1. The Jewish Problem and Its "Solution"

ZIONISM is a national race-based liberation movement Oy! - invading most of Palestine is "liberation," he says, identical in most ways to other liberation movements no, it isn't, it is unique that leftists and progressives the world over -- and in virtually every case but this one -- fervently support. This exceptionalism is also visible at the reverse end of the political spectrum: In every other instance, right-wingers like Patrick Buchanan oppose national liberation movements that are under the spell of Marxist delusions and committed to violent means. But they make an exception for the one that Palestinians have aimed at the Jews again, who invaded whom? Jews forced their way into most of Palestine. The unique opposition to a Jewish homeland at both ends of the political spectrum identifies the problem that Zionism was created to solve. This opposition at "both ends" is very telling indeed; no other people experience such vigorous, ongoing opposition; one must wonder why.

The "Jewish problem" is just another name for the fact that Jews are the most universally hated and persecuted ethnic group in history. Why is that? Why can't Jewish behavior be discussed? The Zionist founders believed that hatred of Jews was a direct consequence of their stateless condition no, it was a direct consequence of historic Jewish bigotry, as evident in the Talmud. As long as Jews were aliens in every society they found themselves in largely by choice -- by purposely not assimilating and remaining a closed society, they would always be seen as interlopers, their loyalties would be suspect for good reason; e. g., most nuclear spies have been Jewish, both then and now and persecution would follow of course; what do you expect? This was what happened to Captain Alfred Dreyfus, whom French anti-Semites falsely accused of spying and who was put on trial for treason by the French government in the 19th Century. Theodore Herzl was an assimilated, westernized Jew rabid Zionists never assimilate fully, they just appear to, who witnessed the Dreyfus frame- up his exoneration is still suspect - and what of the dozens of Jewish spies unquestionably guilty? in Paris and went on to lead the Zionist race-based, bigoted movement.

Herzl and other Zionist founders believed that if Jews had a nation not "nation," they already were so; "country" is the correct term of their own, the very fact would "normalize" legitimize and make them appear less "alien" their condition in the community of nations. Jews had been without a state since the beginning of the diaspora, when the Romans expelled them from Judea on the west bank of the Jordan River, some 2,000 years before. Jews were kicked out of every country many times, Christian or non-Christian. Wonder why? Once the Jews obtained a homeland -- Judea itself seemed a logical site -- and were again like other peoples, the Zionists believed anti-Semitism would wither on its poisonous stating historical fact is not hardly "poison" vine and the Jewish problem would disappear. sorry, this did not happen; Jews were and are a troublesome race, and will remain so, genetically, for many more years until the Jewish genotype ends completely by interbreeding with the host cultures.

Here is what happened instead.

2. The Beginnings

In the 1920s, among their final acts as victors in World War I, the British and French created the states that now define the Middle East out of the ashes of the empire of their defeated Turkish adversary. In a region that the Ottoman Turks had controlled for hundreds of years, Britain and France drew the boundaries of the new states, Syria Lebanon and Iraq. Previously, the British had promised the Jewish Zionists that they could establish a "national home" in a portion of what remained of the area, which was known as the Palestine Mandate. But in 1921 the British separated 80 percent of the Mandate, east of the Jordan, and created the Arab kingdom of "Transjordan." It was created for the Arabian monarch King Abdullah, who had been defeated in tribal warfare in the Arabian Peninsula and lacked a seat of power. Abudllah's tribe was Hashemite, while the vast majority of Abdullah's subjects were Palestinian Arabs. yaaawwwnnnnn.

What was left of the original Palestine Mandate between the west bank of the Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea had been settled by Arabs and Jews some Jews, but mostly Arabs. Jews, in fact, had lived in the area again, some Jews continuously for 3,700 years, even after the Romans destroyed their state in Judea in AD 70. Arabs became the dominant local population by far for the first time in the 7th Century AD as a result of the Muslim invasions. The Arabs were largely nomads who had no distinctive language or culture to separate them from other Arabs. In all the time since, they had made no attempt to create an independent Palestinian state west or east of the Jordan and none was ever established. Who knew that ethnocentric Jews would invade and displace nearly 1 million Arabs total? I hereby forgive the Arabs for not thinking that far ahead.

In 1948, at the request of the Jews who were living in Palestine, the United Nations voted under great pressure from America, and from Jewish groups, as noted by Harry Truman to partition the remaining quarter of the original Mandate to make a Jewish homeland possible. Under the partition plan, the Arabs were given the Jews' ancient home in Judea and Samaria -- now known as the West Bank. The Jews were allotted three slivers of disconnected land along the Mediterranean and the Sinai desert. They were also given access to their holy city of Jerusalem, but as an island cut off from the slivers, surrounded by Arab land and under international control. Sixty percent of the land allotted to the Jews was the Negev desert. Out of these unpromising parts, the Jews created a new state, Israel, in 1948. Gee, that's nice, but the land they got was better on the whole, e. g. citrus, and that precise land was largely NOT their "original" Biblical-era land. At this time, the idea of a Palestinian nation, or a movement to create one did not even exist. See previous comments..

At the moment of Israel's birth, Palestinian Arabs lived on roughly 90 percent of the original Palestine Mandate in Transjordan and in the UN partition area, but also in the new state of Israel itself. There were 800,000 Arabs living in Israel alongside 1.2 million Jews. At the same time, Jews were legally barred from settling in the 35,000 square miles of Palestinian Transjordan good, which eventually was renamed simply "Jordan."

The Arab population in the slivers called Israel had actually more than tripled since the Zionists first began settling the region in significant numbers in the 1880s.The reason for this increase was that the Jewish settlers had brought industrial and agricultural development with them ideas/methods that came largely from White Europeans, which Arabs were not really exposed to; no one ever said that most Arabs were rocket scientists, and I don't either; the normal Jewish IQ is higher than any other human average, and Horowitz knows it, which attracted Arab immigrants to what had previously been a sparsely settled and economically destitute area.

If the Palestinian Arabs had been willing to accept this arrangement in which they received 90 percent of the land in the Palestine Mandate why give in to ethnocentric invaders?, and under which they benefited from the industry ditto, enterprise and political democracy Israel is not a democracy the Jews brought stole; the idea of democracy came from Whites, who have turned it into egalitarianism to the region, there would have been no Middle East conflict. But this was not to be. oh, it the Arab's fault, is it? They forced Jews to invade? How clever of those sand-urchins!

Instead, the Arab League representing five neighboring Arab states declared war on Israel on the day of its creation wonder why?, and five Arab armies invaded the slivers with the aim of destroying the infant Jewish state ditto. During the fighting, according to the UN mediator on the scene, an estimated 472,000 Arabs fled their homes to escape the dangers you mean "were forced out of their homes?" Is that what you mean, Dave?. They planned on returning after an Arab victory and the destruction of the Jewish state. How does he know what the Arabs were thinking?? He was there?

But the Jews -- many of them recent Holocaust survivors Ohh!-play the "Holocaust card"; how clever, when one topic has nothing to do with the other -- refused to be defeated. Instead, the five Arab armies that had invaded their slivers were repelled. Yet there was no peace. Even though their armies were beaten, the Arab states were determined to carry on their campaign of destruction resisting Jewish invaders is a "campaign of destruction," he says, and to remain formally at war with the Israeli state. After the defeat of the Arab armies, the Palestinians who lived in the Arab area of the UN partition did not attempt to create a state of their own. Instead, in 1950, Jordan annexed the entire West Bank.

3. Refugees: Jewish and Arab

As a result of the annexation and the continuing state of war a state of war which Jews created in the first place, the Arab refugees who had fled the Israeli slivers did not return. There was a refugee flow into Israel, but it was a flow of Jews who had been expelled from the Arab countries nope - Jews flooded into Israel from many countries, especially America, especially New York. All over the Middle East, Jews were forced to leave lands they had lived on for centuries gee, wonder why?. Although Israel was a tiny geographical area which has expanded GREATLY since, by taking Arab land and bulldozing Arab villages and a fledgling state, its government welcomed and resettled 600,000 Jewish refugees from the Arab countries. Gee, could this has been part of their visible plan to create an eventual Jewish majority inside Palestine? Could it?? Nahhhh.....how paranoid of me.....

At the same time, the Jews resumed their work of creating a new nation country! A race is a "nation" in what was now a single sliver you keep saying "sliver" - you really like that word, huh? of land. Israel, had annexed "annexed"; you mean "stole?" a small amount of territory to make their state defensible to keep the invaders safe, including a land bridge that included Jerusalem.

In the years that followed, the Israelis made their desert bloom by using millions of White*, Western tax dollars. They built the only industrialized economy in the entire Middle East with White, Western tax dollars and White, Western know-how. They built the only liberal democracy Israel is not a democracy in the Middle East. They treated the Arabs who remained in Israel well really? I have copies of hundreds of U.N. documents that tell a different story. As Sobran says, nobody ever says he wants to be treated the way the Jews treat Palestinians. To this day the very large Arab minority, which lives inside the state of Israel, has more rights and privileges than any other Arab population in the entire Middle East. That may or may not be true, but that does not justify invading Arab land and expelling nearly 1 million Arabs and seizing their property. *Jews are technically not White as a race; they are technically "light-skinned Arabs".

This is especially true of the Arabs living under Yasser Arafat's corrupt dictatorship not nearly as corrupt as Israel's government, which allows White slavery, the Palestine Authority, which today administers the West Bank and the Gaza strip, and whose Arab subjects have no human rights giving them too many Western rights would de-solidify them as a group. In 1997, in a fit of pique against the Oslo Accords, Palestinian spokesman Edward Said I did not know that the writer Said was an "official Palestinian spokesperson" himself blurted this out, calling Arafat "our Papa Doc" after the sadistic dictator of Haiti and complaining that there was "a total absence of law or the rule of law in the Palestinian autonomy areas." Not surprising - policing large bodies of people takes large amounts of money, which is all going to Israel instead.

The present Middle East conflict is said to be about the "occupied territories" the West Bank of the Jordan and the Gaza strip and about Israel's refusal to "give them up." But during the first twenty years of the Arab-Israeli conflict, Israel did not control the West Bank so?. In 1950, when Jordan annexed the West Bank, there was no Arab outrage maybe because Jewish brazenness and bigotry has gotten much worse since, and both of their populations have greatly increased? Nor did the Middle East conflict with the Jews subside.

The reason there was no Arab outrage over the annexation of the West Bank was because Jordan is a state whose ethnic majority is Palestinian Arabs. On the other hand, the Palestinians of Jordan are disenfranchised by the ruling Hashemite minority. Despite this fact, in the years following the annexation the Palestinians displayed no interest in achieving "self-determination" in Hashemite Jordan see my above comment. It is only the presence of Jews, apparently, that incites this claim oh, only that, huh?. The idea that the current conflict is about "occupied territories" is only one of the many large Arab deceits -- now widely accepted -- that have distorted the history of the Middle East wars. riiiggghhttt....guess the Arabs do not really care about stolen land, huh? They simply hate Jews? Where have we all heard that before, again and again and again?

4. The Arab Wars Against Israel

In 1967, Egypt, Syria and Jordan attacked Israel for a second time sorry, the Jews attacked first, and mainstream Jewish authors such as Eric Margolis admit this and were again defeated. It was in repelling these aggressors again, Jews attacked first that Israel came to control stole by force the West Bank and the Gaza strip, as well as the oil-rich Sinai desert. Israel had every right to annex steal these territories captured from the aggressors a time honored by who, since Israel was the aggressor? ritual among nations countries!!!, and in fact the precise way that Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan had come into existence themselves I did not know that they were invaded by ethnocentric non-Arabs. But Israel did not do so. On the other hand, neither did it withdraw its armies or relinquish its control gee, wonder why?.

The reason was that the Arab non-aggressors once again refused to make peace i.e., refused to give in to ethnocentric aggressors. Instead, they declared themselves still at war with Israel, a threat no Israeli government could afford to ignore. By this time, Israel was a country of 2 or 3 million due to massive Jewish immigration -- immigration which they still deny to Arabs surrounded by declared enemies who told Jews to invade in the first place? whose combined populations numbered over 100 million. Geographically Israel was so small that at one point it was less than ten miles across. No responsible Israeli government could relinquish a territorial buffer while its hostile neighbors were still formally at war. This is the reality that frames the Middle East conflict.

In 1973, six years after the second Arab war against the Jews, the Arab armies again attacked Israel. The attack was led by Syria and Egypt, abetted by Iraq, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and five other countries who gave military support to the aggressors, including an Iraqi division of 18,000 men. Israel again defeated the Arab forces using American military equipment and American tax dollars. Afterwards, Egypt and Egypt alone -- agreed to make a formal peace.

The peace was signed by Egyptian president, Anwar Sadat, who was subsequently assassinated by Islamic radicals, paying for his statesmanship you mean his knuckling under to the Jewish invaders with his life. Sadat is one of three Arab leaders assassinated by other Arabs for making peace knuckling under with to the Jews.

Under the Camp David accords that Sadat signed, Israel returned the entire Sinai with all its oil riches mighty White of them, since they stole it in the first place! This act demonstrated once and for all that the solution to the Middle East conflict was ready at hand yes, knuckling under to the Jewish invaders is referred to by the Jews as "peace." It only required the willingness of the Arabs to agree knuckle under.

The Middle East conflict is not about Israel's occupation of the territories yes, it is; it is about the refusal of the Arabs to make peace give in to with the Jewish invaders Israel, which is an inevitable by-product of their desire to destroy it.

5. Self-Determination Is Not The Agenda

The Palestinians and their supporters also claim that the Middle East conflict is about the Palestinians' yearning for a state and the refusal of Israel to accept their aspiration. This claim is also false. The Palestine Liberation Organization was created in 1964, sixteen years after the establishment of Israel and the first anti-Israel war. The PLO was created at a time the West Bank was not under Israeli control but was part of Jordan so? The PLO, however, was not created so that the Palestinians could achieve self-determination in Jordan, which at the time comprised 90 percent of the original Palestine Mandate. The PLOs express purpose, in the words of its own leaders, was to "push the Jews into the sea." Good idea! Who invaded whom?

The official charter of the new Palestine Liberation Organization referred to the "Zionist invasion," that's right declared that Israels Jews were "not an independent nationality," described Zionism as "racist" so did the U.N. and "fascist," Zionism is basically fascist called for "the liquidation of the Zionist presence," and specified, "armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine." Of course; will simply talking to God's Pets get them to leave? In short, "liberation" required the destruction of the Jewish state you mean "the removing of the invaders." Sounds great! The PLO was not even created by Palestinians but by the Arab League -- the corrupt dictators who ruled the Middle East and who had attempted to destroy Israel by military force in 1948, in 1967 and again in 1973. Gasp! They tried to destroy God's Shiny Pets, who forced their way into large parts of Palestine? No!

For thirty years, the PLO charter remained unchanged in its call for Israel's destruction so? Then in the mid-1990s, under enormous international pressure you mean "pro-Israel pressure from Jew-friendly America" following the 1993 Oslo accords, PLO leader Yasser Arafat removed the clause while assuring his followers that its removal was a necessary compromise that did not alter the movement's goals. He did this explicitly and also by citing a historical precedent in which the Prophet Muhammad insincerely agreed to a peace with his enemies in order to gain time to mass the forces with which he intended to destroy them.

6. The Struggle to Destroy Israel

The Middle East struggle is not about right against right you're right - it is about Jews invading Palestine. It is about a fifty-year effort by the Arabs to destroy the Jewish state which had no legitimate claim in the first place, and the refusal of the Arab states in general and the Palestinian Arabs in particular to accept Israels existence why should they? If the Arabs were willing to do this you mean "willing to knuckle under to the Jews?", there would be no occupied territories and there would be a Palestinian state. Yes, but much smaller than would otherwise exist, and surrounded by ethnocentric Jews with warplanes and attack helicopters paid for by White tax slaves.

Even during the "Oslo" peace process -- when the Palestine Liberation Organization pretended to recognize the existence of Israel and the Jews therefore allowed the creation of a "Palestine Authority" what else could they do? Talking to the ethnocentric Jews is fruitless -- it was clear that the PLO's goal was Israel's destruction, and not just because its leader invoked the Prophet Muhammad's own deception. The Palestinians' determination to destroy Israel is abundantly clear in their newly created demand of a "right of return" to Israel for "5 million" Arabs if millions of Jews can "return" to Israel, so can millions of Arabs. The figure of 5 million refugees who must be returned to Israel is more than ten times the number of Arabs who actually left the Jewish slivers of the British Mandate in 1948. So? The number of Jews now in Israel is far beyond what was originally in old Canaan. What is your point?

In addition to its absurdity, this new demand has several aspects that reveal the Palestinians' genocidal genocidal? Really? Shades of "The Holocaust!" agenda for the Jews. The first is that the "right of return" is itself a calculated mockery of the primary reason for Israel's existence -- the fact that no country would provide a refuge for bigoted, ethnocentric Jews many of whom were Communists fleeing Hitler's extermination program during World War II. It is only because the world turned its back on the Jews ahhh, more Jewish victimization, of course when their survival was at stake that the state of Israel grants a "right of return" to every Jew who asks for it. Who forced Jews to run most Communist organizations in Germany/Europe in the 1930s?? And who forced them to invent a religion that claimed that Jews were completely superior to all other humans??? They made their own beds, so to speak, and they deserve what they get..

But there is no genocidal threat to Arabs, no lack of international support militarily and economically oh, really? Palestinians receive lots of attack helicopters and fighter jets from the West, do they?, and no Palestinian "diaspora" (although the Palestinians have cynically appropriated the very term to describe their self-inflicted quandary). The fact that many Arabs, including the Palestinian spiritual leader -- the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem -- supported Hitler's "Final Solution" wonder why? only serves to compound the insult. It is even further compounded by the fact that more than 90 percent of the Palestinians now in the West Bank and Gaza have never lived a day of their lives in territorial Israel so? Many New York Jews were born in New York; so?. The claim of a "right of return" is thus little more than a brazen expression of contempt for the Jews no, the Arabs do not want to become a smaller minority than they already are!, and for their historic suffering more Jewish victimization; it is their identity as a people; they are not "Jews," they are "always-suffering Jews."

More importantly it is an expression of contempt for the very idea of a Jewish state of course. The incorporation of five million Arabs into Israel would render the Jews a permanent minority in their own country good!, and would thus spell the end of Israel great! The Arabs fully understand this, and that is why they have made it a fundamental demand. It is just one more instance of the general bad faith the Arab side has manifested through every chapter of these tragic events. How unsporting of them not to play along with the Jewish invaders.

Possibly the most glaring expression of the Arabs' bad faith is their deplorable treatment of the Palestinian refugees who would not be in that position if Jews had not invaded in the first place and refusal for half a century to relocate them who is going to pay for that? Jews?, or to alleviate their condition ditto, even during the years they were under Jordanian rule. While Israel was making the desert bloom using American tax dollars and relocating 600,000 Jewish refugees from Arab states also using American tax dollars, and building a thriving industrial democracy not a democracy; and also using American tax dollars in its allotted sliver again the "sliver" word; oy, the Arabs were busy making sure that their refugees remained in squalid refugee camps see above comment in the West Bank and Gaza, where they were powerless, right-less, and economically destitute oh, now you are concerned about Arabs, huh?.

Today, fifty years after the first Arab war against Israel you mean the Jewish invasion of Palestine, there are 59 such refugee camps and 3.7 million "refugees" registered with the UN yes, thanks to Jews. Despite economic aid from the UN and Israel itself mighty White of you, despite the oil wealth of the Arab kingdoms, the Arab leaders have refused to undertake the efforts that would liberate the refugees from their miserable camps see above comment, or to make the economic investment that would alleviate their condition. There are now 22 Arab states providing homes for the same ethnic population, speaking a common Arabic language. But the only one that will allow Palestinian Arabs to become citizens is Jordan. And the only state the Palestinians covet is Israel Oh, those dirty Arabs! How dare they want good land and water taken back from the people who stole it.

7. The Policy of Resentment and Hate Hate? Opposing invaders is hate, he says

The refusal to address the condition thanks to Jews getting most of the tax money that America sends overseas of the Palestinian refugee population is and has always been -- a calculated Arab policy always plotting, those Arabs, intended to keep the Palestinians in a state of desperation in order to incite their hatred of Israel for the wars to come. Not to leave anything to chance, the mosques and schools of the Arabs generally -- and the Palestinians in particular -- preach and teach Jew hatred every day this is surprising? What do the Jewish schools teach?. Elementary school children in Palestinian Arab schools are even taught to chant "Death to the heathen Jews" wonder why? Jewish "religion" teaches the 'best of the goyim should be killled,' so there's no room for criticism in their classrooms as they are learning to read. It should not be overlooked, that these twin policies of deprivation (of the Palestinian Arabs) and hatred (of the Jews) are carried out without any protest from any sector of Palestinian or Arab society. That in itself speaks volumes about the nature of the Middle East conflict.

All wars -- especially wars that have gone on for fifty years produce victims with just grievances on both sides "Just grievances?" oh? Now the Arabs might have valid positions? Just a minute ago, they were rabid hate-mongers. And that is true in this one. There are plenty of individual Palestinian victims, as there are Jewish victims, familiar from the nightly news. But the collective Palestinian grievance is without justice. It is a self-inflicted wound Ohh...the Jews did not really invade! The Arabs just imagined it!, the product of the Arabs' xenophobia, bigotry Jews invented ethnic bigotry in about 930 BC - about when the Judah split from the main body of Israelites, long before Arabs even existed in the world, exploitation of their own people, and apparent inability to be generous towards those who are not Arabs see previous comment. While Israel is an open, democratic, multi-ethnic, multicultural society bull-fucking-shit!!! The biggest lie in history that includes a large enfranchised Arab minority, the Palestine Authority is an intolerant see above comments, undemocratic, monolithic police state with one dictatorial leader, whose ruinous career has run now for 37 years.

As the repellent attitudes, criminal methods and dishonest goals of the Palestine liberation movement yeah, sure, Jews worldwide are known for their honesty and integrity, ha! should make clear to any reasonable observer, its present cause is based on usually-justified Jew hatred dislike, and on resentment of the modern, democratic West leave the true West out of it, and little else. Since there was no Palestinian nation before the creation of Israel again, who knew Jews would come along and set up camp?, and since Palestinians regarded themselves simply as Arabs and their land as part of Syria, it is not surprising that many of the chief creators of the Palestine Liberation Organization did not even live in the Palestine Mandate before the creation of Israel so?, let alone in the sliver "sliver" again! oy! of mostly desert that was allotted to the Jews. Edward Said, the leading intellectual mouthpiece for the Palestinian cause grew up in a family that chose to make its home in Egypt and the United States. Yasser Arafat was born in Egypt so? He is still an Arab.

While the same Arab states that claim to be outraged by the Jews' treatment of Palestinians treat their own Arab populations far worse than Arabs are treated in Israel no money from the West can get there, it all goes to Israel; and ongoing sieges do bring out the worst in people, they are also silent about the disenfranchised Palestinian majority that lives in Jordan. In 1970, Jordans King Hussein massacred thousands of PLO militants. But the PLO does not call for the overthrow of Hashemite rule in Jordan and does not hate the Hashemite monarchy. Only Jews are hated. There it is again - Jews as victims only. They swindle, suck blood until they're as blue as these words - no matter - we're only allowed to discuss them as "sufferers." When do we hear about the suffering Jews inflict? Not at FrontPage. What about the New York Times? Well, no, not there either. Washington Post? No. CBS? No. ABC? No....Nowhere and never. Just here.

It is a hatred which Jews started, moreover, that is increasingly lethal. Today, 70 percent of the Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza approve the suicide bombing of women and children if the targets are Jews. There is no Arab "Peace Now" movement, not even a small one, whereas in Israel the movement demanding concessions to Arabs in the name of peace is a formidable political force. There is no Arab spokesman who will speak for the rights and sufferings of Jews, but there are hundreds of thousands of Jews in Israel and all over the world who will speak for "justice" for the Palestinians. How can the Jews expect fair treatment from a people that collectively does not even recognize their humanity? "The best of the goyim should be killed" - Jewish doctrine straight from the Talmud. Any questions?

8. A Phony Peace

The Oslo peace process begun in 1993 was based on the pledge of both parties to renounce violence as a means of settling their dispute. But the Palestinians never renounced violence nor did the Jews who started it and in the year 2000, they officially launched a new Intifada against Israel, effectively terminating the peace process of course, this had nothing to do with Israel shooting unarmed Arabs, etc..

In fact, during the peace process -- between 1993 and 1999 -- there were over 4,000 terrorist incidents wonder why? committed by Palestinians against Israelis, and more than 1,000 Israelis killed as a result of Palestinian attacks more than had been killed in the previous 25 years. By contrast, during the same period 1993-1999 Israelis were so desperate for peace that they reciprocated these acts of murder by giving the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza a self-governing authority, a 40,000 man armed "police force," and 95 percent of the territory their negotiators demanded. This Israeli generosity was rewarded by a rejection of peace, suicide bombings of crowded discos and shopping malls, an outpouring of ethnic hatred and a renewed declaration of war.

In fact, the Palestinians broke the Oslo Accords precisely because of Israeli generosity Yes, the Jews are so very generous while they bulldoze Arab homes to expand their territory, because the government of Ehud Barak who apparently murdered a Palestinian writer and his family in Lebanon in 1973 offered to meet 95 percent of their demands, including turning over parts parts? What great guys! of Jerusalem to their control -- a possibility once considered unthinkable. These concessions confronted Arafat with the one outcome he did not want: Peace with Israel the invaders. Peace without the destruction of the "Jewish Entity."

Arafat rejected these Israeli concessions, accompanying his rejection with a new explosion of anti-Jewish anti-invader violence. He named this violence -- deviously -- "The Al-Aksa Intifada," after the mosque on the Temple Mount. His new jihad was given the name of a Muslim shrine to create the illusion that the Intifada was provoked not by his unilateral destruction of the Oslo peace process, but by Ariel Sharon's visit to the site the suspected war-criminal Sharon did indeed visit that site to provoke Arabs, and many mainstream writers admit it. Months after the Intifada rebelling against the invaders began, the Palestine Authority itself admitted this was just another Arafat lie.

In fact, the Intifada had been planned months before Sharon's visit sure it was as a follow-up to the rejection of the Oslo Accords. In the words of Imad Faluji, the Palestine Authority's communications minister, "[The uprising] had been planned since Chairman Arafat's return from Camp David, when he turned the tables on the former U.S. president Clinton and rejected the American conditions." The same conclusion was reached by the Mitchell Commission headed by former U.S. Senator George Mitchell a pal to all things Jewish, due to his findings to investigate the events: "The Sharon visit did not cause the Al-Aksa Intifada."

9. Moral Distinctions

In assessing the Middle East impasse it is important to pay attention to the moral distinction revealed in the actions of the two combatants. When a deranged Jew goes into an Arab mosque and kills the worshippers (which happened once) he is acting alone and is universally condemned by the Israeli government and the Jews in Israel and everywhere This is the most outrageous statement in the whole piece. Many Israelis view Goldstein as a hero, his grave as a shrine. Condemned? No that's Arab houses you're thinking of, Horowitz. They name streets after Goldstein in Israel. Here's what Horowitz won't tell you, what Jews actually think about Doctor -- apparently Jewish doctors take the hypocritic oath, not the Hippocratic -- Baruch Goldstein, mass murderer of 29: The government allocated a special site for the grave, in the Tourist Park in Kiryat Arba named in memory for Rabbi Meir Kahane may G-D avenge his blood. An Arab assassin murdered Rabbi Kahane, founder and leader of the Kach Movement, in the USA. It is of great significance that Dr. Baruch Goldstein was buried in the Tourist Park, as he was the main initiator in the founding of the park when he was a member of the local city council of Kiryat Arba. Over the years, the grave has become a site of pilgrimage. Numerous people from all over the world come to pray and honor his memory. Read more about Goldstein here, and he is punished to the full extent of Israeli law. But when a young Arab enters a disco filled with teenagers or a shopping mall or bus crowded with women and children and blows himself and innocent bystanders up (which happens frequently) wonder why?, he is someone who has been trained and sent by a component of the PLO or the Palestine Authority; he is officially praised as a hero by Yasser Arafat; his mother is given money by the Palestine Authority; and his Arab neighbors come to pay honor to the household for having produced a "martyr for Allah." The Palestinian liberation movement is the first such movement to elevate the killing of children both the enemy's and its own into a religious calling and a strategy of the cause.As opposed to the noble Israelis, who prefer to murder women and children from the air with attack helicopters paid for by White American tax slaves.

It is not only the methods of the Palestine liberation movement that are morally repellent "morally?" Again, who invaded whom? The Palestinian cause is itself corrupt. The "Palestinian problem" there is no Palestinian problem, only a Jewish problem is a problem created by the Arabs, and can only be solved by them. In Jordan, Palestinians already have a state in which they are a majority but which denies them self-determination. Why is Jordan not the object of the Palestinian "liberation" struggle? The only possible answer is because it is not ruled by Jews. Why was "Israel" the object of the Jewish liberation struggle in the '40s? The only possible answer is because its land was not ruled by Jews.

There is a famous "green line" marking the boundary between Israel and its Arab neighbors which would not exist if..... That green line is also the bottom line for what is the real problem in the Middle East. It is green because plants are growing in the desert on the Israeli side but not on the Arab side. The Jews got a sliver of land without oil, and created abundant wealth and life in all its rich and diverse forms. The Arabs got nine times the acreage but all they have done with it is to sit on its aridity and nurture the poverty, resentments and hatreds of its inhabitants. Out of these dark elements they have created and perfected the most vile anti-human terrorism the world has ever seen: Suicide bombing of civilians. In fact, the Palestinians are a community of suicide bombers: they want the destruction of Israel more than they want a better life.This is what all Jewish-racist arguments for Israel come down to: Sure, we stole it. But look what we've done with it - those stupid, ugly, terrorist A-rabs hardly have a pot to piss in, whereas we've made the desert bloom like a rose. Theft, segregation and racism? Fine if we do it. But if you want to protect your neighborhoods in the South, you're evil. We'll pass civil rights laws and hate crimes and cut your head off for even talking about it. Just shut up and work to pay our taxes... That's reality, White man. Are you going to continue to be taken, taxed and lied to by Jews? Or are you going to rally against them?

If a nation state is all the Palestinians desire they also want seized land back, and no more worries about U.S.-supplied attack helicopters rocketing Arab apartment buildings, Jordan would be the solution. (So would settling for 95 percent of one's demands.) The onus is not on the Arabs; they did not invade. But the Palestinians also want to destroy Israel guess why? This is morally hateful more morality claims from Israel-firsters. It is the Nazi virus oh!! The Nazis! I wondered when you were gonna mention Nazis, which has nothing to do with the issue! revived. Nonetheless, the Palestinian cause is generally supported by the international community, with the singular exception of the United States (and to a lesser degree Great Britain). It is precisely because the Palestinians want to destroy a state that Jews have created -- and because they are killing Jews -- that they enjoy international credibility and otherwise inexplicable support. Poor little Jews - font of all virtue, target of all hatred. Tragic, it's...

10. The Jewish Problem Again

It is this international resistance to the cause of Jewish survival most countries in the West support Israel, for some strange reason, the persistence of global Jew-hatred wonder why? that, in the end, refutes the Zionist hope of a solution to the "Jewish problem." You are right, there is a Jewish problem. The creation of Israel is an awe-inspiring human success story a story of murder and aggression, you mean. But the permanent war to destroy it undermines the original Zionist idea good, let's keep undermining that idea; pass the Cheetos, please. Soda, anyone?.

More than fifty years after the forcible creation of an ethnocentric state Israel, the Jews are still the most hated ethnic group in the world wonder why? Explain without recourse to Jewish behavior, which is forbidden by law most places. Islamic radicals want to destroy Israel send them money, but so do Islamic moderates. For the Jews in the Middle East, the present conflict is a life and death struggle that they started, yet every government in the UN with the exception of the United States and sometimes Britain regularly votes against Israel in the face of a terrorist enemy partly true, but mostly bullshit; who voted to get Zionism unlabelled as racist?, who has no respect for the rights or lives of the bigoted, invading Jews. After the Al-Qaeda attack still not completely proven as fact, and Jews apparently knew about it beforehand on the World Trade Center, the French ambassador to England complained that the whole world was endangered because of "that shitty little country," Israel yes, it is a shitty little country - he is right. This caused a scandal in England which shows how much gentile England is influenced by Jews, but nowhere else bullshit; the Jewish-owned media in America made quick commotion about it. All that stands between the Jews of the Middle East and another Holocaust is their own military prowess and their colony America and the generous, humanitarian support most of it forced by the very wealthy Zionist lobby and gutless, Jew-friendly Senators who have nightmares about Jews calling them "anti-Semites" of the United States.

Even in the United States, however, one can now turn the TV to channels like MSNBC and CNN to see Ariel Sharon who is the elected Prime Minister of a democracy Israel is not a democracy equated politically and morally with Yasser Arafat who is a dictator, a terrorist and an enemy of the United States yes, the Jews made him an enemy by demanding that American tax dollars fund the ethnocentric state of Israel. One can see the same equivalence drawn between Israel's democracy Israel is not a democracy and the Palestine Authority, which is a terrorist entity self-defense is not terrorism and an ally of America's enemies Al Qaeda and Iraq ahh...more Jewish-created enemies which we would likely not have if Israel did not exist.

During the Gulf War, Israel was America's staunch ally no, Jews largely caused our ongoing rift with Arab countries while Arafat and the Palestinians openly supported the aggressor, Saddam Hussein big surprise, is it? Yet the next two U.S. Governments Republican and Democrat alike strove for even-handed "neutrality" in the conflict in the Middle East "neutrality?" The horror!, and pressured Israel into a suicidal not blatantly self-serving "peace process" with a foe dedicated to its destruction again, wonder why? It is only since September 11 that the United States has been willing to recognize Arafat as an enemy thanks, Jews of peace and not a viable negotiating partner.

The Zionists' efforts created a thriving democracy not a democracy for the ethnocentric, supremacist Jews of Israel (and also for the million Arabs who live in Israel) oh.... now we want to help them, huh?, but failed to normalize the Jewish people or make them safe in a world that hates them more Jews-as-innocent-and-perpetual-victims. From the point of view of the "Jewish problem," which Herzl and the Zionist founders set out to solve, it is better today to be a Jew in America than a Jew in Israel don't say that - they might come here!.

This is one reason why I myself am not a Zionist Ha! That is truly funny!; he could have fooled many but an unambivalent, passionate American patriot. Which America does he champion, I wonder? The gentile one or the Jewish one? . America is good for the Jews Are Jews good for America? as it is good for every other minority who embraces its social contract what social contract is that? Our Constitution does not mention "minorities." But this history is also why I am a fierce supporter of Israel's survival make aliyah then and have no sympathy for the Palestinian side in the conflict of course not, being Jewish in the Middle East. Nor will I have such sympathy until the day comes when I can look into the Palestinians' eyes and see something other than death desired for Jews like me. Maybe that day will come right after you recognize that the Jews are the problem in the Middle East, not the Palestinians.

David Horowitz is editor-in-chief of FrontPageMagazine.com, and president of the Center for the Study of Popular Culture.

J.R. COLSON