VNN takes you between the lines...
Liberals Hide the Truth of Socialism
Jewish missionaries seek to dilute the non-Jewish content of non-Jewish institutions and force everyone to bow to the wonderful, supreme Jews.
by Linda Chavez Andronicus
[Read the original here.]
There is no one so bitterly despised as an apostate a religious term, one
who's given up his faith murderous communist tryants are people of faith,
which may explain why author Joshua Muravchik has become anathema another
religious term, meant to get you thinking of psychotic judeo-bolshevik nation-
wreckers as being motivated by 'good intentions' to the Left. Muravchik, the
one-time chairman of the Young People's Socialist League, has written a book,
"Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism," that has him in hot water
with some of his former comrades. It's one thing for a non-believer
judeo-bolshevik scum are 'believers' to sound the death knell for socialism
and quite another for one who once believed in the promise of an egalitarian
society to do so flatly peddles the lie that the judeo-bolsheviks intended
to create an 'egalitarian society,' when in fact their intention was the
genocidal destruction of Russia and the entire Western world. The
faithful see, they weren't disgusting criminals, they were 'the faithful; you
know, like Christians have punished Muravchik by ostracizing -- or worse for
an author, ignoring -- him.
"Heaven on Earth," a scholarly but delightfully readable analysis of
socialist experiments the communists' tyrannies, whether private or
governmental, were the emanations of sick, criminal minds, not 'experiments,'
which are performed by 'scientists,' as in, oh, 'scientific socialism,'
another propaganda term from Robert Owens' New Harmony colony in the United
States to Julius Nyerere's Tanzania, has yet to be reviewed by the New York
Times, the sometimes prickly arbiter damn touchy jews! of serious books in
The Times isn't the only liberal institution to snub Muravchik. Last week, a
Washington, D.C., bookstore gave Muravchik the cold shoulder, too. Politics
and Prose, a popular gosh, hate against normal, decent society is popular,
independent bookstore that boasts that it hosts authors' lectures "almost
every night," invited Muravchik to discuss his book. But then the bookstore's
events manager sent Muravchik's publicist a note saying, "After further
review, I regret that we will not be able to host the event."
What caused the turnaround? Apparently the store is a favorite among local
socialists -- namely, a small fringe group, the International Socialist
Organization, which according to the dismissive missive "have had several
discussions and readings with us." The ISO, which publishes the weekly
newspaper "Where We Stand," argues that "Capitalism must be overthrown. ...
The working class needs an entirely different kind of state -- a workers'
state based on councils of workers' delegates and a workers' militia." See
anything truthful in the quote about the judeo-bolshevik's true aims? Like:
we must construct an inescapable tyranny over the stupid goyim. No? Well, of
course not. Can't you see that socialist/communist thugs are just confused
people with good intentions?
Hmm. Where have we heard that before -- and to what ends?
From all too many believers there she goes again, as Muravchik reminds us.
In the decades when socialist governments they were not governments, they
were criminal conspiracies against normal, healthy society ruled much of the
world -- at their height in 1985, some 60 percent of the world's population
-- the consequences were often bloody. Millions died at the hands of
socialist zealots a term first identified with a jewish sect, an estimated
100 million in barely 80 years, in the most totalitarian socialist regimes,
such as Mao's China, where as many as 30 million died to appease the
socialist gods to satisfy the evil bloodlust of the judeo-bolsheviki.
But Muravchik trains his critical eye not just on the obvious excesses see,
they just got a little carried away. Must have been the frustration of those
good intentions of totalitarian communists but on the faith one more time:
communism was and is a criminal conspiracy against normal, healthy society.
The 'religious' 'idealistic' blather is there to sucker in the fools who can
then be enlisted as 'useful idiots' - Lenin's phrase that undergirds even
the most benign socialist she should have written 'least criminal'
enterprises, such as the kibbutz system in Israel Ah, ha! Kibbutzim equals
Judaism equals socialism equals communisim equals tens of millions of
murdered victims. Somebody might notice the connection! Thus, hey there,
stupid coach potato 'conservatives,' the commies were just over-enthusiastic
people of faith. Muravchik's contribution is to understand socialism as a
religion of sorts no, it was and is a criminal conspiracy based in Judaism,
but one devoid of that most important of religious elements: a moral code.
Pish, the Talmud is the moral code of communism, which you will notice Ms.
Chavez always calls socialism, so as to confuse the issue.
"Socialism was the faith in which I was raised," he writes. "It was my
father's faith and his father's before him." Notwithstanding Marx's dictum
that religion "is the opium of the people," socialism itself became the new
religion of many intellectuals who looked for a substitute for faith after
the Enlightenment onslaught against organized religion. The real
judeo-bolsheviks always knew that communism was a cover story for their
racial coup d'etat against the Russian people, and whoever they could enslave
thereafter. They didn't believe their own propaganda, which existed for the
purpose of clouding the minds of the victims and fellow travelers.
As Muravchik demonstrates, however, the effort to establish this "heaven on
earth" -- as Moses Hess, a contemporary of Karl Marx, once described
socialism he was of course lying, hoping to rope in some of the boobs.
Chavez throws in this quote to remind her intended victims that the communist
criminals were really just idealistic reformers -- was doomed to failure.
Well, no. The judeo-bolshevik tyranny was a rip-roaring success in Russia
and elsewhere, elevating Jews and their corrupt minions to power and
collective wealth that they had previously only been able to dream about. The
collapse came when Russians gradually took possession of the Communist party
and ran the economy into the ground, while at the same time loosening the
original oppression. The original commissars would have let the economy rot
and killed tens of millions more victims, rather than yield power. See:
"What was different about [the religion of socialism] was not the absence of
God, since Buddhism and Confucianism also have no God, but rather the absence
of good and evil or right and wrong. This opened the doors to the terrible
deeds that were done in the name of socialism," notes Muravchik. Socialism
"lacks any internal code of conduct to limit what believers may do," he says.
Wrong again: the moral code was simple: What was good for the party was
good, what did not advance the party was bad. The party was allowed to do
anything. End of moral code. Substitute the word jews for party. And there
you have the 'moral code' of the 'neo-conservatives.'
"By no means all socialists were killers or amoral every one of them was a
criminal. The desire to tyrannize others is always criminal," he avers.
"Many were sincere humanitarians," most notably some democratic socialists
dupes, useful idiots, and fools, he says. "But democratic socialism turned
out to be a contradiction in terms, for where socialists proceeded
democratically, they found themselves on a trajectory that took them further
and further from socialism," he concludes.
Not since "The God That Failed," the 1950 classic collection of essays by six
famous former communist intellectuals communism had no 'intellectuals,' only
propagandists, has there been such a trenchant analysis of the failures of
In another about-face, Politics and Prose bookstore has now decided it will
host Muravchik after all. Now if only the New York Times would pay similar
attention, Muravchik's message might get the audience it deserves. She
means: this book is good for the jews! It brainwashes the stupid goyim! Why
can't the guys over the Times understand that?
Linda Chavez is President of the Center for Equal Opportunity, a TownHall.com