The Legal Framework of White Oppression
Australia has a Racial Discrimination Act. It also has a
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. It does not have freedom of speech.
The Australian state of New South Wales has an
Anti-Discrimination Act (1977) which states in section 20C (1) that "it is unlawful
for a person, by a public act, to incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe
ridicule of, a person or group of persons on the grounds of the race of the person or
members of the group..."
In 1966, there were 50,000 Asians in Australia; there were 1.3 million by 1991, and 1.6 by
1995 -- out of a total population of 18 million. Demographic projections suggest that
Asians will be 25% of the population within twenty years.
The lie put out by the Jewish media is that Australia must Asianize in order to preserve its
economy; if it sticks to "racist" pro-White nationalism, the rest of the world, and
particularly Asia, will refuse to trade with it. This despite the
fact that Japan is perhaps the most successful foreign trader in the world, and certainly
one of the most ethnocentric.
Fredrick Töben: In 2000, the HREOC ruled that the Adelaide Institute breached the RDA by
posting on its website material that was insulting and offensive to the Jewish population.
The Commission said the website, maintained by Dr. Töben, publicized material that was
"vilificatory, bullying, insulting and offensive" to the Jewish population. AI was ordered
to take down the offending material. Toeben refused. Note that the Executive Council of
Australian Jewry (ECAJ) described HREOC's ruling as having "international significance."
In other words, it hopes to use the Australian ruling as a precedent
to shut down other sites. The Jewish position -- in Australia and elsewhere -- is that Jews
should be legally beyond criticism. If you disagree, you are -- ipso facto -- a