Posted by Socrates in John Kaminski, Socrates at 3:53 pm |
![](/wp-content/themes/zigzag/images/post.gif)
John Kaminski has a new column – titled “A Tale of Two Lies” – and a new website.
John Kaminski has a new column – titled “A Tale of Two Lies” – and a new website.
The trial is almost over. The two men – Simon Sheppard, owner of the heretical.com website, and Luke O’Farrell, a writer/contributor to heretical.com – are in court for truth-telling, i.e., for violating the Public Order Act, which outlaws publishing or distributing “racial hatred.” It’s hard to imagine how the British government could charge Sheppard and O’Farrell, since the heretical.com website is not located in the UK. Note that Jews instigated Britain’s first “anti-racism” laws, e.g., “Sir” Frank Soskice.
It only took 28 years for Blacks to completely destroy Rhodesia/Zimbabwe. (On the plus side, it’s now even harder to deny that White rule is the best rule). And let’s not forget how Rhodesia became Zimbabwe:
“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws.” — attributed to Jewish banker Meyer Amschel Rothschild.
Thomas Edison once asked why the U.S. government can issue bonds but can’t issue America’s currency [1]. Apparently, he never got an answer to that question. Newbies, ask yourselves: why doesn’t the U.S. government, i.e., the Treasury, control America’s money system? Why does a non-governmental entity called the “Federal Reserve” control almost all aspects of that system? [2]. If the U.S. Treasury prints our money, it’s only logical that it should control our money as well. (In fact, in most, if not all, of the Western countries, Jews control the money, not the governments – a curious situation indeed):
[1] the Federal Reserve issues America’s money and sets monetary policies
[2] Federal Reserve employees are not government employees
by Rep. Ron Paul. (Note: this resolution came from Jewish congressman Gary Ackerman):
Under the “Neocons Stay on Message” post, a commenter mentioned something that might be worth discussing at length, especially for the benefit of newbies who may be unaware of the pitfalls of America’s current money system. If our money system is ever reformed – granted, that’s a big “if” – what type of system would be best? One idea that has been tossed around is: state banks using U.S. Treasury dollars, i.e., real dollars issued by the U.S. government, not Federal Reserve Notes issued by the Federal Reserve. According to this idea, the state banks would not operate for profit. Instead, they would operate simply as a public service, and would be funded by tax dollars. (A similar idea would be state banks using state money). Privately-owned, for-profit banks would be illegal. Readers surely have some ideas about this.
by Philip Giraldi: [Here].