Sam Francis - Vic Gerhard Exchange, Documenting Sammy's Great Fear
22 February 2005
VNN Reader: I had doubted what Linder said about Francis months ago on how believing one
thing and saying another causes health problems. But now it makes sense.
This picture from last year looks like a 77- or 87-year-old, not a 57-year-old.
To those who think Linder is too harsh, maybe you should think further. If
he speaks his mind and doesn't give a damn, so much the better. After all,
that's what free speech means. His example can teach as much as his content. If
Francis was a coward, then so are many others (including me) and it's up to
us to gain courage. Until we do, our fear should make it clear that, to put it
mildly, what Linder is doing is not nearly as easy as he makes it look.
Here's an e-mail exchange between Sam Francis and Victor Gerhard from 2003.
----------
Original Link:
Here.
Victor Gerhard-Sam Francis Exchanges
by Gerhard & Francis
Loaded: 4/12/2003
(Ed. Note: this is raw email, so don't hold anybody overly responsible for spelling mistakes, etc.)
Here is correspondence with Sammy. I won't put in comments, cause
you don't need them, but note how he first argues that he can't get published,
then next he doesn't agree with me about Jews -- which makes the first point
moot, all the while ignoring the damning questions, like why he criticizes
Hispanics so fiercely, but never Jews. Really, the guy is a nut. Either that or they
have some dirt on him, or he is just a scared shit, I don't know. I could
have ripped him a new asshole because he was 1) hysterical, and 2) illogical, but
I let him off easy. Maybe someday he will do something good, I don't know. He
can't write a paragraph without 3 contradictions and one twisting of his
opponent's argument. I'd love to debate him and drive him into the dirt.
Vic G
[Me to Francis, responding to Moran column]
Anti-Semitism is saying or doing anything a Jew does not like;
whether the statement was true, or the act perfectly justified. That is the real de
finition. How can you even pretend otherwise when Jews call someone who
defends Arabs (Semites) against Jewish tyranny an 'anti-Semite'?
It's great that you are pecking around the edges of the problem. I'm
just not sure what more proof you need to see that Jews are directing
American foreign policy; that Culture of Critique and its mind-boggling account of
facts is completely true; that to rail against blacks and hispanics without
mentioning Jews is like complaining about symptoms but not the disease.
Maybe this sounds cruel and racist; and yet it is true isn't it?
Personally, I've read enough of your writings, heard you speak enough times, and
even talked to you on occasion, so that I am convinced you recognize the
Jewish problem. It would be an immense help if you could now take off the gloves
and let the Jews have it. They have it coming. They are the true enemy of Middle
Americans. "Oil" is not the justification for this war but a laughably
transparent Jewish hedge, nor are the Christian fundamentalists to blame; if they
were not supporting Israel we would barely, as before 9/11, realize they
existed.
My friends are going to jail for speaking their minds; every day
another one is arrested or visited by the FBI, or raided by the Terrorism Task
Force. Now is the time, name the Jew, put THEM on the defensive for once.
Otherwise, Middle America is doomed; its sons' dying in Central Asia, its jobs
moving out of the US, its population increasingly non-White and hostile. We need
you to act now; a few months from now may be too late.
Your columns could make an immense difference at this crucial
moment. We are watching history, and if the Jews triumph here there may be no
stopping them, ever. Goodbye White race.
Vic Gerhard
Wilmington, N.C.
************************************
[Francis back to me]
I just wrote a column on Moran in which I was fairly explicit about
this matter. I have another today that is also pretty explicit about the role
of neo-cons (not all Jews) in getting us into the war. What more do you want?
Peter Brimelow at Vdare told me the first column probably would not be
published by any newspaper in this country (we'll see; my columnn last year
supporting what Billy Graham said to Nixon was not published by my three best outlets),
and without my authority or knowledge he changed a key line that altered my
meaning. You simply cannot go much further than I have already gone and expect
to be published at all in anythng like mainstream media, and anyway, aside
from the current war, I think there are other problems besides the Jewish role in
stirring up blacks and pushing immigration. Both blacks and hispanics have
now acquired their own racial consciousness and are not necessarily under Jewish
control.
********************************
[Me back to Sammy]
I agree, you possibly could not go further and expect to be
published mainstream, as of today. This is a reasonable argument for using this
tactic. I feel (perhaps incorrectly but I doubt it) that the time is past for this
tactic. If you did publish a column going further, USA Today would not print
it, but plenty of people would read it on the ever growing alternative White
media (overthrow.com, antiwar.com, Vanguard News Network, Stormfront, and many
more), and it just may put the bar lower for the next guy who dares. As things
look today, your tactic, which you have followed for the 15 years I have been
reading you, has gotten a good but watered-down message to Middle America, but
our situation is FAR worse than 15 years ago.
Much of Middle America is flying an American flag and 'supporting
the troops;' reasonable if you never had another way of thinking offered to you.
Your columns are scathing at the beginning and middle, but never offer a
realistic answer at the end because you do not name the Jews as the prime movers
in the destruction of Middle America. How can someone organize against an
amorphous 'Elite'? You rarely name names, except as examples. You talk of the
Frankfurt School and other groups, never saying they are almost 100% Jewish and
Jewish-funded and based on Jewish tactics and ideals.
You told me you were reading 'The Culture of Critique.' How anyone
can read that book and not immediately come to important conclusions based on
the Jewish role in the Boasian School, the Left, the Psychoanalytic movement,
the Frankfurt School, critique of gentile cultural, immigration policy and
more, I do not know. Jewish power is the most important and relevant fact in
America today. Yet you do not acknowledge that power. That is a derelection of
duty; you are hated by the left and neo-cons regardless of what you do - but do
you expect the White right, your true home, to appreciate your half-measures?
You are literally a man without a nation.
Precisely how bad must the situation get before you tell the whole
truth? Now, how would you have answered that question 2 years ago? Two years
ago you would have agreed to open fire if the Government ever did something as
tyrannical and insane as the Patriot Act(s), the mass arrests, threats of
government torture, Guantanamo detention, the B-52 strikes, the complete control of
the Executive Branch by Jews, if not Israeli Jews, hideous airport searches,
the Department of Homeland Security, phone taps, and spies controlled by
Israel. All on top of a war against 1.1 Billion Muslims that we can never win.
You are being disingenuous when you say you were tough on the Moran
critics; not all neo-cons are Jews; and blacks and hispanics are not under
Jewish control. You were tough on Moran by the relatively tepid standards of the
paleo-cons a la the Rockford institute. Not all neo-cons are Jews, but those
that are not Jewish know the score and never deviate from the editorial line
DEVISED wholly by Jews. Blacks and hispanics may have thrown off a bit of the
Jewish yoke, but the Jewish strategy and mindset lives on and they would have
little power to intimidate Whites without Jewish judges, lawyers, financing and
media pressure. You know this. As far as Brimelow, he needs a kick in the ass
also.
What is it you want? To be published mainstream? To be rich? To be
on TV? These I can not help you with. But if you want to save Whites and their
culture, get off the fence and attack the enemy. At this point, you are
actually furnishing disinformation, confusing the very public who soon will be
looking for answers as the situation in their country grows worse. And hey, Sobran
gets published. I gave him a thousand dollars of my money because of his
honest stance; a thousand dollars I had to make in payments because I'm his poorest
charter subscriber.
What more can I expect of you? I want you to finally and forever
cast off the chains of Jewish fear, Jewish money, and Jewish influence. I want
you to write columns that will stir the public to rise up and change this
nation. Join those on the radical right who are not afraid to tell the whole truth.
I am not asking you to do ANYTHING I have not done. I lost my job as an
Attorney, I have friends going to jail on made up charges, I've had my phone tapped,
I get the super search at every airport, but I am a FREE MAN! I also write
columns - they don't get published mainstream, but thousands of people read
them. You could do a hundred times better.
I realize this is a lot to ask, but screw the money and
respectability. What do I want? White Power!
Victor J. Gerhard, Esq.
Wilmington, NC
*************************************
[Sammy back to me]
Well, I'm sorry I'm such a disappointment to you. The fact is that I
have read the Culture of Critique, as well as the other two volumes, know
MacDInald personally, and agree with much though not all of what he says. My
entore body of writings over the last 20-25 years is an explanation of how I
sidagree and and have a somewhat dofferent view of the world than what is frankly a
monomanical obsession with an omnipotent Jew. There are reasons why
neo-conservatism exists other than Jewish power, and these should be obvious to any one
actually involved in politics. I was a witness to many of them. Just one, for
example, is the greed and amition and shalloweness of many orthodox
non-Jewish conservatives fro the "respectability" they thought Jews could give them.
You and critics like you always assume that because others don't say what you
demand they say, they must be afraid to say it. The fact is, as I just told you,
I have just written two columns that will probably harm me more than they
help me, so it is not fear on my part. Can you even imagine that maybe I don't
agree with your view of the Jews, that the Jews and the Jews alone are solely
responsible for everthing bad that has happened and is going on? I really don't
think you can. Moreover, as I was trying to tell you indirectly, I depend on
outlets like Vdrae and Rockford; if they don't publish me, I don't get
piublished, and they would not publish me if I write what you want me to write (which
I do not agree with anyway). Sobran does not get published outside of his own
newsletter and maybe the Wanderer. The American Cisnervatuve won't publish
him. Chronicles won't publish him. His syndicate dropped him. So don't tell me
about things I know about more than you. It's fine to piublish on sites like
VNN., but no one -- non one --reads them or takes them seriously outside a
handful of people. Sure I'd like to be rich, but do you imagine I thought I would
ever get rich writing what I write? I really just don't know how to explain to
people like you what the real world is like, because the truth is -- take it
form someone who went through graduate school, worked in a think tank, in the US
Senate, and at a nationally distrubuted newspaper for 9 years -- you and your
pals do not have a fucking clue.
************************************
[Me to Sammy]
Oooookay....now why will the columns harm you, why won't Vdare and
Rockford publish such a column, why can't Sobran get published? Oh, and what is
this war stuff on the T.V.? Come on, I wasn't rude to you, nor did I say Jews
were every single problem, but that they are far, far more of the problem
than recognized by your columns. (By the way, if non-Jewish neo-conservatives
want the 'respectablity' they feel Jews can give them, that is not ANOTHER reason
neo-cons exist, but rather the very one I stated - Jewish Power.) I don't
have a CLUE? You say you agree with most of MacDonald, then when I base my
arguments on him, I don't have a clue? Tell me what part of MacDonald you agree
with, can you buck up and do that? Agreeing with even one chapter would put in
serious question the honesty of your writing, would it not; as that agreement is
never acknowledged by you in your writings. And tell me what you disagree
with. I get the managerial elite argument, I've read and re-read what you have
written over the years, but your very email here implies you won't get published
for criticizing Jews as an ethnic group, though you HAVE criticized black's
and hispanic's as ethnic groups, and then attacks me with an anger I did nothing
to merit.
You are in the same bag as Jared Taylor, who in person admitted he
chose not to attack Jews because he had enough of a problem attacking blacks,
et al. You fit right in at American Renaissance, I'd say. For all your 'think
tank' work, did you ever stand on a street with demonstrators as Jews rained
bricks down on you for daring to speak out against them, as the police turned
their heads? You write about Middle America, I am Middle America. I'm not sure
precisely what sentence got you riled. I'd wish you'd tell me so I can use it
again. Hey, if people read this exchange, who will they think has a clue, you
or me? I'll wager on me.
Plus, the idea that 'no one' takes VNN seriously is ridiculous. The
ever-growing numbers of people that do take it seriously are true activists,
each worth 100 brandy-sniffing Chronicle's readers. People that will put their
financial and physical well being on the line for the ideals you somewhat
endorse. Another point, what is the ENTIRE Muslim world yelling about if not many
of the same beliefs about Jews showcased on VNN? Add in much of Europe and
Asia and South America, and much of the US population of blacks and hispanics,
and, well, that's not really 'a handful of people' is it?
I truly do respect you and your writing had a great effect on my
life. Actually, you brought me a long way to the beliefs I have. Yet you, Dr.
Frankenstein, feel I don't have a clue. What is that line about the guilty man
fleeing where no one pursues? Sorry, should know it, just too Middle American.
Your entire body of work does little to counter an anti-Jewish
explanation of American Politics. I believe almost all you have written; yet it
contradicts most of MacDonald not at all. Your writings try to explain why and
how this managerial elite became so alienated and hostile to traditional
America. It partially explains the alienation, but does little to explain the
hostility, the outright hatred, that these elites have for people who are basically
members of their family. Only a non-White group could have such hatred for
Whites, and such an obsession with their destruction. Only by understanding that
the most influential part of the managerial elite is Jewish can one finally
understand this contradiction in your work.
Anyway, have to get back to the T.V. and see which of my friends
Michael Chertoff has arrested, listen to Alan Dershowitz talk about torturing
them, and hear Ari Fleisher's take on the whole thing, per Richard Pearle. One
last thing; you do realize that Jews as an ethnic group are 3% of the American
population? A smaller percentage than Austrian Americans? That fact has made it
to you right? But since they are not omnipotent, it's just a minor fact of
American politics; voila, the exception proves the rule. Well, as for our
discussion, res ipsa loquitur, as we clueless say.
Vic Gerhard
Counsel, White Revolution
************************************
[Sammy to me]
I had thought that you, unlike several of the others who like to
rant about my "cowardice," "treachery," "phil-Semitism," etc., had a little more
sense, but appraently I was misguided. Let me try to explain once more in some
detail what I am trying to tell you.
1. What you said in your last communication was insulting because it
at least indirectly and perhaps directly questioned my integrity, acusing me
of cowardice or ignorance or dishonesty or greed or ambition as the only
plausible reaons I do not write what you want me to write as you want it written. I
have to say that I have received many criticisms as a columnist but this --
from the professional (and usualy anonymous) anti-Semites -- takes the cake. No
one else presumes ot tell a writer what to write or how to write, even as
they insult his character and intelligence -- not religious nuts, not racial
nuts, not libertarian nuts -- except maybe the Jews themselves. But leave all that
aside.
2. Vdare, Rockford, etc won't publish openly anti-Semitic pieces
because (a) they like most gentiles are irrationally afraid of Jewish power and
(b) they also have rational concerns over Jewish power. Both have Jewish
"friends" who give them money, publicity, support, etc. and they are afraid -- I
believe not entirely withgoiut cause but in an exaggerated way -- of losing that.
Also, like most peopole they would like to do something else besides attack
Jews and sometimes there are Jews with whim they need to work in order th do
those things. (Rockford just held a conference in the Middle East on a prospects
for peace there; it wasnlt my idea and I don't see the point, except that
some donors (non-Jewish ) gave them money to do it.) Therefore, they are veyr
careful about antaginizing Jewish supporters. As you may know, they were
virtually destroyed in the late 1980s by neo-con defunding because of positive remarks
they made about Gore Vidal and because of their opposition to immigration.
Nevertheless, they have consistently published pieces critical of Zionism,
including several of my recent columns on the Iraq war and Jewish neo-con- Israeli
power, and of foreign entanglements, perpetual wars, etc. Chronicles also
published a review of MacDonald by Paul Gottfried which I strongly dsagree with
but they allowed MacDonald to write a long response, more than the American
Conservative allowed. I do not control either RI or Vdare and foten disagree
withbhiw they are run, but essentially they do not attack the Jews because they are
more interested in other problems.
2. Unless you really do believe that Jews are the causes of all
problems, which you deny, you have to admit there are other problems. You ask what
I disagree with in MacDonald. I can't really comment on the general
evolutionary theory since I'm not an expert, but I have no problem with it. Nor do I
have a problem with his characterization of Jews in general, though some people
tell me it's less true of some Jewish groups (Sephardic) than others
(Ashkenazic) or at some periods of history than at others. What I do not agree with
Kevin on is that while he's right about the way Jews are, that doesn't mean they
are always successful. They may have pushed open borders as a means of
underminig what they saw as a hostile hist society, but that doesn't mean their
efforts were the reason we have open borders opr that other groups didn't wnat open
borders for their own reasons. I dealt with immigration partly when I was in
the Senate and frankly the role of the Jews was not at all apparent, as it was
in foreign policy, and many social issues. The main enemies of immigration
control on the right are (1) libertarians and (2) Catholics; the same was true
at the Wash. Times, and I knew Jews who were opposed to more immigration at
both places.Libertarianism tends to be Jewish-led, but it exists as an
idnependent force in its own right amoing gentiles. I recall in 1995 or 95 Bill Gates
visited Sen. Alan Simpson to lobby him on H1-B visas; Simpson caved. Neither is
Jewish and neither did what he did becaise of Jewish power or influence but
because of business and political interests. Business interests have been the
main reason we have immigrant workers pushing out American workers in meat
packing, textiles, poultry processing, etc. The Jews may serve as lawyers or
lobbyists for these groups but Jewish groups per se have had little to do with
immigration policy in recent years.
3. I don't deny that Jews have power -- certainly in the media and
cultural centers generally and in politics through funding, staffing etc. But
Jews are not the ruling class in this country (at least not yet). As in many
other societies they form a subelite that provides services for the ruling class
(tax collecting in Poland, e.g.), but I think they have little interest in
becoming theactual ruling class because they have no interest in that as loing
as their interests are secured.
4. Your line about standing on street corners getting attacked by
Jews is frankly childish. No I didn't. I just lost my job and my career for what
I wrote about race (and I can tell you Jews appear to have had something to
do with that and have certainly used it against me ever since). I'll bet Kevin
MacDOnald never did either. I have a clue for you: Standing on street corners
and yelling anti-Semitic slogans isn't a very effectuve way to challeneg much
of anything. Hyde Park is full of characters like that. What I have tried to
do -- explicitly at the Times and later as well -- has been to make explicit
and serious discussion of race respectable. That means picking your shots and
not saying everything you'd like to say because you know it will simply baffle
or alarm many readers, but it does mean that you can tell many, many people a
lot fo things they didn't know or hadn't thought about. I think I was beginning
to succeed when I was fired, and that may have been the real reason I was
fired. Last summer when the National Alliance had its march on the Israeli
Embassy I asked a friend who was planning to attend why and what good it would do? I
told him all you will accomplish is give the Post the chance to portray all
of you as a bunch of Nazi goons at a time when some opinion sectors were
startiung to turn on Israel. Thatls exactly what happened -- pictures of swastika
flags, jack boots, etc. that understandably frighten and alienate most Americans
and allow the Jews to say, "See, we told you what all those critics of Israel
were like!" The idea that people like Linder and VNN accomplish much of
anything outside of mutual masturbation is ludcrous. Frankly, I had never heard of
Linder until he started attacking me and some people told me about it. With
all due respect, I had never heard of your column until you told me you write
one.
Finally, I have been gratified (one of the few gratifictaions I ever
get in my profession) by being told by doxens of yuong people that I had
taught them something they would not have known otherwise. No one but you and your
friends have ver denounced me for being a hypocrite, a coward, a liar, a
traitor, etc. I would have thiught that you would have epxressed some appreciation
for what I have done, but the fact the you don't and can find only the most
hateful things to say about me tells me all I need to know. As I told one of
your colleagues recently, from now on I can only regard the whole bunch of you
as my enemies and as enemies of the cause for which I am working.
********************************
[Me to Sammy, biting my tongue]
I have though about this a lot, and there is much more that could be
said, but I don't think we are going to agree no matter what is said.
I do have to say that if your foremost cause is the continuation of
the White Race, then there is no possible way we can be enemies as you
described.
Though it sounds fawning, no one has structured my political
awareness like you in your writings. I learned more reading your Chronicles columns,
especially Revolution from the Middle, than in four years of undergraduate
study.
Yours,
Vic Gerhard
|