Vanguard News Network

The poet Ezra Pound was an advocate of Social Credit, by the way [1].

This online book makes some good points about wealth, money and credit, e.g., having wealth and having money is not the same thing. It allows the reader to think about Western money systems in an outside-of-the-box manner.

Social Credit is based on real credit and real production, not on inflationary fiat money or fractional-reserve ledger entries. Here, the book says that the state, not private bankers, should control money for the benefit of society:

“The conversion into money of real credit can only be exercised by a sovereign authority, acting in the name of society itself, and pursuing, not the banker’s profit, but the economic welfare of society as a whole.” (“real credit” = the ability to produce and deliver goods and services).

A Social Credit system could, in theory, be molded and shaped in different ways, according to a country’s needs.

Contrary to what some people believe about Social Credit, it need not be a “cashless” system.

Social Credit could, in theory, put an end to inflationary, interest-and-debt money systems in the West. But even if Social Credit isn’t as viable as some people believe it is, the idea could nonetheless lead to similar ideas which might eventually help Whites as a people [2][3]:

Chapter 14: [Here].

Chapter 15: [Here].

[1] Ezra Pound and Social Credit: [Here]

[2] more about Social Credit: [Here]

[3] a book about Social Credit: [Here]

by Kevin MacDonald: [Here].

The guy who wrote TV and movie treatments of the Nuremberg tribunal, and the guy who invented the real tribunal, were both Jews. (Note: Raphael Lemkin, mentioned in the second article, was also a Jew. Nuremberg was a total fraud, of course, as even Eisenhower’s brother Edgar admitted).

It is [Here].

He sounds like bad news for the internationalists who plan to turn Russia into an Eastern version of America [1]:

[Article].

[1] more about Demidov: [Here]

Lemire seems headed for victory in his battle with the CHRC:

[Article].

Some interesting stuff: [Here].

by Robert E. Reis: [Here]. (Newbies, take note: “gender” is not to be confused with “sex”).

There’s some good commentary here, as usual. (But instead of mentioning the Pearl Harbor attack, he could have mentioned Franklin D. Roosevelt’s September 1941 “shoot-on-sight” order for German ships/U-boats, an order which was a de facto declaration of war on Germany. America had, for all practical purposes, already entered World War II by the time Japan attacked us; furthermore, Germany – not Japan – was America’s primary enemy. In fact, all history books should be revised in order to change the date of America’s entry into WWII from December 7, 1941 to September 11, 1941) [1]:

[Article].

[1] more on FDR’s shoot-on-sight order (a cached page; see the second letter): [Here] ; more [Here]

by Rev. Ted Pike: [Here].