|
BLACKOUT: THE MULTICULTURAL LEFT, THE BEANBAG
RIGHT, AND THE END OF WHITE
Part 4 of 8
Those of you who pay attention may have noticed that Official Europe is
trying to build a superstate called the European Union (EU). The EU is sold
to the public as a sort of Super Wal-mart, where one massive shopping center
will replace the mom-and-pop shops of an outmoded nationalism. If the
quality of your purchases declines, hey, the prices are lower. Efficiencies
are gained. Lost in the shuffle of this massive Gleichschaltung of peoples
is the fact that the leftists are busily working to make their multicultural
lie the New Orthodoxy of the Old Continent.
The leftists are pushing the same lie at the EU level that they are pushing
in Australia, France and the United States: that it is good, necessary and
inevitable that Europe become multicultural. You might think that Germans,
French and English is enough diversity for one continent, but apparently
not. These worldbeat-ers plan to achieve multiculturalism by tacitly
encouraging illegal immigration while openly bashing as racist those who'd
prefer the continent the way it is, civilized. It's Miami all over again:
Whites create conditions -- rich, safe countries -- that attract
non-whites: Africans, Asians and Arabs who destroy those conditions, while
minority demogogues, taking their cue from the Jewish industry, blame the
whites and sow confusion about causes and effects. Leftists don't worry
about the illogic of their political arguments because they are about
destruction, revenge and hate and bossing around free people, not ordered
freedom. How can it be that Africans try to get into Europe by the hundreds
of thousands if white Europeans are racist devils? As in Australia and
America, the Eurrocrats advance the argument that diversity is the road to
business success. This view is too preposterous to rebut, yet it is
advanced by multiculturalists in official capacities who have the power to
punish those who don't conform to their hallucinations. The term witchhunt
is overused, but this sempiternal search for racists in Europe is exactly
that. In five hundred years, people will look back at 2000's hysteria about
racists the way we laugh at the witch-hunters of the middle ages -- although
doubtless the people of 2500 will have invent their own witches to hunt!
Surely we can laugh forwards as well as back... Examples of the new
witchhunt:
The Committee places particular emphasis on the use of education to
cultivate and develop and anti-racist awareness, and on the mobilization of
the mass media to combat manifestations of racism. The Committee considers
that the European Year against Racism should contribute not only to a stance
opposing the dangers of racism, but also cast the positive and welcome
changes occurring in our societies in a favourable light. The Commission
should also make use of the Declaration on the prevention of racial
discrimination and xenophobia and the promotion of equal treatment in the
workplace, adopted in Florence in 1995. The Committee also recalls that the
fight against racism involves a daily struggle at the social level - at
work, at school, in places of leisure and at home. [4/24/96, Economic and
Social Committee press release]
This is incipient totalitarianism. Not bloody, terrorist totalitarianism,
but totalitarianism of the mind-control, There is One Way to Think mold.
How else to interpret "cast the positive and welcome changes occurring in
our societies in a favourable light"? All the tools at the GEM complex's
disposal -- government-education-media -- will be "mobilized" to prosecute
"racism," which, per usual, is never defined. Note the tacit assumption
that the "mass media" is available for EU "mobilization" in the great
"struggle." Words that might have come from the pen of any TASS hack. Not
even a pretense here that the media is free, that it is anything other than
a propaganda arm of the One Worlders. A tool to be mobilized, just like the
army. Wake up, white man! It boggles the mind: anyone who opposes, say,
admitting Muslims -- already five million strong -- into France is opposing
supranational policy. How long before it is illegal to be Caucasian?
More examples of official-think. Think of the EU as a lower-level United
Nations -- an EUN, if you will -- and realize that it is pushing exactly the
same lies, and you will see why so many are so afraid of the real thing.
First up we have some press release boilerplate:
The European Year Against Racism was officially launched today... The
launch of the Year marks a decisive step forward in the European response to
racism. For the first time the Institutions of the European Union (EU) will
engage in concrete action to combat racism. The stated aims of the Year are
to highlight the threat posed by racism to human rights and EU cohesion; to
encourage discussion of anti-racist measures; to disseminate and promote the
exchange of information on good practice and effective anti-racist
strategies; to publicise the benefits of integration policies; and to turn
to good account the experiences of people who have suffered from racism,
xenophobia or anti-semitism. ...
Partners of the Year are broad ranging and include non-governmental
organisations (NGOs), media, decision-makers and politicians, trade unions
and employers' organisations, chambers of commerce and trade associations,
religious bodies and educational establishments. ... Events at European,
national, regional and local levels will take place to develop the European
Year's themes, and will include political, sports, artistic and literary events.
Examples of planned projects include a governmental working group to
investigate racial violence; a Youth Against Intolerance fun-run and
symposium in Belgium; a poster competition in Denmark; special training for
Austrian judges on racism and hostility to foreigners; an anti-racist pop
festival in the UK; and a European week of anti-racist cinema in France.
... BACKGROUND NOTE
A European Year Against Racism - Why?
1997 has been designated as the European Year Against Racism (EYAR) to
highlight the fight against racism, xenophobia and anti-semitism.
This is in response to the continuing presence of racial prejudice,
discrimination and racist attacks in all aspects of society, which present a
constant problem to the European Union. ... [EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESS
RELEASE: IP/97/72 DOCUMENT DATE: JANUARY 30, 1996]
This is Europe, but -- as in our Australian examples -- could anything
sound more American? Is it not remarkable that, against the wishes of the
majority, Europe is concentrating its powers in a superstate that is
strengthening itself daily by sowing civil dissolution under the banner of
anti-racism? A straw man, a witch, an imaginary fellow called "the racist"
takes the hit -- in Australia, France, Europe and the U.S. -- while the real
bogeymen, the Jewish media and the leftist bureacratic elite, beat up and
suppress the few who speak out against the awful reality they and their
multicultural charges are creating. Here's a pretty typical example of the
hysteria, hyperbole and reality-reversal that is common among the EU
burrocratic makers of the new Multicultural World:
"Racism and xenophobia constitute a serious threat not only to the
stability of European society but also to the smooth functioning of economy.
It is in everybody's interest to remedy the problems of racism and
xenophobia in society as a whole,'' said Mr Tyszkiewicz. ``UNICE is
committed to playing an active role in the prevention of racial
discrimination, and calls on all European employers to act in their own
sphere of influence, namely the workplace.''
For companies competing in an increasingly global market, human resources
are an essential factor for success. Harnessing the potential of diversity
is therefore a key asset for a company's competitive position. [3/21/97 ,
press release from Union of Industrial and Employers' Confederations of
Europe (UNICE) (Secretary makes speech on International Day against Racism)]
You get the obvious irony: A bureaucrat's bureacrat advising the corporate
world on staying competitive. As in, Lagging sales at Porsche? Hire more
Africans! Not Arab religious fanatics and Pakistani hoodlums and Asian drug
dealers but "racism" and "xenophobia" are the real problems facing Europe.
It is sick and Orwellian the way the Old Continent is making "the American
problem" its own. It bespeaks a death wish -- or, perhaps, a murder wish.
If diversity were an asset, don't you think the folks who run Mercedes would
have figured it out before the folks in Brussels?
Again, I point out that, at root, the left is anti-democratic because it
does not recognize disagreement as legitimate. There is no middle ground in
its political stereotyping: either you are Good, a supporter of the new
Multicultural Orthodoxy, or you are Bad, an evil racist. The left has no
term for the mass of ordinary Frenchmen or Britons who observe that bringing
in masses of foreign people with their foreign ways is unwise. Because it
runs the big-time media and politics, the left is able to cow the right --
even the right-wing public politicians who, one would think, exist to oppose
and defend -- into accepting this polarity and jumping to the "good" side,
but millions of unfooleds are out there, and I expect at some point they
will erupt. Again I say, these sanctimonious lying leftists are breeding
the opposition they deserve. I may say, as a side point, that the very
reason they call their opponents Nazis and defame them as evil haters is
because they know they aren't. They can gain the tactical advantages of
employing these terms against decent, honorable people in the Machiavellian
calculation they are too sheeplike or busy earning tax-money to explode in
righteous anger. I would bet money, though, that after a point, the left is
going to see its weapons used against it by people who may be a lot closer
to deserving the appellation than the milquetoast cons they slander today.
There are many, many people out there who don't believe in God and Ultimate
Justice, and won't abjure means like the moral majority -- and they aren't
all leftists. Be careful what you wish for, friends.... For us on the
right, the important thing is to recognize the game the leftists are
playing. In my opinion, that game is Ultimate Politics -- winning by any
means. They continually categorize their opponents in words they have
morally loaded: racist, anti-semite, Nazi, anti-feminist, "hate group"
member, homophobe. That their fundamental impulse is anti-democratic is
proved by their actions and their immediate recourse to and universal
preference for labels over arguments. This is both their weakness and their
strength: the leftists are moral crusaders. In a sense, leftists can't be
democrats because their terms preclude it. Standard democratic
give-and-take is unthinkable when your opponent is a 'racist,' or an
'anti-semite' or a 'hater' or a 'Nazi.' You can't negotiate or compromise
with moral evil, can you? In contrast to the leftists, I have built up my
case in this essay through examples, because I believe examples are a better
standard than my opinion, no matter how brilliant and cleverly stated it is.
(For any leftists in the crowd, that's humor, a distinctly right-wing
phenomenon.)
I believe my examples are more powerful than any words I can
use. It is a serious charge to say the left is anti-democratic, but the
evidence sustains it. In Australia and France we have seen the leftists at
work, beating up expressers of other opinions, destroying their book
displays, attacking their public speakers, smashing up their party
headquarters. In most white, western countries, the left controls the
executive and the judicial, and its members staff the huge burrocracies that
from Queensland to Quincy determine the details of our daily lives. The
legislative, in America at least, is the one section of the government
that's hardest to control because it comes from the people. To get around
it, the leftists are by no means above -- and in fact regularly have
recourse to -- vote buying, vote fraud, and gerrymandering. In America they
are attempting to get around Constitutionally mandated census-taking by
replacing it with a statistical sampling they know will result in higher
numbers for liberal groups such as minorities and aliens. The final and
ultimately most effective means at the leftists' disposal -- from Britain to
America to France to Australia -- is to swap out Bad people for Good; simply
to displace, replace, and supplant the evil reactionary nativist nationalist
white majority; and that is exactly what is being done in each of these
countries. It is done by encouraging immigration, legal and illegal, and
then using the Jewish industry to misrepresent what is going on as something
desirable, and to characterize any opposition as morally illegitimate. In
California, for example, the media cast the majority that favored Prop. 187
-- the cutting off of benefits to illegal aliens (i.e., non-Americans) -- as
greedy racists, and even though the measure passed, Jewish groups
forestalled its implementation through legal action, resulting in the final
decision that the will of the majority was "unconstitutional." In every
possible way new immigrants benefit the left-wing parties: through votes
and what cops call 'receivership of stolen property' when it's done by
non-politicians. A white woman in Texas border territory put it to me this
way: One of her hotel employees, a "big, strong girl" [and a Mexican], only
wanted part-time work because forty hours would disqulify her and babies
from various aid programs. The hotel owner and her husband had only been
able to afford one child, in large part because they had so little money
left after taxes, excuse me, between taxes, between paying the hefty Texas
education taxes to pay for the schooling of Mexican children in the U.S.
The leftists know that whites won't have fifteen kids like Mexicans because
they want to give their kids a better chance in life, and thus a hidden
effect of immigration and its higher taxes is not merely that it puts more
areas of the country de facto off-limits to whites, but that it actually
suppresses the white birth rate. Leftists soak the average, honest whites
with high taxes, take their due as Official Fences, and put the remainder
into building up their political bases, the most reliable and pliable of
which are the Black and Mexican colonies that control our big cities and
borderlands. Any objection to these policies is categorized as morally evil
or mentally ill -- with every evil permutation of blackheart neatly
collected under the umbrella smear 'racist.' The liberalists' future is
characterized as "inevitable" and "good" and "necessary" (with the neat side
benefit of being good for the economy) and as time passes and the country
discolors, is does become to seem so.
But it is not. The solution is lying there before our eyes: To decide
that we are white people who love our civilization and who will fight for it
on that basis and no other. We will fight for it not because it is better
or worse, sicker or poorer, richer or healthier -- but because it is ours
and because we love our great-great-great-great grandfathers even as we
would love our great-great-great-great grandchildren, could we know them.
Well, we can't know them, only three or four links of the chain, but we owe
it to them to prepare the conditions for their success, as much as it is
within our power. And who is more powerful than we? What other people has
the track record? We must to our own race be true, and it follows, as the
night the day, we cannot then be false to any other. The word is flung
about casually, but there is very, very little that is inevitable -- if we
are willing to face facts. The facts about race are really not so difficult
to deal with intellectually; the difficult part is finding the initial
courage to follow the path they lay before us. Pauline Hanson and
Jean-Marie Le Pen found the courage -- are we less than they?
Or, we can step aside, surrender two thousand years of history, and submit
to the Padraigs:
It gives me great pleasure to be here on this important day. This is the
International Day Against Racism. We should not underestimate its
significance.
In proclaiming this International Day, the United Nations called upon
citizens across the world to stand up, take action and reject racism,
together. ... This event is one of the first of a series of major actions
at European level within the framework of the European Year Against Racism.
This year is a turning point in the European Union's fight against racism.
After many years of groundwork, it is the first time that Community
institutions and Member States have entered into partnership to take
concrete action to stamp out this evil phenomenon.
... Ethnic minorities are increasingly, and inaccurately, described as
the cause of social problems, rather than as the victims. ... Racist
jokes are not funny. ... Brutal racist crimes against ethnic minorities
are reported across Europe with sickening regularity. They constitute the
most visible tip of an iceberg of prejudice and intolerance underlying our
societies.
[3/21/97, press release, European Commission, Commissioner Padraig Flynn
speech]
Here's your future, Western Man: Lectures from a third-world-plus Padraig,
whatever that is (Gaelic for 'male tampon'?). Paddy might be a figure from
Orwell: Everything from ethnic minorities on is a lie: Minorities do cause
social problems, far out of proportion to their numbers; racist jokes are
funny, much funnier than inoffensive jokes; brutal racist crimes are
uncommon, and more often committed against whites than by them; the "iceberg
of prejudice" never seems to collide with the Titantic of Africans coming
in... How long til this international-day-against-witches makes its
presence felt in the U.S.? Can you imagine a baby-blue world of 2050 where
white are a majority in no country, and our successors observe four
U.N.-mandated holidays:
1) World Aids Day
2) International Day Against Racism
3) Worldwide Holocaust Day of Remembrance
4) Women-and-Minorities Emancipation Day?
Many can. Dangerous illusions produce frightening realities. To the MTV
mind, the goal is to create an MTW -- an MTWorld. MTV is on the tube almost
from pole to pole, showcasing the illusion of the Multicultural World, where
all women are beautiful and men tough (and mostly black) and everybody
dances, sings, acts cool, and fucks and tolerates everyone else, male or
female, except for the intolerant, the racists, the segregationists, the
nationalists, the observant, the thoughtful, the people who like things the
way they increasingly aren't. The MTV producer-devil is like Faust's --
except that he wants your mind, not your soul, and he doesn't give you
anything real in return, just an illusion as diaphonous as fake cotton
candy. You trade your mind for nothing. But insubstantial as it is, the
MTV illusion is powerful. My opinion is that MTV is the most powerful force
in the world. It pitches a very desirable world where there's sex and money
and fame enough for everyone, and venereal disease, poverty, racism and
intolerance are so postlapsarian (that is, more or less, pre-1980). The
MTWorld folks, with similar thought- and bloodlines, are selling a variant
of the MTV illusion. They offer a social and political vision that sounds
great and looks good, but falls apart fingered by thought. White racism is
a powerful and popular explanation for the ills of the world, and when you
accept it, you get a ticket to the cool, new Multicultural World of
Tomorrow. That is what they pitch, through the U.N., through the EU,
through the leftist parties in each white majority country. All you lose is
your mind, your country, your world -- and most importantly, your
neighborhood. I begin to venture into poesy, and perhaps it is time to
return, but we must remember that new social realities begin in visions, and
the vision we oppose sees the world as one big high school district, with
funds to be redistributed from rich to poor areas, and racial assignments to
be made -- all under the auspices of the U.N. with its myriad creepy,
well-paid evangelical internationalists. Our vision -- free and orderly
white America -- is better, but it will lose unless we articulate, advance
and defend it -- openly and with no excuses.
Once again, here's Einlagkh Flynn in full throat (to an EU trade union
committee). If I didn't tell you, would it even occur to you this wasn't
American?:
...clear about the enormous contribution and richness of experience and
culture that people of ethnic minorities bring to our societies. And this
contribution applies to all walks of life. Well known and highly visible
examples exist in the areas of sports and the arts. But there are others
that tend not to be recognised. Young people may find their heroes among
black athletes and musicians, but how do they feel about working alongside
their peers from ethnic minorities?...The Joint Declaration of October 1995
sets out a very lucid argument for the importance and value of cultural
diversity in the workplace.
Different abilities, different approaches, a wide range of experience and
skills. These enrich our working environments. They bring an openness to new
ideas and work methods. We need people to be different. And the ability to
draw upon the potential of these diverse backgrounds will be the key to
success in the marketplace. Difference is not a threat. It is a resource.
Yes, we are to take lessons in economic efficiency and getting along with
others from an Irishman. I apologize. That's just the sort of cruel ethnic
joke this human-pod's ragging us about. A hundred monkeys typing for a
hundred years couldn't come up with anything stupider than: Difference is
not a threat. It is a resource. As in, Seamus the nationalist appreciates
unionists Brian, Ryan and Ian, because after all it's their religious and
political differences that make for a target-rich environment. Seamus and
the Ian boys find their fellow resources well used for hazardous material
disposal -- lead repositories, that sort of thing.
One more blast from the trumpet:
...fight racism in all areas of life, using all the resources and
instruments available.
I am also optimistic that in 1997 we will set up a European Monitoring
Centre for racism and xenophobia. It will help us to track events and
developments and will give us a clearer picture of what we are up against.
And of course, as the Inter Governmental Conference goes into its final
stages this year, I am hopeful that the Union will be provided with a way
of realising its ambitions in this field, with the inclusion in the Treaty
itself of a clause forbidding racial discrimination. ... The key to
success is to unite in the face of racism.
Only by working together can we build a Europe where our differences are
respected and valued.
Only then can we embrace that diversity which is so much part of our
strength.
Only then will we be a European Union worthy of the name.
Is there a world war going on I don't know about? Christ, there's a
Churchillian scale, if not sough, to Pad's blather. Somehow I don't think
Mr. Flynn and the European Union were what Joyce had in mind when he spoke
about transcending the trapping nets of nation and creed. No, the call for
a humorless uniformity that screams from every line of this address is far
from what he had in mind.
"Strength through diversity," why it fairly begs to be writ in iron over an
European Concentration I mean Union camp gate, doesn't it? Throughout this
essay, I have tried to point out that whites worldwide face the same
problems, and that we ought to work together to solve them. One problem in
every white country with even a handful of colored minorities is laws that
racially discriminate against whites. Next time you hear a public con
talking about the need for meritocracy and colorblindness (ideals, like
Everest's peak, achievable only under very specific conditions, and then
only for a few minutes), remember that anti-white discriminatory laws exist
today in: Zimbabwe, South Africa, Australia, Canada, the United States,
Great Britain, France, and the European Union. They may well exist in
Holland, Germany, Italy and Scandinavia, for all I know. I repeat: all
those countries I named have embraced affirmative action (and often called
just that, as in America), the open discrimination against our fellow white
man. In none of these countries has the quarter landed on its edge. Yet
still the cry goes on, the religious puling for colorblind policies that
never come. I say religious puling because, like most pious folk, the
colorblind town criers are never the ones subjected to the new anti-white
laws. Their kids are never the ones who grow up to be police or firemen;
they never are forced to attend inferior inner-city schools. At private
schools it's easier for poseurs, liberal and conservative, to fill them with
lies about equality because they don't have to come in contact with their
equals. No, the truth is the ubiquitous call for meritocracy from public
cons across the white world is a textbook example of the perfect being the
enemy of the good. The irony is that if our public con "leaders" fought for
white rights, they'd get meritocracy, as a compromise, at the very least.
It's funny, isn't it, that blacks everywhere are either 3/5, as they were
when the smartest people America ever produced drew up the rules, or 6/5,
the way they are today when Schumers and Feinsteins and Cohens and Clintons
and Gephardts and Gores set the laws.
Good old Britain. Home of the unwritten Constitution, fatherland of
everything good under the sun that never sets and all that. And this:
Police have passed a report into allegations that Manchester United
goalkeeper Peter Schmeichel racially abused Arsenal's black striker Ian
Wright to the Crown Prosecution Service.
The English Football Association (F.A.) confirmed the report was with
the CPS late on Thursday, 24 hours after animosity between the two players
dating back to November resurfaced in a match at Highbury. The police
investigation followed allegations from television viewers that Schmeichel
verbally abused Wright during a league clash at United's Old Trafford ground
on November 16. If the CPS decides the evidence is strong enough,
Schmeichel will become the first soccer player in Britain to face criminal
charges for alleged racist abuse.
So, if you call someone a nigger in England, you can be jugged. Naturally
enough (as the story goes on to say) there is a question whether Schmeichel
actually said anything at all (we'll let the authorities sort it out), plus
the small fact that Wright got suspended for two games for violent play
against the goalie. Same old story: black-on-white violence outweighed by
white-on-black namecalling. Sounds like free speech has gone the way of the
Empire. Of course, that just puts Britain on a par with the mainland it is
being pushed to join, as we have well seen.
The place names give it away but, again, this next clip is as American as
accusations of racism:
Philip Lawrence was stabbed to death outside a London school. Stephen
Lawrence died of knife wounds while waiting at a London bus stop.
They shared a name and died by the same type of weapon in the same
increasingly violent city, but there the similarity ends.
Philip Lawrence was a white, middle-class teacher whose killer was
tracked down and jailed within a year of his death.
... Stephen Lawrence was an 18-year-old student attacked merely because he
was black and whose killers still walk free four years and two failed court
cases after his death.
This sharp contrast has forced Britain to face the fact that whites and
blacks still live very different lives 40 years after the first mass
arrivals of immigrants from its former colonies in the Caribbean and Indian
sub-continent.
"Stephen's unnecessary death has shown us that bigotry is alive and well in
Britain,'' said Ros Howells, a close friend of the Jamaican-born Lawrence
family.
``Society's problem was that Stephen was a black teen-ager and there are
those in this society who did not and cannot value black lives.''
The Stephen Lawrence case, mostly ignored by the media, has polarized
Britain's white and black communities -- one unable or unwilling to
acknowledge levels of racism, the other convinced that the police and
judicial system is biased against them.
The names of five white gang members in the racially tense south London
district of Eltham where Stephen Lawrence was killed in 1993 have come up
time and again in police inquiries.
Two attempts to prosecute them were thrown out by the courts because of
identification problems, blamed partly by the Lawrence family on police
wasting vital time immediately after the murder.
But it hit the front pages in dramatic fashion last week when the
tabloid Daily Mail - not normally known for championing black causes - took
the unprecedented step of printing the names and pictures of five youths
under a headline ``Murderers.''
``The Mail accuses these men of killing. If we are wrong, let them sue
us,'' the newspaper proclaimed.
The Mail's decision followed an inquest ruling that Stephen Lawrence had
died in ``a completely unprovoked racist attack'' and that there had been a
``lost opportunity'' in collecting evidence.
Politicians and the media were divided over whether to congratulate the
Mail for its bold step or criticize it for conducting a ``trial by media.''
But the Mail succeeded in provoking a wider debate about racism in a Britain
where, despite years of apparent integration, discrimination against blacks
is widespread.
``It is now a possibility that Middle England can be bought to
understand and empathize with the pain of black Britain,'' said Trevor
Philips, chairman of the Runnymede Trust independent think tank on race
issues.
``At every turn, the criminal justice system in particular has failed to
do for them (the Lawrence family) what it seems it would do for almost
anyone else,'' added Philips.
Britain's Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), citing ``desperate
statistics'' says that unemployment in young black men in London is over 60
percent. Last year it dealt with 863 cases of discrimination in London
alone, almost all over employment.
CRE chairman Sir Herman Ouseley was not alone in drawing uncomfortable
parallels between the cases of Stephen and Philip Lawrence.
Philip Lawrence, 48, was hailed as a hero in 1995 after dying while
trying to protect a pupil from a gang attack outside the gates of his
central London school.
The government rushed measures through parliament making it an offense
to sell knives to anyone under 16 and strengthened security in schools. A
knife amnesty was announced.
[02-21-,97, By Jill Serjeant LONDON (Reuter)]
Beyond satire, isn't it? I left the part about the knives in for your wry
amusement; we Americans haven't sunk to banning utensils, but its certainly
a reasonable extrapolation of our recent gun-control moronicity. I'd hate
for Schumer and his fellow freedom-hating Congressional allies to read the
above. It is the racial story that is of real interest. Forty years after
their importation began, blacks, the key ingredient in "the American
Problem," have embroiled formerly all-white Britain in exactly the same
racial mess as the New World. All the catch phrases we Americans know so
well are here:
-- black lives aren't valued
-- the criminal justice system has failed blacks
-- Middle America fails to appreciate the difficulties blacks face
-- despite years of seeming integration, blacks face discrimination at
every turn
-- bigotry is alive and well in America.
As they say, the lesson of history is that we don't learn from history. All
the words, all the actors, all the groups, all the reporting -- all the
same. Down to the jot and tittle. The leftists are nothing if not smart.
Let me use a football simile. The leftist purveyors of multiculturalism are
like the Pittsburgh Steelers in the fourth quarter of a game they're up
twenty to three: They just hand the ball to Bettis over and over and over
again. And they'll keep doing it until someone stops him, which almost
never happens. I may understate, after the British manner, that the right,
the well-put Stupid Party, is not noted for flexibility, adaptability or,
really, any ability at all. To twist the self-help giant's dictum, to fail
to respond to the same tactic over and over and over again and expect a
different result is insanity! First time, shame on you; second time, shame
on me -- they say. But what do you say the 500th time? It's the same thing
in Britain as in America as in South Africa. The Jews and other liberals
have a lock on papers, pupil farms and politics and pump perpetually the
panacea of multiculturalism while living in their rich-white-elite suburbs
while the poor whites get the benefits of rubbing shoulders with the bearers
of the magical gift of diversity while the cringing rump class of better-off
conservatives adopt a me-too loserism to preserve their smallering pile of
between-tax wealth while the New Class Jews, burrocrats, wets and
internationalists consolidate their rule. As for the blacks, well, they do
what blacks do. And those Middle Englanders, like Middle Americans, know
what that means, and they thank god they don't have to live by them, at
least not yet.
More evidence that freedom of speech and white rights are on the wane in
Britain. All these are taken from the British Nationalist Party's website.
Again, I repeat and repeat and repeat, note that British leftists' plans are
the same as Aussie and American plans. It doesn't matter where you go.
They are uniform in their demand for Diversity, and uniform in their tactics
for achieving it. Keep in mind that friends are people who have the same
enemy, and that if we don't all hang together, we'll all hang separately.
Shadow Home Secretary Jack Straw has announced that Labour, if elected, will
introduce 'blacks only' job creation schemes in the inner cities. Local
authorities and private firms will get money to employ young blacks. The
plans are said to be intended to reduce racial tension. Since young
unemployed whites will be banned from obtaining any of the jobs, the schemes
will undoubtedly create enormous and justified resentment and more racial
tension. Workers in private business will know that new staff taken on under
the scheme are there because of financial inducements offered to their firms
to exclude whites. Britain is heading for the black 'quota worker' which has
caused such resentment in the US. (April 7 1996)
Exactly so. And the leftists, politically astute if nothing else, are well
aware of the results of their plans, no matter their rationale going in.
The conclusion is inescapable that they seek, desire, enjoy and profit from
the turmoil that results from the racial spoils game.
A 'mass march' through the West End of London by the Anti-Racist Alliance
flopped recently when only 100 people turned up. The march, titled Trump the
Race Card, was advertised as expected to attract 5,000 marchers. The police
were told to expect 1,000. In the event the police said that only 100
appeared at the starting point. The Guardian claimed the numbers later grew
to 250, but described the march as a 'fiasco'. Police told the marchers the
numbers were too small to justify stopping traffic, and that it must proceed
on the pavement to Trafalgar Square. Organiser Marc Wadsworth accused the
Trades Union Congress of sabotaging the march. There is no doubt that
'anti-racism' is becoming increasingly discredited in the UK capital, with
the various 'anti-racist' groups, who hate each other far more than they
hate so-called 'racists', fighting over a pot of money which provides their
leaders with huge salaries. Very few people in London now believe the myth
of wicked whites persecuting saint-like non-whites, which has been
cultivated on television for decades. The screeching about 'Nazis' at any
white person who dares to challenge political correctness no longer has the
same effect it once did.
Again, astute analysis of the money motives behind the left. The rest
seems a bit hopeful. Britain has many of the same immigration-related
problems as France, yet its nationalists haven't had nearly the success of
the National Front. In any case, the BNP has one of the top two or three
white nationalist websites in the world, full of impressively marshalled and
cogently presented evidence. One interesting pseudo-paradox is that white
nationalists such as the BNP, while decried by the P.C. swells as irrational
racist haters, are far more measured in their speech and respectful of logic
and evidence in presenting their case. It's almost as if the other side,
the P.C.-niks, were the irrational haters.
Note the BNP's reference to the racial myth "cultivated on television for
decades." TV and massive colored immigration came to Britain about the same
time, and, as an official tool of the government, TV pushed the going
policy. As controlled and un-diverse as American TV and media are, the
situation is even worse in Britain and across the continent. In the
European countries the post-telephone-and-telegraph (PTT) has typically been
a government monopoly until this decade. We are now seeing some
liberalization, but rare or non-existent is the European country where you
have more than two or three channels to choose from. It is still accurate
to say that getting out an alternative view, a nationalist view on race, is
all but impossible in Europe over the major media. But even control over
TV, radio and papers isn't enough for Blair and the leftists:
Tories, Labour, and the the Liberal Democrats have all endorsed a 'code of
conduct' on political campaigning issued by the CRE. The laughably titled
Free Speech and Race Relations: Principles of Good Practice and Conduct for
Political Campaigners says that anything which 'stirs up or invites
hostility or divisions between racial or national groups' is banned. The
signatories to the ban, endorsed at a House of Commons meeting, included
Tory Chairman Mawhinney, Tony Blair, and Paddy Ashdown. They promised to
expel anyone who breached the ban from any formal role in their parties, and
to disown them. Thus no one in the main parties may now even criticise
immigration, or presumably even argue for Britain, since that might be seen
as 'inviting hostility between national groups'. All pretence at maintaining
free speech has now been abandoned.
Have you noticed that proposed legislation that contains the word Good,
Clean, Decent or Free is inevitably a bad idea? Again, we see that even
so-called moderates like Tony Blair seek to illegalize, literally to
de-legit-imize their opposition. It does seem, from the examples we've
reviewed, there is no great love of freedom left in the white world. In
Britain, the leftists push, unopposed, blacks-only job schemes, while the
white, right-wing party (under the leadership of the aptly-named Ma-whinney)
formally renounces its right to speak out against anti-white racism. This
is the politics of the death-wish, as the canting Jews and blacks at the
Washington Post would put it, were they right-wing. More from the BNP:
The media have proved predictably coy about an Asian riot in Birmingham
which followed the issuing of a parking ticket. A 200 strong mob rampaged
through the Alum Rock area, breaking windows of banks, shops, and other
premises. Riot police were then attacked with stones, and petrol bombs were
found. Television news declined to report that Asians were involved. Asian
shopkeepers had been warned to shut up shop as organised disturbances were
shortly to occur. A 1,000 strong crowd then gathered, followed by the riot.
A shopkeeper had been arrested for assault after being given a parking
ticket. [4/11/96]
Sounds like the media gave this riot the Kingly treatment -- generous
refusal to parcel out blame by race, though the grounds for such parcelling
be video-evident even unto the blind.
You remember Carmen down under, who adopted a female Aborigine persona to
get published. Here's the situation on the other side of the world (again
from BNP):
Christopher Brand, a psychology lecturer at Edinburgh University has had
his book on intelligence and race banned by his publisher John Wiley and
Sons. He says: "It reveals how wide the political correctness infection has
now spread. They are revealing themselves as total idiots. I am sure no-one
at Wiley ever read the book." The publishers said: "We have decided to
withdraw the book from publication. The management of John Wiley and Sons
Inc does not want to support these views by disseminating them or be
associated with a book which makes assertions that we find repellant."
Mr.Brand warned that there would be a "huge storm" among his academic
audience and said people had not had the chance to read the book and did not
know what his views were apart from what had appeared in the press.
"These aren't views of mine...that blacks have a lower IQ than whites has
been known for the best part of the 20th century. I am happy to be called a
scientific racist." says Mr. Brand. Some students at Edinburgh University
have boycotted his classes this week, but the lecturer said that his
department had declined his offer to explain his views at a seminar.[4/96]
Jesus mumbled. His complete sentence: The truth will set you free...of
your job, your reputation, and quite possibly your life. Here we see one of
the unfortunate consequences of World War Two: frank discussion of human
differences has been forced underground. Anti-semitism seemed gauche in
light of Auschwitz, and the ungassed Jews realized they could pervert this
natural sympathy into a set of intellectual taboos that could remake the
world. They have succeeded. Today, most Americans, so far from being
anti-Semitic, act as though even to use the word 'Jew' is to commit a faux
pas by making an invidious recognition of difference; and if there's one
thing these Jewish diversity pushers won't abide, it's an open-eyed
appraisal of the special qualities they bring to the table. But
Brand/o-like, I say unto you, liberal Jews, you're a real one-eyed Jack in
your new world, but I've seen the other side of your face. In accordance
with the new internationalist and post-racial-yet-anti-white mindset the
clever Jews foisted on the intellectual world, and then the world at large,
both have become a more comfortable place for liberal adherents of the
Mosaic cosmogeny. No longer discriminated against nor looked down on
socially, the Jews themselves have become the players: the suppressors, the
definers, the rulemakers, the tone-setters, through the press and courts and
government burrocracies. As Alan Dershowitz said, "We are the new WASPS."
They are able to pursue their agenda virtually unopposed because they have
made politically incorrect and financially and physically dangerous the mere
observation they are a distinct group with an agenda. They never hesitate
to go after "right-wing Christian extremists" as such when they, for
example, "take over" a local school board, but did you ever read an article
about the leftist Jewish cabal around our crook President? Not unless you
read the "Nazi" press -- or the Jewish religious press. Yet today, as our
examples from around the world have more than amply demonstrated, Jews are
prominent among the leftists who attack their opponents and suppress their
opinions in public and in publishing, even as they were the ringleaders of
the destructive sixties unrest in America. It is no coincidence, as the
Jewish communist hacks used to put it, that with the rise of Jewish power in
America have come socialist taxation and declines in civility and freedom.
For our purposes here, the story of the post-WWII era, in a nutshell, is
that the leftist Jewish intellectuals kicked out of the third reich
gravitated to other western philosophy, history, psychology and anthropology
departments and remade them around the Big Lie that people are products of
their environment. The old view, that there is a human nature, was
discarded. Race was a "myth," according to the title of a typical book, by
anthropologist Ashley Montagu. The university Jews were chief among those
who discredited and, along with their bretheren in the media owning, editing
and controlling the Washington Post and the New York Times, levied heavy
social pressure on anyone who clung to the view that there were inherent and
ineradicable differences between the races. The wisdom of the Jew tells him
blacks aren't black, they're just raised that way. The political Jews, the
judges and burrocrats, through the forties, fifties, sixties, seventies
gained enough power to be able to punish those who rejected their Big Lie
about race, by reassigning their schoolkids in line with the regnant liberal
racial whimsy, building minority public housing -- paid for by the white
middle class -- in white, middle-class neighborhoods, and, in general,
smashing to bits any private white or white male club or group that used to
enjoy Constitutional protection as free association.
What the Jews have done is entirely understandable: they have striven,
using all their money and skill, to make the world more comfortable to
themselves. What makes Jews comfortable depends on what kind of people they
are. You can get the answer two ways: through a perusal of history books,
or through your television. Either way, you find the same thing.
TV-slash-film-slash-entertainment is the Jewish medium par excellence.
Hollywood was the invention of liberal Jews, as one Jewish author of a book
on the subect put it. Less than three percent of the population, Jews make
up the absolute majority of the film and TV crowd of writers, producers and
directors. The short answer is that politically Jews are socialists and
socially Jews are, to put it most charitably, informalists. The unending
sexual innuendo that defines Prime Time comes directly out of the shtetls,
the Jewish ghettoes of Eastern Europe where "life is with people" was the
way. These Jews were not noted for their dignity, nor for their respect for
the rights and privacy of others, because they had little of either. Today,
think of Howard Stern, Richard Belzer, Richard Lewis, Alan Dershowitz,
Charles Schumer, Gloria Allred, Joan Rivers: what comes to mind?
Quickness, intelligence, humor -- yes. Lack of dignity, loose morals,
leftist politics -- yes again. The problem is that the casual sex, the
quick and easy intelligence and the socialist politics that make the grade
for the Jews don't fill the bill for normal white America. They destroy
normal white America. The cultural war or whatever you want to call it is
at base a biological contest between different subspecies of humans.
It is a telling fact that the Jews forget their multiculturalism when it
comes to Jews. Where they press for equality and "democracy" and diversity
and separation of church and state in the traditional white areas of
America, they plead for the exact opposite when it comes to Israel -- and
when it comes to taxing billions from the people whose culture they have
changed for the worse to support their beloved little country. Lately we
have started to hear from the Alan Dershowitzes loud lamentations about
Jewish assimilation in America. Declining numbers of Jews carry out the
practices of the old faith, while increasing numbers marry exogamously.
Well, in the end, if they really wish to practice Judaism, Dershowitz et al.
can always remove to Israel, where the faith is real, and not whatever fits
between TV appearances. But where does the civilized, normal white American
majority flee, when its time comes? Where do we go when America becomes
South Africa? Make no mistake, the time to fight is now, while we are
strong -- not when we are weak, as we will be in 2050, when fewer than two
of every four Americans will be white.
The Brand example is of a piece with the flying bottles in Australia and
the knocked over book display in France -- it is the left's perpetual
crybaby clamor against the intellect. It is the academic aspect of the
general trend of the leftism simply to quash any knowledge it is afraid the
public can't handle. Remember that the next time you hear the liberal
Jewish reporters like the Washington Post's Michael Weisskopf talking about
how dumb, poor and easily led the Christian fundamentalists are. The Jewish
left I laugh at, just as it does the Christian right, because it pulls an
ostrich when it comes to the truth about racial differences. It would be
smooth and easy to say there's no way the truth-fearing liberals/Jews can
win in the end: the truth will out! Smooth and easy, but not necessarily
correct. The left pulled a German dog attack on the truth about race for
decades, and there's no reason they can't keep it up for many more. In
between writing this, I happened to speak to a female gun-store owner in the
later stages of being driven out of business by ATF regulations. Asked how
her business had been, she said it had dropped steadily over the past five
years. One major reason was the ongoing media campaign against guns, gun
rights, gun owners and the constant "official" ridicule directed toward what
really is a gun culture. The practical result of that media hate campaign
-- along with a number of incidents where jackbooted federal thrugs broke
into innocent people's houses and murdered them and/or their pets -- is that
weak-minded women are turning their husbands outdoors with the admonition
not to return until they get rid of the gun, which they just can't have
around the kids. In short, these women and some men, representing a
not-small segment of the body politic, have swallowed enough media animism
to believe that guns are inherently dangerous creatures -- Alive with
killing pleasure! (as Heckler & Hedges might put it) -- deadly metal, not
dead metal. The media is partly responsible for making us all less free and
less safe by making guns out to be like the evil brooms in Fantasia. Just
as their Big Lie about guns being inherently evil and dangerous has had its
effect, so has their Big Lie about racial equality, that any people from
anywhere carrying out any practices can get along just fine. Perhaps the
scariest thing hinted at in the Brand clip is the fact that the truth is
already out; the facts about race and IQ and race and crime are well known,
at least among honest academics. What is needed is not so much the skilled
positions (to resort again to football metaphor) -- Brand and Degler and
Herrnstein and Murray and Levin and Jensen and Schockley etc. have us
covered there -- as blockers: politicians and journalists to spring their
ideas and their consequences and ramifications through the leftist defenses
and into the endzone of public attention and serious consideration and
acceptance. We need to develop a Real Right of writers, editors and
producers and pols who can wean the American public off the leftist babyfood
of multiculturalism, that disgusting mushy intellectual-flavored pablum,
and give them meat suitable for adults. I mix my metaphors but I trust my
meaning is clear. Keep the Brand episode in mind, for it is not the last
such we will encounter in our tour.
In America, just as in Britain, as the following clip shows, there is a
big, untapped market for pro-white politics, for overt nationalism -- for
courage:
Britain's middle classes are racist, homophobic and have nothing but
contempt for the poor, but they are far too polite to say so. At least that
seems to be the message from a controversial television
documentary...show[ing] a group of ``typical'' English people being
untypically forthright with the aid of several bottles of wine.
A ``fly on the wall camera'' eavesdrops on eight dinner guests as they
declare that ``gays are freaks of nature'' and ``Africans always seem to
have their hands out.'' ``An equal society is not one I think I would love
to see in my lifetime,'' says Catherine Goddard, a 31-year-old real estate
agent. ... But wait. It seemed the greatest shock was not that the guests
held such extreme views, but that they were happy to air them in public.
They had volunteered to take part in the film by answering a newspaper
advertisement. The guests themselves were unrepentant, insisting at a
hastily-called news conference in their local public house that ``the
majority of people in this country think this way.''
And while this is firmly denied in most of Britain's polite middle class
society...[j]ust a few days earlier, Prime Minister John Major had been
forced to condemn one of his Conservative members of parliament for talking
of ``black bastards'' and describing his female Labour Party opponent as
having ``three bastard children.'' [3/23/97, Reuters (Helen Smith)]
People who are too embarassed to stick up for what is true, too weak to
draw conclusions and act on them, deserve what happens to them. The
British, like the rest of us, have no one but themselves to blame for their
growing racial problems.
Go to Part 5
|