Vanguard News Network

What happened to sovereignty, which was a right universally acknowledged until recently? This was mentioned at the VNN Forum, but it’s worth repeating here: during the past century, the West – and much of the rest of the world as well – underwent a drastic political and social transformation. Basically, there was a battle between nationalism and internationalism [1]. The latter won. If Westerners want to remain financially solvent and socially secure, they must reject all forms of internationalism. They must return to the idea of thinking and acting locally. Globalism isn’t good for Whites, for what is it but a collection of Jewish ideas that are, unfortunately, often adopted by gentiles? Jews were the leaders in the creation of world government and global finance. In fact, the Soviet Union’s Comintern – run by the Jew named Zinoviev – was designed to aid a global political revolution. Another Jew birthed the UN with help from other internationalist Jews like V. Perlo, S. Adler and H.D. White [2]. Globalism is, for all practical purposes, a new type of Marxism, a suit-and-briefcase version of the old type. It’s revolutionary, it transforms nations and it’s profitable, too [3]:

[Article]

[1] “nationalism” is used in a broad sense here, not just racially but also geographically

[2] about the founding of the UN: [Here]

[3] the author Ivor Benson, a journalist and a former Rhodesian government official, explained that there is a vast difference between capitalism and “supercapitalism.” He says of the latter: “For it is not possible to continue concentrating ownership and control of property and resources without at the same time reducing the number of those who own and control property and resources.” Benson calls both communism and supercapitalism “irreconcilably antagonistic” towards nationalism, and also “revolutionary” (as opposed to “evolutionary”), a significant observation. See Benson’s book “The Zionist Factor” (Costa Mesa, CA.; the Noontide Press, 1992)