17 March, 2008

Posted by Socrates in egalitarianism, jewed law, Socrates, Wilmot Robertson at 10:10 pm | Permanent Link

(Note: Louis Brandeis was the first Jew to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court):

“The 1954 Supreme Court ruling in Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka may some day be ranked as the Fort Sumter of the second American Civil War. Although the Constitution says nothing about education, the Court ordered the desegregation of all public schools on the ground that segregation denies equal opportunities to minorities. Even if school facilities were equal – as some were, but most were not – the very fact of separation, in the Court’s view, was generating in children “a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in ways unlikely ever to be undone.” The Court built its case on the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. In reaching its decision the Court took judicial notice of sociological evidence which had not been heard in the lower courts and which was introduced during its hearings by a legal technicality known as the “Brandeis brief.” Normally, appeal courts did not permit the injection of new facts or new evidence. But Brandeis, when a Supreme Court Justice, broke this longtime precedent by encouraging the admission of briefs containing materials which he considered unquestionable and not openly prejudiced against either side of the dispute. As it turned out, the “Brandeis brief” heard by the Supreme Court in Brown was simply the repetition and elaboration of the liberal-minority thesis of racial equalitarianism. The genetic side of the argument and the effect of integration on the education of white children were totally ignored. The defense was permitted no rebuttal.”

— from the book “The Dispossessed Majority” (Cape Canaveral, FL.; Howard Allen Enterprises, Inc., 1976) by Wilmot Robertson, pp. 278-279

17 March, 2008

Posted by Socrates in globalization, Kosovo, NATO, Serbia, Socrates, UN at 8:59 pm | Permanent Link

“International peacekeepers” go to work in the new, illegitimate, Muslim state:

[Article].

17 March, 2008

Posted by Socrates in bankers, banking, Big Finance, Federal Reserve system, Socrates, Wall Street at 1:10 pm | Permanent Link

Also, will the Fed give aid to other brokerage firms that face ruin? [1]:

[Article].

[1] it isn’t known if Bear Stearns CEO Schwartz is Jewish or not, and it’s better not to just guess. Readers?

16 March, 2008

Posted by Socrates in 'Middle East', America, France, globalization, Israel, Jewish politicians, NATO, tikkun olam, Turkey, Zionism at 7:54 pm | Permanent Link

“The goal of Sarkozy’s Club Med is therefore not, after all, to reinforce the geopolitical weight of France, but instead to consolidate the power of NATO and the United States over the Middle East.”

Note: Sarkozy’s mother is Jewish.

Countries that are located on the banks of the Mediterranean sea include Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey. (As you read this, remember that Turkey and Israel are good friends):

[Article].

16 March, 2008

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 4:22 pm | Permanent Link

Does your congressman use it? What about your “conservative” buddy?

[Article].

15 March, 2008

Posted by Socrates in Big Brother, politics at 5:53 pm | Permanent Link

by Charley Reese: [Here].

15 March, 2008

Posted by Socrates in books, historical factualism, quotations, quotations about jews, Socrates, Yeats-Brown at 5:25 pm | Permanent Link

“We were lunching in a little restaurant on a hill-top above Rapallo. At an adjacent table I noticed a small, dark young man in spectacles and a fair, handsome girl. I glanced at them, and continued my argument. We became rather heated, for my friend accused me of prejudice and religious intolerance. I answered that he knew nothing about the Jewish question, or rather questions, for there were several, and to grasp these problems as a whole one should talk to a wide variety of Europeans, and see for oneself – for instance – the aspect and surroundings of the Ghetto in Warsaw, and the crypto-Jews of Salonika and Constantinople. Presently the girl pushed her plate away with a gesture of disgust, and began striding about the terrace, waving her arms. At this point it dawned on me that the people at the next table were Jews. I left soon afterwards, and heard later that they tackled my friend. They were English Jews, they told him, and had overheard what I was saying.”

— from the book “European Jungle” (London, England; Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1939), by F. Yeats-Brown, pp. 173-174.

14 March, 2008

Posted by Dietrich in Announce, audio, VNNB, VNNB-Friday at 7:00 pm | Permanent Link

Radio Free Whitelandia with host Dietrich. Live at 9PM EST.
Forum thread here

New broadband stream here!


Skype Chat

Listen Live:

Listen w/ WinampWinamp | Listen w/ RealplayerReal | Listen w/ WinampMedia | Listen w/ QuicktimeQuicktime

Subscribe to Podcast

14 March, 2008

Posted by Socrates in book reviews, historical factualism, History for newbies, Hitler, Socrates at 6:59 pm | Permanent Link

Keyword: “making.” Some good comments about Hitler: [Book Review].

14 March, 2008

Posted by alex in Iranian for Aryans, movie reviews, movies at 6:50 pm | Permanent Link

I just watched “Beowulf”

 

“Beowulf as depicted by a Nordic female painter. Beowulf is a hero through-and-through.”

 

“Beowulf the Modern: a bastard product of Jewish cultural perversions.”

 

I thought it was a sordid affair. It was, as to be expected, a corruption of the original tale. It Jewed everything down. There were Jewish superfluities of sex, urination, belching, insulting Christianity, feminism, violence, and deconstruction of a Nordic hero.

 

Examples include:

 

1) Sex: gratuitous displays of a buxom slattern and gross badinage between her and a punkish, tattoo-ridden “warrior”. In a much later scene, the female water demon is naked and wears high-heeled stilettos in 7th century Denmark! Also, Beowulf said he will fight the demon, Grendel, naked, and proceeded to immediately slough off his clothes in front of the Queen! And this is supposedly how ancient Nordics behaved! What Jewish lies!

 

2) Urination and belching (two Jewish fetishes): Two men urinated – right in the building! – and discussed Christianity. A woman belched and other women laughed. Again, Nordics were made to look uncouth and niggerish.

 

3) Calumny against Christianity: The ex-king’s adviser wore a big cross on his chest and man-handled his crippled slave. This put Christians in a bad light by making them brutes and hypocrites; how Jewish!

 

4) Feminism (for non-Jewish consumption, of course): The Queen is irate at Beowulf because he has taken a younger woman as consort. Though the Queen wears a cross on her necklace, she’s still good, because, well, she’s a woman and she’s the victim of (it can only be White) male oppression and maltreatment. I’m sure if a nigger was the hero, this would elicit a sly smirk from the audience, because the nigger is, well, a “god”, and “all Man”; or rather, all pseudo-Man n’$h!t.

 

5) Violence: Extremely violent and sanguinary. A failed Jewish attempt to add “interest” to a flop of a movie. The awe-inspiring Nordic special effects are just that: effects. No substance, no meat, no depth.

 

6) Beowulf is no longer the hero par excellence but a psychoanalyzed, and therefore deconstructed, victim of Jewish radical critique. He is a deflated Super-Goy who is “exposed” as a liar, a cheat, an adulterer, a fraud, a charlatan, a non-interventionist, an America-Firster, a 7th century Holocaust-Denier, and worst of all, an anti-Semite!

 

Zemeckis, the gentile producer said that this movie is not the one we were “forced” to read in high school (no one forced me!). Rather, it’s a movie about high adventure, belching, swearing, and fornicating.

 

Zemeckis, I hope you burn in Hell! My only question for you before you roast is why you didn’t throw in niggers, spics, chinks, and kikes as warrior-heroes in Beowulf’s entourage. This shows that you’re still not sufficiently Jewish!