On the Internet, The Walls Are Closing In
by Victor Gerhard
In a few years pro-White racialists will be effectively denied access to the Internet. Our
enemies have finally found effective devices, methods and Internet choke points, and the
end of the Internet as we know it is in sight. Going by my experiences, our freedom of
access to the Internet is diminishing daily.
In 1995, Don Black used his newly learned computer skills to created the
Stormfront website, and racialists
had their first major presence on the World Wide Web. After decades of being denied any
voice whatsoever in the mainstream media, the Internet provided freedom beyond our wildest
dreams. Suddenly any racialist with the small amount of capital required to create a
Website had instant, direct and uncensored access to millions of people.
Along with spreading anti-Establishment opinions, the Internet was an ideal tool for
recruiting new members and increasing public knowledge about an organization. Internet
merchandise sales, donations, and dues from new members gave the pro-White movement a badly
needed infusion of cash. Groups not only found new supporters, but also could now easily
keep in daily contact with current members, creating a much stronger, active and
interconnected membership. Using the Internet, formerly local groups expanded nationwide,
and formerly national groups expanded worldwide. Another often overlooked benefit was the
large number of racialists who became self-employed by selling merchandise or marketing
their new web skills, thereby avoiding the problems pro-White activists face in the job
The Internet also changed the operation and tactics of our movement. Many hard-copy
magazines and newsletters were quickly replaced by on-line editions or by regular updates
to the website itself. E-mails, newsgroups, mailing lists and chat rooms to some degree
replaced monthly face-to-face gatherings and membership bulletins. As stated much
recruiting moved on-line but so did many organizational activities. New forms of activism
were devised which could take place right on a PC. Racialists used the anonymity and
equality of access of the Internet to confront and fight Jews and leftists throughout
Without the protection provided by the mainstream media leftists were practically
defenseless and outnumbered wherever they went. Ordinarily forbidden subjects were thrown
in the face of the left, and on the unfettered parts of the Internet we won a clear victory
in the battle of ideas. Jews and their illogical, hypocritical, false and oppressive ideas
were often laughed out of chat rooms altogether.
The Internet also created a new unity on the radical right. Through shared members, e-mail
lists, news groups, chat rooms, links, increased accessibility and awareness, new and
unique input from Whites worldwide, and because of certain almost universally visited
sites, such as those of Stormfront and the
National Alliance, the idea of Pan-Aryanism began to become a reality. In general,
formerly quite distant groups and ideologies such as National Socialism, Christian Identity,
the World Church of the Creator, Aryan Nations, the many Ku Klux Klan factions, Skinheads,
Odinists and the many other parts of our movement found few conflicts on the Internet and
much in common. With increased communication and with our race facing increasing peril,
past personal differences were often put aside and pro-White organizations were able to
agree on most of the vital issues facing Whites today. The important and almost universal
14 Words became one of the touchstones of the movement.
The spread of White Power on the Internet was monitored and denounced by the Jews and their
lackeys from the beginning. But because of the unique qualities of cyberspace, the usual
tactics of ideological control did not work. The Internet was growing at a staggering
rate, ignoring national borders. Millions of Web sites were started and thousands of ISPs
and search engines/Web portals were built. How can you control something that doesn't have
a physical location or existence?
Initially the Jews attempted to use exposure and public pressure to target and close down
individual sites. Some people may have lost their day jobs but these attempts almost
always failed. Publication of a site's name usually resulted in increased traffic and
growth. Faced with such a complex problem, the Jews responded with a typically deceptive,
underhanded and multi-level strategy.
The search for choke points....
First, the Jews publicly denied they were trying or would try to censor the Internet,
claiming that the First Amendment, very unfortunately, protected this form of communication;
standard Jewish deception. Second, they searched for new methods or devices for controlling
Internet content. Third, they searched for types of Internet organizations that most Web
sites utilize and that, unlike the sites themselves, would be responsive to their pressure;
in other words, they searched for choke points. Because of the complexity and size of this
task, we have enjoyed about six years of relative freedom. However, most of the pieces are
in place, and the real push to get pro-White groups off the Internet has begun. This will
not be an attack on one front. We are going to be gradually squeezed off the Internet from
many sides and in many ways.
One of the first steps taken and one of the first devices put in place was the well-known
filter, which when implanted, prevented a computer from accessing certain pre-selected
sites. These have been pushed by groups like the ADL, and provided by them to public
schools and public libraries. There has also been a campaign to get parents to put filters
on their children's computers. In addition, some European countries already deny access to
certain 'forbidden' sites -- even when the user directly types in the URL address itself.
Even with the correct web address a Swedish computer user, I am told, cannot access the
site for Resistance Records. In other words a government filters Internet content for a
whole country by using its own computers.
Another device or method, which can be deduced from many separate facts and incidents, is
the roving hit squads of leftist thoughtpolice that patrol the Internet for any deviation
from Jewish-controlled opinion. The question is: how organized are these devils, and are
they connected to any existing organization? I can only guess, but some of the hit squad
members are probably only college students with nothing else to do. However, there has to
be some type of organization or communication between many of these people, because they
appear able to comb the whole Internet, including enormous auction sites such as eBay, and
discussion and news groups -- an incredible task -- and they also know how to apply
pressure on the most vulnerable party to make the offending opinion disappear. These
search-and-destroy squads also probably are feeding information back to the Jewish
organizations that do the big-time, big-money shakedowns.
By use of another ominous device 'searches' now performed by many search engines have been
rigged to trigger certain responses. I have tested this myself on several search engines
and had the same results confirmed by several people. A search for a term such as 'nazi'
or 'skinhead' that might have previously brought up a pro-White site now brings up dozens
of anti-Nazi or anti-Skinhead sites, sites for anti-racist Skinheads, gay Skinheads, and
sites for the ADL, SPLC or NAACP, or sites for articles about the evils of Nazis and
Skinheads. A normal Skinhead site won't appear, if at all, until several pages into the
search. As most of us know, usually people only look at the first page or two of a search.
This device will particularly inhibit the attraction of new recruits to our movement. A
large amount of resources has been put into an effort to convince teenagers that 'real'
skinheads are those who love Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Arabs.
Another device or method is the current influx of Pakistani, Indian, Chinese and other
Asian immigration into America. Jews depend on blacks and Hispanics for votes, crime, and
cultural destruction. However, they are importing Asians not to destroy us but to replace
us, as they realize blacks and Hispanics will never have the technical skills required by
today's society. The Asians can handle computer jobs and they are by nature far more
controllable than Whites.
Asian immigrants will control more and more computer jobs and they are hostile to any sign
of White self-interest. I needed help creating a 'links' page for my site, and the company
assigned me a technician clearly just off the boat from India. Over three months later I
am still waiting for this to be done correctly and some people at the company have implied
to me that this person is merely not happy with my links. Imagine the arrogance and the
distain for Whites programmed into this person; just arrived in the country and she
considers the political opinions of someone whose ancestors have been here for almost 200
years to be incorrect.
Next, a choke point was found when the Jews realized that while there are thousands of
search engines, most Americans use only one of a handful as their home page and initial web
portal. AOL, MSN, Yahoo and several other large search engines became targets of Jewish
Yahoo in particular was vulnerable to attack because Nazi memorabilia was regularly sold at
its auction site. Significantly, the Jews used the laws and jurisdictions of European
countries, like France, which prohibit sales of this kind. Yahoo was threatened with large
fines by French courts, because the French can access the auctions from France. Faced with
this pressure, Yahoo discontinued these types of auctions altogether, as did
Notice the deviousness of this method; the universality of the Internet was used against
itself. One country's laws were applied to force compliance to Jewish demands by the whole
world. The jurisdiction of courts over the Internet is a complicated question, and is not
settled to any great degree. France claimed civil jurisdiction because Yahoo was "doing
business" in France. The Jews were able to turn the matter into a publicity attack on
Yahoo by the old trick of yelling "holocaust!" As any student of Jewish tactics knows, if,
say, Iran tried to get offensive Jewish items off the Internet, the entire debate would
shift, and become one of free speech and national sovereignty, if the effort wasn't ignored
Further pressuring Yahoo (ANY yielding in the face of Jewish attacks immediately brings a
larger and more vicious attack), Jews were able to convince them to place large banners
celebrating 'tolerance' all over the search engine, especially in certain club rooms where
The Jews will continue to use the laws of other countries to restrict the Internet. The
pro-Jewish laws of one country will be enforced against Websites or search engines 'doing
business' in that country, which could be stretched to mean the majority of sites or
engines in the world. Because these are civil penalties, they can be assessed around the
As for criminal charges, the Fall 2001 SPLC Intelligence Report contains an article
with the grandiose caption: Legal Brief When Laws Conflict, subtitled, The
principle of 'double criminality' prevents the extradition of Americans who break European
hate speech laws. This merely means America will not extradite a citizen to a country
that wants to prosecute an act that is legal in America. This has been technically true
since America was founded, so why are they talking as if it's a brand new obstacle to 'hate
crime prosecution'? Because they don't like the 'principle,' i.e., the First Amendment,
and want to get rid of it, maybe by using some of the international treaties the U.S. has
signed to overrule the Constitution. As they put it, "[a]s globalization accelerates and
continues to bring the world closer together, the dilemmas posed by the principle of
'double criminality' will only increase."
Further choke points are discussion rooms and chat rooms such as those on AOL. I remember
first discovering these rooms, such as From the Right, and staying up all night
trading facts, insults and ideology with a 'room' of 20 people, all typing and thinking as
fast as they could. You could say anything. Those rooms no longer exist, replaced by
'community rooms,' clearly designed to control discourse. The shenanigans at Free
Republic are another result of Jewish pressure.
Case Study: LookSmart and the attempt to control search
Even deadlier maneuvering was going on behind the scenes in the search engine market. I
discovered this for myself while trying to submit my Website to search engines. The larger
search engines now charge $200-300 to submit a commercial site. The money is
non-refundable even if the search engine rejects the site. I applied to the Excite search
engine, and paid $200. The search engine appeared to promise that by getting in the Excite
search engine, my site would also appear in many other affiliated search engines. When I
got a reply to my submission, it wasn't from Excite, but from a company called LookSmart.
According to its own information, LookSmart provides the content for over 370 separate
search engines, which reach 77% of U.S. Internet users, and which include Excite, MSN,
AltaVista [recently called the largest search engine on the Web], iwon and CNN.
The reply to my submission was as follows:
LookSmart has reviewed your Express site submission, and we regret to inform you that we
are unable to include your site in the LookSmart directory. At this time, your site does
not meet our editorial standards. LookSmart is committed to editorial integrity and does
not accept porn, hate or spam in its directories.
Now, my site had no content, it only sold items such as skinhead music CDs, and books like
Turner Diaries, Hunter, and many classics also. It lists the items and
prices, and people can buy them online. It has a relatively inoffensive name, but does say
on the front-page "Supplying the White Resistance." Because of the software used, there is
not even a place to put any further comments or content except in a relatively small space
on the first page. I realized at once that since any other submissions to these 370+
search engines would go to this same group of people, my site was now cut off from 77% of
the U.S. Internet market. I did look at the LookSmart rules regarding submissions, but
they were equally vague, mentioning "promotion of hate speech," but in no way defining
Unfortunately, I am unable to accept the rejection of my site. After looking at other
sites you carry, including sites with the most obscene, graphic, anti-white -- rap lyrics
imaginable, I am sure in a court of law and in the court of public opinion your firm is
going to be greatly embarrassed when said sites are compared to mine. I suggest you take
another look. Maybe you remember my site; it sells books by Plato, Aristotle, Conrad and
other authors. Or is this just a 'black-good,' 'white-bad' thing?
In reply, I received another form rejection, asking I look at the LookSmart standards. I
e-mailed back again, in part:
How does my site promote "violence, hate speech or illegal activity"? All the items I
sell are legal. 'Hate speech' is an arbitrary term. Tell me [why] you are rejecting my
site. I don't have to give up my rights to free speech to do business with a company.
You are using standards in a discriminatory manner, and whoever said I have no choice but
to abide by your judgment is incorrect. How can I even resubmit my site if you do not state
what is wrong with it? So please either re-evaluate my site or tell me precisely what is
"promoting violence, hate speech or illegal activity."
As I recall, I received another form e-mail, again merely saying I did not meet their
'standards.' I hate having to use the nauseating liberal formulas of 'free-speech' and
'discrimination' to fight back in cases like this, but the fact is, we are forced to abide
by this tyrannical system because of federal laws devised by the left, and yet the left
never lets these laws get in the way in their treatment of us.
I tried yet another e-mail:
Just to continue with my research into your 'standards,' I was surprised to find that
Excite [LookSmart] has allowed in its search engine the Jewish Defense Organization. Over
the past 20 years this has been America's most active terrorist organization; they have in
fact set off bombs and killed people.
On their [JDO] site is a large message "Death to Nazi Scum." Just in case that is not
clear enough, they have a list of "Nazi" addresses in the upper left-hand corner, with a
revolving picture of an Uzi submachine gun. As you read the addresses of the "Nazis" they
want to kill, you see many names of in fact non-violent groups: The Nationalist Observer -
a newspaper, the Euro-American Alliance - a cultural group, George Dietz - publisher of
Liberty Bell Books here in West Virginia, the Asatru Alliance - an Odinist religious
organization, Bohica Concepts - a book publisher, the British National Party - a legitimate
party of British politics with elected members ... I could go on.
Just in case THAT message is not clear, there is another gun, this on a page about
"training." In case THAT is not clear, there is an article "Jewish Youth learn to Shoot."
"Camp Jabotinsky," according to THEIR information, is where the JDO prepares children to
kill members of the groups listed above.
And this is acceptable to Excite, and my site is not. Why not call the FBI and ask them
about the JDO? Have you done so? If not, why not, when this site so clearly states its
intent to facilitate the murder of a long list of people? I can almost guarantee that
the only groups you have not accepted have been pro-White. You even allow the Black Muslims,
whose expressed religious beliefs are to eliminate Whites. "Hate" seems to be a word that
is applied with blatant hypocrisy.
And in reply, LookSmart sent back this:
You are confusing Excite's index content with that of the LookSmart directory. While
Excite uses LookSmart's directory for a portion of their search results, they also have
content that is distinct and separate from that provided by LookSmart. As per our terms of
service, LookSmart does not list sites that promote violence, hate speech, or illegal
activities in our directory. The site you mentioned below, Jewish Defense Organization
is not listed in the LookSmart directory.
LookSmart was now reduced to blatant lying; at LookSmart's own
directory, the JDO was found merely
by doing a keyword search. Also listed at LookSmart, among many incredibly offensive sites,
was a site for the "
Anahuac-Mexica Movement," an organization explicitly dedicated to overthrowing the U.S.
Government in the Southwestern U.S., evicting all Whites, and creating a "Mexica" State,
presumably with a chicken in every front yard.
Also at LookSmart are several sites with complete listings of rap lyrics by Tupac Shakur,
including the song
Tradin' War Stories, recounting true stories of his killing 'niggas' - "I be
the nigga pullin the trigga and [d]umpin the hollow points in your brain." Also at the
same site is 187 by Dr. Dre, recounting his program for murdering undercover cops.
Dr. Dre also weighs in with the pop standard Natural Born Killaz, describing his
plans to become a serial killer - "I'm the unforgiven, psycho-driven murderer I snatch
him out his truck, hit him with a brick and I'm dancin'."
I realized at this point that LookSmart was going to keep my $200 and reject my site,
without giving me any reason whatsoever. I tried calling all the corporate numbers for
LookSmart and got nowhere. I then sent one more e-mail:
I put the Jewish Defense Organization in your search engine and it came up. Why don't you
try it? It is listed in your directory. Or are you going to tell me that the fact that it
came up in a keyword search in your directory doesn't really mean it's in your directory?
I am a member of one of the groups on [the JDO] assassination list. How can you service a
group which openly states it is training "Jewish Youth" to murder people, including members
of established political parties?
I never heard from LookSmart again.
You must understand what is now happening to search engines. At one time search engines
maintained their own content, usually developed from submissions made by site owners. Now
more and more "search engines" are really false fronts, just different names for doorways
to the exact same content.
LookSmart (and maybe other companies), approaches these search engines and offers them a
great deal - LookSmart will manage the engine's content for a fee which is probably far
less than it costs the search engine to collect its own content. And the engine will have
access to far more content than it could collect on its own. There is a catch of course --
LookSmart is censoring the content for all the sites it services and is doing so in such a
way that pro-White sites are not accepted. Instead of 370+ independent voices there is one
anti-White company. Think of what happened to the all the independent newspapers in the
country - all bought up or supplied content by a few big syndicates; Jewish, of
I predict that soon search engines or companies like LookSmart will not only deny
submissions of pro-White sites but also begin to remove current sites from the searchable
content they maintain, surreptitiously or otherwise. This could be happening
Another choke point: Internet 'automatic submission' services. Examples of these services
are "I Submit" and "I Need Hits." Instead of a Website owner going to hundreds of small
search engines in the U.S. and around the world and submitting his site for their content,
the website owner can go to a service like I Need Hits and that company, for a fee, will
submit a site to hundreds of small search engines very quickly. They also can provide
advertising for a site by listing it in a "Banner Advertising Service."
I paid money to I Need Hits for both services; they did the submissions, or so they say,
but about a month later sent an e-mail, saying in part, "Unfortunately, due to the nature
and content of your website we are unable to provide Banner Advertising Services for your
website." The amazing thing about this is that I Need Hits is really a "middle-man"
service. Why should they in any way care about the content of my site? Why would they
even review the content of my site? Looking at my site isn't necessary for anything they
Again, this pattern will continue with all sorts of on-line services for Websites.
Another choke point: Internet Service Providers, the computers on which Websites are
actually located. If these ISPs don't rely on mainly pro-White sites they can easily be
pressured to throw their one or two pro-White sites off. I have been hearing anecdotal
evidence about this from other pro-White site owners. Recently, after spending several
months starting a corporation, setting up a Website, buying thousands of dollars of
inventory, and spending time and money on advertising and search engines, I received from
my ISP an e-mail, completely out of the blue, that said in full: "Victor: due to the
content of your store, it will be taken down. You will be refunded for your last month of
service." A company Vice President signed it. The most interesting part was that they not
only intended to stop ISP services, but they were going to stop leasing me their store
software, in effect wiping out my entire site; I would not even be able to transfer to
another ISP. Again, a transaction that would seem to have nothing to do with the content
of a site, that is, leasing software, was in fact going to turn on that very
I replied in part:
There is nothing wrong with the content of my store. I informed your sales people of
what my store would be selling from the onset; they registered no objection and gladly took
Never was I told you had an unwritten and undisclosed rule against free speech. If I
were not White you would not take this action. I was assured by your sales people that my
site was mine and could be transferred to another host. If my site is "taken down," I will
not only sue you immediately, but I will begin a press campaign, and also inform the entire
Internet that [your company] will destroy a site without warning at the very moment months
of work and financial investment begin to start paying back the expended effort. [Y]ou
blatantly made it clear that the "content of my store" was the problem. The "content"
concerns White people, you couldn't make it more clear. Your anti-White bias and
affiliations must also be an issue.
I then called the company to speak with that Vice President. I didn't reach him but the
next day he called me. What followed was an utterly bizarre conversation - he started by
saying that he was going to record the conversation. Next, he accused me of "hiding" and
"lying about" the content of my site, which was on his company's sever! Then, he accused
me of cursing at and harassing his staff. This was so false, and such an obvious attempt
by him to get an accusation against me on tape, that when I furiously denied it he quickly
changed the subject.
He next pulled a trick that had been tried on me before, saying the content of my site fell
under prohibitions against obscene adult material, a/k/a pornography! Of course, the
amazing thing about this conversation is that I was a customer of this man's company, and I
had already paid them a large sum for their services, and had paid my ISP fee on time every
single month. Yet he immediately took an adversarial stance against me. In this instance
however, because I was so clearly determined to do anything within my power to harm the
company, they relented (the decision was made before the Vice President called me, yet he
still had to harass me, probably attempting to get a better reason to take down my site in
the future) and stated my site would not be destroyed.
If this had not been a small, mainly family-owned company in a competitive market, I feel
sure they would have pulled my site. It was mainly the thought of the possible bad
publicity that made them back off.
I predict that ISPs will continue to be pressured to throw pro-White sites off their
servers. There are thousands of these servers, so the Jews may try to find some method to
speed up the process. Naming servers as parties in lawsuits filed against the sites they
carry may be one method. Some kind of Jew-controlled trade association "tolerance
guideline" might be another. The Jews may try to pass laws making servers liable for any
criminal actions or 'hate crimes' of Websites; even if no racialist Website is ever accused
of a 'hate crime,' servers would hesitate to rent it space.
Another choke point: consultants and graphics services. I have heard complaints about the
difficulty in finding people in our movement able to provide a specific computer service.
Ironically, I ran into this problem while trying to help solve it.
I was so enraged by the almost daily abuse I was taking in trying to earn a living and help
my race that I decided to create a submission-type directory of Whites in the racialist
movement by their professions. In this way, someone looking for a service like Web
designing or tax preparation could go to another racialist. Also the directory would
include any racialist merchants who wanted to be listed according to items they sold --
allowing all of us to buy White to the greatest degree possible.
After some searching I finally found one company who leased and hosted the software I
needed. I told the little twit of a salesgirl that I was creating something for the people
who were being excluded from the Internet and I named some of the groups. She was more
than happy to take my money and have me sign a contract to put the whole package together,
"within 3 weeks" she said.
Two months later, after I had sent her company a detailed outline of what I wanted built,
she was not returning my calls and it was as if her company had disappeared off the face of
the earth. As she implied when I managed to finally track her down, once her company saw
in writing the pro-White purpose of the directory no employee would have anything to do
with developing it. I cancelled my contract, about four hundred dollars
After quite a bit more searching I found Bill, a one-man operation in northern New England
who said he could provide the software and build the directory. He also said he owned his
own ISP and could host the directory at a very reasonable rate. He had a graphics
consultant, Mike, who could design my graphics cheaply. Again, I told him the project was
to help people who were being excluded from the Internet, specifically White people, and
told him the name of the domain I had purchased, which had the word 'white' in it. He had
no problems with the project. I wrote out a check for a thousand dollars, the majority of
his projected fee, and sent it to him.
Now, before you call me a moron, my thinking was that this was the perfect guy to do what I
needed, and because he was self-employed, lived in an all-White area, had no problem with
the project and had his own ISP, he was the last guy I could expect to be pressured. Plus
I had talked to Mike and he agreed to the project also. I figured that once Bill had a
thousand dollars in his hand he would never back out of the project. So I sure felt like
a moron when...
I got back from a trip to New York and saw four e-mail messages waiting. Before I left I
had e-mailed a one-page, detailed plan of the directory to Mike and Bill. However, I had
learned my lesson, I thought. I sent the most inoffensive and innocent looking directory
possible. Nowhere was there the name of a pro-White group or activity. It merely listed
professions - 'web consultant,' 'tax preparer,' and products - 'automotive products,'
'computer hardware' and so on. Not one thing to do with race, except of course the domain
name included the word 'white.'
The first e-mail was from Bill, the second from Mike. Both told me they had received and
reviewed the plan and were already at work designing the directory; Mike's e-mail even
attached some possible graphics he had already created for me.
The third e-mail was from Mike and it is a classic of the genre:
After reviewing the content for your site I realized what your site was promoting. I do
not agree with the position your site may promote. I believe the world is made better by
having diversity in it. I must decline to work for your site. I believe you have the
right to do what you are doing but I do not want to participate in it. I wish to withdraw
my designs and not collect the fee for the logos I designed for you. You can have someone
reproduce a similar logo if you wish but please do not use mine.
Well, by now nothing could surprise me. The fourth e-mail was of course from Bill -- it
contained a few unusual twists -- listen to this rambling BS:
We've got a problem. I can't host this site on any of my servers due to it's[sic]
content. I don't mind continuing the finished text development of the site but you'll have
to find an internet provider to host the site. When I first asked if this was adult related,
I never thought of the content you're creating would not be considered adult by you. My
contract with my service provider forbids this type of content on my servers. Let me know
how you'd like to proceed. Where I am not providing any of the actual content, I feel
comfortable finishing the site but can't further develop it beyond the scope of what my
search engine can provide. If this is not acceptable, I'll be glad to return your
"We've got a problem," that just cracks me up every time. Suddenly, an utterly inoffensive
site is 'adult' because of the word 'white,' though Bill never asked me if it was an 'adult'
site -- labeling the site 'adult' was merely the pathetic, transparent evasion of a cringing
coward. And now Bill has no servers, or does he? Of course both of these White, adult
males knew precisely what I intended to do and had no problem with it as they stated in
their own e-mails sent the day before. If I were very paranoid I'd say that between their
first and second e-mails someone had a talk with old Bill and Mike. Maybe, as a friend
suggested, they had a talk with each other and suddenly had second thoughts. Anyway, hey,
Bill was actually going to build the site if I wanted! Yee-ha, talk about getting lucky.
I finally found a person in the U.S. who would take at least some money from me for a
project with the word 'white' in it!
So I e-mailed Bill:
Any "agreement" that would ban my search engine, based on its "content" (it has content?
what is the content? where can I find it?) is so incredibly Unconstitutional as to be
laughable. But what is [really] sad is that people are getting away with doing these things
anyway. A small group of people is manipulating the whole country. Doesn't the fact that a
site can be banned merely because of POSSIBLE content show that what my site represents is
the correct view of the world? Being pro-White is equated with pornography? - Hey, some day
they'll come for you.
Yes, please complete the project, [I'll find another host]. Also, please suggest another
graphics consultant. Because of what my site "may" contain, and in the name of diversity
and tolerance, Mike has told me to get lost.
At the moment, Bill is still at work. And a number of decent Whites, whom I know only from
the Internet, have given me some help with graphics and a few other details, for free I must
note, and I am very grateful.
Clearly, Bill and Mike illustrate another way the Jews are choking us on the Internet -
general anti-White propaganda. It has become so mind-warping that help of any kind from
non-racialists will be the exception rather than the rule.
I've had even more incidents, if you can believe it, including all the items eBay banned me
from selling, but they don't add to my general argument.
I'm afraid the choke point that will finish us off in the end is going to be access to
phone lines. The Jews will pressure the phone companies, some of the most gutless companies
in existence, to deny phone line service to ISPs with pro-White sites. There are satellite
systems and cable systems, but satellite and cable companies can be pressured
There may be lots of hiding and compromising in our future; I've already spoken to several
racialists who say they deliberately tone down or censor what is on their site to avoid
potential trouble. I can't blame them, but to me, that's no victory.
Loss of Internet usage is going to be very damaging to our movement, at least in the short
run. We've become so dependent on it that we have all but forgotten how we organized and
communicated before the Internet. Although it may be hard to believe, a good portion of
our people have never known what our movement was like before the Internet; they were either
not racialists or too young. How do we go back to a very different way of doing
The Internet has had some negative effects on our movement. Too much substitution of
typing for action - real, physical action; too much time spent alone in a room. Not
enough face-to-face meetings, which is the only way to truly know someone, even today. If
in fact we are pushed off the Internet, we must be ready to turn that happening into a
benefit for our movement. We must be ready with even better and more effective alternatives
of communication and organization, as farfetched as that may seem today. We must prepare
for the day when we turn on our computer and no one is there but a Jew, looking back at