Between the Lines...
[Read original here.]
Why Israel Is The Victim And The Arabs Are The Indefensible Aggressors In the Middle East
by David Horowitz J.R. Colson
1. The Jewish Problem and Its "Solution"
ZIONISM is a national race-based liberation movement Oy! - invading most of
Palestine is "liberation," he says, identical in most ways to other
liberation movements no, it isn't, it is unique that leftists and
progressives the world over -- and in virtually every case but this one --
fervently support. This exceptionalism is also visible at the reverse end of
the political spectrum: In every other instance, right-wingers like Patrick
Buchanan oppose national liberation movements that are under the spell of
Marxist delusions and committed to violent means. But they make an exception
for the one that Palestinians have aimed at the Jews again, who invaded
whom? Jews forced their way into most of Palestine. The unique opposition to
a Jewish homeland at both ends of the political spectrum identifies the
problem that Zionism was created to solve. This opposition at "both ends"
is very telling indeed; no other people experience such vigorous, ongoing
opposition; one must wonder why.
The "Jewish problem" is just another name for the fact that Jews are the
most universally hated and persecuted ethnic group in history. Why is that? Why can't Jewish behavior be discussed?
The Zionist founders believed that hatred of Jews
was a direct consequence of their stateless condition no, it was a direct
consequence of historic Jewish bigotry, as evident in the Talmud. As
long as Jews were aliens in every society they found themselves in largely by choice -- by purposely not assimilating and remaining a closed
society, they would always be seen as interlopers, their loyalties would be
suspect for good reason; e. g., most nuclear spies have been Jewish, both
then and now and persecution would follow of course; what do you expect?
This was what happened to Captain Alfred Dreyfus, whom French anti-Semites
falsely accused of spying and who was put on trial for treason by the French
government in the 19th Century. Theodore Herzl was an assimilated,
westernized Jew rabid Zionists never assimilate fully, they just appear
to, who witnessed the Dreyfus frame- up his exoneration is still suspect - and what of the dozens of Jewish spies unquestionably guilty? in Paris and went on to lead the Zionist race-based, bigoted movement.
Herzl and other Zionist founders believed that if Jews had a nation not
"nation," they already were so; "country" is the correct term of their own,
the very fact would "normalize" legitimize and make them appear less
"alien" their condition in the community of nations. Jews had been without
a state since the beginning of the diaspora, when the Romans expelled them
from Judea on the west bank of the Jordan River, some 2,000 years before.
Jews were kicked out of every country many times, Christian or
non-Christian. Wonder why? Once the Jews obtained a homeland -- Judea
itself seemed a logical site -- and were again like other peoples, the
Zionists believed anti-Semitism would wither on its poisonous stating
historical fact is not hardly "poison" vine and the Jewish problem would
disappear. sorry, this did not happen; Jews were and are a troublesome
race, and will remain so, genetically, for many more years until the Jewish
genotype ends completely by interbreeding with the host cultures.
Here is what happened instead.
2. The Beginnings
In the 1920s, among their final acts as victors in World War I, the British
and French created the states that now define the Middle East out of the
ashes of the empire of their defeated Turkish adversary. In a region that
the Ottoman Turks had controlled for hundreds of years, Britain and France
drew the boundaries of the new states, Syria Lebanon and Iraq. Previously,
the British had promised the Jewish Zionists that they could establish a
"national home" in a portion of what remained of the area, which was known
as the Palestine Mandate. But in 1921 the British separated 80 percent of
the Mandate, east of the Jordan, and created the Arab kingdom of
"Transjordan." It was created for the Arabian monarch King Abdullah, who had
been defeated in tribal warfare in the Arabian Peninsula and lacked a seat
of power. Abudllah's tribe was Hashemite, while the vast majority of
Abdullah's subjects were Palestinian Arabs. yaaawwwnnnnn.
What was left of the original Palestine Mandate between the west bank of
the Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea had been settled by Arabs and Jews
some Jews, but mostly Arabs. Jews, in fact, had lived in the area again,
some Jews continuously for 3,700 years, even after the Romans destroyed
their state in Judea in AD 70. Arabs became the dominant local population
by far for the first time in the 7th Century AD as a result of the Muslim
invasions. The Arabs were largely nomads who had no distinctive language or
culture to separate them from other Arabs. In all the time since, they had
made no attempt to create an independent Palestinian state west or east of
the Jordan and none was ever established. Who knew that ethnocentric Jews
would invade and displace nearly 1 million Arabs total? I hereby forgive the
Arabs for not thinking that far ahead.
In 1948, at the request of the Jews who were living in Palestine, the United
Nations voted under great pressure from America, and from Jewish groups, as
noted by Harry Truman to partition the remaining quarter of the original
Mandate to make a Jewish homeland possible. Under the partition plan, the
Arabs were given the Jews' ancient home in Judea and Samaria -- now known as
the West Bank. The Jews were allotted three slivers of disconnected land
along the Mediterranean and the Sinai desert. They were also given access to
their holy city of Jerusalem, but as an island cut off from the slivers,
surrounded by Arab land and under international control. Sixty percent of
the land allotted to the Jews was the Negev desert. Out of these unpromising
parts, the Jews created a new state, Israel, in 1948. Gee, that's nice, but
the land they got was better on the whole, e. g. citrus, and that precise
land was largely NOT their "original" Biblical-era land. At this time, the
idea of a Palestinian nation, or a movement to create one did not even
exist. See previous comments..
At the moment of Israel's birth, Palestinian Arabs lived on roughly 90
percent of the original Palestine Mandate in Transjordan and in the UN
partition area, but also in the new state of Israel itself. There were
800,000 Arabs living in Israel alongside 1.2 million Jews. At the same time,
Jews were legally barred from settling in the 35,000 square miles of
Palestinian Transjordan good, which eventually was renamed simply
The Arab population in the slivers called Israel had actually more than
tripled since the Zionists first began settling the region in significant
numbers in the 1880s.The reason for this increase was that the Jewish
settlers had brought industrial and agricultural development with them
ideas/methods that came largely from White Europeans, which Arabs were not
really exposed to; no one ever said that most Arabs were rocket scientists,
and I don't either; the normal Jewish IQ is higher than any other human
average, and Horowitz knows it, which attracted Arab immigrants to what had
previously been a sparsely settled and economically destitute area.
If the Palestinian Arabs had been willing to accept this arrangement in
which they received 90 percent of the land in the Palestine Mandate why
give in to ethnocentric invaders?, and under which they benefited from the
industry ditto, enterprise and political democracy Israel is not a
democracy the Jews brought stole; the idea of democracy came from Whites,
who have turned it into egalitarianism to the region, there would have been
no Middle East conflict. But this was not to be. oh, it the Arab's fault,
is it? They forced Jews to invade? How clever of those sand-urchins!
Instead, the Arab League representing five neighboring Arab states
declared war on Israel on the day of its creation wonder why?, and five
Arab armies invaded the slivers with the aim of destroying the infant Jewish
state ditto. During the fighting, according to the UN mediator on the
scene, an estimated 472,000 Arabs fled their homes to escape the dangers
you mean "were forced out of their homes?" Is that what you mean, Dave?.
They planned on returning after an Arab victory and the destruction of the
Jewish state. How does he know what the Arabs were thinking?? He was
But the Jews -- many of them recent Holocaust survivors Ohh!-play the
"Holocaust card"; how clever, when one topic has nothing to do with the
other -- refused to be defeated. Instead, the five Arab armies that
had invaded their slivers were repelled. Yet there was no peace. Even though
their armies were beaten, the Arab states were determined to carry on their
campaign of destruction resisting Jewish invaders is a "campaign of
destruction," he says, and to remain formally at war with the Israeli
state. After the defeat of the Arab armies, the Palestinians who lived in
the Arab area of the UN partition did not attempt to create a state of their
own. Instead, in 1950, Jordan annexed the entire West Bank.
3. Refugees: Jewish and Arab
As a result of the annexation and the continuing state of war a state of
war which Jews created in the first place, the Arab refugees who had fled
the Israeli slivers did not return. There was a refugee flow into Israel,
but it was a flow of Jews who had been expelled from the Arab countries
nope - Jews flooded into Israel from many countries, especially America,
especially New York. All over the Middle East, Jews were forced to leave
lands they had lived on for centuries gee, wonder why?. Although Israel
was a tiny geographical area which has expanded GREATLY since, by taking
Arab land and bulldozing Arab villages and a fledgling state, its
government welcomed and resettled 600,000 Jewish refugees from the Arab
countries. Gee, could this has been part of their visible plan to create an eventual Jewish majority inside Palestine? Could it?? Nahhhh.....how paranoid of me.....
At the same time, the Jews resumed their work of creating a new nation
country! A race is a "nation" in what was now a single sliver you keep
saying "sliver" - you really like that word, huh? of land. Israel, had
annexed "annexed"; you mean "stole?" a small amount of territory to make
their state defensible to keep the invaders safe, including a land bridge
that included Jerusalem.
In the years that followed, the Israelis made their desert bloom by using
millions of White*, Western tax dollars. They built the only industrialized
economy in the entire Middle East with White, Western tax dollars and
White, Western know-how. They built the only liberal democracy Israel is
not a democracy in the Middle East. They treated the Arabs who remained in
Israel well really? I have copies of hundreds of U.N. documents that tell a
different story. As Sobran says, nobody ever says he wants to be treated the way the Jews treat Palestinians. To this day the very large Arab minority, which lives
inside the state of Israel, has more rights and privileges than any other
Arab population in the entire Middle East. That may or may not be true, but
that does not justify invading Arab land and expelling nearly 1 million
Arabs and seizing their property. *Jews are technically not White as a race; they are technically "light-skinned Arabs".
This is especially true of the Arabs living under Yasser Arafat's corrupt
dictatorship not nearly as corrupt as Israel's government, which allows White slavery, the Palestine Authority, which today administers the West Bank and
the Gaza strip, and whose Arab subjects have no human rights giving them
too many Western rights would de-solidify them as a group. In 1997, in a
fit of pique against the Oslo Accords, Palestinian spokesman Edward Said I
did not know that the writer Said was an "official Palestinian
spokesperson" himself blurted this out, calling Arafat "our Papa Doc"
after the sadistic dictator of Haiti and complaining that there was "a
total absence of law or the rule of law in the Palestinian autonomy areas."
Not surprising - policing large bodies of people takes large amounts of money, which is all going to Israel instead.
The present Middle East conflict is said to be about the "occupied
territories" the West Bank of the Jordan and the Gaza strip and about
Israel's refusal to "give them up." But during the first twenty years of the
Arab-Israeli conflict, Israel did not control the West Bank so?. In 1950,
when Jordan annexed the West Bank, there was no Arab outrage maybe because
Jewish brazenness and bigotry has gotten much worse since, and both of their
populations have greatly increased? Nor did the Middle East conflict with
the Jews subside.
The reason there was no Arab outrage over the annexation of the West Bank
was because Jordan is a state whose ethnic majority is Palestinian Arabs. On
the other hand, the Palestinians of Jordan are disenfranchised by the ruling
Hashemite minority. Despite this fact, in the years following the annexation
the Palestinians displayed no interest in achieving "self-determination" in
Hashemite Jordan see my above comment. It is only the presence of Jews,
apparently, that incites this claim oh, only that, huh?. The idea that the
current conflict is about "occupied territories" is only one of the many
large Arab deceits -- now widely accepted -- that have distorted the history
of the Middle East wars. riiiggghhttt....guess the Arabs do not really care
about stolen land, huh? They simply hate Jews? Where have we all heard that
before, again and again and again?
4. The Arab Wars Against Israel
In 1967, Egypt, Syria and Jordan attacked Israel for a second time sorry,
the Jews attacked first, and mainstream Jewish authors such as Eric Margolis
admit this and were again defeated. It was in repelling these aggressors
again, Jews attacked first that Israel came to control stole by force
the West Bank and the Gaza strip, as well as the oil-rich Sinai desert.
Israel had every right to annex steal these territories captured from the
aggressors a time honored by who, since Israel was the aggressor? ritual
among nations countries!!!, and in fact the precise way that Syria,
Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan had come into existence themselves I did not know
that they were invaded by ethnocentric non-Arabs. But Israel did not do so.
On the other hand, neither did it withdraw its armies or relinquish its
control gee, wonder why?.
The reason was that the Arab non-aggressors once again refused to make
peace i.e., refused to give in to ethnocentric aggressors. Instead, they
declared themselves still at war with Israel, a threat no Israeli government
could afford to ignore. By this time, Israel was a country of 2 or 3 million
due to massive Jewish immigration -- immigration which they still deny to
Arabs surrounded by declared enemies who told Jews to invade in the first
place? whose combined populations numbered over 100 million. Geographically
Israel was so small that at one point it was less than ten miles across. No
responsible Israeli government could relinquish a territorial buffer while
its hostile neighbors were still formally at war. This is the reality that
frames the Middle East conflict.
In 1973, six years after the second Arab war against the Jews, the Arab
armies again attacked Israel. The attack was led by Syria and Egypt, abetted
by Iraq, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and five other countries who gave
military support to the aggressors, including an Iraqi division of 18,000
men. Israel again defeated the Arab forces using American military
equipment and American tax dollars. Afterwards, Egypt and Egypt alone --
agreed to make a formal peace.
The peace was signed by Egyptian president, Anwar Sadat, who was
subsequently assassinated by Islamic radicals, paying for his statesmanship
you mean his knuckling under to the Jewish invaders with his life. Sadat
is one of three Arab leaders assassinated by other Arabs for making peace
knuckling under with to the Jews.
Under the Camp David accords that Sadat signed, Israel returned the entire
Sinai with all its oil riches mighty White of them, since they stole it in
the first place! This act demonstrated once and for all that the solution
to the Middle East conflict was ready at hand yes, knuckling under to the
Jewish invaders is referred to by the Jews as "peace." It only required the
willingness of the Arabs to agree knuckle under.
The Middle East conflict is not about Israel's occupation of the territories
yes, it is; it is about the refusal of the Arabs to make peace give in
to with the Jewish invaders Israel, which is an inevitable by-product of
their desire to destroy it.
5. Self-Determination Is Not The Agenda
The Palestinians and their supporters also claim that the Middle East
conflict is about the Palestinians' yearning for a state and the refusal of
Israel to accept their aspiration. This claim is also false. The Palestine
Liberation Organization was created in 1964, sixteen years after the
establishment of Israel and the first anti-Israel war. The PLO was created
at a time the West Bank was not under Israeli control but was part of Jordan
so? The PLO, however, was not created so that the Palestinians could achieve self-determination in Jordan, which at the time comprised 90 percent of the original Palestine Mandate. The PLOs express purpose, in the words of its own leaders, was to "push the Jews into the sea." Good idea! Who
The official charter of the new Palestine Liberation Organization referred
to the "Zionist invasion," that's right declared that Israels Jews were
"not an independent nationality," described Zionism as "racist" so did the
U.N. and "fascist," Zionism is basically fascist called for "the
liquidation of the Zionist presence," and specified, "armed struggle is the
only way to liberate Palestine." Of course; will simply talking to God's Pets get them to leave? In short, "liberation" required the destruction of the Jewish state you mean "the removing of the invaders." Sounds great! The PLO was not even created by Palestinians but by the Arab League -- the corrupt dictators who ruled the Middle East and who had attempted to destroy Israel by military force in 1948, in 1967 and again in 1973. Gasp! They tried to destroy God's Shiny Pets, who forced their way into large parts of Palestine? No!
For thirty years, the PLO charter remained unchanged in its call for
Israel's destruction so? Then in the mid-1990s, under enormous international pressure you mean "pro-Israel pressure from Jew-friendly America" following the 1993 Oslo accords, PLO leader Yasser Arafat removed the clause while assuring his followers that its removal was a necessary compromise that did not alter the movement's goals. He did this explicitly and also by citing a historical precedent in which the Prophet Muhammad insincerely agreed to a peace with his enemies in order to gain time to mass the forces with which he intended to destroy them.
6. The Struggle to Destroy Israel
The Middle East struggle is not about right against right you're right - it
is about Jews invading Palestine. It is about a fifty-year effort by the
Arabs to destroy the Jewish state which had no legitimate claim in the first
place, and the refusal of the Arab states in general and the Palestinian
Arabs in particular to accept Israels existence why should they? If the
Arabs were willing to do this you mean "willing to knuckle under to the
Jews?", there would be no occupied territories and there would be a
Palestinian state. Yes, but much smaller than would otherwise exist, and surrounded by ethnocentric Jews with warplanes and attack helicopters paid for by White tax slaves.
Even during the "Oslo" peace process -- when the Palestine Liberation
Organization pretended to recognize the existence of Israel and the Jews
therefore allowed the creation of a "Palestine Authority" what else could
they do? Talking to the ethnocentric Jews is fruitless -- it was clear that
the PLO's goal was Israel's destruction, and not just because its leader
invoked the Prophet Muhammad's own deception. The Palestinians'
determination to destroy Israel is abundantly clear in their newly created
demand of a "right of return" to Israel for "5 million" Arabs if millions of Jews can "return" to Israel, so can millions of Arabs. The figure of 5 million refugees who must be returned to Israel is more than ten times the number of Arabs who actually left the Jewish slivers of the British Mandate in 1948. So? The number of Jews now in Israel is far beyond what was originally in old Canaan. What is your point?
In addition to its absurdity, this new demand has several aspects that
reveal the Palestinians' genocidal genocidal? Really? Shades of "The Holocaust!" agenda for the Jews. The first is that the "right of return" is itself a calculated mockery of the primary reason for Israel's existence -- the fact that no country would provide a refuge for bigoted, ethnocentric Jews many of whom were Communists fleeing Hitler's extermination program
during World War II. It is only because the world turned its back on the
Jews ahhh, more Jewish victimization, of course when their survival was at stake that the state of Israel grants a "right of return" to every Jew who asks for it. Who forced Jews to run most Communist organizations in Germany/Europe in the 1930s?? And who forced them to invent a religion that claimed that Jews were completely superior to all other humans??? They made their own beds, so to speak, and they deserve what they get..
But there is no genocidal threat to Arabs, no lack of international support
militarily and economically oh, really? Palestinians receive lots of attack
helicopters and fighter jets from the West, do they?, and no Palestinian
"diaspora" (although the Palestinians have cynically appropriated the very
term to describe their self-inflicted quandary). The fact that many Arabs,
including the Palestinian spiritual leader -- the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem
-- supported Hitler's "Final Solution" wonder why? only serves to compound the insult. It is even further compounded by the fact that more than 90 percent of the Palestinians now in the West Bank and Gaza have never lived a day of their lives in territorial Israel so? Many New York Jews were born in New York; so?. The claim of a "right of return" is thus little more than a brazen expression of contempt for the Jews no, the Arabs do not want to
become a smaller minority than they already are!, and for their historic
suffering more Jewish victimization; it is their identity as a people; they are not "Jews," they are "always-suffering Jews."
More importantly it is an expression of contempt for the very idea of a
Jewish state of course. The incorporation of five million Arabs into
Israel would render the Jews a permanent minority in their own country
good!, and would thus spell the end of Israel great! The Arabs fully
understand this, and that is why they have made it a fundamental demand. It
is just one more instance of the general bad faith the Arab side has
manifested through every chapter of these tragic events. How unsporting of them not to play along with the Jewish invaders.
Possibly the most glaring expression of the Arabs' bad faith is their
deplorable treatment of the Palestinian refugees who would not be in that
position if Jews had not invaded in the first place and refusal for half a
century to relocate them who is going to pay for that? Jews?, or to
alleviate their condition ditto, even during the years they were under
Jordanian rule. While Israel was making the desert bloom using American tax
dollars and relocating 600,000 Jewish refugees from Arab states also using
American tax dollars, and building a thriving industrial democracy not a
democracy; and also using American tax dollars in its allotted sliver
again the "sliver" word; oy, the Arabs were busy making sure that their
refugees remained in squalid refugee camps see above comment in the West
Bank and Gaza, where they were powerless, right-less, and economically
destitute oh, now you are concerned about Arabs, huh?.
Today, fifty years after the first Arab war against Israel you mean the Jewish invasion of Palestine, there are 59 such refugee camps and 3.7 million "refugees" registered with the UN yes, thanks to Jews. Despite economic aid from the UN and Israel itself mighty White of you, despite
the oil wealth of the Arab kingdoms, the Arab leaders have refused to
undertake the efforts that would liberate the refugees from their miserable
camps see above comment, or to make the economic investment that would alleviate their condition. There are now 22 Arab states providing homes for the same ethnic population, speaking a common Arabic language. But the only one that will allow Palestinian Arabs to become citizens is Jordan. And the only state the Palestinians covet is Israel Oh, those dirty Arabs! How dare they want good land and water taken back from the people who stole it.
7. The Policy of Resentment and Hate Hate? Opposing invaders is hate, he
The refusal to address the condition thanks to Jews getting most of the tax
money that America sends overseas of the Palestinian refugee population is
and has always been -- a calculated Arab policy always plotting, those
Arabs, intended to keep the Palestinians in a state of desperation in order
to incite their hatred of Israel for the wars to come. Not to leave anything
to chance, the mosques and schools of the Arabs generally -- and the
Palestinians in particular -- preach and teach Jew hatred every day this is
surprising? What do the Jewish schools teach?. Elementary school children in Palestinian Arab schools are
even taught to chant "Death to the heathen Jews" wonder why? Jewish "religion" teaches the 'best of the goyim should be killled,' so there's no room for criticism in their
classrooms as they are learning to read. It should not be overlooked, that
these twin policies of deprivation (of the Palestinian Arabs) and hatred (of
the Jews) are carried out without any protest from any sector of Palestinian
or Arab society. That in itself speaks volumes about the
nature of the Middle East conflict.
All wars -- especially wars that have gone on for fifty years produce
victims with just grievances on both sides "Just grievances?" oh? Now the
Arabs might have valid positions? Just a minute ago, they were rabid
hate-mongers. And that is true in this one. There are plenty of individual
Palestinian victims, as there are Jewish victims, familiar from the nightly
news. But the collective Palestinian grievance is without justice. It is a
self-inflicted wound Ohh...the Jews did not really invade! The Arabs
just imagined it!, the product of the Arabs' xenophobia, bigotry Jews
invented ethnic bigotry in about 930 BC - about when the Judah split from the
main body of Israelites, long before Arabs even existed in the world,
exploitation of their own people, and apparent inability to be generous
towards those who are not Arabs see previous comment. While Israel is an
open, democratic, multi-ethnic, multicultural society bull-fucking-shit!!!
The biggest lie in history that includes a large enfranchised Arab
minority, the Palestine Authority is an intolerant see above comments,
undemocratic, monolithic police state with one dictatorial leader, whose
ruinous career has run now for 37 years.
As the repellent attitudes, criminal methods and dishonest goals of the
Palestine liberation movement yeah, sure, Jews worldwide are known for
their honesty and integrity, ha! should make clear to any reasonable
observer, its present cause is based on usually-justified Jew hatred
dislike, and on resentment of the modern, democratic West leave the true
West out of it, and little else. Since there was no Palestinian nation
before the creation of Israel again, who knew Jews would come along and set
up camp?, and since Palestinians regarded themselves simply as Arabs and
their land as part of Syria, it is not surprising that many of the chief
creators of the Palestine Liberation Organization did not even live in the
Palestine Mandate before the creation of Israel so?, let alone in the
sliver "sliver" again! oy! of mostly desert that was allotted to the Jews.
Edward Said, the leading intellectual mouthpiece for the Palestinian cause
grew up in a family that chose to make its home in Egypt and the United
States. Yasser Arafat was born in Egypt so? He is still an Arab.
While the same Arab states that claim to be outraged by the Jews' treatment
of Palestinians treat their own Arab populations far worse than Arabs are
treated in Israel no money from the West can get there, it all goes to
Israel; and ongoing sieges do bring out the worst in people, they are also
silent about the disenfranchised Palestinian majority that lives in Jordan.
In 1970, Jordans King Hussein massacred thousands of PLO militants. But the
PLO does not call for the overthrow of Hashemite rule in Jordan and does not
hate the Hashemite monarchy. Only Jews are hated. There it is again - Jews as
victims only. They swindle, suck blood until they're as blue as these words - no matter - we're only allowed to discuss them as "sufferers." When do we hear about the suffering Jews inflict? Not at FrontPage. What about the New York Times? Well, no, not there either. Washington Post? No. CBS? No. ABC? No....Nowhere and never. Just here.
It is a hatred which Jews started, moreover, that is increasingly lethal.
Today, 70 percent of the Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza approve the suicide
bombing of women and children if the targets are Jews. There is no Arab
"Peace Now" movement, not even a small one, whereas in Israel the movement
demanding concessions to Arabs in the name of peace is a formidable
political force. There is no Arab spokesman who will speak for the rights
and sufferings of Jews, but there are hundreds of thousands of Jews in
Israel and all over the world who will speak for "justice" for the
Palestinians. How can the Jews expect fair treatment from a people that
collectively does not even recognize their humanity? "The best of the goyim should be killed" - Jewish doctrine straight from the Talmud. Any questions?
8. A Phony Peace
The Oslo peace process begun in 1993 was based on the pledge of both parties
to renounce violence as a means of settling their dispute. But the
Palestinians never renounced violence nor did the Jews who started it and
in the year 2000, they officially launched a new Intifada against Israel,
effectively terminating the peace process of course, this had nothing to do
with Israel shooting unarmed Arabs, etc..
In fact, during the peace process -- between 1993 and 1999 -- there were
over 4,000 terrorist incidents wonder why? committed by Palestinians
against Israelis, and more than 1,000 Israelis killed as a result of
Palestinian attacks more than had been killed in the previous 25 years. By
contrast, during the same period 1993-1999 Israelis were so desperate for
peace that they reciprocated these acts of murder by giving the Palestinians
in the West Bank and Gaza a self-governing authority, a 40,000 man armed
"police force," and 95 percent of the territory their negotiators demanded.
This Israeli generosity was rewarded by a rejection of peace, suicide
bombings of crowded discos and shopping malls, an outpouring of ethnic
hatred and a renewed declaration of war.
In fact, the Palestinians broke the Oslo Accords precisely because of
Israeli generosity Yes, the Jews are so very generous while they bulldoze
Arab homes to expand their territory, because the government of Ehud Barak
who apparently murdered a Palestinian writer and his family in Lebanon in
1973 offered to meet 95 percent of their demands, including turning over
parts parts? What great guys! of Jerusalem to their control -- a
possibility once considered unthinkable. These concessions confronted Arafat
with the one outcome he did not want: Peace with Israel the invaders.
Peace without the destruction of the "Jewish Entity."
Arafat rejected these Israeli concessions, accompanying his rejection with a
new explosion of anti-Jewish anti-invader violence. He named this violence
-- deviously -- "The Al-Aksa Intifada," after the mosque on the Temple
Mount. His new jihad was given the name of a Muslim shrine to create the
illusion that the Intifada was provoked not by his unilateral destruction of
the Oslo peace process, but by Ariel Sharon's visit to the site the
suspected war-criminal Sharon did indeed visit that site to provoke Arabs,
and many mainstream writers admit it. Months after the Intifada rebelling
against the invaders began, the Palestine Authority itself admitted this
was just another Arafat lie.
In fact, the Intifada had been planned months before Sharon's visit sure it
was as a follow-up to the rejection of the Oslo Accords. In the words of
Imad Faluji, the Palestine Authority's communications minister, "[The uprising] had been planned since Chairman Arafat's return from Camp David, when he turned the tables on the former U.S. president Clinton and
rejected the American conditions." The same conclusion was reached by the
Mitchell Commission headed by former U.S. Senator George Mitchell a pal to
all things Jewish, due to his findings to investigate the events: "The
Sharon visit did not cause the Al-Aksa Intifada."
9. Moral Distinctions
In assessing the Middle East impasse it is important to pay attention to the
moral distinction revealed in the actions of the two combatants. When a
deranged Jew goes into an Arab mosque and kills the worshippers (which
happened once) he is acting alone and is universally condemned by the
Israeli government and the Jews in Israel and everywhere This is the most outrageous statement in the whole piece. Many Israelis view Goldstein as a hero, his grave as a shrine. Condemned? No that's Arab houses you're thinking of, Horowitz. They name streets after Goldstein in Israel. Here's what Horowitz won't tell you, what Jews actually think about Doctor -- apparently Jewish doctors take the hypocritic oath, not the Hippocratic -- Baruch Goldstein, mass murderer of 29: The government allocated a special site for the grave, in the Tourist Park in Kiryat Arba named in memory for Rabbi Meir Kahane may G-D avenge his blood. An Arab assassin murdered Rabbi Kahane, founder and leader of the Kach Movement, in the USA. It is of great significance that Dr. Baruch Goldstein was buried in the Tourist Park, as he was the main initiator in the founding of the park when he was a member of the local city council of Kiryat Arba. Over the years, the grave has become a site of pilgrimage. Numerous people from all over the world come to pray and honor his memory. Read more about Goldstein here, and he is punished to the full extent of Israeli law. But when a young Arab enters a disco filled with teenagers or a shopping mall or bus crowded with women and children and blows himself and innocent bystanders up (which happens frequently) wonder why?, he is someone who has been trained and sent by a component of the PLO
or the Palestine Authority; he is officially praised as a hero by Yasser
Arafat; his mother is given money by the Palestine Authority; and his Arab
neighbors come to pay honor to the household for having produced a "martyr
for Allah." The Palestinian liberation movement is the first such movement
to elevate the killing of children both the enemy's and its own into a
religious calling and a strategy of the cause.As opposed to the noble Israelis, who prefer to murder women and children from the air with attack helicopters paid for by White American tax slaves.
It is not only the methods of the Palestine liberation movement that are
morally repellent "morally?" Again, who invaded whom? The Palestinian cause is itself corrupt. The "Palestinian problem" there is no Palestinian problem, only a Jewish problem is a problem created by the Arabs, and can
only be solved by them. In Jordan, Palestinians already have a state in
which they are a majority but which denies them self-determination. Why is
Jordan not the object of the Palestinian "liberation" struggle? The only
possible answer is because it is not ruled by Jews. Why was "Israel" the object of the Jewish liberation struggle in the '40s? The only possible answer is because its land was not ruled by Jews.
There is a famous "green line" marking the boundary between Israel and its
Arab neighbors which would not exist if..... That green line is also the
bottom line for what is the real problem in the Middle East. It is green
because plants are growing in the desert on the Israeli side but not on the
Arab side. The Jews got a sliver of land without oil, and created abundant
wealth and life in all its rich and diverse forms. The Arabs got nine times
the acreage but all they have done with it is to sit on its aridity and
nurture the poverty, resentments and hatreds of its inhabitants. Out of
these dark elements they have created and perfected the most vile anti-human
terrorism the world has ever seen: Suicide bombing of civilians. In fact,
the Palestinians are a community of suicide bombers: they want the
destruction of Israel more than they want a better life.This is what all Jewish-racist arguments for Israel come down to: Sure, we stole it. But look what we've done with it - those stupid, ugly, terrorist A-rabs hardly have a pot to piss in, whereas we've made the desert bloom like a rose. Theft, segregation and racism? Fine if we do it. But if you want to protect your neighborhoods in the South, you're evil. We'll pass civil rights laws and hate crimes and cut your head off for even talking about it. Just shut up and work to pay our taxes... That's reality, White man. Are you going to continue to be taken, taxed and lied to by Jews? Or are you going to rally against them?
If a nation state is all the Palestinians desire they also want seized land
back, and no more worries about U.S.-supplied attack helicopters rocketing
Arab apartment buildings, Jordan would be the solution. (So would settling for 95 percent of one's demands.) The onus is not on the Arabs; they did
not invade. But the Palestinians also want to destroy Israel guess why?
This is morally hateful more morality claims from Israel-firsters. It is
the Nazi virus oh!! The Nazis! I wondered when you were gonna mention
Nazis, which has nothing to do with the issue! revived. Nonetheless, the
Palestinian cause is generally supported by the international community,
with the singular exception of the United States (and to a lesser degree
Great Britain). It is precisely because the Palestinians want to destroy a
state that Jews have created -- and because they are killing Jews -- that
they enjoy international credibility and otherwise inexplicable support. Poor little Jews - font of all virtue, target of all hatred. Tragic, it's...
10. The Jewish Problem Again
It is this international resistance to the cause of Jewish survival most
countries in the West support Israel, for some strange reason, the
persistence of global Jew-hatred wonder why? that, in the end, refutes the
Zionist hope of a solution to the "Jewish problem." You are right, there is a Jewish problem. The creation of Israel is an awe-inspiring human success story a story of murder and aggression, you mean. But the permanent war to destroy it undermines the original Zionist idea good, let's keep undermining that idea; pass the Cheetos, please. Soda, anyone?.
More than fifty years after the forcible creation of an ethnocentric state Israel, the Jews are still the most hated ethnic group in the world wonder why? Explain without recourse to Jewish behavior, which is forbidden by law most places. Islamic radicals want to destroy Israel send them money, but so do Islamic moderates. For the Jews in the Middle East, the present conflict is a life and death struggle that they started, yet every
government in the UN with the exception of the United States and sometimes
Britain regularly votes against Israel in the face of a terrorist enemy
partly true, but mostly bullshit; who voted to get Zionism unlabelled as
racist?, who has no respect for the rights or lives of the bigoted,
invading Jews. After the Al-Qaeda attack still not completely proven as
fact, and Jews apparently knew about it beforehand on the World Trade
Center, the French ambassador to England complained that the whole world was
endangered because of "that shitty little country," Israel yes, it is a
shitty little country - he is right. This caused a scandal in England which shows how much gentile England is influenced by Jews, but nowhere else bullshit; the Jewish-owned media in America made quick commotion about it.
All that stands between the Jews of the Middle East and another Holocaust is
their own military prowess and their colony America and the generous, humanitarian support most of it forced by the very wealthy Zionist lobby
and gutless, Jew-friendly Senators who have nightmares about Jews calling
them "anti-Semites" of the United States.
Even in the United States, however, one can now turn the TV to channels like
MSNBC and CNN to see Ariel Sharon who is the elected Prime Minister of a
democracy Israel is not a democracy equated politically and morally
with Yasser Arafat who is a dictator, a terrorist and an enemy of the United
States yes, the Jews made him an enemy by demanding that American tax
dollars fund the ethnocentric state of Israel. One can see the same
equivalence drawn between Israel's democracy Israel is not a democracy and the
Palestine Authority, which is a terrorist entity self-defense is not
terrorism and an ally of America's enemies Al Qaeda and Iraq ahh...more
Jewish-created enemies which we would likely not have if Israel did not
During the Gulf War, Israel was America's staunch ally no, Jews largely
caused our ongoing rift with Arab countries while Arafat and the
Palestinians openly supported the aggressor, Saddam Hussein big surprise,
is it? Yet the next two U.S. Governments Republican and Democrat alike
strove for even-handed "neutrality" in the conflict in the Middle East
"neutrality?" The horror!, and pressured Israel into a suicidal not
blatantly self-serving "peace process" with a foe dedicated to its
destruction again, wonder why? It is only since September 11 that the
United States has been willing to recognize Arafat as an enemy thanks,
Jews of peace and not a viable negotiating partner.
The Zionists' efforts created a thriving democracy not a democracy for the
ethnocentric, supremacist Jews of Israel (and also for the million Arabs
who live in Israel) oh.... now we want to help them, huh?, but failed to
normalize the Jewish people or make them safe in a world that hates them
more Jews-as-innocent-and-perpetual-victims. From the point of view of the
"Jewish problem," which Herzl and the Zionist founders set out to solve, it
is better today to be a Jew in America than a Jew in Israel don't say
that - they might come here!.
This is one reason why I myself am not a Zionist Ha! That is truly funny!;
he could have fooled many but an unambivalent, passionate American patriot. Which America does he champion, I wonder? The gentile one or the Jewish one? . America is good for the Jews Are Jews good for America? as it is good
for every other minority who embraces its social
contract what social contract is that? Our Constitution does not mention "minorities." But this history is also why I am a fierce supporter of Israel's survival make aliyah then and have no sympathy for the
Palestinian side in the conflict of course not, being Jewish in the Middle East. Nor will
I have such sympathy until the day comes when I can look into the
Palestinians' eyes and see something other than death desired for Jews like
me. Maybe that day will come right after you recognize that the Jews are the problem in the Middle East, not the Palestinians.
David Horowitz is editor-in-chief of FrontPageMagazine.com, and president of
the Center for the Study of Popular Culture.