|
BLACKOUT: THE MULTICULTURAL LEFT, THE BEANBAG
RIGHT, AND THE END OF WHITE
Part 6 of 8
As for the implicit contention that emanates from public Jews, that they
are somehow more sensitive to suffering and tragedy than others, I don't
believe it. Killing a Jew, to a Jew, is like killing a gentile, except it's
worse. To Jews, all gentiles are versions of Arabs. Did Jews play a
conspicuous role in opposing the murder of South Vietnamese by Northern
communists?; in opposing the Cambodian massacres? Or in leading the
American left to break faith with the very troops trying to prevent
massacres and totalitarian rule? Were Jews conspicuously worried about
inter-tribal murder between the Hutus and Tutsis, amounting to 250,000
deaths, and likely to start anew? Does their "never again" encompass
Bosnian Muslims? The answer to all but one of these questions is No. Not
because they are necessarily worse than any other group, but because they
are like other groups in that they primarily are concerned with themselves.
Or, they would be like other groups, if other groups had the political and
media power that Jews exercise. In fact, such is their cleverness that they
forbid as anti-Semitic any mention of their domination of the media. While
a medieval king or Joe Stalin might have forbidden criticism on point of
death, at least there was no pretense about who was running the show. Such
is the cleverness of the Jewish media that they have persuaded millions that
the idea that Jews dominate the media industry is mythical, and espousers
thereof, kooks. You probably haven't heard any Jews concerned about the
following, either:
The Church of Scientology Wednesday upbraided Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright for saying comparisons between Germany's treatment of
Scientologists and its Nazi-era persecution of Jews were ``distasteful."
... The State Department in its annual human rights report accused Germany
of harassing Scientologists... But in Bonn on Monday, Albright downplayed
the differences over the subject and she attacked Scientologists for
accusing Germany of acting toward them as Nazis had treated Jews.
"...I must say that any discussion which draws comparisans between what
happened under the Nazis and what is happening now is historically
inaccurate and totally distasteful,'' she [said]. Jentzsch, of the Los
Angeles-based Church, denied such comparisons had been made by
Scientologists. ... Listing acts by German authorities, such as a ban on
Church members holding civil service jobs in Bavaria and a boycott of Cruise
and Travolta movies by Chancellor Helmut Kohl's Christian Democratic Union
party, [Jentzsch] concluded:
``The youth wing of the Chancellor's party has passed out condoms with
skulls and crossbones on them claiming they are 90 percent effective in
preventing future Scientologists.
``Now you tell me, what about this situation is distasteful? What we've
said or what they've done?'' asked Jentzsch. ``Anyone who thinks we're being
inaccurate or even exaggerating ought to go to Germany and claim to be a
Scientologist. Anyone who does that will soon learn about officially
sanctioned discrimination first-hand.'' [LOS ANGELES (Reuter)]
The Church of Scientology Thursday hit out at a German public opinion poll,
saying it was evidence of a ``hate campaign'', and accused a minister of manipulating
Bavarians. In a statement issued from its Los Angeles headquarters, the
church's president Rev. Heber Jentzsch decried the results of a survey for
Bavarian television released Wednesday as ``the strongest evidence yet of
the use of a hate campaign against the Church of Scientology in Germany..."
The survey, conducted for Bavarian television, found that 59.2 percent of
respondents were in favour of calling in the Federal Office for the Protection
of the Constitution -- an anti-extremist watchdog agency -- to keep a eye on the
controversial organisation. Of those who had heard of the organisation, 40.6 percent
favoured banning it altogether, according to the survey of 508
people carried out by the Allensbach polling group. [LOS ANGELES (Reuter)]
The Jews are much less interested in preventing mass murder or
discrimination against others than in fighting off pretenders to their
"greatest (sob) story ever told" and milking the benefits of their tale of
woe. They grudgingly concede American blacks' painful legacy of slavery,
but after all they were slaves themselves two thousand years ago, and when
you add to that the Holocaust, well, it's like an ice cream soda and an ice
cream soda with a cherry on top. Am I the only one to notice the
contradictory Jewish claims that A) the Holocaust is unique, apart from all
history; and B) we must be on guard that it happen "never again"? Like all
leftists I've ever encountered, the Jews send logic by the boards.
Here, too, if what Jentzsch is saying about Kohl and the CDU is right, is
an unmistakeable characteristic of the public right, whether in Germany, the
U.S., France, Australia or Britain: it gutlessly abuses fellow rightists
who don't sell out on the Big Lie about race. As I say, this coward's
vituperation typifies the public right across the globe: In England, the
Tories sign away their right to criticize anti-white job discrimination
policies while abusing the British Nationalist Party that defends the rights
of the poor whites who will lose jobs because of it; in Germany, the CDU
picks on a small religion because it can while siding with the left that
anyone who loves Germany is a new nazi; in France, the public right goes
after the National Front, even teaming with leftists to oppose it, while the
NF gets beat up and sued for defending traditional France; in Australia, it
denounces National Action and heralds the new Multicultural Dawn while
spewing words that, to use typical American leftist legal rhetoric, create a
hostile environment for people who like the old, successful Australia and
will endure beatings to stick up for it; and in America, it does everything
it can to insist that it, too, belongs to an "open and inclusive" party, a
party that is opposed to racism, nationalism and and any other -ism the left
or the media tell it to hate, while frothing hate bubbles on a David Duke
because he says the same things about affirmative action and welfare they do
but means it. The public cons in all these country are Judases; they've
sold their principles for thirty pieces of media approval -- and God how
they hate those who kept faith with reality. There is probably a fancy
psychology term for people who are too weak to vent their anger on their
real opponents, and so abuse women and children and pets. Let's just say
that, since it is afraid to fight the left -- as signified by its giving in
to the Big Lie about race, that it doesn't matter -- the public right,
needing some type of release for its aggressive urges, vents doubly hard on
the "extreme right," i.e., that portion of the right-wing deemed
unacceptable, un-American, and out-and-out Evil by the media and leftist
politicians. Nationalists and others who deal with race factually and
straightforwardly are labelled "haters" by the media, and thereby become
officially approved targets of derision, ridicule and abuse and -- in a word
-- hate. A "hater" is, by definition, someone the media, leftists and
Beanbag Right encourage you to hate. A "hate group" may be include members
who hate but it is always a group you are encouraged to hate. Let me sum
up: the mainstream right in the western white democracies is made up of
moral cowards, scared men who are acceding to policies that are changing
their countries for the worse -- and deep down they know this; they know
they are giving in exactly where they ought to fight; and their deep fear
and self-disgust is evident in their incredibly unmeasured, double-hard
abuse of the David Dukes, Pauline Hansons and Jean-Marie Le Pens of the
world. It is certainly odd the way men as measured in their speech as Bob
Dole and George Bush fall to abusing the David Dukes with the sweaty,
nervous relief of a man who's just had a gun taken off him. Finally, they
must feel, I'm on the side of the gods (the media, of course). "The exits
are clearly marked," said Bob Dole, referring to his me-too buddies' policy
toward the principled right, at the Republicans' last nominating convention.
They sure are, Bob. I can see 'em from here.
The public right's fear is the fear of the whipped dog: it used to have a
backbone, used to have spirit, but it had it beaten out of it by its master,
in this case, the media. It just became easier to hate who the media wanted
them to hate than to stand up for principle any longer. Perhaps the oddest
thing about the politically correct right is that its standard-bearers, Bush
and Dole, to take the two latest examples, are unquestionably physically
courageous, as demonstrated in wartime. Yet when it comes to politics, they
run away from their own words. For some reason, the public cons, the
Beanbag Right, just can't find any political courage within its ranks.
Instead they give us the bouillon pols: they taste and smell like beef, but
in the end they're all water. In any case, their problems don't matter: I
suspect that as a real right is built up to oppose the Beanbags, the body
politic will come around. Courage is a magnet, in politics as elsewhere.
And make no mistake, the failure of the mainstream right to uphold principle
has left a void that nationalists are starting to fill in every white
country across the globe. Farthest ahead are the French. Not too far
behind them are the Australians, then the British. For historical reasons
and because it has relatively fewer minority problems than the others,
Germany lags. But America is the country to watch for three reasons:
1) it has a higher percentage of non-whites than any other white country
(growing quickly through illegal and legal immigration, which are 90%
colored);
2) it has relatively little organized white nationalist activity, yet more
freedom of speech and politics than other western countries.
3) it is the fastest-moving country in the world.
The third point is most often missed by pessimists on the right, who assume
that things must proceed as they have recently. Yesterday, the gut-level
facts about race were believed by (nearly) everybody, because they were
true. Today, they are rejected by (nearly) everybody because they are
politically incorrect. Who knows what tomorrow will hold? But we outpace
ourselves; we still have more of Germany and Europe to tour before we get
back to the Big Dog.
A widely noted fact is that English is the first language of much of the
world and the second language of most of the rest. It seems likely to
become the de facto world language. The world reach of English, like the
world-span of MTV, marks a stirring toward a world culture. This is
certainly convenient for us Americans, yet it is dangerous to nationalists
because it makes it easier for the Jewish/leftist agitprop crowd. A less
widely noted fact is that Hollywood spreads its 'language' at least as
widely as English. It is hard to realize, unless you have been abroad, just
how powerful Hollywood is. Imagine that twelve of the fifteen movies from
which you had to choose of a Friday night were all produced in a small
Yugoslavian town on the Adriatic coast. Unthinkable? Only to you,
American. That's how it is even in a super-developed country such as
Germany, which has the history and talent to produce its own films, plus the
obvious advantage of knowing its audience. Even there, the market is
dominated -- eighty to ninety percent -- by Hollywood productions. The same
innuendo-laden attack-through-the-genitals approach that takes 'em in
Dubuque turns out to work in Dortmund, Dorchester and Dar es Salaam. It
even works in Asia. This stripped-down appeal might conduce to nothing more
than a fat, stupid, ill-dressed Americanism become Earthism, and, no mistake
that would be bad enough, but worse is the Jewish mentality that spreads
with it. In the very crudest way, which I will refine when we get back to
America, Hollywood's agenda is to niggerize the world the way it has
niggerized America, by glorifying the Affenkultur, preparing us all to be
stupid but well-fed slaves under a world government.
Here's a brief bit about Germany attempting to break out of its Hollywood
thrall:
Germany's film industry has emerged from years in the doldrums with a
string of powerful box
office hits, raising hopes that it can recapture some of the international
cinematic allure ruined by the Nazis and decades of dull post-war pictures.
Rejuvenated by a run of popular romantic comedies made for large
mainstream audiences rather than tiny art house crowds, German films
produced more hits in 1996 than ever before and grabbed a market share at
home of 17 percent.
Although modest by some standards, this was nearly double the level of
1995...Five German-made films pulled in box office receipts of more than 12
million marks ($7.5 million) and one German film,
``Werner,'' grossed 50 million marks. Three of the country's top ten
grossing films last year were German-made.
... Before the Nazis took power in 1933, the Babelsberg studio outside
Berlin was one of the world's leading film centres, producing classics like
Fritz Lang's ``Metropolis'' in 1926 and Josef von Sternberg's ``Der Blaue
Engel'' (The Blue Angel), starring Marlene Dietrich, in 1930.
But Lang, Dietrich, Billy Wilder and others left for Hollywood and what
was left of the local film industry was misused by the Nazis for propaganda.
After the war, dull auteur films often written, directed, produced and
starred the same person helped bury the industry further.
With unification in 1990, Germany and its population of 80 million
became the world's second largest film market with annual sales of 1.3
billion marks. It trails only the U.S. [02-12-97, Erik Kirschbaum
BERLIN, Feb 13 (Reuter)]
A country of 80 million, the largest market outside the U.S. -- and totally
dominated by Hollywood. It appears to be simply a fact that non-Jews only
occasionally can produce films that people want to see; the talents for
filmmaking (which is as much writing as anything) are not evenly distributed
across peoples. The Jews are the best at it on earth, there can be no doubt
about that. The minute the Nazis drove them out, the filmmaking industry in
Germany pretty much disappeared. Except for Leni Riefenstahl, the Nazi
propagandist and genuine artist, the German Aryans produced little worth
viewing and virtually nothing for export. Perhaps a non-Jewish, non-leftist
film industry can be created, but that is a big 'if.' The unfortunate
upshot of film being a Jewish industry is that many stories that ought to be
told, won't be. For example, in America, there was the black pilot gone
bad: a beneficiary of affirmative action, fired by multiple employers, who
wound up trying to bludgeon two Fedex pilots -- in air -- so that he could
seize control of the plane and crash it into headquarters in Memphis,
Tennessee. You don't believe this happened? That's not my problem. The
point is, if we had Jewish-equivalent talent on the right, we could make an
incredible action movie/propaganda piece demonstrating the extreme dangers
of the racial policies America has been pursuing this century. Or, we could
make a movie about a poor white big-city highschooler, a brainy kid who has
the scores to go to a magnet school but can't because his parents live
inside the city borders and he has to stay at his local school so local
black pols can boast about racial balance. We could show the type of abuse
this kid and his friends endure daily -- racial taunts, purposeful knocks by
baggy-pants blacks niggerwalking down the hall, getting kicked out of the
bathroom for interrupting drug deals, screams from black girls fighting
daily, Tamikas cussing like truckers as nails and hair extensions go flying;
lies about white people put forward as unequivocally as the ten commandments
by the history teacher; the creepy Jewish psychologist/counselor who tells
him it's all part of the white man's burden he and his generation are going
to have to live with en route to the glorious multicultural world of
tomorrow. Just an idea. But you'll never see it in celluloid. What you
will see is 101 more movies of the week/Sunday Night Specials/Black History
Month Features showing some historic moment of the "civil rights" movement
recreated with impossibly beautiful black women with impossibly responsible
black husbands and impossibly angelic children all hell-bent as the Cleavers
on living upright lives if the racists would just leave them alone. In
other words, black people as they never were, are or will be. Black people
who aren't blacks but stained white saints. Or some actor cut her
directorial teeth on the 1000th horror story about evil rural racists and
the Idealistic homosexual or minority newcomers they harass/rape/kill before
being brought to justice and the light by a handful of decent rustics led by
a heroic Jewish liberal or similar worthy. I write of the way things are,
not the way I'd like them to be, and these are exactly what you have seen
from the Jewish industry (and Hollywood, as much as the press and TV
deserves the moniker) and will continue to see. Wish we had the talent
among our ranks to write and produce movies, but I'm afraid we don't, at
least not much. And until our own come out of the woodwork, the best I can
do is call for them and continue to criticize the incredibly destructive
stuff the Jews are putting out. It is hugely destructive, almost totally
Jewish and it is having the most baleful of effects on our country and the
rest of the world.
And even when Europeans do write their own films, they come out
suspiciously American in tone and theme, as the following attests:
Twelve-year-old British actor Jordan Kiziuk enthralled the Berlin Film
Festival Wednesday with a film debut performance as a small Jewish boy who
survives a Polish ghetto during World War II.
As the star of ``The Island on Bird Street,'' which premiered at the 47th
annual festival, Kiziuk plays a bright child whose luck and ingenuity keep
him alive despite constant raids on the ghetto by Nazi SS men.
He fronts an international cast that icludes Hollywood veteran Jack Warden
and Irish star Patrick Bergin, but the boy from Lancashire, England, who was
11 when he played the part of Alex, acts alone during most of the 100-minute
epic. ... ``I studied history at school and I learned how people were
killed (in the Holocaust),'' Kiziuk said after the film's screening. ``So I
knew how much to be frightened of what was happening.'' [Reuters/Variety
15:53 02-19-97 By Deborah Cole BERLIN (Reuter)]
It would appear that the film industry is more international than national,
from the above. The same type of story and the familiar mental environment
are all there; nobody American would be in the least confused by this story
nor its message. It seems that in the West, the left-wing version of
racial/cultural morality is commonly held, apart and above any lingering
national sentiment. Certainly this appears to be true in the film world.
Another example:
Berlin authorities said Monday they are looking into allegations that one
of Germany's most popular entertainers made racial insults toward a black
hotel employee in California. The newspaper Bild am Sonntag reported that
actor Harald Juhnke told a security guard last week at Hollywood's Mondrian
Hotel: ``You filthy nigger. Hitler was right. The likes of you should have
been gassed before.'' The 67-year-old Juhnke has a huge following in
Germany, but his image has been badly damaged by his reportedly drunken and
hostile behavior during the hotel visit. Three German television stations
said Monday they are suspending all projects with Juhnke. A number of German
politicians said his behavior was inexcusable; one called for a boycott of Juhnke.
[AP-NY-02-10-97 2240E The Associated Press BERLIN (AP)]
As in the example with the English goalkeeper, note that the fact that even
though there is dispute over whether the words were even uttered -- whether,
that is, the thing worth reporting even took place -- the AP has already
zipped the damning story around the world. While use of "nigger" might be a
mark of low class, it is now grounds for a lawsuit in many "free" countries.
Oddly enough, use of white trash is neither socially inappropriate nor
illegal; indeed it is common to find the term in the biggest paper in the
United States: Gannett's USA Today. It's a sign of where the power lies in
America and the world.
A final word from Germany, which we need to consider along with the State
Department's downplaying of discrimination against Scientologists:
About 100 American intelligence agents are operating undercover in Germany,
Der Spiegel magazine said...According to...the latest report, the [German]
Economics Ministry informed Germany's counterintelligence office in 1995
that a ministry department chief responsible for Iran had been meeting with
American agents since 1994. ...the Americans were chiefly interested in
getting a list of German companies that delivered high-technology supplies
to Iran... [3/30/97, AP]
We've got a Jewish Secretary of State, ostensibly protecting American
interests, yet whose every public statement is in furtherance of "women's
rights," internationalism or some other leftist shibboleth. American
foreign policy is run by left-wing Jews through the triumvirate of Madeleine
Albright at State, William Cohen at Defense, and Sandy Berger at the
National Security Agency (NSA). The interests of Israel are never far from
their minds. Interesting that American spies seem to be carrying water for
the Mossad. Without getting too far into the complex and interesting
relationship between America and the Jewish state, suffice it to say that
there is either nothing or all-but-nothing that isn't known by Israel within
hours of its being known by the American defense/intelligence elite. When
you throw in sympathetic leftist Jews at the papers that matter, you can see
that the leftist Jews are in every way perfectly situated to get the latest
information and spin it to further their one-world, anti-white, anti-freedom
agenda. They are also perfectly situated to neutralize opposition.
Go to Part 7
|