

  2. It allows organized Jewry to steal literally tens of billions of dollars.

  3. It provides cover for Israeli actions that are more disgusting and criminal than anything Hitler ever dreamed of.

  4. It permanently blocks the one route back to political sanity by insisting that every non-Jewish race pretend it doesn't exist.

Truth creeping out between the lies: take Dachau...

Consider Dachau, for example: it was called an "extermination" camp by Jewish groups for 50 years. They even had a photo of a "gas chamber door" at Dachau.

And today? Even some Jewish "Holocaust experts" admit that "no gassing occurred on German soil."1 Since Dachau was in Germany, this is a very curious admission.

Did the gas chambers at Dachau magically disappear? They must have.

More Jewish writers are admitting to Jewish funny-business than ever before. The Jewish professor Arno Mayer of Princeton University wrote in his 1988 book "Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?: The 'Final Solution' in History: ...From 1942 to 1945, certainly at Auschwitz, but probably overall, more Jews were killed by so-called 'natural' causes than by 'unnatural' ones. Oy! That doesn't sound kosher!

It is time to end the positive portrayals of Communist mass-murderers, and time to start telling the truth about Nazism, however shocking that may be to soccer moms in Ohio.

We must mention these facts about Nazism in e-mails, in chat rooms, to friends and neighbors. We must let the truth out, and let the chips fall where they may.

If this leads to a Jew being called names on a street corner, so be it -- the Jews made their collective bed, and now they must lie in it. It is time for Jews to suffer in return for the suffering Jews have caused.

Let us open the doors, and let the truth out: the truth about the Jews.



1. Both Nazi-hunter Simon Wiesenthal [in 1975 and 1993] and Dr. Martin Broszat of the German-government-funded Institute for Contemporary History in Munich [in 1960] deny gassings at Dachau.

Back to VNN Main Page

Click Here!