Between The Lines: 'New Orleans Protocol'
by Alex Linder
6 June 2004
Gathering of White leaders yields historic agreement.
by Paul Fromm
BY A. LINDER
On Saturday, May 29, 2004, leaders of groups from three countries struck a historical agreement about future conduct in the post-September 11 era. The protocol was the initiative of former Louisiana State representative David Duke.
SOMEBODY NEEDS TO BONE UP ON DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 'HISTORICAL' AND 'HISTORIC.'
The protocol pledges adherents to a pan-European outlook, recognizing national and ethnic allegiance, but stressing the value of all European peoples. The three provisions of the protocols are:
1. Zero tolerance for violence.
"ARYANS PROMISE TO SHOW UP WITH KNIFE AT GUNFIGHT." ZOG WILL BE HAPPY TO HEAR THAT. SMART ARYANS WILL PAY ATTENTION TO ZOG'S ACTIONS AT WACO, AND THE WORDS OF SUPREME COMMANDER EISENHOWER: "BE SLOW TO SAY WHAT YOU WILL DO, AND NEVER SAY WHAT YOU WON'T."
2. Honourable and ethical behaviour in relations with other signatory groups. This includes not denouncing others who have signed this protocol. In other words, to paraphrase the successful leftist strategy of the old Popular Front, "no enemies on the right."
CONTINUE TO SMEAR NON-SIGNATORIES. "BUSINESS AS USUAL." POLITE FACE IN PUBLIC, DIRTY TRICKS IN PRIVATE. SAME-OLD SAME-OLD.
3. Maintaining a high tone in our arguments and public presentations.
NOTE THE WORDING. NA PROMOTES THE BLOODIEST, MOST SLUR-LADEN, MOST VIOLENT MATERIAL IMAGINABLE NOT JUST IN THE "MUSIC" PEDDLED THROUGH RESISTANCE RECORDS, BUT IN THE VERY THING THAT PUT THE GROUP ON THE MAP, WILLIAM PIERCE'S THE TURNER DIARIES. THESE GUYS WHINE THAT VNN USES EPITHETS AND SLURS, WHILE SELLING WHITE POWER ROCK THAT IS NOTHING BUT. AS LONG AS IT FILLS NA COFFERS, IT'S PERFECTLY FINE. ITZ ALL ABOUT THE JEWISH PAPER. THE LONG GREEN CAN USE ANY WORDS IT LIKES, NO PROBLEM, SAYS DISHONORABLE HYPOCRITE KEVIN STROM.
The founding endorsers of the New Orleans Protocol
'FOUNDING ENDORSERS,' GOOD LORD. GET A GRIP, GUYS.
are David Duke of EURO and The David Duke Report, Don Black of Stormfront.org, long-time writer and activist Sam G. Dickson, John Tyndall (a founder of the British National Party, but not currently in an executive position in that party), Willis Carto of the American Free Press, Dr. Ed Fields, a National Alliance member and publisher of The Truth at Last newspaper, Kevin Alfred Strom, Media Director of the National Alliance, and David Pringle, Membership Coordinator of the National Alliance, and Paul Fromm of the Canadian Association for Free Expression.
Other groups and individuals are cordially invited to sign on and endorse the New Orleans Protocol.
THE PROTOCOL IS UNNECESSARY AND POORLY NAMED.
POORLY NAMED BECAUSE NEW ORLEANS CONNOTES MARDI GRAS, WHICH IS TO SAY, WILD PARTYING. BEYOND THAT, IT'S KNOWN FOR CRIME. NOT THE WORDS YOU WANT ASSOCIATED WITH A PROTOCOL AIMED AT TIDYING UP YOUR PUBLIC IMAGE. IT IS A MEASURE OF THE GENERAL COMPETENCE OF THE SIGNERS THAT NONE OF THEM PICKED UP ON THIS.
UNNECESSARY BECAUSE A PROTOCOL ISN'T NEEDED FOR NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO QUIT LYING AND SMEARING OTHER GROUPS, JUST HONORABLE LEADERS. AS LONG AS NA CONTINUES TO SPREAD LIES ABOUT VNN IN PRIVATE, WE'LL CONTINUE TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT IT IN PUBLIC, FOOLISH 'PROTOCOL' BE DAMNED.
FINALLY, THE PROTOCOL IS FOOLISH BECAUSE ITS EXISTENCE IMPLIES A NEED. I FEEL NO SHAME IN MY WORDS OR ACTIONS BEFORE A JEW-CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA WHICH SMEAR MY NAME AND PEOPLE AROUND THE CLOCK AS "WHITE TRASH." THIS PROTOCOL PLAYS DIRECTLY INTO THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE WHO STEREOTYPE US AS ILLITERATE LOSERS. IT ACKNOWLEDGES PROBLEMS THAT DO NOT EXIST, AND COVERS UP THE PROBLEMS THAT DO. IF YOU FEEL THE NEED TO IMPROVE YOUR BEHAVIOR, NOP SIGNERS, WHATZ STOPPING YOU? I UNDERSTAND WHY THE STROMS FEEL THE NEED TO APOLOGIZE FOR THEIR SHABBY ACTIONS, BUT IS IT REALLY NECESSARY TO SIGN A PAPER IN PUBLIC? YOU'RE EMBARASSING THE REST OF US AND MAKING OUR TASK MORE DIFFICULT. JUST QUIT ACTING LIKE SHITS, AND THE REST OF US WILL SAY "JOB WELL DONE."
The New Orleans Protocol is, as David Duke explained, "a historical event."
YEAH, AND SO'S THE FART I JUST LET OFF. THE TERM HE SEEKS IS 'HISTORIC.' WHAT A SHAME NOBODY PICKED UP ON THIS. AFRAID TO SPEAK UP, PERHAPS? INCOMPETENT TOTALITARIANISM IS NO PANACEA FOR ARYANS. WHITE LIBERTY IN THE CONTEXT OF RACIAL DICTATORSHIP IS THE RECIPE FOR SUCCESS.
The European nationalist movement across North America, with our allies in Britain and, we hope, elsewhere are committing ourselves unequivocally to the high road: no more sleazy denunciations of other nationalists on the Internet, which can only give aid and comfort to the enemy or to agents of the state; no more stealing of other groups' mailing lists or members; and, finally, no tolerance of violence.
CHARACTERISTIC DISHONESTY: THE PROTOCOL ONLY COVERS SIGNERS; NOT A WORD IS SAID ABOUT DISCONTINUING THE SMEARING OF NON-NA GROUPS, WEBSITES AND INDIVIDUALS. WHICH IS IT, FROMM? IT IS THE HEIGHT OF JEWINESS TO PRETEND THE PROTOCOL BANS THE SMEARING OF NON-SIGNERS WHEN IT FACT IT POINTEDLY EXCLUDES THEM FROM PROTECTION. HONEST ARYANS KNOW THAT HISTORY SHOWS YOU CAN RELY ON THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO DO THAT WHICH BRINGS IT MONEY; BEYOND THAT, NOTHING.
The New Orleans Protocol in no way seeks to form an umbrella group. It in no way diminishes the independence of any of the endorsers.
WHEN YOU CONSTRAIN THE FORM BY WHICH A MAN EXPRESSES HIMSELF, YOU DIMINISH HIS INDEPENDENCE AND USURP HIS FREEDOM. THE PEOPLE WHO CONTROL THE MEDIA USE SLURS AND VICIOUS, ANTI-WHITE STEREOTYPES DAY IN AND DAY OUT. SLURS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM AND HYPOCRITES IN BUSINESS SUITS ARE NOT THE SOLUTION.
It does not involve ideological uniformity. All groups maintain their independence and their own particular agenda and emphases. However, all have pledged to behave in a certain constructive way, as outlined by the Protocol.
'CONSTRUCTIVE' IS AN OPINION, NOT A FACT. THE JEWS' MEDIA ARE ONE MILLION TIMES MORE POWERFUL THAN THE EFFORTS OF THE SIGNERS OF THIS PROTOCOL. LOGIC TELLS YOU THERE'S NO CORRELATION BETWEEN ABSTAINING FROM SLURS AND SUCCESS, AND THAT IN FACT THE CORRELATION MAY WELL RUN IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. THE JEWS USE SLURS AND EPITHETS AS REGULAR PRACTICE. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO STICK TO CAREFUL REMONSTRATING, JUST LIKE THE FECKLESS CONSERVATIVES? NO. THE READING ARYAN PUBLIC HAS NO PROBLEM WITH SLURS; ITS PROBLEM IS NOBODY REPRESENTS ITS INTERESTS.
The zero tolerance position on violence does not make us into pacifists or prevent us from defending ourselves against attacks. However, all foolish talk about aggressive violence is out-of-line. Indeed, the Canadian experience with CSIS agents like Grant Bristow in the Heritage Front is that those urging violence and illegal measures are usually government agents or agents provocateurs.
BEING WARY OF THOSE WHO APPROACH US ADVOCATING VIOLENCE AND RENOUNCING VIOLENCE CATEGORICALLY AS A WAY TO OVERTHROW THE MOST TYRANNICAL SYSTEM IN HISTORY ARE TWO SEPARATE THINGS. WHAT DOES 'STAYING LEGAL' MEAN UNDER A TYRANNY THAT DOESN'T FOLLOW THE LAW? IT MEANS DAVID DUKE AND THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE COMMIT THEMSELVES TO OBEYING RULES SET UP TO INSURE THE GENOCIDE OF THE ARYAN RACE. THIS MAY BE UNDERSTANDABLE FOR THE HEADS OF A FOR-PROFIT PRIVATE COMPANY SUCH AS THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE, BUT ARYANS WILL DO WELL TO STEER CLEAR OF SILLY ABSTRACT AND ABSOLUTE COMMITMENTS TO ANY COURSE OF ACTION.
The Internet is our communications salvation in the face of increasing minority control of mainline means of communication as well as increased state censorship. However, many individuals use the Internet for 'trash talk' and defamation of other groups and leaders. We don't object to ideological differences or disagreements over methods.
YES, IN FACT YOU DO. YOU BELIEVE YOUR WAY IS THE RIGHT WAY -- EXCEPT WHEN IT COMES TO ATTACKING OTHERS WHO DISAGREE, WHO ARE FAIR GAME UNDER YOUR PROTOCOL.
WHAT YOU SEEK IS NOT THE HIGH ROAD, BUT PROTECTION AGAINST CRITICISM OF YOURSELVES WHILE PRESERVING YOUR FREEDOM TO UNDERMINE OTHERS BY WHICHEVER MEANS SEEMS MOST EXPEDITIOUS. THE STANDARD STROM HYPOCRISY SHINES THROUGH. UNDER YOUR PROTOCOL IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO ACKNOWLEDGE HIM AS A "SIDEWINDER," TO QUOTE HIS WIFE. YOU SEEK TO KEEP FROM HONEST ARYANS INFORMATION THEY NEED TO MAKE DECISIONS, JUST AS THE JEWS DO. ARYANS WILL HAVE NONE OF IT.
We do, however, believe that loose gossip and defamation serve only to assist our enemies. Those subscribing to the New Orleans Protocol are signalling their intention to abide by honourable standards in relations with others in the nationalist movement.
AGAIN, QUIT STROMMING & FROMMING THE TRUTH. THE PROTOCOL VERY POINTEDLY SAYS THAT ONLY SIGNERS ARE COVERED. THE PROTOCOL IS AN ARROGANT ARROGATION; AN ATTEMPT TO CLAIM THAT ONLY THE SIGNERS REPRESENT ARYANS AND ARYAN INTERESTS, AND THAT ALL OTHERS ARE PRETENDERS WHO MAY FREELY BE ABUSED. BUT YOU DO NOT REPRESENT ARYANS. YOU WHO SIGN THIS FOOLISH DOCUMENT REPRESENT NO ONE BUT YOURSELVES.
Those who do not come on board are also signaling either a discomforting ambivalence about violence or an addiction to harmful defamation of patriots in preference to constructive advocacy of their views and a concentration on the enemy.
PAUL FROMM WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DEFINE OTHERS' BEHAVIOR TO SUIT HIS INTERESTS. PAUL FROMM REPRESENTS PAUL FROMM ONLY. THE REFUSAL TO SIGN THE 'NEW ORLEANS' PROTOCOL SIGNALS NOTHING, BECAUSE THE PROTOCOL ITSELF MEANS NOTHING.
I personally take considerable satisfaction in the New Orleans Protocol as I have promoted and practised the policy of "no enemy on the right" in Canada for the past 20 years. - Paul Fromm
IT'S ALL ABOUT HOW YOU FEEL, PAUL, NOT WHAT'S IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF ARYANS GENERALLY, WHICH THIS PROTOCOL IS NOT.