Vanguard News Network

Pretty good response to our other thread. Now let’s try the same question, but applied to WORDS and words ONLY.

How do we argue, go at it, whatever you want to call it – verbally. How do we use words to triumph over the enemy?

How do we define “we”? What term do we use to refer to this defined “we”? How the enemy – define and refer to it? How refer to the end state we seek, how refer to the end state the enemy seeks for us?  How to frame our struggle? Does the fact the enemy controls the ‘moral high ground’ / tv uplink satellites affect our choices? If political polarization is our goal, how will this affect our choice of terms – for ourselves, our opponents, our arguments? What do you see, verbally or terminologically, being done that shouldn’t be done, or not done that should be done?

Look at what happens when you try to enforce the law in America, especially immigration law. By the way, what’s a “human right”?

[Article].

by Dr. William Pierce.

“The education of America’s children is a matter of continuing controversy and anguish for many Americans, including a majority of White parents with school-age children. Americans are unhappy about the level of violence in the schools, which keeps going up, and the educational standards, which keep going down. Parents are increasingly concerned that their children are not safe in public schools, and just about every responsible White adult is concerned about the failure of America’s schools to educate young Americans well enough to keep America technologically and economically competitive in an increasingly competitive world.”

[Article].

This is a challenge post. See if you can come up with the right answer, or a better answer than we can.

How do we win?

What is winning? Define it.

How do we get there from here?

Susie Soldierchick should be at home, raising kids and baking things. But noooo…

[Article].

Newbies, president Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “destroyers-for-bases” deal with Britain – which was vital to the waging of World War II – was hatched and nurtured by the Jewish lawyer/adviser Benjamin V. Cohen [1]:

[Book Review].

[1] refers to Cohen’s July 1940 memo to Roosevelt titled “Memorandum Re: Sending Effective Material Aid to Great Britain with Particular References to the Sending of Destroyers.” The memo urged Roosevelt to give Britain warships and, in true Jewish fashion, made false claims about the legality of doing so. Cohen’s destroyers-for-bases deal was illegal since it bypassed Congress, which didn’t learn of it until after it was finalized. Furthermore, Cohen and another powerful Jew, Felix Frankfurter, used a gentile (Dean Acheson) to “sell” the bases-for-destroyers idea to president F.D. Roosevelt. Not only did Cohen and Frankfurter help set the stage for America’s entry into WWII, but another Jew, Walter Lippmann, a writer/commentator and a member of The Century Group, wrote a speech supporting the bases-for-destroyers deal which was read on national radio on August 4, 1940 by U.S. General John Pershing – a speech which helped sway public opinion from “isolationist” to “interventionist.” Add to that Jewish billionaire Bernard Baruch’s “cash-and-carry” plan for illegal arms sales to the allies (among other things), and you’ve got America’s war against Germany cooked up by the HorseJews of the Apocalypse. In fact, Hitler cited the ending of U.S. neutrality as a main reason for his declaration of war against America on Dec. 11, 1941

Post anything intriguing you come across.

Discussed on forum here. Join the forum and add your view, or leave it in the comments.