|
This is a letter to a columnist.
Sir -- as interesting as your feelings are to you -- and you sure seem to do
a lot of sighing -- it might be better, and certainly more instructive for
your readers, for you to investigate the statistics on interracial crime.
Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance (amren.com) recently gave a
press conference carried on C-span covering just that subject. Turns out
blacks commit 90% of what are called "hate crimes" when whites do them. The
fact that you in the media never report the truth about interracial crime is
what has people like the old man you mention so upset. The fact that
honest, intelligent white people who want to write accurately about blacks
can't get jobs with the major media (partly because positions are filled
with mediocre affirmative action hires such as yourself) is what gets me
upset. Enjoy your world, it probably can't last too long.
Jack Halliday
A letter to Charlie Reese's home paper.
Editor --
I'm an online reader, writing to congratulate you for having the courage
to publish Charlie Reese. His opinions, such as his recent column on the
ethnic cleansing carried out by the Jewish terrorists who founded Israel,
address topics that are seldom seen in the mainstream press, and his
thinking is a welcome change from the lockstep liberalism we get in the
big-city dailies. I'm sure your Jewish readers are quite expressively
aghast that you would publish certifiable facts that they and their beloved
country would rather deny or conceal, but normal white Americans like me
represent the majority, and we are glad to see a bit of truth slip through
the cracks of their media armor. Again, sir, let me simply thank you for
using the First Amendment the way it was intended.
Jack Halliday
A letter to a Chrisitian coward columnist at World Net Daily (WND).
A large part of the reason that the "extremists," "anti-biblical
zealots," and "secular elite" have triumphed is that their opponents are
afraid to name them for what they mostly are -- Jews. None of the changes
you denigrate would have occurred save for the actions of Jew-led liberals.
They succeeded by demonizing "right-wing Christian extremists seeking to
impose their morality on others," but you never return the favor by
describing them as 'left-wing Jewish extremists seeking to impose their
morality on normal white Americans.' As long as you and Farah and your ilk
are afraid to name the real enemy, you are fighting with one hand tied
behind your back, and you will keep losing. Your fear is quite apparent to
friend and enemy alike, and the fact that you won't look directly at him
merely encourages the Jewish enemy to further aggressions.
Jack Halliday
A letter to one of the writers at one of the new online conservative mags that have
sprung up.
good article on buchanan. you give a good summary of what he believes and
you rightly note that unlike the other candidates he has thought deeply and
written/spoken well. he is the only major candidate who could converse
intelligently with the founders, in my view.
i think one of the most telling political events of the nineties was the
"culture war" speech buchanan gave at the republican convention. this
speech is so routinely lied about that its content is forgotten by most, who
have simply accepted the reality-reversal (about its content and effects)
the media pulled. i am referring to the fact that bush's numbers actually
went up immediately after the speech -- and, noting this, quayle and i
believe bush himself praised buchanan. then the media howl over the
ugliness and divisiveness and extremism of his words set in, and pretty soon
the polls -- and bush and quayle in turn -- reversed themselves. today, in
the unlikely event the average american remembers the incident, he recalls
that buchanan said something bad that hurt the republicans.
which goes to make my point: the media is the real political power in this
country. ask newt gingrich, for one, if he is more powerful than the people
behind dan rather. i think you need to delve a little deeper in your
analysis of the reasons it is so difficult for buchanan to succeed. your
article reminds me of the commentators at an nba game, talking about how a
certain player needs to quit making stupid fouls when, under certain
circumstances, it's much less about what the player is objectively doing
(ie, fouling on a breakaway layup) than ref-whim calls to further a league
objective (extending a playoff series, or giving the home team a chance to
get back in the game). it is simply not accurate to say that buchanan's
results are determined by his actions rather than by the media's treatment
of him. media portrayal is the dominant factor; buchanan's actions are but
a significant, secondary factor.
the funny thing is, the media-watchers on the establishment right know this,
but bull-like, they always go after the cape (dan rather) instead of the
matador (the producers and network honchos).
because they eschew as anti-Semitic direct criticism of the jews who own and
dominate the media and set its message, the media-watchers render themselves
ludicrous, as reflected in the bumper stickers they send out: I Don't
Believe the Liberal Media! That phrase neatly conveys their impotence. The
effective words are: Mass Media = Jewish Hate Group. That gets to the
point, and it cuts when it gets there. The jews never limit themselves to
indirect attacks in opposing the "right-wing Christian extremists" who want
to "take over" rural school boards by voting, but the Jewish-intimidated
"responsible" conservatives never point a finger at the jewish cabal
surrounding clinton that imposes its wishes by fiat. masculine direct
aggression beats feminine indirect remonstrating every time. in a sense,
all "respectable" right-wingers are just redundant mary matalins opening
their legs to the carvilles. and the america these joined forces are
producing is an increasingly ugly baby... dont bother responding to this, i
know what youre going to say. just think about it.
jack halliday
To another writer at the same site...
sr rollins:
your column implies you're delving "beneath the surface," yet you blame
-- trial lawyers? can you say "beside the point"? maybe you need to
surface and check out the Jewish greed floating on top. yeah, really, look
up -- i swear it's there. did you see the latest?: some jewish
kids-of-kampers are suing germany for forcing them to grow up with
psychologically impaired parents, or some such. i forget exactly what it
was, but then it doesn't really matter does it? well, with five kids to
feed you need to make sure you don't rock the boat, so it was nice you threw
in that bit about the most "horrid" event of the century, just so nobody
mistook your direction. it's always comfortable to be right and correct,
isn't it? the murders carried out in the ukraine (check 'em out sometime)
by stalin's jewish butchers rank a little higher on my list, but hey, de
gustibus non disputandum est, right?
jack halliday
On the real meaning of Rush Limbaugh...
> No folks don't set too much store in Rush Limberger because he is a race
traitor; and not only that but he is a traitor to Almighty God and the Lord
Jesus Christ as well.
Not being god, I can't directly address these serious charges, but
here's where the rubber meets the road with Rush: Several years ago, a
woman called his show and said (I paraphrase), I run my own business and I
don't see why I should be forced by the federal government to hire blacks if
I don't want to. What's your answer to that? Rush hemmed and he hawed so
much I thought he was applying for reserve horse on the Mr. Ed show.
Finally, he emitted...well...i just dont think we can tell black people, i
mean, we cant tell them to go out there and get educated and study and then
say, well, i mean, we just cant -- it just isnt fair to black people.
The sad thing was, you could tell from the h&h that he agreed with her.
So here's the upshot: You can be the biggest radio host in the history of
the world (20 million listeners), worth (i guess) more than ten million
dollars -- and you still have to bury the truth lest you be exposed as a
"racist" and have it all come crushing down. This is what freedom of speech
means in our American democracy at the turn of the millenium.
jh
A comment on the Kennedys to a forgotten editor.
This comment can stand as is. You have no way of verifying name/city/state anyway, so
what's the point, other than to satisfy your journalistic scruples about anonymous sources?
In fact, why don't you add the following:
How many real Americans have been murdered, raped or assaulted by the third-worlders
Nine-Hours Ted and the rest of the Kennedys worked so hard to pack into the country with
the 1965 immigration act (to consider just one of the bad laws they've pushed on us)?
The Kennedys are a dishonorable family. Their supporters, to the extent they aren't Irish
Catholic bigots or paid media/academic sycophants, are the type of people who admired Lady
Di: rich, liberal twit wannabes; purple T-shirt wearing land-manatee sized,
tabloid-devouring women.
What Dan Quayle should have said: You're right. I'm not Jack Kennedy. I'm a decent man
from an honorable family.
That JFKJ is dead is certainly a good thing, because one of these years, he'd have been
pushed into presidential politics whether he wanted it or not. America has suffered
enough from his northeastern mafia, and what's bad for the Kennedys is good for normal
white Americans -- the people whose interests I care about.
-- A normal white American
p.s. it's odd with your Huge Concern for Documented Sources that you dont publish email
addresses of your readers -- the one thing you do know for a fact -- but you ask them to
provide you with unverifiable names, cities and states. think about that for a moment.
Another letter to The Federalist.
jesus -- really delusional stuff, man. and you living in california
nonetheless. how many niggers* do you think want a colorblind society? and
how many want jesse j and the other nigger extortionists to keep shakin down
whitey for the $176.1m settlements? under which california law are whites
treated as equals to the blacks and mestizos? which race other than whites
is fighting for colorblind policies rather than for its own specific
interests? the sad part is, if conservatives like you fought for white
rights you get colorblind policies at a minimum -- whites STILL constituting
over 70% of americans. but you are afraid to, aren't you? the media jews
have really put the fear into you, havent they? (i dont know you, you may
well be jewish yourself, in which case, my sympathy.)
how do you figure the constitution is class- and colorblind? what was
that part about blacks counted as 3/5th? women not allowed to vote?
senators not directly elected? you conservatives have become dumb f*****g
idiots, waving sayonara to facts and limits and embracing with disgusting
fervor jewish neocon engendered fantasies about individual rights. get it
straight: jews hate whites. the minute they were able, they reversed our
immigration law, and by the 1965 immigration act they've nearly killed the
country. you stupid cons let them into your movement and they take over,
and now you all have to bow down to All Immigrants are Good and pretend that
niggers and mexicans can be civilized. the "conservative" jews are laughing
at you up their sleeves, while the liberal jew in every house (the
Talmudvision) mocks you openly.
whoever wrote this dumb email: you are effectively living in Aztlan
yet you whine on about colorblind policies. how is your conservative,
colorblind individualism serving the new south africa? now that the
witch-burners and penis-shrinkers, the cannibals and the communists, the
pogo-dancing 75-IQ niggers are in power? can you see that scene coming to
La? do you ever look out your window? do you ever head to the other side
of the 10 freeway? did Thomas Jefferson believe in a colorblind society?
how about abe lincoln? Or did they believe in shipping blacks back to
Africa? What was George Washington's position on immigration? you aint
conservative son, you're either a jew or a jew-tool.
i know nothing of you as a man other than what you write. and that
tells me you are a miserable, woebegone sap, probably one of those
grant-sniffing softbellies and seminar stander-upper for the Original
Constitutional ideals, even as you shade the founders views to suit your
foundation. not one of those mestizos flocking over the border thinks you
and your limp white ilk are other than total FOOLS. how the fuck do
"conservatives" ever win an election courting 85 IQ blacks and 90 IQ
mexicans with abstractions like colorblind individualism when theres a lying
cunt like bill clinton (portland state) actively eagerly anticipating the
day when whites will be but a plurality, even as he hastens that day by
calling for more white, earned money to be shifted to the shiftless spics
and niggers? but you guys go on and on about imminent success because in a
race in nome 34 years ago a white republican garnered forty percent of the
black vote. if gwb gets 39% of the brown vote in texas, its a harbinger of
the new dawn. of course, in any other contest 61% would be considered a
landslide. what are these, the new soviet elections?
but you guys are jew tools, and you're too smart not to see what im
saying, and i suspect you know that normal white americans no more want to
live around niggers than you do, and there's nothing "dark" about it.
right? but you just cant say that and keep your job. so whats an honorable
man to do...? but, of course, im directing that question to the wrong set
of folks.
when you get tired of the fakery or you grow some balls, the white
rights movement -- the real opposition -- will be here waiting for you.
* FYI: "niggers" is a slur used for blacks in places equivalent to where
jewish editors and "fearless" caucasian conservatives use "white trash" to
describe members of the European race.
A letter to the (ex)President of the Institute that puts out The Federalist.
so, arrny, how are the jews doing? are they demeaning themselves as good
citizens? is schumer upholding the bill of rights? is feinstein? is
specter? is sperm-burbling barnie?
jews are destructive parasites. conservatives are feckless because they
see the light and turn from it.
how do you suppose george washington would look at Jews today? would he
see jewish control of mass media -- hence public opinion -- as desirable?
or as a new form of white slavery? would he be afraid, as you are, to name
the real enemy of american freedom and civilization as -- the jew? why are
you?
A letter to Linda Bowles, a prototypical Christian coward columnist
(for WND).
you're a smart woman and a good writer and you make excellent points.
but.
until you go after the jews as jews -- the adl, the jdl, the rest of 'em
-- you're not serious. have you ever asked yourself:
1) Is a Jew ever described as a hater by the controlled media?
Of course not.
2) Is there such a thing as a Jewish hate group?
Not if you listen to the controlled media.
the jews are pushing the hate crimes legislation in the US just as they
push speech codes in every majority white country around the globe (except
israel); and just as they pushed (and push in every country around the
globe) the destructive colored immigration that leads to the tensions that
spur the anti-body-type reactions of white natives they invariably describe
as hate.
who are the real haters? The answer must be obvious: the Jews. their
actions, their history, their sacred texts all attest to their ethnocentric,
racist hatred of whites and christians and their rabid desire to denature
and subdue normal white majorities.
surely you see that Jews are the primary force behind the drive to do
away with the first and second amendments. many intelligent conservatives
see that already, and more are coming around to that position every day.
it's your choice to remain a kosher con, but i think you can do better.
you must see that you are writing as though you are in a dream world
where if enough people can get the facts about the palpable absurdity that
is hate crimes legislation it will somehow make a difference. it wont. the
jews pushing this stuff are simply laughing at you for the type of stuff you
write in your most recent column. they know good and well what they are
doing -- trying to make get rid of the little remaining free speech and make
crimes by whites triple word scores in prison scrabble. unless you are
jewish yourself, why not use your public column to expose them and their
motives? that is serious, not spurious opposition.
i apologize for wasting your time, but you show a glimmer of guts.
jack halliday
A letter to David Horowitz on reading his whine about being called a racist
by a Time black hack.
dr horowitz --
idiot niggers like white wouldnt be working in jobs they cant hack save
for the "civil rights" work of you and your leftist peers. the fried
chickens are really coming home to roost, arent they, senor horowitz!
the niggers learned well from the jew-led liberals how to smear and
label and neutralize, didnt they.
you "wash your hands" of jared taylor and his ilk, with their scrupulous
regard for facts, their (self-defeating) care not to point fingers at jews,
their refraining from emotion-laden terms like 'nigger' (no problem with
'white trash') -- and yet still the "whites" are coming after you! how sad,
how sad. good thing you've got friends to inform time how "astute" and
"rigorous" and "unsentimental" you are. (except when youre being gutless
going after taylorites for not genuflecting before your cultural determinist
religious dogma).
of course, white and pearlstine are individuals, im sure yr keeping in
the mental forefront. nothing generalizable here about black intelligence
and character and jewish editorial policies. nothing at all. no doubt time
is really concerned about the accuracy of its stories; employing only
qualified black writers interested in cogent, documented articles; amenable
to reason in responding to complaints of bias or mistakes. not a yid-run
"hate"-mag aimed at kicking the normal white american in the teeth.
let's review: you slyly smear taylor as a dirty nazi for having more
courage than you in pointing out our racial (crime) problems. then you
complain when you fall on the ground trying to crawl about a tenth as far
out on the branch you cut out from under him. and now were all supposed to
email some nigger half-wit in your defense. well, i suppose youll get a
percentage of your cautious-con readers -- the kind like you who can think
and brave...up to a point. remonstrators.
why are you so sly and dishonest. youre just another yid looking for an
angle, always thinking youre smarter than everyone else. walking that
careful line, just like taylor thought he could -- neither pc nor racist,
getting the facts out there and influencing the debate. fools! just like
you cheated on all or most of your wives, we and they see through you.
youre smart, but not trustworthy. youre an operator whos now trapped by
some of the machinery you -- in one of your guises -- set in motion. 99/100
black writers are trading on their negritude. what else do you expect them
to do when they havent got the brains. of course theyre going to cleave to
the jew-set line to keep the paychecks coming. if white turned white
overnight, hed be out of a paycheck and a subject. white's being paid for
being black. that's what affirmative action means, no matter how its
described.
the whole thing's funny. taylor hasnt got the guts to go after the
jews, and carefully distances himself from those who do; you havent even got
the nuts to go as far as taylor, carefully distancing yourself and your
customers from his careful reasonings. what a marvelous, if destructive,
charade. you now claim youre a conservative -- a conservative and a
cultural determinist at once! that may make the scene with gelded
republicans, but intellectually its a flop.
go back and read cuddihy. you yids are ugly, and your two-faced
policies, well as they have served you, have destroyed america. but some of
us smell you, mr horowitz. the yid-run press aint gonna let the truth about
race/crime seep out. you see that. they will destroy anyone who gets in
their way. the yids who run the media are the real political power in this
country, and save you identify and expose them, you fight sham.
i went back and reread yr radical son. fulsome encomia aside, its
boring. page after page i ask myself, cant this dumb yid step outside
himself and see the picture: the yids are physically ugly people who
bone-out push politically ugly ideas -- socialists bent on destroying the
country. your yid parents are like those nasty wasps that lay eggs to eat
their way out of the beautiful caterpillar of america. the lesson of your
life -- which you pretend, in your new guise as a (fake) conservative, not
to see -- is that jews -- you, your parents, the class they and you spring
from, your the whole yiddish mindset and way of being -- are a curse in
america. the old left and the new left -- jew-dominated. the communist
traitors -- jews. the sixties radicals -- mostly jews. the leadership of
the new left -- almost all jews. would tom hayden, the one non-jew of note
, have become a leftist without the yid milieu? within probably five years,
this very paragraph will be grounds for imprisonment as a hate criminal --
thanks to the efforts of you and the rest of the yids. what i have written
here would today get me imprisoned in europe, australia and canada were i to
publish it. yids cant be good americans. its not in their makeup, their
mindset, their background, their history. they are ugly people who destroy.
read cuddihy and look in the mirror. we dont need you. we dont want you.
go away. go back to sheinbaum and pollard-land, and good riddance. what a
curse you are. how much america suffers from you. how much hatred you spew
on normal whites, and how little criticism you receive. how dangerous it
will be for you when white americans open their eyes.
your cultural determinism defines you as a leftist, no matter how much
you pretend to the fools to be a conservative. just like you leftists kept
believing that although this socialist revolution failed, the next one would
work out -- you believe the same thing about niggers. the funny thing is,
there have only been -- what -- fifteen or twenty socialist revolutions,
whereas there have been hundreds and thousands of black/mestizo
neighborhoods and cities and regions and countries -- none of which ever
works out (as you can tell by the civilized whites' removal). you see
what's happening in south africa, mr "conservative" -- and by your
individualist logic you are bound to approve it. niggers, jumping niggers,
pogo-dancing jigs, voting jigs, penis-shrinking niggers -- give em the vote.
niggers, their men, just like you and me -- or you, anyway. if they slice
animals throats in their driveway -- give em the vote. if they necklace
with tires their enemies, let em pull the lever once -- no! twice ! they've
been denied so long. you neocons know that packing the coloreds and pushing
the individualism is killing us, yet you will have no other. youd better
hope you keep control of the reigns, my friend. if you ever lose it, you
wont like what happens next. seriously, dave, where's the evidence that
blacks can be civilized? not one or two people, but as a race. where's the
evidence. see, i think you know it aint there; its just another bullshit
mental construct like the glorious revolution you have to pretend to believe
in to be "taken seriously" by the yid-controlled media. just like newt and
all the other hypocrites who say pack our great land with niggers and
mestizos -- because theyll all be voting conservative come the new dawn!
who do you think youre fooling, mr steam valve? say dave: how do we grow a
civilized culture in south africa when the nigger has the vote? how do we
keep america from sliding down south africa way as the country discolors?
where have blacks shown the ability to produce that genius political culture
you claim to admire? how the fuck can 85-average IQ people -- borderline
retarded -- produce civilization? who do you think you're kidding? you
neocon yids must be laughing your heads off at how dumb we whites are, and
i dont blame you. but more of us are catching on than you think. thats
why yall are so worried to get the first and second amendments cancelled.
an idea for you: a smart guy like you ought to be able to whip off a
book in six months. why dont you write a book about the Jews in America.
your premise is that Jews are an American curse, how they led it to
intellectual, cultural and physical destruction through their 20th
century-pushed policies. try to disprove it. go over jewish entertainment
and media control/influence, jewish influence on immigration policy (read
kevin macdonald), and jewish academic influence in putting across the
race-doesnt-exist lie in anthropology and throughout academia. why does
everything yids touch turn to shit for everyone but them?
you cant be as naive as you pretend to be. white's just a jew-tool.
communist yids like pearlstine have written the rules we now play and suffer
under. no surprise the rules are unfair to logical white men -- even unfair
to fake conservative chosenites. stop whimpering. or show some guts and go
after your class -- the yids who made it all possible.
jack halliday
A second letter to Horowitz, same subject.
boy. dont mean to waste your time, but hadnt read the white article before
last email.
man, he really brought the jew out of you! hysterical, female reaction.
christ, i thought you were going to publish your resume, dragging up your
whole history, relatives, character references. if i were a cartoonist,
youd be a woman on a chair going Eeeek! at the white-mouse.
as though Time were a respectable publication or white other than a dumb
nigger hired for his color!
calm down, you idiot. black people dont listen to reason, they think
the federal government spreads aids. white people dont take black writers
seriously. no one will be moved by your words, just as no one will listen
to white. the lines are already drawn.
instead of trying to get the repubs to make abstract arguments to inner
city 85-iq idiots about why they should vote for the earners' party instead
of enjoying the fruits of theft, why dont you try my idea: disproving the
thesis that jews, over the course of the 20th century, have brought american
civilization to the brink of destruction? that's a task worthy of your
ability. i dont think you could do it, and i think you might well come out
the other end a jewish nazi(!)
but what a Jew you are: quick to make snide genetic references to
anyone you can safely dismiss as a "right wing extremist," disdaining to
rebut serious arguments, while huffing grievously about your refutation
because some half-wit octaroon punched the wrong computer keys. like most
jews -- honor is simply beyond you.
seriously, though, give my idea some thought. id really like to see you
give it a try. you instinctively and from your life's history ought to have
the jewish soul down pat -- put this into a rockefellers or kennedys type
book. what has this spirited clan meant to/done to the host country?
ill buy it. seriously, dont let the dumb niggers get ya down.
A letter to an ex-East European conservative columnist, Balint Vazsonyi.
i read your book. let me quote from it:
...[P]eople who are painfully aware of massive, unwelcome changes in the
American reality, and who know perfectly well the direction of those
changes, seem paralyzed when it comes to calling them by name.
Boy, if that isnt the sausage calling the kielbasa Polack. You, sir, are
perfectly paralyzed when it comes to pointing out the people responsible for
leading us down the wrong path. How can you write a whole book bemoaning
some bizarre Franco-Germanic philosophy nobody ever heard of yet you never
mention the tangible, graspable people who are doing this to us: the Jews?
Is this gutlessness? Or just typical fear of being called an anti-semite,
whatever that is? I don't know whether you are Jewish yourself, but it
would certainly explain your book. The Jews made up practically the entire
Soviet leadership, most of the butchers and many of the commissars, plus
they led the German communists that Hitler defeated, not to mention their
role in your land Hungary and the rest of Eastern Europe.
The Jews in Americas made up most of the traitors in the 30s and the
radicals in the sixties. Jewish liars in academia such as Franz Boas
successfully put across the lie that race doesn't exist, paving the way for
multiculturalism, the destruction of the white man and his culture. Yid
feminists put across lies about sex ("gender" as they politically restyled
it), screwing up generations of college-educated women. Almost all the
leaders of the anti-Vietnam crusade and the campus unrest were Jewish. Most
of the corrupt clowns around Clinton are Jewish, mixed in with a few
incompetent colored and assorted sexual deviants. Yid papers in Jerusalem
print columnists laughing over the fact that we in America are to scared to
observe: America is run by Jews. But nobody with any access to the public
is ever points it out, afeared of yid yelps about anti-semitism, which is
just the jews' word for people they hate. No, the mass media is nothing but
a jewish hate group. Jews are the main ones pushing hate crimes legislation
and gun control, just as they have successfully done in Australia and
Britain. Jews run Hollywood and are responsible for the unending innuendo
and nonstop "get help" psychiatric infomercial that is television. The one
studio that was traditional-American and anti-Jewish was Disney, but now
that Walt's gone, the Jew Eisner is producing anti-white movies celebrating
miscegenation while his underlings -- the few that arent yids and gay --
pretend to be, wearing stars of david and literally pretending to be queer.
Finally, yids have spent 100 years pushing destructive non-white immigration
against the wishes of the majority until they have finally got de facto open
borders. Wherever there's an Aryan, normal white majority, the Jew runs
scared. He does everything in his power to get rid of it. The destruction
of America is seen by the Jews who are primarily responsible for it as a
good thing. How can you defeat an enemy when you dont name him? The Jews
are never afraid to go after "right wing Christians seeking to impose their
morality," yet you public figures in the "opposition" never call the Jews on
their little game. No balls, right?
Rather you, like an idiot, drone on about "Franco-German philosophy" as
though Schopenhauer and Nietzsche are somehow responsible for our mess.
Christ! Kant and Marx were yids, right? Most of the Frankfurt school and
New School for Social Research were yids, right. Corrupted anthropology,
sociology, pedagogy -- due to the influence of Jews, undeniably.
Your book is nothing but a wasted chance. Unless you are Jewish
yourself, in which case, job well done. You have successfully dragged a red
herring across the path. Maybe America will never wake up to what you yids
are about.
jack halliday
A letter to WND.
talk about bowing before the radical few! you write a whole column without mentioning the
major force behind america's political balkanization or disintegration: the jews. who are
the main promoters of "hate speech" legislation? gun control? open borders? i get so
tired of reading your WND jeremiads against media bias...why do you never point out who
runs the press and sets the editorial policies? do you think your readers are too dim to
see your fear? you critize others for bowing to the radical few, yet you refuse to point
out just who these people are! now, let's pretend these "radical few" were doing something
really important -- breaking into dougherty's house -- instead of something trifling like
destroying the country. i bet you could give the cops a better description than that!
surely you have more guts than that, mr daugherty? or not? if pressing a magic button
removed every jew from america tomorrow, how long do you think it would take for us to
clean up the rest of the mess? my guess is not long. all that is necessary for jews
to destroy america is for normal white americans to fail to point out that Jews want to
take our guns, cancel the first american and efface our borders. I've always found it
odd that anyone who uses the word "jew" in limning our problems becomes a conspiracy
kook, yet never in any major newspaper are jews as a group held up to criticism.
who was it that led the Old Left communists in the thirties and the New Left campus radicals
in the sixties? which group produced the leading traitors and the america haters? Why are
you at WND and on the "respectable" right afraid to point this out?
the jews -- against the express wishes of the vast majority of americans -- have pushed for
open borders for the past hundred years -- ever since they first migrated to america in
appreciable numbers. jews feel uncomfortable in a white-majority society, thus they have
worked to discolor the U.S. they are succeeding. now we all enjoy the benefits of people
who ought to be crawling around the hills of guatemala living right next door to us.
but keep up the good work -- standing up bravely against the unnamed enemy; that is, the
enemy you are afraid to name. the jews laugh at you. they aren't afraid to go after
right-wing christians as such but you quail when it comes to naming them.
did you ever ask yourself who owns the Washington Post? the New York Times? the Wall
Street Journal? CBS, NBC, ABC, Time/Warner, Disney? Newsweek? USN&WR? Who owns the
movie studios? MTV? when was a Jew ever held up to ridicule as a left-wing archie bunker
who needed to have his consciouness raised? who produced the academics that polluted our
teachers colleges? our anthro departments? who spread the "race doesn't exist" lie?
jewish ethnic aggression has brought america to its knees, while you mainstream softbelly
"conservatives" carry on your "civilized" and "responsible" remonstrating. one
suggestion: check out Prof kevin macdonald's work...eye-opening stuff regarding the
biological basis of jewish ethnic chauvinism. by the way, you might also read john murray
cuddihy's The Ordeal of Civility -- explanations of the intellectual agressions of Marx,
Freud, Levi Strauss in terms of shtetl-yid contact with the civilized white aryan. they
look in our eyes and become ugly to themselves -- and seek to destroy us. and their work
is made easier by ignorant or gutless "conservatives."
We've allowed them to get so far in large part because writers like
Nyquist won't name them.
How the hell can you write about the Green Party organizer without
pointing out (I'd be willing to bet) he's Jewish? That's the whole point,
dumbass. Most members of green parties aren't Jewish, some of the leaders
aren't Jewish, but the prime impetus behind these parties is just that --
Jewish. If you think about why you are afraid to write these obvious
truths, you'll see that Jewish media control is a very real fact that you
deal with in your daily life. Every ten minutes on CNN we get an update on
the trial of the second WHITE man responsible for the "tragic" death of the
dragged black man. Nothing about those Indians up in Dakota who
dragged/murdered a white man. Nothing about the niggers down in Florida who
made good their promise to kill the next white man they saw. Nothing. So
one turns to the Internet in solace, goes to worldnetdaily, and gets the
typical conservative writer coitus interruptus. You always go to the brink,
and you always stop short.
Why do we let these enemies and malcontents win? Look in the fucking
mirror and ask yourself that question. If these assholes did something
really important like breaking into the Nyquist house instead of something
paltry like destroying the U.S., I bet you could provide the cops with a
much better, more detailed picture of who did the dirty work than you do
here. Get some balls. Who ever heard of a socialist movement anywhere in
the West that wasnt Jewish orchestrated? Which group more than liberal Jews
is pushing to end free speech, ban gun ownership, and make the Internet as
tame as print/TV media? Which group is NEVER criticized by name, yet never
hesitates to demonize and attack its opponents openly and explicitly?
Again: GET SOME BALLS.
Jack Halliday
Back to Backtalk Index
|