Posted by Socrates in Socrates, White solutions, White thought, Whiteness Studies at 1:50 pm |
![](/wp-content/themes/zigzag/images/post.gif)
An article about Metapedia, the White encyclopedia: [Here]. Also, Metapedia has apparently been attacked by trolls.
An article about Metapedia, the White encyclopedia: [Here]. Also, Metapedia has apparently been attacked by trolls.
The war-for-Israel’s-benefit isn’t going smoothly: [Article]
Join your host Bud White for this week’s Free Talk Live: Friday. Mark joins in on the conversation midway through the show.
To clean up the pile of stories we haven’t had a chance to cover the last few weeks, the pace of this weeks show in TJB news reporting will be nothing short of relentless. He’ll be covering a NJ Kike slaughterhouse in deep trouble with the DEP, NY anti-zionist demonstations held by Hacidic Jews, NY kikes sentenced in insider trading schemes, 50,000 Yeshiva Students Avoiding IDF Service and a ton more.
Unless there has been a postponement, former National Alliance leader Shaun Walker and two other men convicted with him will be sentenced on July 31, 2007. They face years in prison.
“Civil rights” as a legal concept is bogus. For example, back when America was still more-or-less a White republic (i.e., 1883), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that, according to the 14th Amendment, anti-racism laws only apply to “states oppressing individuals,” not to “individuals oppressing individuals.” Obviously, Walker isn’t a “state” [1]. But regardless of that, since America’s citizenship law of 1790 allowed only “White” people to become citizens, that means that Whites are favored people in America, which means that America’s founders would have rejected the idea of “civil rights” laws in the first place [2]. Also, one can sort of judge the validity of modern “civil rights” laws by considering the non-White source of the first one: the Civil Rights Act of 1957, which came from Jewish congressman Emanuel Celler’s bill H.R.6127. Since Jews pioneered the modern “civil rights” laws, those laws are automatically questionable, since America is a Western country based on Western ideas and Jews aren’t Western but pseudo-Western. After all, are Israeli citizens bound by White-constructed “rights” laws? (No, unless you count a treaty). Why should White men be bound by Jewish-constructed “rights” laws?
Details of the Walker case: [Here] and [Here]
More about Walker: [Here]
[1] this is a moot point, however, because the 14th Amendment wasn’t ratified properly, as mentioned: [Here]
[2] the 1790 citizenship law: [Here]
Join Mark and Masher for FTL Thirsty Thursday with special guest John DeNugent from the Barnes Review.
Tonight’s show will be different from the others. I will have Discussion and News Without The Jews.
I may, however throw someone under the bus.Maybe not?!
Make sure you tune in NEXT WEEK when Dietrich will be filling in for me and he will have a very special guest on.
Some interesting stuff: [Here]
It happens routinely: a city or state creates a law to deal with illegal immigrants, but a federal judge voids it:
Why bother? America has already abandoned nativism on the whole. Of course, we had some help with that abandoning, e.g., Jewish, Jewish-founded or Jewish-staffed groups have long tried to convince White people that the preservation of White cultural hegemony is undesirable or even immoral [1]:
[1] a mention of the SPLC’s staff: [Here]. (Trivia: Mark Potok is the son of the Polish-born, Jewish painter/author Andrew Potok, whose family fled Poland at the start of World War II)