White Politics II: Julius Streicher and the
Enemy This Time
[Streicher facts taken from Little Man, What Now?: Der Stürmer in the Weimar
Republic, by Dennis E. Showalter (1982).]
by Alex Linder
Julius Streicher comes to us across the decades as a sex-obsessed nut so disgusting that
even his fellow Nazis steered clear of him. But that's Jew-filtered half-truth. The
editor of Der Stürmer was an Iron Cross winner and highly successful orator who
produced curiously strong propaganda that put the NSDAP over the top in Bavaria and
Franconia. Thanks to his relentless editorializing, speaking and legal wrangling -- and
the help of a first-rate cartoonist -- the infamous soldier-propagandist soldered Weimar
corruption to the guilty Jew and burned that link into the cerebellum of the German
The sleaze of the system was so perfectly embodied in his cartoon kikes that a generation
of Germans came to see itself as Us, and to understand what needed to be done with Them.
That's a lesson the fissiparous White West has yet to learn today, and it's the reason
Streicher and his story are worth cracking open in 2001.
What did Streicher know? How did he discover it? How did he put his knowledge to use?
These are the questions that make investigation of Streicher and DS of more than
historical interest. In sum: How can we take what Streicher had and apply it to our
He must have possessed something powerful since he was hanged at Nuremberg for his words
and ideas alone -- called "war crimes" by the victors. That's right: the "democratic"
victors put him to death for using the First Amendment! Welcome to reality, democracy
fans! Democracy advocates place a lot of faith in their theory, almost as much as they do
in a stout hemp rope.
Is it possible that what they were afraid of then is what they are afraid of now? Is it
possible that Streicher holds the key to the door they don't want us to unlock? The
answer is yes. Streicher was no Christian coward, like so many of the "courageous"
Christian columnists we see backslapping and logrolling on the Internet and tv. He had
an Iron Cross and convictions and defended them on the street, in court, on paper and from
the podium. No Zionist lickspittle Cal Thomas he; no Israeli suckpoop Joe Farah; no Holy
Land Tour Guide Pat Robertson.
He knew that identifying the Jew was real politics and everything else beanbag. He was
right. And he was influential. And he won... What have our Christian cowards ever
won? History records the Nazis retook a country from the Jews, and it shows that
they were exceptionally brave and able men in so doing. They were better men than the
Jew-toadying Christian cowards who denounce them today, no matter what the books
Streicher applied: Where he came from and where we're going...
Like most of the Nazi hierarchy, Streicher was of undistinguished origin, and seemed likely
to carry on trackless. But WWI changed him, left him restive, filled with energy with no
obvious outlet. Most White Americans today, grown up comfy in the suburbs, have never
stretched themselves. Is it odd that war brings out the best in man, while peace brings
out the belly?
Streicher too might have settled for a nice gemütlich life had not the Great War
intruded. But during that war he came to realize that he had dash and vigor and that maybe
there was a bit more to him than a schoolteacher. As Showalter puts it, the war -- his
bravery and its rewards -- taught him that his own actions properly applied could alter
reality. In commercial parlance, he had just done it, and having done it wanted to do it
again. How to do that in peacetime?
Well, German peacetime wasn't peaceful. Towns were clogged with scrofulous Jews plotting
insane revolutions. Politics was the answer. Streicher became a socialist, went to
meetings, argued, got whipped by people who'd read books. Showalter paints him as
realizing he couldn't get by on bluster when crossing swords with indoctrinated Marxists.
Maybe that's true. I suspect he came across the Jews that dominate these things and had a
visceral reaction. Perhaps a little of both....
After one meeting, somebody pressed a copy of a Jew-critical tract into his hand, and
shortly thereafter Saul became Paul. He converted to the cause of "anti-Semitism," and it
was apparently a genuine intellectual conversion. That's unusual: most people are
anti-Semitic instinctively -- anti-Semitism being the natural reaction of the non-Jew to
the Jew, based on his appearance and behavior, whether in Palestine, Poland or
Hitler details in Mein Kampf the horror with which he regarded his first Jews in
Vienna. Anti-Semitism is the natural reaction of a human to an Alan Dershowitz, and that
very formulation is how Streicher would have phrased it, or more likely had it drawn --
because the overriding technique he employed, the technique he is famous for, was
capturing -- crystallizing -- the corruption of a country in the cover caricature of a
One may write ad infinitum about crooked government, but why? A picture of Alan Dershowitz,
Barbara Boxer, Chuck Schumer, Paul Wellstone, Larry King, Dick Morris, etc. etc. will
suffice. Conjure their faces in your mind and you'll see what I mean. Even better than a
picture is a cartoonist's rendering of these mortal monsters! Streicher took over a paper,
found a great cartoonist named "Fips" and was off to the races...
The idea we have that Germans are a docile folk is laughable if we are implying that
Americans by contrast are bold and pertinacious. Little Man, as does Irving's free
Goebbels diaries download, gives you the real picture: Political debate was extremely
vicious and personal and no-holds-barred in the Weimar Republic. It wasn't the dithery,
mugwumpish pussyfooting we know today.
Compared to the ubiquitous pro-government pablum in our papers these days, Streicher in
Nuremberg, like Goebbels in Red Berlin, constantly badgered the local Jews and government
and police officials as part of a corrupt machine -- and was constantly being hauled into
court for libel or defamation because of it. And constantly being fined and sentenced.
But never giving up. And ultimately winning.
Germans docile and sheeplike compared to Americans? No. America, by long odds the freest
nation left in the White West, won't tolerate a word of criticism of the preferred stock,
by which I mean Jews and their colored tools. No 'nigger' ever peeps its head into the
funnypapers where redneck and White trash find happy asylum. If there is a hair's breadth
difference in editorial content between the most esoteric queer giveaway in the bowels of
Zoo City and the primmest newsletter circulating Mormon stakes in Provo, then it certainly
doesn't touch on anything real.
Nothing dealing with power politics in this country, where Jew-controlled Consumer is King,
is touched on outside the Internet. Attacking Whites is the only acceptable position in
the Jew-controlled media, which are everything but the 'Net and pillow talk, and the
cowish, cowed Caucasian majority implicitly tolerates this, even as it tolerates being
discrimimated against on the job, having its women raped by rank ape Negroes, its paycheck
cut in half to feed proliferating pickaninnies, its guns yanked out of its hands and
reforged into burrocrats' staples and paper clips, its mouth papered over with double-thick
Streicher was a Jew-hater, a bigot and an evil coward, say our controllers. What are we,
White man? Our freedom is being slowly taken from us, and we kick back and knit our hands
behind our head. We are free to be foolish, and we are too foolish to be free.
When you read VNN, you always get something that reads you back. That's because our
writers grew up in the Jew-constructed Propasphere and came to their views through reading,
thinking and experience. Very few leftists can say the same, which is why their works are
so tepid, vapid and complacent. The idea that someone disagrees is foreign; they've never
In similar vein, almost any book you pick up on the Third Reich will be weak analytically.
The left cannot explain the nationalists because it can't afford to examine their arguments.
It can only afford to label and dismiss them. The Jew-led left isn't interested in
accuracy, it is interested in winning politics. Falsified history is a useful tool. And
just as in Weimar, there's a battle going on today that it intends to win.
Lying about the past and misrepresenting it to the present serves a number of goals. The
Nazis beat the Jews, folks, and the Jews don't want you to understand how or why they did
that. They want you pig-happy in your indolent ignorance. Not out in the streets speaking
and fighting for your cause like the Germans did.
Jew or not, Showalter hasn't the fortitude or motive to consider that the Nazis might be
right. Indeed, it is invariable that those who write about the Nazis write against them.
That's why they are perpetually at a loss to understand the phenomenon. So it is with
Showalter, like every other leftist, can't explain anything but can explain away everything.
What motivated the Nazis and those who voted for them? Why, fear, confusion and alienation,
of course. With side dishes of hatred, envy and malice. What did you expect? Heroic
patriotism and a desire to save a foundering nation? Are you kidding? Do you think Hymie's
going to publish rubbish like that? No. What Hymie will publish -- the only thing he will
publish -- is this: Nazis were attractive to "people who, whatever their objective
circumstances, perceived themselves as actual or potential losers." Typical Jewish smearing;
social-forces scatology masquerading as explanation.
And this inevitable misreading of the Nazis leads, inevitably, to a misreading of their
opponents. If the Nazis are losers, then surely we need give no credence to their criticism
of the Jews. The two are joined: Taking the Nazis seriously means examining Jewish behavior.
And that's the one thing the Jews will not allow, because they know where it will lead. So
it's always -- always -- hate and stupidity and alienation and low bank accounts explain
everything; Jewish character and behavior explain nothing. A tad 'simplistic' methinks, to
use one of the Jews' favorite put-downs.
What's the point even pretending to explain X's actions if you've written off X's own
explanations as wrong before you've started? The fact is that in America today, just as in
Germany in the '30s, Jewish domination of the media makes it exceedingly difficult to get
an alternative view in edgewise. If you point out that, say, Jews control the media
corporations that put out about 99% of what the average American reads and sees and hears,
then these Semitically Correct "academics" like Showalter will, when they get around to
writing about you, point out that you were attempting to mobilize hostilities and
frustrations based on the "perceived fact of Jewish involvement."
See, the Nazis felt strong enough to make it the basis of their arguments, but Showalter
just dismisses their attitude as a "perception." He doesn't want to take on their claims
about Jewish actions directly. Can't have that. Because the brilliant, omniscient Jews
already have provided us with all the "explanation" of the Nazis we need -- alienated,
hateful losers -- so what need have we to consider Nazi views at all?
Thus, we modern libs don't need to take on the Nazi arguments. We don't have the strength,
we simply label and move on. And this is done anywhere majority interests run up against
Jewish interests: If you oppose any item on the Jewish agenda, you are swept into one of a
handful of "hate" categories designed by their master propagandists: racist, sexist,
homophobe, anti-Semite, etc. And the Jewish media control that really does exist through
repetition makes that label stick in the public mind. That's reality, folks. It can't be
denied. It can't be explained away. It can only be covered up or dealt with, like
There are perhaps three sentences in the entire book where Showalter lets his guard down
and plays it straight.
1) He says that Streicher's editorials and cartoons had "just enough truth to be
So even the liberal, probably Jewish Showalter admits that there was a factual basis for
the caricatures and complaints. The door opens a crack. But not wide enough for a
no-holds-barred discussion of Jewish behavior, character and actions. Not even for a
polite discussion of Jewish actions and motives and interests. Those are off limits to
dumb goyim like us -- unless we make it our business to break through the
2) Der Stürmer was "more sophisticated than critics are willing to concede. Its
tone may be aggressive, loud, crude and banal -- but it is above all comprehensible."
In other words, it has a point of view that is intelligent and direct and treats Everyman
with respect. Unlike anything the Jewish media -- then or now -- produce, which is filled
with casuistries, lies and evasions because truth is not in the Jew's interest and not on
I can't say it any better than Streicher, who said he was "flinging the truth in the faces
of bastards in Bavarian-German style." Or, as Kid Rock put it, he raised both middle
fingers and kept on gunning. And won. He won. He won. He won...
Have you ever won, White man? Conservative? Republican? Truth is, you have no idea how
it feels, do you? You have no idea how winning politics actually works, do you? The Jews
do. And the Nazis did too!
They hit hard and directly at:
The honesty of an Alan Dershowitz
The character of a Chuck Schumer
The integrity of a Dick Morris
The love of a Susan Sontag
The generosity of a Gloria Allred
The beauty of a Bella Abzug
Real Jews, real qualities!
Make these fucking yids TASTE it! THAT's the way to win. Jared Taylor and his pay-stub
philo-Semites are a hundred miles away from anything that works. You don't get from here
to success by appearing on BET and "Queen" Latifah, you get there the way Streicher and the
pro-Germans did, by physically, verbally, legally DAILY fighting the Jew. That's why we
say, no man who won't openly defend Whites and openly name the Jews the enemy is on our
side. The days of pay-stub, philo-Semitic racialism are over. William Pierce and National
Alliance-style confrontation -- verbally and physically -- lead the way.
Streicher and Fips put out beautiful page-sized ink renderings of these unspeakable hominid
blotches every issue. See the evil! Feel it! Snuffle around in it until you grasp the
smell and savor of the yid, until you feel him, and imbibe what he is up to. Bury your
senses in him like a bloodhound until you couldn't mistake that worm under the yard-thick
pile of offal he calls home.
If you want to be a Christian conservative coward, you stick to safe and stingless "secular
humanists" and "atheists" and bureaucrats and other faceless demons. If you want to be
effective, like the Jewish Bolvsheviks and the Nazis who fought them, you make it harsh and
personal and direct.
The Jews in America denounce right-wing Christian extremists seeking to impose their
morality. They make it wickedly personal and they spare no cudgel in beating God's own
sadomasochists. And the Christians, well, they keep prim and ineffectual with their
beloved "secular humanist" teddy bear.
The Jews always win, the Christians always lose.
The way out, White man, is to attack the Jews as Jews. And attack them in harsh and
personal terms. To subject them to endless, ceaseless ridicule. All of which they deserve,
and all of which they have been subjecting US to for decades. It is time we turn the tables
on these liar-swindlers and start bashing them even harder than they bash us. They are
corrupt, ugly and evil creatures, and if you don't think for a minute they are intent on
our genocide, you are a fool who can't reason from evidence. No Jews. Just Right.
That must be our byword.
Men of today? Why we run around slurping up to "African-Americans," begging Mexicans to
vote for us, yanking our ancestors' flags off tiny plaques. No wonder we lose. No wonder
we lost our country.
Men of tomorrow? -- no quarter.
Racialism versus Republicanism...
This is the choice before us today: White racialism and White revolution or whiteblind
Republicanism. I say whiteblind because although Republicans like to say they are
colorblind, they are full of concern for reaching out to minorities and discussing their
colored interests the same way the Democrats do. Political debate is scripted so that
advocating collective minority group-interests is not merely legitimate but expected; by
the same token even to speculate about the existence of White interests is immediately and
by all quarters branded "hate."
The idea that Whites are a group and possess interests is denigrated across the board
between the media-set poles that bound "respectability." Whites only exist as something
bland -- 'whitebread' -- or racist -- 'redneck' -- or low-class -- 'white trash.' All
these terms are ubiquitous in the "hate"-hating Judenpresse. White is something to be
looked down on and discriminated against; all official sources -- schools, tv and
government -- impart this message. White is something to be afraid of and gotten away from
These are the terms of the debate in 2001, and Republicans accept them. Which should be a
sign that although the party is made up of White people, it isn't run by them, though the
face of the party stays White to fool the voters. The Republicans have been belittled.
They content themselves with nudging around the edge about taxes, and focusing on
their persons and problems. Their controllers will handle the big issues.
Sam Francis calls Republicans the Stupid Party, updating what John Stuart Mill said about
conservatives in the 18th century. Hard to argue. But here's why what the Republicans
are doing makes sense, given their character and circumstances. Three
1) Republicans won't fight. I feel no need to make a case for this point. If there's any
principle the Republicans haven't backslid on since FDR, I have no idea what it is.
2) Media is politics [sic], as the Russian-Jewish media mogul correctly
3) The media are controlled by Jews.
So we've got people who won't fight, and other people who control the media completely
except for the Internet, which they are also working hard to bring under their thumb. And
there's also the fact that much of the money funding the Republicans comes from Jews. The
conclusion naturally presents itself not that Republicans are Jewish puppets, but that they
serve that function by lending the appearance of a genuine contest to what actually is a
rigged outcome. They don't do whatever Jews tell them, but they never step outside the
Jew-set line on the essentials.
Republicans know they are addicted to Jewish money and constrained by Jewish media. Those
facts alone make genuine resistance impossible. Knowing that because of the media Big
Stick they can't fight on the issues their Jewish controllers will brook no dissent on --
race and open immigration and "civil rights" -- the Republicans content themselves with the
small beer: niggling over how much to cut taxes.
Republicanism is not for people who want to fight the real battles of the day, it is for
people who are "realistic," who accept the status quo. Seventy years ago, they would have
told anybody supporting the same "civil rights" they slobber over today to be "realistic"
-- there's no way we can get the support of Southern Whites if you want to do away with
segregation. Today they preach that being "realistic" demands we accept the nobility and
correctness of FDR and MLK, just like Ronald Reagan did.
But realistic people aren't the force driving the world. They merely follow along in the
train of whoever has the guts to make his vision real. Reps will not be a problem, they
are intent on what's good for them -- individually. We will be able to flip them easily
when the time comes. The minute we show the slightest ability to do them harm, they will
roll over like soft little puppies, in the same way that women will become racists the
minute our opinion spreads fashionably over the wires.
The thing about being "realistic" that matters to White revolutionaries is that the people
who mouth it can be dictated to by us just as easily as the Jewish racists. The hatred
for "racism" that appears to exist in America is skin-deep, belied by every White family
that has had to move away to escape influxing coloreds. If we have the power to sing our
song over the satellites, the White majority will have no problem singing along. The Jew
knows that, and the fact shivers him.
Republicans today are the folks who do not want to buck long odds, they want to be elected
and reelected, and they want the emoluments that go with it. They want to live comfortably
with the respect of the media and their peers, and if the price of that is ignoring a few
paltry racial facts, well, that's not too steep.
They may not like the Jewish insistence that the Mexican invasion run unopposed, but, just
like a real job, you've got to do what the boss says. That's life. That's reality.
You've got to be a team player, no matter your private opinion. You've got to go along to
get along. Politics is the art of the compromise, the art of the deal, the art of the
possible. For realistic people, that's true. So they wax fat and happy, content with
niggling the small points, confirmed in their complacency by the matrix in which they
What Republicans have in store, they think, are decades more of the same. Winning plenty
of seats while losing slowly overall, and abandoning one by one the principles they pretend
to defend. The only principle Republicans truly defend is that they ought to get their
share of the spoils. There are still enough White Americans in rural areas to guarantee
electoral success at least for a couple more decades, and Republicans aren't interested in
looking any farther ahead, and couldn't do anything if they did. Whatever vestigial sense
of fight or honor they have left is channeled in the only politically safe direction:
harping against their colleagues for not reaching out enough to the minorities; indulging
in the safe-because-impotent pipe dream that majorities of coloreds, with their low IQs and
third-world habits, can be persuaded to vote conservative.
It seems obvious that Republicans are the de facto party of White people, and that by
advocating White interests, they could maintain majority status. But this fails to take
into account decades of Jewish media agitprop and how deeply the "don't fight" lesson has
been ingrained in our White pols. You can't expect heroism from beaten dogs, and time
after time, the Jew-controlled media have proven their ability to demonize anyone who
resists the two-party line. The illusion of debate, the illusion of contesting principles
-- the reality of all but total control on the issues that matter to the
There is a reason we have anti-White discrimination, called "affirmative action" or "civil
rights," and there is a reason we have open invasion from Mexico. Real political control
in the U.S. is held by the Jews who own and edit the media and donate the money that drives
the system, not by clowns vying to replace Bozo in the sports-politics you see on tv every
If we call the Republicans the Stupid Party, all we are doing is pretending that we on the
sidelines know how to campaign better than the professionals. But anyone in the business
-- read ex-Rep. Paul Findley's book They Dared to Speak Out -- knows that countering
Jewish interests brings a hailstorm of hateful criticism and quick political death. Lacking
the revolutionary temperament, the conservatives make the necessary adjustments, and soon
enough they come to love Big Brother. No, the Republican Party is not at this late juncture
in any way capable of being the vehicle for advancing White interests.
It will require a revolutionary party to do that.
Fighting for White interests means rejecting the system as illegitimate. It means
recognizing and refusing to play along with the Jews with a deathgrip on the organs through
which we discuss our problems. It means building our own alternative media like
VNN and our own political parties that reject Jewish money and influence outright,
with absolutely no exceptions.
Jared Taylor can puff his lungs out on Queen Latifah and other important shows but it won't
make a bit of difference. Our circumstance is grave. Our arguments must be equally so.
When you're up against the most murderous gang of crooked kikes the world has ever seen,
politeness won't get the job done. Nietzsche be damned, we Whites are going to have to
produce our own monsters, or this baby's going down with the bathwater.